Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:26:46.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Idea of Demographic Transition and the Study of Fertility Change: A Critical Intellectual History

from PART I - History as Critique: Debating the McKeown Thesis and the Postwar Policy Consensus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Get access

Summary

This chapter's main aim is to contribute to the study of fertility change through analyzing certain intellectual and institutional aspects of the field of study since World War II. The principal focus is the intellectual history of the idea of demographic transition: the idea that has provided students of changing fertility throughout the postwar era with the dominant collective definition of the phenomenon they are seeking to understand and explain. “Demographic transition” has been confusingly invoked at different times by different authors—or even by the same author at the same time—as theory (“the” demographic transition), historical model, predictive model, or mere descriptive term. All of these uses crop up at various points in the account below. I will make no attempt to adjudicate between them. My aim, rather, is to explain this ambivalence through investigating their joint provenance.

If the postwar intellectual history of the study of changing fertility is intimately bound up with the idea of demographic transition, the institutional history has become deeply involved with the agencies and administration of population policy, the “family planning industry,” as Paul Demeny has christened it. During the 1950s an intellectual orthodoxy concerning the importance of the relationship between national economic development and population growth solidified among social scientists, economic planners, and political leaders in the West and in those nations that looked predominantly to the liberal democracies of the West. Within this orthodoxy, the dominant line of thought has tended to emphasize the extent to which relatively rapid population growth can obstruct the potential for economic growth in less-developed countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Health and Wealth
Studies in History and Policy
, pp. 46 - 97
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×