Book contents
- Gynecologic Care
- Gynecologic Care
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Basic Gynecologic Care Issues
- Section 2 Gynecologic Surgery
- Section 3 Infertility
- Section 4 Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
- Section 5 Gynecologic Oncology
- Section 6 General Considerations
- 38 Patient Safety in Gynecologic Care
- 39 Essentials of Practice Management
- 40 Ob-Gyn and the Law
- 41 Physicians and Healthcare Systems
- 42 Evidence-Based Medicine
- 43 Cultural Competency
- 44 Physician Health
- 45 Medical Ethics
- Index
- References
41 - Physicians and Healthcare Systems
from Section 6 - General Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2018
Book contents
- Gynecologic Care
- Gynecologic Care
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Basic Gynecologic Care Issues
- Section 2 Gynecologic Surgery
- Section 3 Infertility
- Section 4 Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
- Section 5 Gynecologic Oncology
- Section 6 General Considerations
- 38 Patient Safety in Gynecologic Care
- 39 Essentials of Practice Management
- 40 Ob-Gyn and the Law
- 41 Physicians and Healthcare Systems
- 42 Evidence-Based Medicine
- 43 Cultural Competency
- 44 Physician Health
- 45 Medical Ethics
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Gynecologic Care , pp. 394 - 401Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
American Medical Association. Physicians and disruptive behavior. In: Code of medical ethics: current opinions and annotations. 2010–11 ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association. 2010. P. 326–8.Google Scholar
Papadkis, MA, Teherani, A, Banach, MA, Knettler, TR, Rattner, SL, Stern, DT et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2673–82.Google Scholar
The Joint Commission. Leaders create and maintain a culture of safety and quality throughout the hospital. Standard LD.03.01.01. In: Comprehensive Accreditation Manual. CAMH for Hospitals: The Official Handbook. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission; 2010. P. LD-15-LD-16.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, A, O’Daniel, M. A survey of the impact of disruptive behaviors and communication defects on patient safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008 Aug;34(8):464–7.Google Scholar
Freeman, BD. Is it time to rethink postgraduate training requirements for licensure? Acad Med 2015 Oct 5:1–3.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 373. Sexual misconduct, Obstet Gnecol 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):441–4.Google Scholar
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/privileges accessed January 11, 2016.Google Scholar
Sorrel, AL. Hospital can be sued for credentialing doctor with questionable qualification, Minnesota high court rules.amednews.com. www.amednews.com/article/20071015/profession/31015964/4/.accessed January 17, 2015.Google Scholar
www.acog.org/-/media/Statements-of-Policy/Public/sop73.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20160111T1536132100 accessed January 11, 2016Google Scholar
AAFP – ACOG joint statement of cooperative practice and hospital privileges. American Academy of Family Physicians. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Am Fam Physician 1998;Jul;58(1):277–8.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 365. Seeking and giving consultation. Obstet Gynecol 2007 May;109(5):1255–60.Google Scholar
The Medical Staff Handbook: A Guide to Joint Commission Standards, Third Edition. Joint Commission Resources. Chatman, IJ, Porché, RA. eds. 2011; 89–97.Google Scholar
Pradarelli, JC, Campbell, DA JR, Dimick, JB. Hospital credentialing and privileges of surgeons: a potential safety blind spot. JAMA 2015 Apr 7;313(13):1313–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1943.Google Scholar
Teirstein, PS, Topol, EJ. The role of maintenance of certification programs in governance and professionalism. JAMA 2015 May 12;313(18):1809–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3576.Google Scholar
Lambert, KM, Barry, P, Stokes, G. Risk management and legal issues with the use of social media in the healthcare setting. J Healthc Manag 2012;31(4):41–7. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.20103.Google Scholar
www.npdb.hrsa.gov/topNavigation/aboutUs.jsp accessed January 11, 2016.Google Scholar
Earnest, MA, Wong, SL, Federico, SG. Perspective: physician advocacy: what is it and how do we do it? Acad Med 2010;85:63–7.Google Scholar
Croft, D, Jay, SJ, Meslin, EM, Gaffney, MM, Odell, JD. Perspective: is it for advocacy training in medical education? Acad Med 2012;87(9):1165–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huddle, TS. Perspective: medical professionalism and medical education should not involve commitments to political advocacy. Acad Med 2011;86:378–83.Google Scholar
Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician’s charter. Lancet 2002;359:520–2.Google Scholar
Larson, DB, Nance, JJ. Rethinking peer review: what aviation can teach radiology about performance improvement. Radiology 2011;259(3):626–32.Google Scholar
Brook, OR, Romero, J, Brook, A, Kruskal, JB, Yam, CS, Levine, D. The complementary nature of peer review and quality assurance data collection. Radiology 2015 Jan;274(1):221–9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guthrie, M. Guidelines for disciplinary action from peer review. Physician Exec 2009;35(4):78–9.Google Scholar
Nasca, TJ, Weiss, KB, Bagian, JP. Improving clinical learning environments for tomorrow’s physicians. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:991–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, DI, Au, H, Fargo, R, Garrison, RC, Thompson, G, Yu, M, Loo, LK, Code, R. Redesigning hospital-wide peer review for academic hospitals. Am J Med Qual 2015 Apr;22:1–5.Google Scholar
Singh, H, Thomas, EJ, Petersen, LA, Studdert, DM. Medical errors involving trainees. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2030–6.Google Scholar
Kachalia, A, Studdert, DM. Professionalism liability issues in graduate medical education. JAMA 2004;292:1051–6.Google Scholar
Young, JQ, Ranji, SR, Wachter, RM, Lee, CM, Niehaus, B, Auerbach, AD. “July Effect”: Impact of the academic year-end changeover on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:309–15.Google Scholar
Khanna, R, Wachsberg, K, Marouni, A, Feinglass, J, Williams, MV, Wayne, DB. The association between night or weekend admission and hospitalization: relevant patient outcomes. J Hosp Med 2011;6:10–14.Google Scholar
The Joint Commission. Comprehensive accreditation manual. CAMH for hospitals: the official handbook. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): AMA 2010:280–3.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 520. Disclosure and discussion of adverse events.Obstet Gynecol 2012 Mar;119(3):686–9.Google Scholar
Gallagher, TH, Waterman, AD, Ebers, AG, Fraser, VJ, Levinson, W. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA 2003;289:1001–7.Google Scholar
Mazor, KM, Simon, SR, Yood, RA, Martinson, BC, Gunter, MJ, Reed, GW et al. Health plan members’ views about disclosure of medical errors. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:409–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickson, GB, Clayton, EW, Githens, PB, Sloan, FA. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. JAMA 1992;267:1359–63.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, D, Wu, AW, Holtzman, NA, Smith, MK. When a physician harms a patient by a medical error: ethical, legal, and risk-management considerations. J Clin Ethics 1997;8:330–5.Google Scholar
Goldberg, RM, Kuhn, G, Andrew, LB, Thomas, HA Jr. Coping with medical mistakes and errors in judgment. Ann Emerg Med 2002;39:287–92.Google Scholar
Weiss, RM, Miranda, F. Transparency, apology and disclosure of adverse outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008;35:53–62, viii.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed