Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T21:54:35.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Communicating with the other: Infinity, geometry, and universal math and science

from Part II - Transcending anthropocentrism: How do we move beyond our own preconceptions of life, intelligence, and culture?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Douglas A. Vakoch
Affiliation:
SETI Institute
Steven J. Dick
Affiliation:
Library of Congress, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

If the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) detects an artificial signal from a distant civilization, our next challenge will be to understand any encoded message, and then to decide what we may want to transmit in reply. The few intentional messages humans have sent into space thus far reflect the assumption that mathematics and science are universal. Any civilization able to build technology capable of interstellar communication must certainly know at least the basics of these areas, it is often argued. How accurate is this Platonic notion that our math and physics tap into universal principles? Might different civilizations have their own versions of math and science that are perfectly adequate for explaining the universe, but that do not directly map onto our notions?

Lingua Cosmica

In the standard approach to constructing interstellar messages that may be comprehensible to an independently evolved intelligence, we start with concepts presumably shared by sender and recipient. If the goal of interstellar communication is to share information not previously known by the recipient, the sender has the additional challenge of identifying a sequence that will lead from shared to unique information. For example, logician Hans Freudenthal began his interstellar language Lingua Cosmica, or Lincos, with an exposition of mathematical concepts (Freudenthal 1960). He then moved to a discussion of time; then human behavior; and finally notions of space, motion, and mass. In the process, he attempted to convey some of the idiosyncrasies of human life in terms of potentially universal principles of mathematics and science.

A recurrent critique of Lincos is that ambiguities at one point in the exposition may make subsequent sections unintelligible. In this chapter, I examine the potential problems raised by Freudenthal's reliance on concepts related to infinity early in his message, and propose an alternative approach that introduces notions of three-dimensional (3D) space and motion as a foundation for discussing human behavior, with the goal of enhancing intelligibility.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, Peter. 1982. “Omnilinguals.” In Philosophers Look at Science Fiction, edited by Smith, Nicholas D., 75–85, Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Deavours, Cipher A. 1985. “Extraterrestrial Communication: A Cryptologic Perspective.” In Extraterrestrials: Science and Alien Intelligence, edited by Regis, Edward Jr., 201–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
DeVito, Carl L. 2014. Science, SETI, and Mathematics. New York, NY: Berghahn.Google Scholar
DeVito, Carl L. and Little, W. A.. 1988. “Fractal Sets Associated with Functions: The Spectral Lines of Hydrogen.” Physical Review A 38:6362–6364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeVito, Carl L. and Oehrle, Richard T.. 1990. “A Language Based on the Fundamental Facts of Science.” Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 43:561–568.Google Scholar
Drake, Frank. 1978. “The Foundations of the Voyager Record.” In Murmurs of Earth: The Voyager Interstellar Record, edited by Sagan, Carl, 45–70. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Hans.1960. Lincos: Design of a Language for Cosmic Intercourse, Part I. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Hersh, Reuben. 1997. What Is Mathematics, Really?Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Núñez, Rafael E.. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes from: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York, NY: Basic.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, Guillermo A. and Lomberg, Jon. 2011. “Communication Among Interstellar Intelligent Species: A Search for Universal Cognitive Maps.” In Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence (CETI), edited by Vakoch, Douglas A., 371–395. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, Philip. 1963. “Interstellar Communication.” In Interstellar Communication: A Collection of Reprints and Original Contributions, edited by Cameron, A. G. W., 249–271. New York, NY: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Narens, Louis. 1997. “Surmising Cognitive Universals for Extraterrestrial Intelligences.” In Astronomical and Biochemical Origins and the Search for Life in the Universe, edited by Cosmovici, Cristiano B., Bowyer, Stuart C., and Werthimer, Dan, 561–570. Bologna: Editrice Compositori.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1985. “Extraterrestrial Science.” In Extraterrestrials: Science and Alien Intelligence, edited by Regis, Edward Jr., 83–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rotman, Brian. 1993. Ad Infinitum … the Ghost in Turing's Machine: Taking God out of Mathematics and Putting the Body Back in: An Essay in Corporeal Semiotics and Theological Presuppositions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sefler, George F. 1982. “Alternative Linguistic Frameworks: Communications with Extraterrestrial Beings.” In Philosophers Look at Science Fiction, edited by Smith, Nicholas D., 67–74, Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Vakoch, Douglas A. 1978. “Possible Pictorial Messages for Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence.” Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 44:23–25.Google Scholar
Vakoch, Douglas A. 1998. “Constructing Messages to Extraterrestrials: An Exosemiotic Perspective.” Acta Astronautica 42:697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vakoch, Douglas A. 2000. “The Conventionality of Pictorial Representation in Interstellar Messages.” Acta Astronautica 46:733–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vakoch, Douglas A. 2011. “A Narratological Approach to Interpreting and Designing Interstellar Messages.” Acta Astronautica 68:520–534.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×