Akerlof, GA, ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’ (1970) 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics, 488Google Scholar

Alemanno, A, ‘The Better Regulation Initiative at the Judicial Gate: A Trojan Horse within the Commission’s Walls or the Way Forward?’ (2009) 15 European Law Journal, 382–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alemanno, A, ‘The European Reform of Organic Farming: Balancing Consumer Preferences and Free Movement Imperatives’ [2009] European Food and Feed Law Review, 406Google Scholar

Amato, G, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power: The Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market (Oxford: Hart 1997)Google Scholar

Ankersmit, L, ‘Het einde van de kiloknallers? De grenzen aan zelfregulering van duurzaam vlees onder het kartelverbod’ (2011) Actualiteiten Mededingingsrecht, 149Google Scholar

Ankersmit, L, ‘The Scope of the Common Commercial Policy after Lisbon: The Daiichi Sankyo and Conditional Access Services Grand Chamber Judgments’ (2014) 41 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 193Google Scholar

Ankersmit, L, ‘What if Cassis de Dijon were Cassis de Quebec? The Assimilation of Goods of Third Country Origin in the Internal Market’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review, 1387Google Scholar

Ankersmit, L and Lawrence, JC, ‘The Future of Environmental Labelling: US – Tuna II and the Scope of the TBT’ (2012) 39 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 127Google Scholar

Ankersmit, LJ, Lawrence, JC, and Davies, GT, ‘Diverging EU and WTO Perspectives on Extraterritorial Process Regulation’ (2012) 21 Minnesota Journal of International Law Online, 58Google Scholar

Armstrong, KA, ‘Mutual Recognition’ in Barnard, Catherine and Scott, Joanne (eds.) The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises (Oxford: Hart, 2002), 225Google Scholar

Arnould, J, ‘Secondary Policies in Public Procurement: The Innovations of the New Directives’ [2004] Public Procurement Law Review, 191Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, S, ‘The Purpose of the EU Procurement Directives: Ends, Means and the Implications for National Regulatory Space for Commercial and Horizontal Policies’ (2011–2012) 13 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 1Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, S and Kunzlik, P (eds.), Social and Environmental Policies in EC Procurement Law: New Directives and New Directions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Azoulai, L, ‘The Court of Justice and the Social Market Economy: The Emergence of an Ideal and the Conditions for Its Realization’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, 1335Google Scholar

Bailey, D, ‘Restrictions of Competition by Object under Article 101 TFEU’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review, 559Google Scholar

Baksi, S and Bose, P, ‘Credence Goods, Efficient Labelling Policies, and Regulatory Enforcement’ (2007) 37 Environmental & Resource Economics, 411Google Scholar

Balineau, G and Dufeu, I, ‘Are Fair Trade Goods Credence Goods? A New Proposal, with French Illustrations’ (2010) 92 Journal of Business Ethics 331Google Scholar

Baquero Cruz, J, Between Competition and Free Movement: The Economic Constitutional Law of the European Community (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002)Google Scholar

Baquero Cruz, J, ‘Free Movement and Private Autonomy’ (1999) 24 European Law Review, 603Google Scholar

Barnard, C, EU Employment Law, 4th edn, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Barnard, C, ‘Fitting the Remaining Pieces into the Goods and Persons Jigsaw’ (2001) 26 European Law Review, 35Google Scholar

Barnard, C, The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms Third Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Barrett Lydgate, E, ‘The EU, the WTO and Indirect Land-Use Change’ (2013) 47 Journal of World Trade, 159Google Scholar

Bartels, L, ‘Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: The Case of Trade Measures for the Protection of Human Rights’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade, 353Google Scholar

Basaran, HR, ‘How Should Article 81 EC Address Agreements that Yield Environmental Benefits’, (2006) 9 European Competition Law Review, 479Google Scholar

Bayefsky, AF, ‘Cultural Sovereignty, Relativism, and International Human Rights: New Excuses for Old Strategies’ (1996) 9 Ratio Juris, 42Google Scholar

