Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T02:25:34.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

I. William Zartman
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Saadia Touval
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
International Cooperation
The Extents and Limits of Multilateralism
, pp. 238 - 265
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Dominic and Hogg, Michael A.. 1990. An Introduction to the Social Identity Approach. In Abrams, and Hogg, , eds., Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Aggarwal, Vinod K. 1996. Debt Games: Strategic Interaction in International Debt Rescheduling. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albin, Cecilia. 2001. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Dollar, David. 2000. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5: 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Gerard. 2004. The Authoritarian Illusion. The National Interest, fall: 79–83.
Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ambrosio, Thomas. 2005. The Russo-American Dispute over the Invasion of Iraq: International Status and the Role of Positional Goods. Europe-Asia Studies, 57 (8): 1189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Arbatov, Alexei. 2007. Is a New World War Imminent? Russia in Global Affairs, July–September, available at http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/numbers/20/1130/html.
Arneil, Barbara. 1996. John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, Leon. 2002. Russia's Choice. Russian Outlook, winter, available at www.aeg.org/publication13639/.
Aron, Leon. 2006. The United States and Russia: Ideologies, Policies, and Relations. Russian Outlook, summer, available at www.aei.org/publications/pubID.24606/pub_detail.asp.
Arrow, Kenneth. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Art, Robert J. 2003. A Grand Strategy for America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Artlow, Joshua P. 2008. At Brazil Conference, G–20 Urges Swifter Action on Financial Crisis. Washington Post, 10 November, available at www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/09/AR2008110902499.html.
Avenhaus, Rudolf. 2007. Nash's Bargaining Solution. PINPoints, 29: 7–9.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration, Princeton Studies in Complexity. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert and Keohane, Robert O.. 1986. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and institutions. In Oye, Kenneth A., ed., Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton University Press, 226–54.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert and Hamilton, W. D.. 1981. The Evolution of Cooperation. Science, 211: 1390–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Axtell, Robert. 2000. Why Agents? On the Varied Motivations for Agent Computing in the Social Sciences. Working Paper Series. Washington, DC: Center on Social and Economic Dynamics.Google Scholar
Axtell, Robert, Axelrod, Robert, Epstein, Joshua, and Cohen, Michael. 1996. Aligning Simulation Models: A Case Study and Results. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1: 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badkhen, Anna. 2005. US, Russia Descend into Mutual Distrust; Divisions Threaten Anti-Terror Efforts. San Francisco Chronicle, July 21.
Baker, James. 1999. The Road to Madrid. In Crocker, Chester, Hampson, Fen Osler, and Aall, Pamela, eds., Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith M. 1990. Inventing the French Revolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David A., ed. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barry, Dave. 1984. Macho Diplomacy: Maybe US Foreign Policy Needs the Feminine Touch. Boston Globe, May 30: 57.Google Scholar
Bernard, Jessie. 1949. American Community Behavior. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
Bernard, Jessie. 1957. The Sociological Study of Conflict. In Bernard, et al., The Nature of Conflict. New York: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard and Munro, Ross H.. 1997. The Coming Conflict with China. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Berthélemy, Jean-Claude. 2005 Bilateral Donors' Interest vs. Recipients' Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same?Review of Development Economics, 10 (2): 179–95.Google Scholar
Bijian, Zheng. 2005. China's “Peaceful Rise” to Great-Power Status. Foreign Affairs, 84 (5): 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Ken. 1997. Book Review of Robert Axelrod's The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), http://iasss.soc.survey.ac.uk/1/1/2.html.Google Scholar
Birdsall, Nancy, Claessens, Stijn, and Diwan, Ishac. 2003. Policy Selectivity Forgone: Debt and Donor Behavior in Africa. World Bank Economic Review, 17 (3): 409–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. L. 2004. Vladimir Putin and the New World Order. Looking East, Looking West?Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Blechman, Barry M. 1996. Emerging from the Intervention Dilemma. In Crocker, Chester A., Hampson, Fen Osler, and Pamela, Aall, eds., Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 287–96.Google Scholar
Bloom, Bridget. 1966. Unpublished paper, NISER, August 25.
