Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:12:50.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Roger E. Backhouse
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Philippe Fontaine
Affiliation:
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
Get access

Summary

The Second World War

The Second World War and the events surrounding it – the rise of the Nazi regime and the economic trauma of the 1930s – were crucial for economics. In the 1920s, though American economics had grown rapidly since the turn of the century, European economics remained dominant. The generation that had shaped economics as it entered the twentieth century, many of whose members died in the 1920s, was overwhelmingly European. In the 1920s and 1930s, a high proportion of the most innovative work was still done in Europe – Alfred Marshall's Cambridge, the London School of Economics (LSE), Karl Menger's seminar in Vienna, Stockholm, and Lausanne.

By the end of the Second World War, the situation was completely different. Hundreds of European economists, many Jewish, had been forced to emigrate and, though some stopped in Britain, most ended up in the United States (Hagemann 2000), joining those who had left Russia and Eastern Europe after the 1917 revolution. Many rapidly achieved influential positions: Harvard had Joseph Schumpeter (from Austria) and Wassily Leontief (from Russia via Germany); Jacob Marschak (Ukrainian, via Germany and Britain) was at the Cowles Commission in Chicago, along with many other émigrés; Fritz Machlup (Austrian) was at Johns Hopkins. The extent of this migration is shown by the fact that in 1945, half the articles in the American Economic Review (AER), the journal of the American Economic Association (AEA), were written by economists born outside the United States, but holding positions in U.S. universities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amadae, S. M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Arena, R. 2008. French forms of Keynesianism. Paper presented to HISRECO Conference, Lisbon, June 5–7, 2008.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. 1998. The transformation of US economics, 1920–1960: viewed through a survey of journal articles. In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, ed. Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M., 85–107. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy Volume 30.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. 2005. The rise of free-market economics: economists and the role of the state since 1970. In The Role of Government in the History of Economic Thought, ed. Medema, S. G. and Boettke, P., 355–92. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 37.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. 2008. Economics in the United States, 1945 to the present. In New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. second edition, ed. Blume, L. and Durlauf, S., 522–33. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. 2010. The Puzzle of Modern Economics: Science or Ideology?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R. E., and Medema, S. G. 2009. Defining economics: the long road to acceptance of the Robbins definition. Economica 76 (special issue):805–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, B. W. 2006. Keynes and Keynesianism. In The Cambridge Companion to Keynes, ed. Backhouse, R. E. and Bateman, B. W., 271–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, M. A. 2004. A Perilous Progress: Economists and the Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmer, D. L. M. 2002. The MIT Center for International Studies: The Founding Years, 1951–1969. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Bodkin, R. G., Klein, L. R. and Marwah, K.. 1991. A History of Macroeconometric Model-Building. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bowen, H. R. 1953. Graduate education in economics. American Economic Review 43(4 (Part 2)):1–223.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, M. 1970. Radical economics in America: a 1970 survey. Journal of Economic Literature 8(3):747–66.Google Scholar
Clower, R. W. 1965. The Keynesian counterrevolution: a theoretical appraisal. In The Theory of Interest Rates, ed. Hahn, F. H. and Brechling, F. P. R., 103–25. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1992. Changing perceptions of American graduate education in economics, 1953–1991. Journal of Economic Education 23(4):341–52.Google Scholar
Colander, D. ed. 1997. The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 28.Google Scholar
Colander, D. ed. 2000. The Development of Economics in Western Europe since 1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colander, D. 2001. The AEA and the radical challenge to social science. In Economics Broadly Considered: Essays in Honor of Warren J. Samuels, ed. Biddle, J. E., Davis, J. B., and Medema, S. G., 144–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cockett, R. 1994. Thinking the Unthinkable: Think Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–1983. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Colander, D. 1990. The Making of an Economist. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Colander, D. 1992. The sounds of silence: the profession's response to the COGEE report. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(3):600–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, D. 2005. The making of an economist redux. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(1):175–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, D., and Klamer, A.. 1987. The making of an economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3):95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, H. 2006. Patrons of the revolution: ideals and institutions in postwar behavioral science. Isis 97(3):420–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, R., P. A. Samuelson, and Solow, R. M.. 1958. Linear Programming and Economic Analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Fontaine, P., and Leonard, R.. 2005. The Experiment in the History of Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fourcade, M., and Khurana, R.. 2008. Scientific and merchant professionalism in American economics. Paper presented to History of Economics as History of Science Workshop, Cachan, 20 June, 2008.Google Scholar
Frey, B., and Eichenberger, R.. 1993. American and European economics and economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(4):185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B., and Pommerehne, W. W.. 1988. The American domination among eminent economists. Scientometrics 14(1–2):97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1968. The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review 58(1):1–17.Google Scholar
Frisch, R. 1933. Editor's note. Econometrica 1(1):1–4.Google Scholar
Geweke, J., Horowitz, J. L., and Pesaran, H.. 2008. Econometrics. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second edition, ed. Durlauf, S. N. and Blume, L. E.. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Online at www.dictionaryofeconomics.com.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. D. W. 1998. The patrons of economics in a time of transformation. In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, ed. Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M., 53–81. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 30.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. 1965. The role of the history of economic thought in the understanding of modern economic theory. American Economic Review 55(1):119–27.Google Scholar