Beqiraj, J, ‘The Delicate Equilibrium of EU Trade Measures: The Seals Case’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal, 279Google Scholar

Bernstein, S and Cashore, B, ‘Can Non-State Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework’ [2007] Regulation & Governance, 347Google Scholar

Bhagwati, J, ‘After Seattle: Free Trade and the WTO’ in Roger, B, Porter, Jagdish and others (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: the Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2001), 50Google Scholar

Bhagwati, J, In Defense of Globalization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Black, J, ‘Constitutionalising Self-Regulation’ (1996) 59 The Modern Law Review, 24Google Scholar

Bodansky, D, ‘What’s So Bad about Unilateral Action to Protect the Environment?’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law, 339Google Scholar

Boedeltje, M and Cornips, J, ‘Input and Output Legitimacy in Interactive Governance’ (No. NIG2-01) NIG Annual Work Conference 2004 RotterdamGoogle Scholar

Bogaert, S, ‘Horizontality: The Court Attacks?’ in Barnard, Catherine and Scott, Joanne (eds.), The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002), 123Google Scholar

Bonroy, O and Constantatos, C, ‘On the Use of Labels in Credence Goods Markets’ (2008) 33 Journal of Regulatory Economics, 237Google Scholar

Bork, RH, The Antitrust Paradox. A Policy at War with Itself (New York: Basic Books, 1978)Google Scholar

Bronckers, M, ‘The Relationship of the EC Courts with other International Tribunals: Non-Comittal, Respectful or Submissive?’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review, 601Google Scholar

Brown, C, ‘Case C-112/00, Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v. Austria’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review, 1499Google Scholar

Brus, M, ‘Case C-510/99, Procureur de la République v. Xavier Tridon’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review, 169Google Scholar

Camm, T and Bowles, D, ‘Animal Welfare and the Treaty of Rome-Legal Analysis of the Protocol on Animal Welfare and Welfare Standards in the European Union’ (2000) 12 Journal of Environmental Law, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caporaso, JA, ‘International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations’ (1992) 46 International Organization, 599Google Scholar

Casey, D, ‘Disintegration: Environmental Protection and Article 81 EC’ (2009) 15 European Law Journal, 362Google Scholar

Castaldo, S, Perrini, F, Misani, N and Tencati, A, ‘The Missing Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Trust: The Case of Fair Trade Products’ (2009) 84 Journal of Business Ethics 1Google Scholar

Chalmers, D, Davies, G, and Monti, G, European Union Law; Cases and Materials, 2nd edn, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Chang, H, ‘An Economic Analysis of Trade Measures to Protect the Global Environment’ (1995) 83 Georgetown Law Journal, 4Google Scholar

Charnovitz, S, ‘Free Trade, Fair Trade, Green Trade: Defogging the Debate’ (1994) 27 Cornell International Law Journal, 459Google Scholar

Charnovitz, S, ‘The Law of Environmental PPMs in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality’ (2002) 27 The Yale Journal of International Law, 59Google Scholar

Conford, R, The Origins of the Organic Movement (Edinburgh: Floris Books, 2001)Google Scholar

Cornish, W, Intellectual Property: Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Damjanovic, D, ‘The EU Market Rules as Social Market Rules: Why the EU can be a Social Market Economy’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review, 1685Google Scholar

Darby, M and Karni, E, ‘Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud’ (1973) 16 Journal of Law and Economics, 67Google Scholar

Davies, G, ‘Freedom of Movement, Horizontal Effect, and Freedom of Contract’ [2012] European Review of Private Law, 805CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, G, ‘Is Mutual Recognition an Alternative to Harmonisation: Lessons on Trade and Tolerance of Diversity from the EU’ in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Federico (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) 265Google Scholar

