Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:59:36.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship and Future Research Directions

from Part IV - Innovation Management and its Links with Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2018

Jorge Niosi
Affiliation:
Université du Québec, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Entrepreneurship as a more general field of research has exploded in recent decades. Many different scientific disciplines have contributed to the understanding of entrepreneurship. The definitions, approaches, and results are so diverse that the concept of entrepreneurship may well have become a “catch-all” term (Davidson et al. 2001; OECD 2008). Despite this broad scope, the entrepreneurship literature has contributed a range of interesting theoretical and empirical results, which focus attention upon specific dimensions of how and why founders, teams, and firms act upon the process of entrepreneurship as well as more broadly within the economy and society. Numerous articles and handbooks have endeavored to define the field of entrepreneurship as a research field as well as to define the phenomena and the appropriate lines of enquiry for future research (Shane 2000; Shane & Venktaraman 2000; Carlsson et al. 2013; Landström et al. 2012; Venktaraman et al. 2012).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D., and Carlsson, B. 2009. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics January. 32(1): 1530.Google Scholar
AEGIS Research Project 2013 (Advancing Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship and Innovation for Economic Growth and Social Well-being in Europe), Grant Agreement number 225134) European Commission, DG Research, Brussels.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. S. 2009. Schumpeter’s Evolutionary Economics: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Engine of Capitalism. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., and Ray, S. 2003. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing 18: 105123.Google Scholar
Bull, I. and Willard, G. 1993. Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 8(3): 183195.Google Scholar
Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., and Tskanikas, A. (2015) Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship: Exploring a taxonomy based on the AEGIS survey, in Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M., and Radosevic, S. (eds.), Dynamics of Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Business Strategy and Public Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., and Tsakanikas, A. 2011. Final report summarizing survey methods and results. AEGIS – 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, Deliverable 7.1.5.Google Scholar
Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., and Ylinenpää, H. 2013. The Evolving Domain of Entrepreneurship Research. Small Business Economics 41: 913930.Google Scholar
Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., and Etzebarria, G. 1997. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy 26(4–5): 475491.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. Low, M. and Wright, M. 2001. Low and MacMillan ten years on: Achievements and future directions for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25(4):515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, J. and Shane, S. 2003. Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management 29 (3): 333349.Google Scholar
Holmén, M., Magnusson, M., and McKelvey, M. 2007. What are innovative opportunities? Industry and Innovation 14(1): 2745.Google Scholar
KEINS Research Project (Knowledge base entrepreneurship: Institutions, networks and systems, EU project n.CT2-CT-2004–506022) supported by European DG Research.Google Scholar
Klepper, S. 2015. Experimental Capitalism: The Nanoeconomics of American High-Tech Industries. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landström, H., Harirchi, G., and Åström, F. 2012. Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy 41(7): 11541181.Google Scholar
Ljungberg, D., McKelvey, M., and Lassen, A. H. 2012. Final report on case studies: Emerging trends, lessons and methodological issues. The AEGIS case study analysis. AEGIS – 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, Deliverable D7.2.3.Google Scholar
Lundvall, B. A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31(2): 247264.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. (ed.). 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F. 2010. Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and innovation systems in Europe, in Malerba, F. (ed.), Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship and Innovation Systems: Evidence from Europe. Abington; New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M., and Radosevic, S. (eds.). 2015. Dynamics of Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Business Strategy and Public Policy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F. and McKelvey, M. 2011. Conceptualizing knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship: Concepts and models. AEGIS – 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, Deliverable 1.1.1.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and McKelvey, M. 2015. Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship: Conceptual framework, in Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M., and Radosevic, S. (eds.), Dynamics of Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Business Strategy and Public Policy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and McKelvey, M. 2018. Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship: Integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics and innovation systems. Small Business Economics.Google Scholar
McKelvey, M. and Lassen, A. H. 2013a. Managing Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
McKelvey, M. and Lassen, A. H. 2013b. How Entrepreneurs Do What They Do: Case Studies of Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
McKelvey, M., Ljungberg, D. and Lassen, A. H., 2015. Structuring the process of knowledge intense entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of 86 case studies of ventures. In Malerba, et al 2015. Dynamics of Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S. 1998. Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S. and Foster, J. 2012 Economic emergence: An evolutionary economics perspective. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization 82(2–3): 420432.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. 1993. National Innovation Systems. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OECD (2008) Fostering entrepreneurship for innovation, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2008/5, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science 11(4): 448469.Google Scholar
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. 2002. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25: 217226.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1934. The theory of Economic Development.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1949. Economic theory and entrepreneurial History, in Change and the Entrepreneur. Postulates and Patterns for Entrepreneurial History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vaghely, I. P. and Julien, P.-A. 2010. Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing 25(1): 7386.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×