Bornstein, Gary, Mingelgrin, Danny, and Rutte, Christel. 1996. The Effects of Within-group Communication on Group Decision and Individual Choice in the Assurance and Chicken Team Games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40: 486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, Gary, Budescu, David, and Zamir, Shmuel. 1997. Cooperation in Intergroup, N-person, and Two-person Games of Chicken. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41: 384–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David. 1998. Political Theories of International Relations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y. and Hill, P.. 1982. Intergroup Perceptions in Higher Education: A Field Study. In Tajfel, Henri, ed., Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel. 2006. Group Competition, Reproductive Leveling, and the Evolution of Human Altruism. Science, 314: 1569–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert. 2003. Origins of Human Cooperation. In Peter, Hammerstein, ed., The Genetic and Cultural Origins of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert. 2006. The Puzzle of Human Sociality. Science, 214 (Dec. 8).Google Scholar
Bradford, Colin and Linn, Johannes. 2007. Policy Briefing #163: Reform of Global Governance: Priorities for Action. Brookings Institute, available at www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2007/10global%20governance/pb163.pdf.
Brams, Steven J. 1975. Game Theory and Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. 1985. Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J. 1990. Negotiation Games. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J. 1994. Theory of Moves. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. and Kilgour, D.Marc. 1987. Winding Down if Preemption or Escalation Occurs: A Game-Theoretic Analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31: 547–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J., Kilgour, D. Marc, and Sanver, M. Renzi. 2007. A Minimax Procedure for Negotiating Multilateral Treaties. In Avenhaus, Rudolf and Zartman, I. William, eds., Diplomacy Games: Formal Models and International Negotiations. Springer.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2002. American Primacy in Perspective. Foreign Affairs 81 (4): 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2005a. Hard Times for Soft Balancing. International Security 30 (1): 72–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2005b. International Relations Theory and the Case against Unilateralism. Perspectives on Politics 3 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Chris. 2002. Sovereignty, Rights and Justice: International Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael E., Coté, Owen R., Jr., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., eds. 2000. America's Strategic Choices. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, Rupert J. and Ross, Gordon F.. 1982. The Battle for Acceptance: An Investigation into the Dynamics of Intergroup Behavior. In Henri, Tajfel, ed., Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press, 155–78.Google Scholar
Brown, Seyom. 2008. Higher Realism: A New Foreign Policy for the United States. Paradigm.
Brown, Seyom. 2009. Adapting to the Evolving Polyarchy, In Zartman, I. William, ed., Imbalance of Power: The Post-bipolar System of World Order. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner.Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 2004. The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan. 2004 Conciliation, Counterterrorism, and Patterns of Terrorist Violence. International Organization, 59 (1): 145–76.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David. 2000. Aid, Policies and Growth. American Economic Review XC, 4: 847–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. Michael and Nolte, Georg, eds. 2003. United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Calleo, David P. 1987. Beyond American Hegemony: The Future of the Western Alliance. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. D. 1971. Adam Smith's Science of Morals. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James A. 1993. International Relations Theory and Multilateralism. In Ruggie, J. G., ed., Multilateralism Matters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1997. Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2001a. Agent-Based Modeling in Political Science. Political Methodologist, 10 (1):16–22.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2001b. Modeling the Democratic Peace as a Kantian Selection Process. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45: 470–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2005. Computational Models of Social Forms: Advancing Generative Macro Theory. American Journal of Sociology, 110 (4): 864–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. 1995. Structure, Institutions, and Process: Russia's Changing Foreign Policy. In Adeed, Dawisha and Karen, Dawisha, eds., The Making of Foreign Policy in Russia and the New States of Eurasia. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
,Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. 2006. US Role in the World: Multilateral Cooperation and International Institutions, available at http://worldpublicopinion.org.