Davies, G, ‘Process and Production Method Based Restrictions on Trade in the EU’ in Barnard, C. (ed.), Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 2007–2008 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008), 69Google Scholar

de Mars, S, ‘The Limits of General Principles: A Procurement Case Study’ (2013) 38 European Law Review, 316Google Scholar

de Sadeleer, N, ‘Environmental Governance and the Legal Bases Conundrum’ (2012) 31 Yearbook of European Law, 373Google Scholar

de Sadeleer, N, EU Environmental Law and the Internal Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

de Vries, S, ‘Case C–470/03, A.G.M.–COS.MET Srl v. Suomen valtio, Tarmo Lehtinen’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, 56Google Scholar

de Witte, B, ‘Non-market Values in Internal Market Legislation’ in Shuibhne, Niamh Nic (ed.), Regulating the Internal Market (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006), 61Google Scholar

de Witte, F, ‘Sex, Drugs & EU Law: The Recognition of Moral and Ethical Diversity in EU Law’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review, 1545, 1553Google Scholar

Dhondt, N, Integration of Environmental Protection into Other EC Policies: Legal Theory and Practice (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar

Dougan, M, ‘Minimum Harmonization and the Internal Market’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review, 853Google Scholar

Doukas, D, ‘Untying the Market Access Knot: Advertising Restrictions and the Free Movement of Goods and Services’ (2007) 9 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 177Google Scholar

Dragos, D and Neamtu, B, ‘Sustainable Public Procurement: Life-Cycle Costing in the New EU Directive Proposal’ [2013] European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 19Google Scholar

Drijber, BJ and Stergiou, H, ‘Public Procurement Law and Internal Market Law’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review, 805Google Scholar

Dworkin, G, ‘Paternalism’ in Wasserstrom, R A (ed.), Morality and the Law (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1971)Google Scholar

Eeckhout, P, EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Enchelmaier, S, ‘Article 36: General’ in Oliver, P (ed.), Oliver on Free Movement of Goods in the European Union (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010), 215Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, PF, ‘“Morality” May Not Be Enough to Justify the EU Seal Products Ban: Animal Welfare Meets International Trade Law’ (2011) 14 Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 85–136Google Scholar

Fridell, M, Hudson, I and Hudson, M, ‘With Friends Like These: The Corporate Response to Fair Trade Coffee’ (2008) 40 Review of Radical Political Economics, 8Google Scholar

Gaines, SE, ‘Processes and Production Methods: How to Produce Sound Policy for Environmental PPM-Based Trade Measures?’ (2002) 27 Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 383Google Scholar

Gale, F and Haward, M, Global Commodity Governance: State Responses to Sustainable Forest and Fisheries Certification (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)Google Scholar

Geraerts, D and Natens, B, ‘The WTO Consistency of the European Union Timber Regulation’ (2014) 48 Journal of World Trade, 433Google Scholar

Gerbrandy, A, ‘Competition Law and Private-Sector Sustainability Initiatives’ in Colombi Ciacchi, A.L.B. and others (eds.), Law & Governance – Beyond the Public-Private Divide? (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2013), 81–103Google Scholar

Gormley, L, ‘Competition and Free Movement: Is the Internal Market the Same as a Common Market?’ [2002] European Business Law Review, 517Google Scholar

Gormley, L, ‘Reasoning Renounced? The Remarkable Judgment in Keck & Mithouard’ [1994] European Business Law Review, 63Google Scholar

Gormley, L, ‘Silver Threads among the Gold … 50 Years of the Free Movement of Goods’ (2007) 31 Fordham International Law Journal, 1637Google Scholar

Haas, E B, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–57 (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1958)Google Scholar

Habermas, J, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Harbo, TI, ‘The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal, 158, 185Google Scholar

Harrems, N, ‘The Leghold Trap Regulation and Potential Pitfalls during the Dutch Presidency of the EU’ (1998) European Environmental Law Review, 7Google Scholar

Harvey, D, A brief history of neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Haufler, V, ‘The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme: An Innovation in Global Governance and Conflict Prevention’ (2010) 89 Journal of Business Ethics, 403Google Scholar

Hedemann-Robinson, M, ‘Defending the Consumer’s Right to a Clean Environment in the Face of Globalisation. The Case of Extraterritorial Environmental Protection under European Community Law’ (2000) 23 Journal of Consumer Policy, 25Google Scholar