Hagemann, H. 2000. The post-1945 development of economics in Germany. In The Development of Economics in Western Europe since 1945, ed. Coats, A. W., 113–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hands, D. W., and Mirowski, P.. 1998. A paradox of budgets: the postwar stabilization of American neoclassical demand theory. In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, ed. Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M., 260–92. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 30.Google Scholar
Harberger, A. 1997. Good economics comes to Latin America. In The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics, ed. Coats, A. W. B., 301–11. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 28.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Huret, R. 2008. La fin de la pauvreté? Les experts sociaux en guerre contre la pauvreté aux Etats-Unis (1945–1974). Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B., and Israel, G.. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jardini, D. R. 1996. Out of the Blue Yonder: The RAND Corporation's Diversification into Social Welfare Research, 1946–1968. Doctoral thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. G. 1971. The Keynesian revolution and the monetarist counter-revolution. American Economic Review 61(2):1–14.Google Scholar
Katz, B. 1989. Foreign Intelligence: Research and Analysis in the Office of Strategic Services, 1942–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Khurana, R. 2007. From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T. C. 1957. Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. O. 1991. Report of the commission on graduate education in economics. Journal of Economic Literature 29(3):1035–53.Google Scholar
Lee, F. S. 2004. To be a heterodox economist: the contested landscape of American economics, 1960s and 1970s. Journal of Economic Issues 38(3):747–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, F. S. 2009. A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, A. 1968. On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. J. 1991. War as a ‘simple economic problem’: the rise of an economics of defense. In Economics and National Security, ed. Goodwin, C. D., 261–84. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 23.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. J. 2008. Game theory in economics, origins of. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second edition, ed. Blume, L. and Durlauf, S.. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Online at www.dictionaryofeconomics.com.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M. R. 1997. The professional and political impacts of the internationalization of economics in Brazil. In The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics, ed. Coats, A. W., 184–207. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 28.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, J. 2002. Reinventing the Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, E. 1977. The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mata, T. 2009. Migrations and boundary work: Harvard, radical economists, and the Committee on Political Discrimination. Science in Context 22(1):115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, S. G. 2000. Related disciplines: the professionalization of public choice analysis. In Toward a History of Applied Economics, ed. Backhouse, R. E. and Biddle, J.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 32.Google Scholar
Mehrling, P. 2005. Fischer Black and the Revolutionary Theory of Finance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moggridge, D. 2008. Harry Johnson: A Life in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. S., and Rutherford, M., eds. 1998. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Volume 30.Google Scholar
Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O.. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2005. John Kenneth Galbraith: His Life, His Politics, His Economics. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Patinkin, D. 1956. Money, Interest and Prices. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Patinkin, D. 1965. Money, Interest and Prices, Second edition. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Phelps, E. S. et al. 1970. Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Portes, R. 1987. Economics in Europe. European Economic Review 31(6):1329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, D. 1997. The Formation of Econometrics: A Historical Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. C. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ruggles, N., ed. 1970. The Behavioral and Social Sciences Survey: Economics Panel. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ruggles, R. 1962. Relation of the undergraduate major to graduate economics. American Economic Review 52(2):483–89.
Rutherford, M. 2008. National Bureau of Economic Research. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second edition, ed. Durlauf, Steven N. and Blume, Lawrence E.. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Online at http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1948. Economics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1955. Economics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Schrecker, E. 1986. No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, C., ed. 1998. Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences during the Cold War. New York: The New Press.
Solow, R. M. 1997. How did economics get that way, and what way did it get?Daedalus 126:39–58.
Stapleton, D. H. 2003. Joseph Willits and the Rockefeller's European programme in the social sciences. Minerva 41(2):101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdes, J. G. 1995. Pinochet's Economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanoli, A. 2008. National accounting, history of. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second edition, ed. Blume, L. and Durlauf, S., Volume 5: 838–43. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Online at www.dictionaryofeconomics.com.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 1998. Axiomatisches mißverständnis. Economic Journal 108(451):1837–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Economics
  • Roger E. Backhouse, University of Birmingham, Philippe Fontaine, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
  • Book: The History of the Social Sciences since 1945
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845260.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Economics
  • Roger E. Backhouse, University of Birmingham, Philippe Fontaine, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
  • Book: The History of the Social Sciences since 1945
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845260.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Economics
  • Roger E. Backhouse, University of Birmingham, Philippe Fontaine, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
  • Book: The History of the Social Sciences since 1945
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845260.005
Available formats
×