Intercultural Philosophy and Environmental Justice between Generations Indigenous, African, Asian, and Western Perspectives
Book contents
- Intercultural Philosophy and Environmental Justice between Generations
- Intercultural Philosophy and Environmental Justice between Generations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Indigenous Philosophies on Justice between Generations
- Part II Intergenerational Ethics in Dialogue with Confucianism and Daoism
- Part III Humanity Facing the Near Environmental Future
- Index
- References
Part III - Humanity Facing the Near Environmental Future
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2024
Book contents
- Intercultural Philosophy and Environmental Justice between Generations
- Intercultural Philosophy and Environmental Justice between Generations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Indigenous Philosophies on Justice between Generations
- Part II Intergenerational Ethics in Dialogue with Confucianism and Daoism
- Part III Humanity Facing the Near Environmental Future
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Intercultural Philosophy and Environmental Justice between GenerationsIndigenous, African, Asian, and Western Perspectives, pp. 165 - 222Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Bibliography
Anders, Günther. 2011. Die Zerstörung unserer Zukunft. Ein Lesebuch. Zürich: Diogenes.Google Scholar
Hara, Tamiki. 1973. Natsu-no-hana / Chinkonka [Summer Flowers / Requiem]. Tokyo: Kôdansha.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Legge, James, trans. 1968. The Sacred Books of China. The Texts of Confuciansm. Part 2163 of The LI KI, XI-XLVI. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Picht, Georg. 1969. Wahrheit – Vernunft – Verantwortung. Philosophische Studien [Truth – Reason – Responsibility. Philosophical Studies]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Watsuji, Tetsurô. 1962. Watsuji Tetsurô Zenshû [Collected Works of Tetsurô Watsuji], Vol. 9. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Watsuji, Tetsurô. 1996. Watsuji Tetsurô’s Rinrigaku. Ethics in Japan. Translated by Seisaku Yamamoto and Robert E. Carter. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Anderson, Kevin and Peters, Glen. 2016. “The Trouble with Negative Emissions.” Science 354, no. 6309: 182–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bostrom, Nick and Ćirković, Milan M., eds. 2008. Global Catastrophic Risks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrov, Radoslav, Hovi, Jon, Sprinz, Detlef F., Sælen, Håkon, and Underdal, Arild. 2019. “Institutional and Environmental Effectiveness: Will the Paris Agreement Work?” WIREs Climate Change 10: e583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Sue. and Kymlicka, Will. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, Piers M., Maycock, Amanda C., McKenna, Christine M. and Smith, Christopher J.. 2020. “Latest Climate Models Confirm Need for Urgent Mitigation.” Nature Climate Change 10: 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2004. “The Global Warming Tragedy and the Dangerous Illusion of the Kyoto Protocol.” Ethics & International Affairs 18, no. 1: 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2011a. A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Challenge of Climate Change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2011b. “Some Early Ethics of Geoengineering.” Environmental Values 20: 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2013. “The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering.” Political Science & Politics 46, no. 1: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2014. “A Call for a Global Constitutional Convention Focused on Future Generations.” Ethics & International Affairs 28, no. 3: 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2019. “Motivating (or Baby-Stepping Toward) A Global Constitutional Convention for Future Generations.” Environmental Ethics 41: 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2022a. “Is the Paris Climate Agreement Another Dangerous Illusion?” In Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Yearbook 2021, 157–174. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2022b. “On the Scope of Institutions for Future Generations.” Ethics and International Affairs 36, no. 2: 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2022c. “Environmentalizing Bioethics: Planetary Health in a Perfect Moral Storm.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 65, no. 4: 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2023a. “The Ethics of Climate Targets: Extinction Rebellion vs. the Climate Establishment.” In The Routledge Handbook on Applied Climate Ethics, ed. by Brown, Donald and Gwiazdon, Katy, 38–51. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2023b. “Climate Targets and Moral Corruption.” American Philosophical Association Public Philosophy Blog.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. and Weisbach, David A.. 2016. Debating Climate Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ord, Toby. 2021. The Precipice. Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. New York, NY: Hachette Books.Google Scholar
Robinson, Mary. 2008. “Foreword.” In Climate Change and Human Rights: A Rough Guide. Versoix: International Council on Human Rights, pp. iii–iv.Google Scholar
Shepherd, John et al. 2009. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