Hertel, M, ‘Climate-Change-Related Trade Measures and Article XX: Defining Discrimination in Light of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities’ (2011) 45 Journal of World Trade, 653Google Scholar

Hojnik, J, ‘Free Movement of Goods in a Labyrinth: Can Buy Irish Survive the Crises?’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review, 291Google Scholar

Horsley, T, ‘Unearthing Buried Treasure: Art 34 TFEU and the Exclusionary Rules,’ (2012) 37(6) European Law Review, 737Google Scholar

Howse, R and Langille, J, ‘Permitting Pluralism: The Seal Products Dispute and Why the WTO Should Accept Trade Restrictions Justified by Noninstrumental Moral Values’ (2012) 37 Yale Journal of International Law, 367Google Scholar

Howse, R and Regan, D, ‘The Product/Process Distinction: An Illusory Basis for Disciplining Unilateralism in Trade Policy’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law, 249Google Scholar

Jack, B, Agriculture and EU Environmental Law (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009)Google Scholar

Jackson, JH, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations 2nd edn (Cambridge, MIT Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Jans, JH, ‘Stop the Integration Principle?’ (2009–2010) 33 Fordham International Law Journal, 1533Google Scholar

Jans, JH and Vedder, HHB, European Environmental Law (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar

Jansen, B, ‘The Limits of Unilateralism from a European Perspective’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law, 309Google Scholar

Jarvis, MA, ‘Case C-325/00, Commission v. Germany, Judgment of the Court of Justice of 5 November 2002. Full Court’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review, 71Google Scholar

Jones, A, ‘Regulating the Legal Profession: Article 81, the Public Interest and the ECJ’s Judgment in Wouters’ (2008) 19 European Business Law Review, 1079Google Scholar

Kieran, F, ‘A Separation of Powers Approach to Non-efficiency Goals in EU Competition Law’ (2013) 19 European Public Law, 189Google Scholar

Kingston, S, Greening EU Competition Law and Policy (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Kingston, S, ‘Integrating Environmental Protection and EU Competition Law: Why Competition Isn’t Special’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal, 780Google Scholar

Kjølbye, L, ‘The New Commission Guidelines on the Application of Article 81 (3): an Economic Approach to Article 81’ (2004) 25 European Competition Law Review, 566Google Scholar

Komninos, AP, ‘Non-competition Concerns: Resolution of Conflicts in the Integrated Article 81 EC’ (2008) The University of Oxford Centre for Competition Law and Policy Working Paper (L) 08/05Google Scholar

Krämer, L, ‘Sustainable Development in EC Law’ in Bugge, H and Voigt, C (eds.), Sustainable Development in International and National Law (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar

Krenn, C, ‘A Missing Piece in the Horizontal Effect “Jigsaw”: Horizontal Direct Effect and the Free Movement of Goods’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review, 177Google Scholar

Kröger, J, ‘Nationally Exclusive Support Schemes for RES Electricity Production and the Free Movement of Goods’ (2013) 10 Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 378–393Google Scholar

Kuijper, PJ and Bronckers, M, ‘WTO Law in the European Court of Justice’ (2005) 42 Common Market Law Review, 1313Google Scholar

Kulovesi, K, Morgera, E and Muñoz, M, ‘Environmental Integration and Multi-faceted International Dimensions of EU Law: Unpacking the EU’s 2009 Climate and Energy Package’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review, 829Google Scholar

Kunzlik, P, ‘From Suspect Practice to Market-Based Instrument: Policy Alignment and the Evolution of EU Law’s Approach to “green” Public Procurement’ [2013] Public Procurement Law Review, 97Google Scholar

Laïdi, Z, La norme sans la force: L’énigme de la puissance européenne, 2nd edn (Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po, 2008)Google Scholar

Lang, ATF, ‘Reconstructing Embedded Liberalism: John Gerard Ruggie and Constructivist Approaches to the Study of the International Trade Regime’ (2006) 9 Journal of International Economic Law, 81Google Scholar

