Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T05:04:17.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - US youth justice policy transfer in Canada: we'll take the symbols but not the substance

from PART 2 - Comparative penal policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2011

Jane B. Sprott
Affiliation:
Ryerson University
Adam Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

Introduction

On an average day in 1997 there were 4,687 youths in custodial facilities in Canada (a rate of 192.13 per 100,000) and by 2005–6 there were 1,987 (a rate of 77.42 per 100,000). Canada has a rather lengthy history of being concerned about the overuse of custody for youths and has struggled for some time to reduce it. In 1965 a government committee released the first report on youth justice and noted great concern about the use of court and custody for minor offences (Department of Justice 1965). Since then, most government reports have reiterated those concerns. However, during the late 1980s onwards the Canadian public became increasingly concerned about crime and wanted the government to ‘toughen-up’ the youth justice system. The government was therefore in a difficult position – for political reasons it felt that it should respond to the public, but there were also the persistent concerns that custody was actually being overused. How Canada managed to reduce the use of imprisonment for youths during an era where there was considerable pressure from the public to ‘toughen-up’ the youth justice system is the focus of this chapter. More generally, this chapter uses Canada's youth justice reforms to explore the limits of policy convergence and policy transfer between Canada and the USA. Youth justice policy in Canada appears to be driven more by social, political and cultural specificities and less by simple policy transfer from the USA.

Type
Chapter
Information
International and Comparative Criminal Justice and Urban Governance
Convergence and Divergence in Global, National and Local Settings
, pp. 331 - 355
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bottoms, A. (1995) ‘Philosophy and politics of sentencing’ in Clarkson, C. and Morgan, R. (eds.), Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 17–49.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. (2000) ‘Politics and public servants: observations on the current state of criminal law reform’, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 341–54.Google Scholar
,Department of Justice (1965) Juvenile Delinquency in Canada: The Report of the Department of Justice Committee on Juvenile Delinquency, Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
,Department of Justice (1999) Minister of Justice Introduces New Youth Justice Law, Press release, March 11. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada.Google Scholar
,Department of Justice (2008) Statement from the Minister of Justice concerning the Supreme Court of Canada's decision on R. v. D.B., 16 May, http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/news-nouv/nr-cp/2008/doc_32255.html.
Doob, A. N. (2001) Youth Court Judges' Views of the Youth Justice System: The Results of a Survey, Ottawa: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Doob, A. N. and Sprott, J. B. (2004) ‘Youth justice in Canada’ in Tonry, M. and Doob, A. (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of the Research, vol. 31, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 185–242.Google Scholar
,Federal–Provincial–Territorial Task Force on Youth Justice (1996) A Review of the Young Offenders Act and the Youth Justice System in Canada, Ottawa: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Giles, C. and Jackson, M. (2003) ‘Bill C-7: the new Youth Criminal Justice Act: a darker Young Offenders Act?’, International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 27(1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, A. von (1976) Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments, New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Hogeveen, B. (2005) ‘If we are tough on crime, if we punish crime, then people get the message: constructing and governing the punishable young offender in Canada during the late 1990s', Punishment and Society, 7(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. and Newburn, T. (2007) Policy Transfer and Criminal Justice: Exploring US Influence over British Crime Control Policy, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, P., Merrigan, P. and Verstraete, M. (2008) ‘Dynamic labour supply effects of childcare subsidies: evidence from a Canadian natural experiment on low-fee universal child care’, 6 October 2008, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279674.
Newburn, T. and Jones, T. (2005) ‘Symbolic politics and penal populism: the long shadow of Willie Horton’, Crime Media Culture, 1(1), 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newburn, T. and Sparks, R. (2004) ‘Criminal justice and political cultures’ in Newburn, T. and Sparks, R. (eds.), Criminal Justice and Political Cultures: National and International Dimensions of Crime Control, Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (2001) ‘Convergence: the useful myth?’, Public Administration, 79(4), 933–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprott, J. B. and Doob, A. N. (1998) ‘One law, ten outcomes: imprisonment in Canada’, Overcrowded Times, 9(4), 1–9.Google Scholar
Sprott, J. B. and Doob, A. N. (2006) Understanding Trends in the Use of Youth Court and in the Use of Custody under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, Ottawa: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Sprott, J. B. and Snyder, H. N. (1999) ‘Youth crime in the U.S. and Canada, 1991 to 1996’, Overcrowded Times, 10(5), 1, 12–19.Google Scholar
,Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs (1997) Reviewing Youth Justice, Shaughnessy Cohen, M.P., Chair, Thirteenth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, House of Commons, Ottawa: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (2007) ‘Determinants of penal policies’ in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime, Punishment, and Politics in Comparative Perspective: Crime and Justice: A Review of the Research, vol. 36, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Trépanier, J. (1983) ‘The Quebec Youth Protection Act: institutionalized diversion’ in Corrado, R. R., Blanc, M. and Trépanier, J. (eds.), Current Issues in Juvenile Justice, Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Trépanier, J. (2004) ‘What did Quebec not want? Opposition to the adoption of the Youth Criminal Justice Act in Quebec’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46(3), 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C. M. and Doob, A. N. (2007) ‘Punitive trends and stable imprisonment rates in Canada’ in Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime, Punishment, and Politics in Comparative Perspective: Crime and Justice: A Review of the Research, vol. 36, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 297–369.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×