Chiu, Daniel Y. 2003. International Alliances in the Power Cycle Theory of State Behavior. International Political Science Review, 24 (1): 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. K. and Bowles, S., 2007. The Coevolution of Parochial Altruism and War. Science, 318: 636–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, Thomas J. 1999. China, the US–Japan Alliance, and the Security Dilemma in East Asia. International Security, 23 (4): 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J. 2002. The Contemporary Security Dilemma: Deterring a Taiwan Conflict. Washington Quarterly, 25 (4): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, Amy. 2007. Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – and Why They Fail. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 1989. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2005. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clément, Sophia. 2003. The United States and NATO: A Selective Approach to Multilateralism. In Malone, David M. and Khong, Yuen Foong, eds., Unilateralism and US Foreign Policy: International Perspectives. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 399–420.Google Scholar
Clements, K. C. and Stephens, D. W.. 1995. Mutualism and the Prisoner's Dilemma. Animal Behavior, 50: 527–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clough, Emily. 2001. Computational Modeling from a Graduate Student Perspective. Political Methodologist, 10 (1): 26–28.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael, Riolo, Rick L., and Robert, Axelrod. 1999. The Emergence of Social Organization in the Prisoner's Dilemma: How Context-Preservation and other Factors Promote Cooperation. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael, Riolo, Rick L., and Robert, Axelrod. 2001. The Role of Social Structure in the Maintenance of Cooperative Regimes. Rationality and Society, 13 (1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coicaud, Jean-Marc. 2001. Legitimacy, Socialization and Social Change. In Kupchan, C. et al., eds., Power in Transition: The Peaceful Change of International Order. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 68–100.Google Scholar
Collins, Nancy. 1995. A Legacy of Strength and Love [interview with President Clinton]. Good Housekeeping, 221 (5): 113–15.Google Scholar
,Commission on Human Security. 2003. Human Security Now: Protecting and Empowering People, final report, New York.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. 1988 [1819]. Political Writings, ed. Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conybeare, John. 1986. Trade wars: A Comparative Study of Anglo-Hanse, Franco-Italian, and Hawley-Smoot conflicts. In Oye, Kenneth A., ed., Cooperation Under Anarchy, Princeton University Press, 147–72.Google Scholar
Conybeare, John. 1987. Trade Wars: The Theory and Practice of International Commercial Rivalry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew F. 1995. In Search of Niches: Saying “Yes” and Saying “No” in Canada's International Relations. Canadian Foreign Policy, Winter: 1–14.
Coser, Lewis, 1956. The Social Functions of Conflict. New York: Free.Google Scholar
,Council on Foreign and Defense Policy (Russia). 2000. Strategiya dlya Rosii: Povestka Dnya dlya Presidenta-2000 [The Strategy for Russia. The Agenda for the President-2000] Moscow: Vagrius.Google Scholar
,Council on Foreign Relations. 2007. US–China Relations: An Affirmative Agenda, A Responsible Course, available at www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/ChinaTaskForce.pdf.
Cox, Robert W., ed. 1997. The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.CrossRef
Crane, David. 2008. Paul Martin's Prescient Idea Takes Hold. Embassy, November 12, available at www.embassymag.ca/page/view/crane-11–12–2008.
Crocker, Chester A. 1992. High Noon in Southern Africa. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralph and Garten Ash, Timothy. 2003. L'Europe et l'Amérique que nous voulons. Le Monde, September 7, available at http://watch.windsofchange.net/themes_62.htm.
Dawisha, Karen and Parrott, Bruce. 1994. Russia and the New States of Eurasia. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Jeffrey S., Gumerman, George J., Epstein, Joshua M., Axtell, Robert, and Swedlund, Allan C.. 1998. Understanding Anasazi Culture Change through Agent-Based Modeling. Working paper. Santa Fe: Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
Callières, François. 2005 [1716]. On the Manner of Negotiating with Sovereigns. Washington: Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Felice, F. B. 1976 [1778]. Negotiations, or the Art of Negotiating. In William Zartman, I., ed. The 50% Solution. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Deng, Yong and Moore, Thomas G.. 2004. China Views Globalization: Toward a New Great Power Politics? Washington Quarterly, 27 (3): 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, Russ and Solomon, Rachael. 2004. Bush's Multilateralism. Chronicle Online, September 21, available at www.chronicle.duke.edu/vnews/display.v/ART/2004/09/21/415017b0e507.
Denver Post. 2008. Reform Pledged at Summit. 15 November, available at www.denverpost.com/newsheadlines/ci_10993435.
