Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T07:56:24.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The homoerotics of favoritism in tragedy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Mario DiGangi
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

The sodomitical subject of tragedy

For understanding the politics of male homoerotic relations in early modern England, Chapman's The Gentleman Usher (1602) offers a simple but crucial lesson: some homoerotic intimacies are more threatening to social order than others. With his administrative responsibilities and authority over other servants, a gentleman usher or steward, if corrupt or incompetent, could impede the smooth functioning of a noble household. Bassiolo may represent just such an ambitious and disorderly household servant, but it is Mendice, the court favorite, who is finally banished from the play. Although both Bassiolo and Mendice have disruptive access to the bodies of their social superiors, Mendice's access is more dangerous because his master is the Duke.

In early modern Europe, favorites could acquire tremendous power through their closeness to the body of the prince. The correlation between political power and physical proximity to the monarch's body was complexly negotiated in the court of Queen Elizabeth. Elizabeth's domestic intimates were women and therefore not holders of political office, although they did wield considerable influence with the queen in matters of patronage. Throughout her reign, Elizabeth had various male favorites such as Leicester, Ralegh, and Essex, who provides the most notorious example of one who pressed to the limit of treason his privileged closeness to the queen. As for courtiers and statesmen, new historicist and feminist scholars have explored how Petrarchan conventions shaped political relations generally in the Elizabethan court.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×