Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:27:57.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Barriers to the implementation and usage of work–life policies

from Part III - Cultural change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Paula Caligiuri
By
Cynthia A. Thompson
Edited by
Steven A. Y. Poelmans
Paula Caligiuri
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Cynthia A. Thompson
Affiliation:
Professor Baruch College, CUNY, USA
Steven A. Y. Poelmans
Affiliation:
IESE Business School, Barcelona
Get access

Summary

Work is taking over the lives of many employees in today's fast-paced, global environment, and organizations are increasingly offering work–life programs to help employees manage the conflicts and stress resulting from long hours and workload escalation. For some firms, work–life programs are having their intended effect: absenteeism declines, loyalty and retention increase, the ability to recruit talented employees improves, and many employees report that their productivity improves. However, for other firms, work–life programs are not successful, or do not reach their potential for enhancing work–life balance for employees. In some cases employees may not be aware the programs exist, in other cases employees are fearful that their careers will suffer if they participate in the programs. Further, programs sometimes fail because they are not implemented properly, as when employees are not given the necessary technical and management support to work from home.

The purpose of this chapter is to discuss potential barriers that may impede the successful implementation and utilization of work–life programs. I will begin by discussing the underlying assumptions and values that influence the way employees and employers think about work and family. For example, I will discuss the ways in which organizations and individuals define success, and how these traditional definitions limit their ability to think creatively about new ways of working.

Type
Chapter
Information
Harmonizing Work, Family, and Personal Life
From Policy to Practice
 , pp. 209 - 234
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. D. & Russell, J. E. A. (1999). Parental leave of absence: Some not so family friendly implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 166–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badal, J. (2006). To retain valued women employees, companies pitch flextime as macho. The Wall Street Journal Online, p. B1, December.Google Scholar
Bailyn, L. (1993). Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bailyn, L. & Fletcher, J. K. (1997). Unexpected connections: Considering employees' personal lives can revitalize your business. Sloan Management Review, 38, 11–19.Google Scholar
Blair-Loy, M. & Wharton, A. (2002). Employees' use of work–family policies and the workplace social context. Social Forces, 80(3), 813–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E., & Swanberg, J. E. (1998). The 1997 National Study of the Changing Workforce (Vol. 2). New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
Bond, J. T., Thompson, C. A., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2003). Highlights of the 2002 National Study of the Changing Workforce.New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. M. (2000). Work design for flexible work scheduling: Barriers and gender implications. Gender, Work and Organization, 7, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinchilla, N., Poelmans, S., Leon, C. & Tarres, J. (2004). Guía de buenas prácticas de la empresa flexible. Hacia la conciliación de la vida laboral, familiar y personal. www.iese.edu/icwf.
Cleveland, J. (2005). What is success? Who defines it? Perspectives on the criterion problem as it relates to work and family. In Kossek, E. E. & Lambert, S. (eds), Work and Life Integration: Organizational, Cultural, and Individual Perspectives (pp. 319–346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Corporate Voices for Working Families (2005). Business Impacts of Flexibility: An Imperative for Expansion.Washington, DC: Corporate Voices for Working Families.Google Scholar
Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2004). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 124–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, R.Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ertel, M. & Pech, E. (2006). Success factors of teleworking in the public sector. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Occupational Stress and Health, Miami, Florida, March.
Frankel, M. (1998). Creating the family-friendly workplace: Barriers and solutions. In Klarreich, S. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Health Psychology: Programs to Make the Workplace Healthier. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, S., Thompson, C., Carpenter, M., & Marcel, D. (2001). Proving Leo Durocher wrong: Driving work/life change at Ernst & Young. A Wharton Work/Life Integration Project (http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/template.php?name=casestudy_wharton).
Haas, L., Allard, K., & Hwang, P. (2002). The impact of organizational culture on men's use of parental leave in Sweden. Community, Work and Family, 5, 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, V. Y., St-Onge, S., & Archambault, M. (2002). Environmental and personal antecedents of telecommuting outcomes. Journal of End User Computing, 14, 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, J. & Summes, J. (2004). Lacking balance? Work–life employment practices in the modern economy. Personnel Review, 33, 418–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kofodimos, J. R. (1995). Beyond Work–Family Programs: Confronting and Resolving the Underlying Causes of Work–Personal Life Conflict. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
Konrad, A. M. & Mangel, R. (2000). The impact of work–life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1225–1237.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, P. (2000). Jobs for life. Fast Company, May, p. 236.Google Scholar
Lapierre, L. M. & Allen, T. D. (2006). Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: Implications for work–family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, S. (1997). “Family-friendly” employment policies: A route to changing organizational culture or playing around at the margins? Gender, Work & Organisation, 4, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S. (2001). Restructuring workplace cultures: The ultimate work–family challenge?Women in Management Review, 16, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, S. & Cooper, C. (2005). Work–life Integration: Case Studies of Organizational Change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P., Brown, K., & Bradley, L. (2005). Explanations for the provision–utilization gap in work–life policy. Women in Management Review, 20, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, B. (2001). Changing a culture of face time. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Nord, W. R., Fox, S., Phoenix, A., & Viano, K. (2002). Real-world reactions to work–life balance programs: Lessons for effective implementation. Organizational Dynamics, 30, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, L. & Allen, T. D. (2001). Work/family benefits: Variables related to employees' fairness perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlow, L. A. (1997). Finding Time: How Corporations, Individuals, and Families can Benefit from New Work Practices. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E. & Blum, T. C. (2000). Work–family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1107–1117.Google Scholar
Pleck, J. H. (1993). Are “family-supportive” employer policies relevant to men? In Hood, J. C. (ed.), Men, Work, and Family (pp. 217–237). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Poelmans, S., Chinchilla, M. N., & Cardona, P. (2003). The adoption of family-friendly HRM policies. International Journal of Manpower, 24, 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelmans, S. & Sahibzada, K. (2004). A multi-level model for studying the context and impact of work–family policies and culture in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prottas, D. J., Thompson, C. A., Kopelman, R. E., & Jahn, E. W. (2007). Factors affecting employee knowledge of work–family programs. Personnel Review, 36, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, R., Bailyn, L, Fletcher, J., & Pruitt, B. (2002). Beyond Work–Family Balance: Advancing Gender Equity and Workplace Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rothhausen, T. & Gonzales, J. (1998). Family-friendly backlash – Fact or fiction? The case of organizations' on-site childcare centers. Personnel Psychology, 51, 685–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Shain, M. (2005) Benchmarking the psychosocial environment. Journal of Employee Assistance, 34, 32–33.Google Scholar
Simon, R. W. (1995). Gender, multiple roles, role meaning, and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. A. (2005). Work–life balance? Organizations in denial. Journal of Employee Assistance, 35, 2, 7–9.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. A., Andreassi, J., & Prottas, D. (2005). Work–family culture: Key to reducing workforce-workplace mismatch? In Bianchi, S. M., Casper, L. M., Christensen, K. E., & Berkowitz King, R. (eds), Workforce/Workplace Mismatch? Work, Family, Health and Well-being. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Allen, T. (2006). Work–life balance: An industrial-organizational psychology perspective. In Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Kossek, E., & Sweet, S. (eds), Work–Family Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work–family benefits are not enough: The influence of work–family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. A.Jahn, E. W., Kopelman, R., & Prottas, D. (2004). The impact of perceived organizational and supervisory family support on affective commitment: A longitudinal and multi-level analysis. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 545–567.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. A. & Prottas, D. J. (2006). Relationship among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. (2000). Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×