Deutsch, Karl W. et al. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Waal, F. B. M. 1992. Chimpanzee Politics. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Dobriansky, Paula J. 2000. Russian Foreign Policy: Promise or Peril?Washington Quarterly, 23 (1): 135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, Charles F. 1991. Systems in Crisis: New Imperatives of High Politics at Century's End. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, Charles F. 2000. Confronting the Principles of the Power Cycle: Changing Systems Structure, Expectations, and War. In Midlarsky, Manus I., ed., Handbook of War Studies II. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Doran, Charles F. 2001. Why Canadian Unity Matters and Why Americans Care: Democratic Pluralism at Risk. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, Charles F. and Parsons, Wes. 1980. War and the Cycle of Relative Power. American Political Science Review, 74 (4): 947–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Siverson, Randolph M.. 1986. Arms Races and Cooperation. In Oye, Kenneth A., ed., Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton University Press, 118–46.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter. 2003. When the Weak Bargain With the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization. International Negotiation, 8 (1): 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresner, Daniel W. 2008. The Future of US Foreign Policy. Internationale Politik und Gessellschaft, 1: 11–35.Google Scholar
Dudley, Leonard and Montmarquette, Claude. 1976. A Model of the Supply of Bilateral Foreign Aid. American Economic Review, 66 (1): 132–42.Google Scholar
Dueck, Colin. 2004. New Perspectives on American Grand Strategy. International Security, 28 (4): 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, A. 1984. Grotius et le droit naturel du dix-septième siècle. In ,Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, ed., The World of Hugo Grotius (1583–1645). Amsterdam: Holland University Press, 15–41.Google Scholar
Dufour, A. 2003. Economics, Philosophy of History, and the “Single Dynamic” of Power Cycle Theory: Expectations, Competition and Statecraft. International Political Science Review, 24 (1): 13–49.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. 1997. Cooperation among Animals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dutt, Sagarika. 2002. UNESCO and a Just World Order. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Dyer, Geoff. 2008. China lectures US on economy. Financial Times, December 4, available at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/48ac15fc-c1bc-11dd-831e-000077b07658.html.
East, Maurice A. 1972. Status Discrepancy and Violence in the International System: An Empirical Analysis. In Rosenau, James N., Davis, Vincent, and East, Maurice A., eds., The Analysis of International Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Easterly, William, 2001. Growth Implosions, Debt Explosions, and My Aunt Marilyn: Do Growth Slowdowns Cause Public Debt Crises? Policy Research Working Paper 2531. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
The Economist. 2004. The Bush Presidency: Je ne regrette rien. August 26.
Ellemers, Naomi and Rijswijk, Wendy. 1997. Identity Needs Versus Social Opportunities: The Use of Group-Level and Individual-Level Identity Management Strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60 (1): 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi, Knippenberg, Ad, and Wilke, Henk. 1990. The Influence of Permeability of Group Boundaries and Stability of Group Status on Strategies of Individual Mobility and Social Change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 233–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellemers, Naomi, Wilke, Henk, and Knippenberg, Ad. 1993. Effects of the Legitimacy of Low Group or Individual Status on Individual and Collective Status-Enhancement Strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (5): 766–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi, Rijswijk, Wendy, Roefs, Marlene, and Simons, Catrien. 1997. Bias in Intergroup Perceptions: Balancing Group Identity with Social Reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23 (2): 186–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1998. A Plea for Mechanisms. In Swedberg, R., ed., Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enderlin, Charles. 2002. Le rêve brisé. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Epstein, Joshua, and Axtell, Robert. 1996. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. 1990. Cooperation Theory and Disarmament Negotiations in the 1950s. World Politics, 42: 502–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth and Sahnoun, Mohamed, eds. 2001. The Responsibilty to Protect. Ottawa: International Commission on State Sovereignty.
Fearon, James D. 1995. Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41 (1): 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Richard. 2008. Voluntary Multilateralism and institutional Modification: The First Two Decades of Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). Review of International Organizations, 3 (3): 239–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, David M. 2000. China Reconsiders Its National Security: The Great Peace and Development Debate of 1999. Alexandria, VA: CAN Corporation.Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger and Ury, William. 1982. Getting to Yes. New York: Houghton & Mifflin.Google Scholar
,Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. 2000. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, July 11.
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fravel, M. Taylor. 2008. China's Search for Military Power. Washington Quarterly, 31 (3): 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew, and Maskin, Eric. 1990. Evolution and Cooperation in Noisy Repeated Games. American Economic Review, 80 (2): 274–79.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. 2005. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of American National Security Policy During the Cold War, rev. and expanded ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallucci, Robert, Wit, Joel, and Poneman, Daniel. 2005. Going Critical: The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Galtung, J. 1964. A Structural Theory of Aggression. Journal of Peace Research, 1 (2): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellman, Barton. 1998. US and China Nearly Came to Blows in 1996. Washington Post, 21 June: A1.