Levashova, Y, ‘How Effective is the New EU Timber Regulation in the Fight against Illegal Logging?’(2011) 20 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 294Google Scholar

Lohse, EJ, ‘Fundamental Freedoms and Private Actors – Towards an “Indirect Horizontal Effect”’ 13 (2007) European Public Law, 159Google Scholar

Loozen, E, ‘Professional Ethics and Restraints of Competition’ [2006] European Law Review, 28Google Scholar

Loureiro, ML and Lotade, J, ‘Do Fair Trade and Eco-Labels in Coffee Wake up the Consumer Conscience?’ (2005) 53 Ecological Economics, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ludwig, R and O’Gorman, R, ‘A Cock and Bull Story? – Problems with the Protection of Animal Welfare in EU Law and Some Proposed Solutions’ (2008) 20 Journal of Environmental Law, 363Google Scholar

Lugard, P and Hancher, L, ‘Honey, I Shrunk the Article! A Critical Assessment of the Commission’s Notice on Article 81(3) of the EC Treaty’ (2004) 25 European Competition Law Review, 410Google Scholar

Lupton, S, ‘Shared Quality Uncertainty and the Introduction of Indeterminate Goods’ (2005) 29 Cambridge Journal of Economics, 399Google Scholar

Maduro, MP, We the Court: the European Court of Justice and the European economic constitution: a critical reading of Article 30 of the EC Treaty (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998)Google Scholar

Manners, I, ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies, 235Google Scholar

Martens, M and de Margerie, S, ‘The Link to the Subject-Matter of the Contract in Green and Social Procurement’ [2013] European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 8Google Scholar

Matsushita, M, Schonebaum, TJ and Mavroidis, PC (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice And Policy (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2006) 808Google Scholar

Mattera, A, ‘L’ article 30 du traité CEE, la jurisprudence «Cassis de Dijon» et le principle de la reconnaissaince mutuelle’ [1992] Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 13Google Scholar

Mattera, A, ‘Principle of Mutual Recognition and Respect for National, Regional and Local Identities and Traditions’ in Kostoris, Fiorella and Schioppa, Padoa (eds.), The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the European Integration Process (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)Google Scholar

Mena, S and Palazzo, G, ‘Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives’ (2012) 22 Business Ethics Quarterly, 527Google Scholar

Micheletti, M, Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)Google Scholar

Moïsé, E and Steenblik, R, ‘Trade-Related Measures Based on Processes and Production Methods in the Context of Climate-Change Mitigation’, (2011) OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, 2011/04Google Scholar

Monti, G, ‘Article 81 EC and Public Policy’ (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 1057Google Scholar

Monti, G, ‘EU Competition Law from Rome to Lisbon – Social Market Economy’ in Heide-Jorgensen, Caroline, Bergqvist, Christian, Neergaard, Ulla & Poulsen, Sune Troels (eds.), Aims and Values in Competition Law (Kopenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2013), 27Google Scholar

Mortelmans, K, ‘Towards Convergence in the Application of the Rules on Free Movement and on Competition?’ (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review, 613Google Scholar

Munoz, R, ‘Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited. Judgment of 19 March 1998, [1998] ECR I-1251’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review, 831Google Scholar

Nicoaïdis, K and Howse, R, ‘“This is my EUtopia …”: Narrative as Power’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies, 767–792Google Scholar

Nocolaides, P, ‘The Balancing Myth: The Economics of Article 81 (1) and (3)’ (2005) 32 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 123Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A, ‘The Legality of Moral Crusades Disguised in Trade Laws: An Analysis of the EC “Ban” on Furs from Aimals taken by Leghold Traps’ (1996) 8 Journal of Environmental Law, 237Google Scholar

Notaro, N, ‘The New Generation Case Law on Trade and Environmnent’ (2000) 25 European Law Review, 467Google Scholar