Spash, Clive. 2016. “This Changes Nothing: The Paris Agreement to Ignore Reality.” Globalizations 13, no. 6: 928–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiery, Wim, Lange, Stefan, Rogelj, Joeri, et al. 2021. “Intergenerational Inequities in Exposure to Climate Extremes.” Science 374, no. 6564: 158–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations. 2015. “Historic Paris Agreement on Climate Change: 195 Nations Set Path to Keep Temperature Rise Well Below 2 Degrees Celsius.” UN News. https://unfccc.int/news/finale-cop21.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). 2019. Emissions Gap Report 2019. www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2019.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary-General. 2013. Intergenerational Solidarity and the Needs of Future Generations. United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/756820#record-files-collapse-headerGoogle Scholar
Von Bulow, Michael. 2009. “Failure in Copenhagen is Not an Option.” COP Website. http://en.cop15.dk/news/view+news?newsid=2257 [no longer available].Google Scholar
Watene, Krushil. 2016. “Valuing Nature: Māori Philosophy and the Capability Approach.” Oxford Development Studies 44, no. 3: 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watene, Krushil. In press. “Kaitiakitanga: Toward an Intergenerational Philosophy.” In Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics, ed. by Gardiner, Stephen M.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whyte, Kyle Powys. In press. “Ancestry and Crisis: Intergenerational Ethics and Ecocentrism.” In Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics, ed. by Gardiner, Stephen M.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Yangyang and Ramanathen, Veerabhadran. 2017. “Well Below 2°C: Mitigation Strategies for Avoiding Dangerous to Catastrophic Climate Changes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences 114, no. 39: 10315–10323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibliography
Beckstead, Nicholas. 2013. On the Overwhelming Importance of Shaping the Far Future. PhD thesis, Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. C. 2016. Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, David. 2006. Better Never to Have Been. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, David. 2017. The Human Predicament: A Candid Guide to Life’s Biggest Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, Nick. 2013. “Existential Risk as a Global Priority.” Global Policy 4: 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, Nick and Cirkovic, Milan, (eds.). 2008. Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen and Powell, Russell. 2018. The Evolution of Moral Progress: A Biocultural Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caroti, Simone. 2011. The Generation Starship in Science Fiction: A Critical History 1934–2001. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. 2023. “Pessimism about the Future.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 46: 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2009. The Second-Person Standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 2013. “How the Afterlife Matters.” In Death and the Afterlife, edited by Scheffler, Samuel, 131–142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Elizabeth. 2004. “Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating?” Philosophical Perspectives 18: 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark. 2010. Surviving Death. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark. 2014. “Is Life a Ponzi Scheme?” Boston Review, 2 January 2014. www.bostonreview.net/articles/mark-johnston-samuel-scheffler-death-afterlife-humanity-ponzi-scheme/Google Scholar
Lear, Jonathan. 2008. Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Tim. 2011. Ethics for a Broken World: Reimagining Philosophy after Catastrophe. Montreal and Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Tim. 2014. “Ethics for Possible Futures.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114: 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Tim. 2017. “How Should Utilitarians Think about the Future?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47: 290–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Tim. 2018a. “Answering to Future People.” The Journal of Applied Philosophy 35: 532–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Tim. 2018b. “Moral Imaginativeness, Moral Creativity and Possible Futures.” In Creativity and Philosophy, edited by Gaut, Berys N. and Kieran, Matthew, 350–368. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Tim. 2019. “Corporate Agency and Possible Futures.” Journal of Business Ethics 154: 901–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulgan, Tim. 2020b. “What Exactly Is Wrong with Human Extinction?” In Proceedings of the International Society for Utilitarian Studies, edited by Schmidt-Petri, Christoph and Schefczyk, Michael, 267–283. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Ord, Toby. 2020. The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Melinda A. 2002. “A New Way of Doing the Best We Can: Person-based Consequentialism and the Equality Problem.” Ethics 112: 315–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2013. Death and the Afterlife. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2018. Why Worry about Future Generations? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, Joshua and Woods, Derek. 2021. Calamity Theory: Three Critiques of Existential Risk. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Lugt, Mara. 2021. Dark Matters: Pessimism and the Problem of Suffering. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Rivka. 2015. The Risk of a Lifetime: How, When, and Why Procreation May Be Permissible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Susan. 2013. “The Significance of Doomsday.” In Death and the Afterlife, edited by Scheffler, Samuel, 113–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar