Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:24:28.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Wanted – Dead or Alive

Realism in International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

By
Richard H. Steinberg
Edited by
Jeffrey L. Dunoff  and
Mark A. Pollack
Jeffrey L. Dunoff
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Mark A. Pollack
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

“Realism” is the theory international lawyers love to hate. Dozens of commentators have attacked realism or written its epitaph. Some commentators have even asked: is anybody still a realist? (Legro and Moravcsik 1999).

Many international law (IL) scholars challenge “realism” because most think it means that international law is epiphenomenal and so devoid of meaning – which could make their jobs irrelevant, wasteful, and quixotic. But they also seem to love realism – or a version of it – because the misunderstood and mischaracterized structural realist straw-man claim that “international law does not matter” serves for them as the perfect foil for arguments that international law is important. It is the null hypothesis that enables international lawyers to show that their argument and life's work does have meaning. So, in a sense, even those who hate “realism” actually love it – in the same way that prohibitionists hated alcohol, Joe McCarthy hated Communism, and family values conservatives hate pornography. What would they do without it?

Type
Chapter
Information
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations
The State of the Art
 , pp. 146 - 172
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W. (1993). “‘Trust But Verify’: The Production of Information in Arms Control Treaties and Other International Agreements,” Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. (1999). “International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 361–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan (2000). “Hard Law and Soft Law in International Governance,” International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1947). Summa Theologica, translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province (New York: Benziger Brothers).Google Scholar
Austin, John (1832). The Province of Justice Determined (London: John Murray, Albemarle Street).Google Scholar
Bauer, Raymond, de Sola Pool, Ithiel, and Dexter, Lewis Anthony (1963). American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade (New York: Atherton Press).Google Scholar
Bederman, David J. (2002). The Spirit of International Law (Athens: University of Georgia Press).Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A., and Gulati, G. Mitu (2010). “Withdrawing from International Custom,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 202–75.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen (2013). “Constructivism and International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 119–45.Google Scholar
Brunsson, Nils (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations (New York: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1966). “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach,” World Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 361–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric (2003). “Developing Countries and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” Journal of World Trade, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 719–35.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. (1946). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, Hillary, Chinkin, Christine, and Wright, Shelley (1991). “Feminist Approaches to International Law,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 613–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve (2002). “WTO Cosmopolitics,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 299–354.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1957). “The Concept of Power,” Behavioral Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 201–15.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Laura A. (2002). “Using Legal Process to Fight Terrorism: Detentions, Military Commissions, International Tribunals and the Rule of Law,” Southern California Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 6, pp. 1407–92.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Petern N. (1998). “Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A. (2013). “International Law and International Relations:Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and , Joel P. Trachtman, (1999). “Economic Analysis of International Law,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
Engle, Karen (2000). “Culture and Human Rights: The Asian Values Debate in Context,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 291–333.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. (1998). “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, , , James, and Wendt, Alexander (2002). “Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations Theory (London: Sage Publications), pp. 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, , , Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, , , Geoffrey, and Weingast, Barry R. (1993). “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market,” in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 173–206.Google Scholar
George, , , Alexander (1991). Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press).Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert (1981). War and Change in International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A. (2005). The Limits of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith L., and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.) (1993). Ideas & Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith L., Rivers, Douglas, and Tomz, Michael (2007). “Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade,” International Organization, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith L., and Steinberg, Richard H. (2008). “Negotiate or Litigate? The Effects of WTO Judicial Delegation on U.S. Trade Politics,” Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 257–82.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter (1978). “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 881–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Yeon Kim, Soo (2005). “An Exclusive Country Club: The Effects of the GATT on Trade, 1950–1994,” World Politics, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 453–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, J. (1996). “State Interests and International Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European Economic and Monetary Union,” Security Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 176–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, , , Hugo (1901). The Rights of War and Peace, Including the Law of Nature and of Nations, translated by A. M. Campbell (New York: M. Walter Dunne).Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd (2000). Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. (1992). “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone,” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis (1955). The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World).Google Scholar
Hazard, J. N. (1950). “The Soviet Union and International Law,” Soviet Studies, Vol. 1, pp. 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley (1971). “Weighing the Balance of Power,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 618–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell (1881). The Common Law (Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.).Google Scholar
Hughes, E. J. (1974). “Winston Churchill and the Formation of the United Nations Organization,” Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 9, No. 4, 177–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John (2000). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kagan, Donald (1974). The Archidamian War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D. (1998). “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,”International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 645–85.Google Scholar
Kelson, Hans (1942). Law and Peace in International Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Kennedy, David (1988). “International Law and the Nineteenth Century: History of an Illusion,” Quinnipiac Law Review, Vol. 19, pp. 99–136.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1983). “The Demand for International Regimes,” in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 325–55.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (forthcoming). “Stephen Krasner: Subversive Realist” in Finnemore, Martha and Goldstein, Judith (eds.), Power in the Contemporary Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph (1972). “Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction,” International Organization, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 329–49.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. (1969). American Business Abroad (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard B. (2005). “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law,” Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 15–61.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry (1973). A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822 (New York: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H. (2004). “International Law as Part of Our Law,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara (2013). “Institutionalism and International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan (2001). “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 761–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1976). “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 317–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1978). Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials, Investments, and U.S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1983a). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1983b). “Regimes and the Limits of Realism: Regimes as Autonomous Variables,” in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 355–68.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1991). “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier,” World Politics, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 336–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch (1946). “The Grotian Tradition in International Law,” The British Year Book of International Law, Vol. 23, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W., and Moravcsik, Andrew (1999). “Is Anybody Still a Realist?,” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 5–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissitzyn, O. J. (1952). “Recent Soviet Literature on International Law,” The American Slavic and East European Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 257–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1908). The Prince, translated by W. K. Marriott (London: J. M. Dent).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O. (1997). “World Society and the Nation State,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (1997). “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 513–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2013). “Liberal Theories of International Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 83–118.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1940). “Positivism, Functionalism and International Law,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 260–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1978). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th ed. (New York: Alfred Knopf).Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. (1994). “Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution Versus Information,” International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost, and Elsig, Manfred (2013). “The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 445–73.Google Scholar
Platias, Athanasios, and Koliopoulos, Constantinos (2010). Thucydides on Strategy: Grand Strategies in the Peloponnesian War and Their Relevance Today (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. (forthcoming). “Theorizing the European Union: Realist, Intergovernmentalist and Institutionalist Approaches,” in Jones, Erik, Menon, Anand, and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (New York: Oxford University Press).
Popper, Karl (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe (1921). The Spirit of the Common Law (Francestown, NH: Marshall Jones Company).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert (1988). “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 427–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal (2013). “Institutional Proliferation and the International Legal Order,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 293–320.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David (1998). “Conclusions,” in Raustiala, Kal, Victor, David G., and Skolkinoff, Eugene V. (eds.), The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 659–707.Google Scholar
Riches, Cromwell A. (1940). Majority Rule in International Organization (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).Google Scholar
Rose, Gideon (1998). “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 144–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward W. (1978). Orientalism (New York: Pantheon).Google Scholar
Sattler, Thomas, and Bernauer, Thomas (2011). “Gravitation or Discrimination? Determinants of Litigation in the World Trade Organization,” European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 143–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C. and Pollack, Mark A. (2013). “Hard Law and Soft Law,” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 197–222.Google Scholar
Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter J. (2010). Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, Bruno, and Paulus, Andreas L. (1999). “The Responsibility of Individuals for Himan Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 302–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth (2011). “The Global Diffusion of Law: Transnational Crime and the Case of Human Trafficking,” in American Political Science Association (APSA), 2011 Annual Meeting (Washington, DC: APSA), available at SSRN: .
Slaughter Burley, Ann-Marie (1993). “International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 205–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter Burley, Ann-Marie (2004). A New World Order: Government Networks and the Disaggregated State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur (1983). “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World,” in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 115–40.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. (2002). “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO,” International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 339–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. (2004a). “Who Is Sovereign?,” Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 329–45.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. (2004b). “Judicial Law-Making at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 613–45.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. (forthcoming). “International Trade Law as a Mechanism for State Transformation,” in Finnemore, Martha and Goldstein, Judith (eds.), Power in the Contemporary Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Sunstein, Cass S. (1996). Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Thucydides, (1954). History of the Peloponnesian War, translated by Rex Warner (New York: Penguin Classics).Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond (1971). Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, translated by A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1992). “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. (2008). “Realism,” in Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 131–49.Google Scholar
Zamora, Stephen (1980). “Voting in International Economic Organizations,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 566–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×