Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Introductory rules
- Section II Composition of the arbitral tribunal
- Section III Arbitral proceedings
- Section IV The award
- Article 33 Decisions
- Article 34 Form and effect of the award
- Article 35 Applicable law, amiable compositeur
- Article 36 Settlement or other grounds for termination
- Article 37 Interpretation of the award
- Article 38 Correction of the award
- Article 39 Additional award
- Article 40 Definition of costs
- Article 41 Fees and expenses of arbitrators
- Article 42 Allocation of costs
- Article 43 Deposit of costs
- APPENDIX 1 United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
- APPENDIX 2 Recommendations to assist arbitral institutions and other interested bodies with regard to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as revised in 2010
- Index
- References
Article 33 - Decisions
from Section IV - The award
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Introductory rules
- Section II Composition of the arbitral tribunal
- Section III Arbitral proceedings
- Section IV The award
- Article 33 Decisions
- Article 34 Form and effect of the award
- Article 35 Applicable law, amiable compositeur
- Article 36 Settlement or other grounds for termination
- Article 37 Interpretation of the award
- Article 38 Correction of the award
- Article 39 Additional award
- Article 40 Definition of costs
- Article 41 Fees and expenses of arbitrators
- Article 42 Allocation of costs
- Article 43 Deposit of costs
- APPENDIX 1 United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
- APPENDIX 2 Recommendations to assist arbitral institutions and other interested bodies with regard to arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules as revised in 2010
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Guide to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules , pp. 369 - 377Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
and (eds.), Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 747.
and , Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2nd ed. (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2007), 661.Google Scholar
, International Commercial Arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009), 2461.Google Scholar
and , with and , Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2009),CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1989), 837.Google Scholar
, ‘Responsibility of Arbitrators and Arbitral Institutions – Let Sleeping Dogs Lie’, in and (eds.), The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration, 2nd ed. (New York: Juris Publishing, Inc, 2008), 618;Google Scholar
, ‘The 2003 Freshfields Lecture: Dissenting Opinions in International Commercial Arbitration: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’, Arbitration International, 20(3) (2004), 229;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Rights and Duties of the Arbitrator: Six Aspects of the Rule of Reasonableness’, in (ed.), The Status of the Arbitrator, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin: 1995 Special Supplement (Paris: ICC Publishing, 1995), 32;Google Scholar
, Commentary on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: The Application by the Iran–US Claims Tribunal (The Hague: TNC Asser Instituut, 1991), 214.Google Scholar
Judgment of 16 October 2003, X S.A.L et al. v Z Sàrl
, ASA Bulletin 22(2) (2004), 372;
Paris Court of Appeal, 15 January 2003, Société des télécommunications internationale du Cameroon (Intelcan v SA France Télécom) (2004) Rev Arb, No 2, 369
, ASA Bulletin, 4(2) (1986), 81.
, and , International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia Pacific Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2011),Google Scholar
and , ‘Supreme Court Rules Arbitral Tribunal Not Required to Disclose Hearing Notes’, IBA Arbitration News, 15(1) (2010), 131;Google Scholar