Obradovic, D, Alonso Vizcaino, JM, ‘Good Governance Requirements Concerning the Participation of Interest Groups in EU Consultations’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review, 1049Google Scholar

Odudu, O, The Boundaries of EC Competition Law: The Scope of Article 81 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Odudu, O, ‘The Wider Concerns of Competition Law’ (2010) 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 599Google Scholar

Ogus, A, ‘The Paradoxes of Legal Paternalism and How to Resolve Them’ (2010) 30 Legal Studies, 61Google Scholar

Oliver, P (ed.), Oliver on Free Movement of Goods in the European Union (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ‘Processes and Production Methods (PPMs): Conceptual Framework and Considerations’ (OECD 1997)Google Scholar

Partiti, E, ‘The Appellate Body Report in US – Tuna II and Its Impact on Eco-Labelling and Standardization’ (2013) 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 73Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J, ‘Carbon Leakage Measures and Border Tax Ajdustments under WTO Law’ in Prevost, Denise and van Calster, Geert (eds.), Research Handbook on Environment Helath and the WTO (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012)Google Scholar

Pijnacker Hordijk, EH, ‘Oordeel over verenigbaarheid van verbod van invoer en verhandeling van uitheemse vogelsoorten met art. 36 EEG-Verdrag en Richtlijn inzake het behoud van de vogelstand’ [1991] Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving, 261Google Scholar

Pirker, B, Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review: A Theoretical and Comparative Study (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar

Polanyi, K, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (2nd edn, Beacon Press 2001)Google Scholar

Pollack, MA, ‘Unilateral America, Multilateral Europe?’ in Peterson, John and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the Twenty-first Century (London: Routledge, 2003), 115Google Scholar

Roe, B and Sheldon, I, ‘Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches’ (2007) 89 American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1020Google Scholar

Romppanen, S, ‘Regulating Better Biofuels for the European Union’ [2012] European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 123Google Scholar

Rosenboom, N, ‘How does article 101(3) TFEU case law relate to EC guidelines and the welfare perspective?’ (2013) SEO Working PaperGoogle Scholar

Roth, WH, ‘Case C-205/07, Lodewijk Gysbrechts, Santurel Inter BVBA, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 December 2008’ (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review, 509Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’ (1982) 36 International Organization, 379Google Scholar

Ruggie, JG, Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: Norton & Company, 2013)Google Scholar

Ryland, D and Nurse, A, ‘Mainstreaming after Lisbon: Advancing Animal Welfare in the EU Internal Market’ [2013] European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 101Google Scholar

Ryngaert, C, Jurisdiction in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Sands, P, ‘“Unilateralism”, Values, and International Law’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law, 291Google Scholar

Sauter, W and Schepel, H, State and Market in European Union Law: The Public and Private Spheres of the Internal Market before the EU Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Scharpf, FW, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Schepel, H, ‘Case C-171/11 Fra.bo Spa v Deutsche Vereinigung des Gas- und Wasserfaches’ 9 (2013) European Review of Contract Law, 186Google Scholar

Schepel, H, ‘Constitutionalising the Market, Marketising the Constitution, and to Tell the Difference: On the Horizontal Application of the Free Movement Provisions in EU Law’ 18 (2012) European Law Journal, 177Google Scholar

Schepel, H, ‘The New Approach to the New Approach: The Juridification of Harmonized Standards in EU Law’ 20 (2013) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 521Google Scholar

Schepel, H, ‘Private Regulators in Law’ in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses, and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2013), 356Google Scholar

Scherer, G and Palazzo, G (eds.), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2008), 249Google Scholar

Schiff Berman, P, ‘Global Legal Pluralism’ (2007) 80 Southern California Law Review, 1155Google Scholar

Schütze, R, ‘Supremacy without Pre-emption? The Very Slowly Emergent Doctrine of Community Pre-emption’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review, 1023Google Scholar

Scott, J, EC Environmental Law (Longman, London 1998)Google Scholar

Scott, J, ‘Extraterritoriality and Territorial Extension in EU Law’ (2014) 62 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 87Google Scholar