George, Alexander L., Farley, Philip J., and Dallin, Alexander, eds. 1988. US–Soviet Security Cooperation: Achievements, Failures, Lessons. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gibson, Neil. 2006. The Shanghai Communiqué. Washington, DC: SAIS-The Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Gill, Bates. 2005. China's Evolving Regional Security Strategy. In Shambaugh, David, ed., Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. 1997. The Security Dilemma Revisited. World Politics, 50: 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennon, Michael J. 2003. Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Intervention after Kosovo. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldgeier, James M. and McFaul, Michael. 2003. Power and Purpose: US Policy toward Russia after the Cold War. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Avery. 2001. The Diplomatic Face of China's Grand Strategy: A Rising Power's Emerging Choice. China Quarterly, 168: 835–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Avery. 2005. Rising to the Challenge: China's Grand Strategy and International Security. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 1995. Great Power Cooperation under Conditions of Limited Reciprocity: From Empirical to Formal Analysis. International Studies Quarterly, 39: 453–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. and Freeman, John R. 1990. Three-Way Street: Strategic Reciprocity in World Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Charles with Valasek, Tomas. 2007. Preparing for the Multipolar World: European Foreign and Security Policy in 2020. London: Centre for European Reform.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization, 42: 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, H. 1925 [1625]. De Jure Belli ac Pacis, ed. Scott, James Brown, trans. Kelsey, Francis W.. Classics of International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gunaratana, Rohan. 2002. Inside Al Quaeda: Global Network of Terror. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gvosdev, Nikolas K. and Simes, Dimitri K.. 2005. Rejecting Russia? National Interest, Summer.
Haakonssen, Knud. 1983. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 1996. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy. From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1966. International Integration: The European and the Universal Process in International Political Communities. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Haass, Richard N. 1997. The Reluctant Sheriff: The United States after the Cold War. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haftendorn, Helga. 2006. German Ostpolitik in a Mutilateral Setting. In Haftendorn, Helga, Soutou, Georges-Henri, Szabo, Stephen, and Wells, Jr. Samuel, eds., The Strategic Triangle: France, Germany and the US in the Shaping of the New Europe. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The Genetic Evolution of Social Behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerstein, Peter. 2003. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hampson, Fen Osler and Flanagan, Stephen, eds. 1986. Securing Europe's Future: Changing Elements of European Security. Boston, MA: Auburn House.
Hampson, Fen Osler. 1995. Multilateral Negotiations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hampson, Fen Osler with Reid, Holly. 2003. Coalition Diversity and Normative Legitimacy in Human Security Negotiations. International Negotiation, 8 (1): 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanrieder, Wolfram 1989. Two Decades of German Foreign Policy. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1982. Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Harles, John. 2008. Health Care. In David, Thomas and Barbara Boyle, Torrey, eds., Canada and the United States: Differences that Count, 3rd ed. Peterborough: Broadview.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter and Rittberger, Volker. 1997. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinbecker, Paul. 2004. Washington's Exceptionalism and the United Nations. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 10 (3): 273–80.Google Scholar
Held, David, McGrew, Anthony G., Glodblatt, David, and Perraton, Jonathan. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Culture. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hemmer, Christopher and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2002. Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization, 56 (3): 575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1996 [1651]. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1998. World Disorders: Troubled Peace in the Post-Cold War Era. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Höglund, Christine. 2010. Tactics in Negotiations between States and Extremists. In Zartman, I. William and Faure, Guy Olivier, eds, Engaging Extremists. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Holbrooke, Richard. 1998. To End a War. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Holzgrefe, L. and Keohane, Robert O., eds. 2003. Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Homans, G. C. 1961. Social behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. 2005. Jealousy of Trade. International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, eds. 1983. Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Origins of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopmann, P. Terrence. 1996. The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflicts. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hopmann, P. Terrence. 2001. Bargaining and Problem-Solving: Two Perspectives on International Negotiation. In Crocker, Chester A., Hampson, Fen Osler, and Aall, Pamela, eds., Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International ConflictWashington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press, 445–68.Google Scholar
Howard, Nigel. 1971. Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1985 [1742]. Of the Balance of Power. In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 1998–99. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order. International Security, 23 (3): 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikle, Fred Charles, 1964. How Nations Negotiate. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Inosemtsev, Vladislav and Karaganov, Sergei. 2005. Imperialism of the Fittest. National Interest, summer: 74–81.
Jackson, Linda A., Sullivan, Linda A., Harnish, Richard, and Hodge, Carole N.. 1996. Achieving Positive Social Identity: Social Mobility, Social Creativity, and Permeability of Group Boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (2): 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Patrick and Lui, Hebron. 1997. Great Powers: Cycles of Relative Cabability and Crises in World Politics. International Interactions, 23: 145–73.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30: 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1982. Security Regimes. International Organization, 36: 357–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1988. Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation. World Politics, 40: 317–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Job, Brian. 1997. Multilateralism: The Relevance of the Concept to Regional Conflict Management. In Lake, David and Morgan, Patrick, eds., Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Joffe, Josef. 2006. Überpower: The Imperial Temptation of America. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
,Johnson's Russia List. 2008. 177, September 30.
Johnston, Alastair Iain and Evans, Paul. 1999. China's Engagement with Multilateral Security Institutions. In Johnston, and Ross, Robert S. eds. Engaging China the Management of an Emerging Power. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, Edward E. 1998. Major Developments in Five Decades of Social Psychology. In Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner, eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill (repr. from 1985 ed.), I, 3–57.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 2004. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Random House, Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1992. Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers. International Organization, 46: 681–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1993. Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers. In Ruggie, J. G., ed., Multilateralism Matters. New York: Columbia University Press, 295–326.Google Scholar
Kahn, Herman. 1965. On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Karl. 2007. However, There Is Something New in the West. Internationale Politik, 62 (7–8): 120–21.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary, Martin, Mary, and Selchow, Sabine. 2007. Human Security: A New Strategic Narrative for Europe. International Affairs, 83: 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Thomas. 2006. Theoretical Roots of US Foreign Policy: Machiavelli and American Unilateralism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kanet, Roger and Kolodziej, Edward, eds. 1991. The Cold War as Cooperation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRef
Kant, I. 1991. Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karaganov, Sergei. 2007. Cold Peace is More Dangerous than Cold War. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, March 7, available at www.rg.ru/2007/03/07/karaganov.html.
Kaul, Inge, Conceicão, Pedro, Goulven, Ketell, and Mendoza, Ronald U., eds. 2003. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Gloablization. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Kautilya, . 1960. Arthasastra. Mysore Publishing House.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society. Grotius Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegley, Charles W., and Raymond, Gregory A.. 2002. Exorcising the Ghost of Westphalia: Building World Order in the New Millennium. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2004. International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization, 58 (3): 425–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David. 1986. Primitive Legal Scholarship. Harvard International Law Journal, 27: 1–98.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1983. The Demand for International Regimes. In Krasner, Stephen D., ed., International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Reciprocity in International Relations. International Organization, 40: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2002. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Joseph, Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Jr Joseph S.. 2000. Introduction. In Nye, and Donahue, John D., eds., Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington, DC: Brookings, 1–44.Google Scholar
Kessler, Glenn. 2005. US, China Agree to Regular Talks. Washington Post, April 8: A14.
Khong, Yuen Foong. 2001. Negotiating “Order” During Power Transitions. In Kupchan, C. et al., eds., Power in Transition: The Peaceful Change of International Order. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 39–44.Google Scholar
Kim, Samuel S. 2003. China's Path to Great Power Status in the Globalization Era. Asian Perspective, 27 (1): 35–75.Google Scholar
Kimball, Warren F. 1991. The Juggler: Franklin Roosevelt as Wartime Statesman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kirton, John J. and Radoslava, Stefanova, eds. 2004. The G8, the United Nations and Conflict Prevention. London: Ashgate.
Kissinger, Henry. 1961. The Necessity for Choice – Prospects of American Foreign Policy. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1979. The White House Years. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A. and Shultz, George P.. 2008. Building on Common Ground with Russia. Washington Post, October 8.
Knippenberg, Ad. 1984. Intergroup Differences in Group Perceptions. In Tajfel, Henri, ed., The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knippenberg, Ad and Naomi, Ellemers. 1993. Strategies in Intergroup Relations. In Hogg, Michael A. and Dominic, Abrams, eds., Group Motivation: Social Psychological Perspectives. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert. 2000. La bonne foi en droit international public: contribution à l'étude des principes généraux de droit. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komorita, S. S., Hilty, J. A., and Parks, C. D.. 1991. Reciprocity and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35: 494–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauthammer, Charles. 2002. American Unilateralism, Hillsdale College Churchill Dinner, Mayflower Hotel, Washington, DC, December 4.
