Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:24:40.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Metamorphic neural interfaces with insects for remote controlled biobots

from Part II - Biosensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Alper Bozkurt
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Sandro Carrara
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Krzysztof Iniewski
Affiliation:
Redlen Technologies Inc., Canada
Get access

Summary

Muscles are the mechanical actuators of the body controlled by neurons. We use these actuators to perform many actions during the activities of our daily life. Moreover, we have benefited throughout history from the muscle power of larger animals, for farming, transportation, and industry. However, the muscle power of insects has not yet been exploited reliably or reproducibly, although insects possess a much higher ratio of muscle force to body mass than most large domesticated mammals. The novel field of insect–machine interfaces (IMI) combines microtechnology and neuroengineering to benefit from the muscle power of insects in a “biobotic” manner. To facilitate this, Early Metamorphosis Insertion Technology (EMIT) provides a novel neurotechnological pathway for integrating microelectronic sensing and actuation platforms into insects during metamorphosis. Metamorphic development not only provides an elegant and effective method of mechanically affixing artificial systems in or on an insect, but also produces a reliable bioelectrical interface without any observable short-term adverse effect on insect flight behavior. As an application of biobotic control of insect locomotion, the first steps towards flight and gait navigation in moths and cockroaches are presented in this chapter.

Insect–machine interfaces (IMI)

Developments in micromachining technology have shifted the notion of implantable neuromotor prosthetics from science fiction to reality [1]. The highly miniaturized complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) electronics on these micromachined probes have made possible a number of complicated neurophysiological studies by coupling state-of-the-art signal processing technologies to initiate and record advanced brain function [2, 3]. This technology provides techniques and tools that allow us to understand and generate robust electronically controlled muscle movement. Restoring impaired motor function has been possible in vertebrates such as rabbits, cats, and monkeys, and will eventually be useful for humans, by controlling their motor function using either external operator commands or the output of the subject’s own brain [4, 5]. These systems are at a suitable scale (~5 mm3) to fit on an insect to build insect–machine interfaces (IMI). For a reliable IMI, hybrid bioelectronic structures with insects need to be formed through which CMOS devices and micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) structures are coupled with the insect’s natural sensors and actuators.

Type
Chapter
Information
Handbook of Bioelectronics
Directly Interfacing Electronics and Biological Systems
, pp. 183 - 194
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lebedev, M.A., Nicolelis, M. A. L.Brain machine interfaces: Past, present and future,” Trends Neurosci., 29, 536–46, 2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Najafi, K., “Micromachined systems for neurophysiological applications” in Handbook of Microlithography, Micromachining, and Microfabrication, Vol. 2., Rai-Choudhury, P., Ed. SPIE Press/IEE, Chapter 9, pp. 517–69, 1997.Google Scholar
Wise, K. D., “Silicon microsystems for use in neuroscience and neural prostheses: Interfacing with the central nervous system at the cellular level,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., 24, 22–9, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S.H., “Converting thoughts into action,” Nature, 442, 141–2, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konig, P., Verschure, P. F. M. J., “Neurons in action,” Science, 296, 1817–8, 2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wootton, R., “From insects to microvehicles,” Nature, 403, 144–5, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taubes, G., “Biologists and engineers create a new generation of robots that imitate life,” Science, 288, 80–3, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, A., Bozkurt, A., Ewer, J., Blossey, B., Lal, A., “Surgically implanted micro-platforms in Manduca-sexta”, Solid State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head Island, June 2006, pp. 209–11, 2006.Google Scholar
Bozkurt, A., Gilmour, R., Sinha, A., Stern, D., Lal, A., “Insect machine interface based neuro cybernetics,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 56 (6), 1727–33, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duch, C., Bayline, R. J., Levine, R. B., “Postembryonic development of the dorsal longitudinal flight muscle and its innervation in Manduca sexta,” J. Comp. Neurol., 422 (1), 1–17, 2000.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, R. B., Morton, D. B., Restifo, L. L., “Remodeling of the insect nervous system,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5, 28–35, 1995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C., “Physiology of insect diapause: The role of the brain in the production and termination of pupal dormancy in the giant silkworm Platysamia cecropia,” Biol. Bull., 90, 234–43, 1946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C., “The juvenile hormone. II. Its role in the endocrine control of molting, pupation, and adult development in the Cecropia silkworm,” Biol. Bull., 121, 572–85, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozkurt, A., Gilmour, R., Lal, A., “ In vivo electrochemical characterization of tissue–electrode interface during metamorphic growth,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 58 (8), 2401–6, 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozkurt, A., Lal, A. “Bioelectrical enhancement in tissue-electrode coupling with metamorphic-stage insertions for insect machine interfaces” 33rd International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’11), Boston, MA, 2011.
Bozkurt, A., Lal, A., Gilmour, R., “Radio control of insects for biobotic domestication,” 4th International Conference of the IEEE Neural Engineering (NER’09), Antalya, Turkey, 2009.
Weiland, J. D. and , D. J.Anderson chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 47 (7), 911–18, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisemann, C. H., Jorgensen, W. K., Merritt, D. J. et al. “Do insects feel pain? – A biological view,” Experienta, vol. 40 (2), 164–7, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B., “Do insects feel pain?,” Antenna, 4, 8–9, 1980.Google Scholar
Bozkurt, A., Paul, A., Pulla, S., et al. “Microprobe microsystem platform inserted during early metamorphosis to actuate insect flight muscle,” 20th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2007), Kobe, Japan, pp. 405–8, 2007.
Bozkurt, A., Gilmour, R., Stern, D., Lal, A., “MEMS based bioelectronic neuromuscular interfaces for insect cyborg flight control,” 21st IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2008), Tucson, AZ, pp. 160–3, 2008.
Bozkurt, A., Gilmour, R., Lal, A., “Balloon assisted flight of radio controlled insect biobots,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 56 (9), 2304–7, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozkurt, A., Lal, A., Gilmour, R., “Aerial and terrestrial locomotion control of lift assisted insect biobots,” 31th International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’09), Minneapolis, MN, 2009.
Heinrich, B., “Thermoregulation in endothermic insects”, Science, 185, 747–756, 1974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latif, T., Bozkurt, A., “Line following terrestrial insect biobots”. 34th International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’12), San Diego, CA, 2012.
Whitmire, E., Latif, T., Bozkurt, A., “Kinect-based system for automated control of terrestrial insect biobots”. 35th International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC’13), Osaka, Japan, 2013.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×