Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I NEW PARADIGMS AND SOCIAL THEORY PERSPECTIVES
- Part II INSTITUTIONALIZING MODERNITY: DEVELOPMENT AND DISCONTINUITY
- Chapter Three Habermas on the Institutionalizing of Modernity: Communicative Rationality, Lifeworld and System
- Chapter Four Giddens on Institutionalizing Modernity: Power and Discontinuity
- Chapter Five Intermediate Reflections on Social Theory Alternatives: Contrasts and Divisions
- Part III THE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CONSTELLATION OF CONTEMPORARY MODERNITY
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter Three - Habermas on the Institutionalizing of Modernity: Communicative Rationality, Lifeworld and System
from Part II - INSTITUTIONALIZING MODERNITY: DEVELOPMENT AND DISCONTINUITY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 January 2018
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I NEW PARADIGMS AND SOCIAL THEORY PERSPECTIVES
- Part II INSTITUTIONALIZING MODERNITY: DEVELOPMENT AND DISCONTINUITY
- Chapter Three Habermas on the Institutionalizing of Modernity: Communicative Rationality, Lifeworld and System
- Chapter Four Giddens on Institutionalizing Modernity: Power and Discontinuity
- Chapter Five Intermediate Reflections on Social Theory Alternatives: Contrasts and Divisions
- Part III THE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CONSTELLATION OF CONTEMPORARY MODERNITY
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Habermas defines modernity as a project that is incomplete, rather than as a phase of development that has been superseded by postmodernity (Habermas 1996d; 1984; 1987b). The project of modernity seeks to realize the ideals of universal emancipation, autonomy, authenticity and social progress. In his opinion, the project of modernity is based on rationality and it finds expression in different spheres of society. It is not limited to the instrumental and functionalist rationalization of the capitalist economy and the state's bureaucratic administrative system, rather it also occurs by way of communicative rationality in the spheres of science, art, and morality, as well as the broader interpersonal relations and social interaction of individuals’ lifeworld. Habermas's change to the paradigm of communication is then supposed to both enable a proper appreciation of the potential of modernity's cultural rationalization and overcome the difficulties that he believes bedevilled the Frankfurt School's critique of instrumental reason. The project of modernity derives from the critique of religious and metaphysical belief system's totalizing character, while at the same time depending on individual and collective learning processes that integrate the rationalization of the differentiated spheres of value:
The project of modernity as it was formulated by the philosophers of the Enlightenment in the eighteenth century consists in the relentless development of the objectivating sciences, of the universalistic foundations of morality and law, and of autonomous art, all in accord with their own immanent logic. But it at the same time also results in releasing the cognitive potentials accumulated in the processes from their esoteric high forms and attempting to apply them in the sphere of praxis, that is, to encourage the rational organization of social relations. (Habermas 1996d, 45)
One of the things to state about the project of modernity is that a loss of commitment to the project means the end of it. Habermas's intention is precisely to demonstrate that the project of modernity is binding upon modern individuals and that the price of renouncing the normative commitments of the modernist project is regression, both at the level of the modern individual and the social collective.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Habermas and Giddens on Praxis and ModernityA Constructive Comparison, pp. 103 - 138Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2017