Kuglanski, A. W. and Higgins, E. T., eds. 1996. Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles. New York: Guilford.
Kupchan, Charles A. 1998. After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity. International Security 23 (2): 40–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A., Adler, Emanuel, Coicaud, Jean-Marc, and Khong, Yuen Foong, eds. 2001. Power in Transition: The Peaceful Change of International Order. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Kydd, Andrew and Duncan, Snidal. 1993. Progress in Game-Theoretical Analysis of International Regimes. In Rittberger, Volker, ed., Regime Theory and International Relations, New York: Oxford University Press, 112–35.Google Scholar
Lalonde, Richard N. 1992. The Dynamics of Group Differentiation in the Face of Defeat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (3): 336–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalonde, R. N. and Silverman, R. A.. 1994. Behavioral Preferences in Response to Social Injustice: The Effects of Group Permeability and Social Identity Salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66: 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampton, David M. 2001. Same Bed, Different Dreams: Managing US–China Relations, 1989–2000. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lampton, David M. 2005. China's Rise in Asia Need Not Be at America's Expense. In Shambaugh, David, ed., Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 306–26.Google Scholar
Lampton, David M. and Richard, Daniel Ewing. 2003. The US–China Relationship Facing International Security Crises: Three Case Studies in Post-9/11 Bilateral Relations. Washington, DC: Nixon Center.Google Scholar
Langlois, Jean-Pierre P. 1991. Rational Deterrence and Crisis Stability. American Journal of Political Science, 35: 801–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, Walter. 1999. The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. 1992. L'invention de l'économie au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. 1999. Le stoïcisme dans les œuvres de jeunesse de Montesquieu. In Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine, ed., Montesquieu. Les années de formation (1689–1720). Naples: Liguori Editore, 163–83.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. 2001. Montesquieu on Economics and Commerce. In Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A. and Rahe, Paul, eds., Montesquieu's Science of Politics. Essays on The Spirit of the Laws. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 335–73.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch. 1988. The Psychology of Reciprocity in International Relations. Negotiation Journal, 4: 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch and Alexei, Shevchenko. 2003. Shortcut to Greatness: The New Thinking and the Revolution in Soviet Foreign Policy. International Organization, 57 (1): 77–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. J. and Young, G. A.. 1975. Coalition Formation: An Integrative Model. Sociometry, 38 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Susan V. 2004. US Diplomat Stands Firm: How China Relations Improved: An Insider View. Far Eastern Economic Review, October 28.
Lax, David and Sebenius, James. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests, and Orders. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legvold, Robert. 2007. Russian Foreign Policy during Periods of Great State Transformation. In Legvold, , ed., Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-first Century and the Shadow of the Past. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaine, Gerard. 1974. Social Differentiation and Social Originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4 (1): 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Douglas. 1997. The Continuation of History: Power Transition Theory and the End of the Cold War. Journal of Peace Research, 34: 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, Russell J. 1993. Reciprocating Influence Strategies in Interstate Crisis Bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37: 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, Alexander T. J., and Eiss, Camille, eds. 2004. Reshaping Rogue States: Preemption, Regime Change, and US Policy toward Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lesaffer, Randall. 2000. The Medieval Canon Law of Contract and Early Modern Treaty Law. Journal of the History of International Law, 2 (2): 178–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesage, Dries. 2007. Globalisation, Multipolarity and the L20 as an Alternative to the G8. Global Society 20 (3): 343–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser, Ian O., Hoffman, Bruce, Arquilla, John, Ronfeldt, David, and Michele, Zanini. 1999. The New Terrorism. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack. 1992. Prospect Theory and International Relations. Political Psychology, 13: 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Nira, Trope, Yaakov, and Stephan, E. 2007. In Higgins, E. T. and Kuglanski, A. W., eds., Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving. 1990. When Is an Arms Rivalry a Prisoner's Dilemma? Richardson's Models and 2 x 2 Games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberthal, Kenneth. 2005. Preventing a War Over Taiwan. Foreign Affairs, 84: 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Margot. 1996. Foreign Policy Thinking. In Malcolm, Neil, Pravda, Alex, Allison, Roy and Light, Margot, eds., Internal Factors in Russian Foreign Policy. OxfordUniversity Press, 44–45.Google Scholar
