Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:11:02.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Open Access

from Part IV - Systemic Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2018

Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489, 179.Google Scholar
Beall, J. (2016). Predatory journals: Ban predators from the scientific record. Nature, 534, 326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkeley, G. (n.d.) If a tree falls in the forest, Retrieved January 7, 2018 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_a_tree_falls_in_a_forestGoogle Scholar
Bohannon, J. (2013). Who's afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 6065.Google Scholar
Björk, B.-C. (2017). Gold, green, and black open access. Learned Publishing. doi:10.1002/leap.1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enserink, M. (2016). In dramatic statement, European leaders call for “immediate” open access to all scientific papers by 2020. Science. doi:10.1126/science.aag0577Google Scholar
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantages of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157.Google Scholar
Fanelli, D. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90, 891904.Google Scholar
Franco, A., Malhorta, N., & Simonovits, G. (2017). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345, 15021505.Google Scholar
Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs.non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.htmlGoogle Scholar
Himmelstein, D. S., Romero, A. R., Levernier, J. G., Munro, T. A., McLaughlin, S. R., Tzovaras, B. G., & Greene, C. S. (2017). Sci-hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature. eLife 2018;7:e32822 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.32822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.Google Scholar
Laakso, M., and Björk, B.-C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of the longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10, 124.Google Scholar
Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible. Nature, 411, 521.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J., & Pepe, A. (2016) 65 out of the 100 most cited papers are paywalled. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from www.authorea.com/users/8850/articles/125400-65-out-of-the-100-most-cited-papers-are-paywalledGoogle Scholar
Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7, 531536.Google Scholar
Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7(6), 528530.Google Scholar
Pinfield, S., Salter, J., & Bath, P. A. (2016). The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 17511766.Google Scholar
Shen, C., & Björk, B.-C. (2015). “Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13, 230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorokowski, P., Kulczycki, E., Sorokowska, A., & Pisanski, K. (2017), Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature, 543, 481483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7), 726728.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Open Access
  • Edited by Robert J. Sternberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals
  • Online publication: 19 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304443.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Open Access
  • Edited by Robert J. Sternberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals
  • Online publication: 19 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304443.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Open Access
  • Edited by Robert J. Sternberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals
  • Online publication: 19 November 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304443.021
Available formats
×