Scott, J, ‘The Multi-level Governance of Climate Change’ in Craig, Paul (ed.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 805Google Scholar

Scott, J, ‘The New EU “extraterritoriality”’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review, 1343Google Scholar

Sevenster, H, Eco-imperialisme binnen de Europese Unie; een juridisch probleem? (Deventer: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1998)Google Scholar

Shuibhne, NN and Maci, M, ‘Proving Public Interest: The Growing Impact of Evidence in Free Movement Case Law’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review, 965Google Scholar

Snell, J, Goods and Services in EC Law: A Study of the Relationship between the Freedoms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Spar, DL and La Mure, LT, ‘The Power of Activism: Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global Business’(2003) 45 California Management Review, 78Google Scholar

Steinrücken, T and Jaenichen, S, ‘The Fair Trade Idea: Towards an Economics of Social Labels’ (2007) 30 Journal of Consumer Policy, 201Google Scholar

Stolze, M and Lampkin, N, ‘Policy for Organic Farming: Rationale and Concepts’ (2009) 34 Food Policy, 237Google Scholar

Temple Lang, J, ‘The Development by the Court of Justice of the Duties of Cooperation of National Authorities and Community Institutions under Article 10 EC’ (2007–2008) 31 Fordham International Law Journal, 1483Google Scholar

Thaler, RH and Sunstein, CR, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

The American Law Institute, Restatement (third) of Foreign Relations Law (The American Law Institute 1987)Google Scholar

Townley, C, Article 81 EC and Public Policy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Trebilcock, M, Howse R and Eliason A eds, The Regulation of International Trade, 4th edn (London: Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar

Van Calster, G, ‘Export Restrictions – A Watershed for Article 30’ (2000) 25 European Law Review, 335Google Scholar

Van Calster, G, International & EU Trade Law: The Environmental Challenge (London: Cameron May, 2000)Google Scholar

van Eijndthoven, J, ‘Energy Taxation at European Level: What does it do for the Environment and Sustainability?’ [2011] EC Tax Review, 283Google Scholar

van Hoek, A, ‘Het proces tegen Shell wegens olielekkages in de Ogonidelta (Nigeria)’ (2013) 62 Ars Aequi, 482Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, B, ‘From Status to Impact, and the Role of National Legislation: The Application of Article 34 TFEU to a Private Certification Organisation in Fra.bo’ [2013] European Journal of Risk Regulation, 405Google Scholar

Vedder, H, Competition Law and Environmental Protection in Europe: Towards Sustainability? (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar

Vogel, D, ‘The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct’ (2010) 49 Business & Society, 68Google Scholar

Vogel, D, ‘Trading up and Governing Across: Transnational Governance and Environmental Protection’ (1997) 4 Journal of European Public Policy, 556Google Scholar

Vranes, E, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Wasmeier, M, ‘The Integration of Environmental Protection as a General Rule for Interpreting Community Law’ (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review, 159Google Scholar

Weiler, JHH, ‘In the Face of Crisis: Input Legitimacy, Output Legitimacy and the Political Messianism of European Integration’ (2012) 34 Journal of European Integration, 825Google Scholar

Weiler, JHH, ‘Mutual Recognition, Functional Equivalence and Harmonization in the Evolution of the European Common Market and the WTO’ in Kostoris, Fiorella and Schioppa, Padoa (eds.), The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the European Integration Process (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 25Google Scholar

Wiers, J, Trade and Environment in the EC and the WTO: a Legal Analysis (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2002)Google Scholar

Wiesbrock, A, ‘An Obligation for Sustainable Procurement? Gauging the Potential Impact of Article 11 TFEU on Public Contracting in the EU’ (2013) 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 105Google Scholar

Witt, AC, ‘Public Policy Goals under EU Competition Law: now is the Time to set the House in Order’ (2012) 8 European Competition Journal, 443Google Scholar

Wright, C, ‘Tacking Conflict Diamonds: The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme’ (2004) 11 International Peacekeeping, 697Google Scholar