Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:28:51.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Testing the boundaries of imperial alliance: cooperation, negotiation and resistance in the era of Razin (1667–1681)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Brian J. Boeck
Brian J. Boeck
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Beginning in the mid-seventeenth century, a significant shift occurred in the strategic objectives of the Muscovite government. After the construction of the Belgorod line Tatar raids could no longer penetrate the Russian heartland, making it possible for officials to incline their ears towards the chorus of voices calling for Russians to help their Orthodox brethren abroad. Upon accepting a major military commitment in Ukraine, Muscovite officials searched for a strategy that would bring security to their southern frontier. For the first time the tsar's relationship with the Don Cossacks was brought as a chip to the diplomatic bargaining table in 1667, but Russian officials still treated the Don region with flexibility in order to avoid imperial overreach.

This chapter examines how the shift in Russian strategic priorities tested the boundaries of the alliance between the Don Host and the Russian tsar. It connects the Razin rebellion to the consequences of the Russian involvement in Ukraine after 1654, but argues that neither event radically altered the separate deal between the tsar and the Don Cossacks. Remarkably, Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich permitted his representatives to bargain with rebel leaders and failed to punish Don Cossacks who invaded Muscovite territory. The Host evaded implementing “autocratic” will in cases as small in scale as the arrest of a single Cossack criminal or as significant in scope as the construction of a key government fort.

Type
Chapter
Information
Imperial Boundaries
Cossack Communities and Empire-Building in the Age of Peter the Great
 , pp. 68 - 85
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stevens, Carol, Soldiers on the Steppe: Army Reform and Social Change in Early Modern Russia (DeKalb, Ill., 1995)Google Scholar
Pritsak, Omeljan, “Das erste turkisch-ukrainische Bundnis (1648),” Oriens 6 (1953), 266–98Google Scholar
Sysyn, Frank E., Between Poland and the Ukraine: The Dilemma of Adam Kysil, 1600–1663 (Cambridge, 1985)Google Scholar
Brekhunenko, Viktor, Stosunky ukrainskoho kozatstva z Donom (Kiev, 1998), pp. 235–74Google Scholar
Mininkov, N. A., Donskoe kazachestvo v epokhu pozdnego srednevekov'ia (Rostov-na-Donu, 1998), pp. 394–97Google Scholar
Akty otnosiashchiesia k istorii iuzhnoi i zapadnoi Rossii, vol. X (Saint Petersburg, 1878)
Hrushevsky, Mykhailo, History of Ukraine-Rus', vol. VIII, ed. Sysyn, Franket al. (Edmonton, 2002)Google Scholar
Basarab, John, Pereiaslav 1954: A Historiographical Study (Edmonton, 1982)Google Scholar
Torke, Hans-Joachim, “The Unloved Alliance: Political Relations between Muscovy and Ukraine in the Seventeenth Century,” in Potichnyj, Peter J., et al., Ukraine and Russia in Their Historical Encounter (Edmonton, 1992), pp. 39–69Google Scholar
Plokhy, Serhii, The Cossacks and Religion in Early Modern Ukraine (Oxford, 2001), pp. 274–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosul, Ia. S., Istoricheskie sviazi narodov SSSR i Rumynii (Moscow, 1965), vol. II, p. 249Google Scholar
Zagorovskii, V. P., “Vopros o russkom morskom flote na Donu do Petra I” in Trudy Voronezhskogo universiteta, vol. LIII, no. 1 (1960), 162–63Google Scholar
Chesnok, V., “Krepost' Liutik (XVII–XVIII vv.),” Izvestiia Rostovskogo oblastnogo muzeia kraevedeniia 5 (1990), 66–73Google Scholar
Khodarkovsky, Michael, “The Stepan Razin Uprising: Was it a ‘Peasant War’?” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 42 (1994), 1–19Google Scholar
Yaresh, Leo, “The ‘Peasant Wars’ in Soviet Historiography,” The American Slavic and East European Review 16 (1957), 241–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avrich, Paul, Russian Rebels 1600–1800 (New York, 1976), p. 62Google Scholar
Stepanov, I. V., Krest'ianskaia voina v Rossii: vosstanie Stepana Razina v 1670–1671 gg (Leningrad, 1966), p. 292Google Scholar
Riabov, S. I., Donskaia zemlia v XVII veke (Volgograd, 1992), p. 186Google Scholar
Boeck, B., Shifting Boundaries on the Don Steppe Frontier: Cossacks, Empires and Nomads to 1739 (Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 2002), pp. 583–86Google Scholar
Tkhorzhevskii, S. I., Sten'ka Razin (Petrograd, 1923), pp. 38–40Google Scholar
Tomsinskii, S. G., Krestianskoe dvizhenie v feodal'no-krepostnicheskoi Rossii (Moscow, 1932), p. 76Google Scholar
Chistiakova, E. V., “Krest'ianskoe dvizhenie v Podmoskov'e i pokhod Vasiliia Usa,” Voprosy Istorii (1953), p. 133Google Scholar
Pronshtein, A. P., “K istorii pokhoda otriada Vasiliia Usa k Moskve,” in Nosov, N. E., ed., Krestianstvo i klassovaia bor'ba v feodal'noi Rossii (Leningrad, 1967), pp. 250–63Google Scholar
Bushkovitch, Paul, Peter the Great: The Struggle for Power, 1671–1725 (Cambridge, 2001), pp. 33, 67, 52, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savel'ev, A., Trekhsotletie Voiska Donskago 1570–1870 (Saint Petersburg, 1870), p. 362Google Scholar
Kotel'nikov, Evlampii, “Istoricheskoe svedenie Voiska Donskago o Verkhnei Kurmoiarskoi stanitse,” in Chteniia v obshchestve istorii i drevnostei Rossiiskikh 3 (1863), 27Google Scholar
Boeck, B., “Capitulation or Negotiation: Relations Between the Don Host and Moscow in the Aftermath of the Razin Uprising,” in Kappeler, Andreas, ed., Die Geschichte Russlands im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert aus der Perspektive seiner Regionen, in Forschungen zur osteuropaischen Geschichte, 63 (2004), 382–94Google Scholar
Galaktionov, I. V., “Andrusovskii dogovor 1667 goda i problema russko-pol'skogo soiuza,” Slavianksii sbornik 2 (Saratov, 1978), 70–120Google Scholar
Stateinyi spisok stol'nika Vasiliia Tiapkina i d'iaka Nikity Zotova posol'stva v Krym v 1680 godu dliia zakliucheniia Bakchisaraiskago dogovora (Odessa, 1850)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×