Lindskold, Svenn, Han, Gyuseog, and Betz, Brian. 1986. The Essential Elements of Communication in the GRIT Strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12: 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipson, Charles. 1984. International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs. World Politics, 37: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipson, Charles. 1986. Bankers' Dilemmas: Private Cooperation in Rescheduling Sovereign Debts. In Oye, Kenneth A., ed., Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 200–25.Google Scholar
Lipson, Michael. 2004. Transaction Costs Estimation and International Regimes. International Studies Review, 6 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, Friedrich. 1857. Système national d'économie politique. Paris.Google Scholar
Lo, Bobo. 2002. Russian Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era: Reality, Illusion and Mythmaking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Bobo. 2003. Vladimir Putin and the Evolution of Russian Foreign Policy. London: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1988 [1690]. The Second Treatise of Government. In Locke, , Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luard, Evan. 1990. International Society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luard, Evan. 1992. The Balance of Power: The System of International Relations, 1648–1815. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 2000. Agent-Based Modeling of Collective Identity: Testing Constructivist Theory. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), 3: 1–19.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian S., Miodownik, Dan, and Eidelson, Roy J.. 2004. Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It? American Political Science Review, 98 (2):209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Gene M. 2007. Rethinking American Foreign Policy: Towards Realistic Multilateralism. American Foreign Policy Interests, 29 (1): 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Gene M. and Mastanduno, Michael, eds. 2001. Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
McCrisken, Trevor. 2004. American Exceptionalism and the Legacy of Vietnam: US Foreign Policy since 1974. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D. and Williams, John T.. 1993. Policy Uncertainty in Two-Level Games: Examples of Correlated Equilibria. International Studies Quarterly, 37: 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Diane M., Devos, Thierry, and Smith, Eliot R.. 2000. Intergroup Emotions: Explaining Offensive Action Tendencies in an Intergroup Context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 602–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, Robert D., and Little, Richard. 1977. A Foreign Policy Model of US Bilateral Aid Allocation. World Politics, 30 (1): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, Michael and Willer, Robert. 2002. From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling. In Cook, Karen S. and Hagan, John, eds., Annual Review of Sociology, 28. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Magnier, Mark and Murphy, Kim. 2005. An Exercise Fit for Sending US a Message. Los Angles Times, August 17: A5.
Magnusson, Lars. The Controversy on Free Trade and Protection–An Introduction. In Magnusson, , ed., Free Trade 1793–1866, 2 vols. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Maier, Charles. 2006. Among Empires: American Ascendancy and its Predecessors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Tom. 2003. Overlooking Chechen Terror. Washington Post, editorial, March 1: A19.
Malone, David M. and Foong Khong, Yuen, eds. 2003.Unilateralism and US Foreign Policy: International Perspectives. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Mann, James. 2000. About Face: A History of America's Curious Relationship with China, from Nixon to Clinton. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Martens, Jens. 2007. Multistakeholder Partnerships – Future Models of Multilateralism? Dialogue on Globalization Occasional Paper 29. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa. 1999. Interests, Power and Multilateralism. In Lipson, Charles, and Cohen, Benjamin J., eds., Theory and Structure in International Political Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa. 2004. Self Binding. Harvard Magazine, September–October: 33–36.
Mastanduno, Michael and Kapstein, Ethan. 1999. Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War. In Kapstein, and Mastanduno, , eds., Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press, 11–13.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas. 2005. Grotius and the Skeptics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 66: 577–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, John. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazarr, Michael. 2000. Opportunity Seized: Preventive Diplomacy in Korea. In Jentleson, Bruce, ed., Opportunities Missed, Opportunities Seized. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Sarah E. and Gerber, Theodore P.. 2005–06. Soviet Nostalgia: An Impediment to Russian Democratization. Washington Quarterly 29 (1): 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 1995. Anarchy and Identity. International Organization 49: 299–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 1996. Reputation and international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Meyssonnier, Simone. 1989. La Balance et l'Horloge. La genèse de la pensée libérale en France au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Editions de la passion.Google Scholar
Michishita, Narushiga. 2003. Calculated Adventurism: North Korea's Military-Diplomatic Campaign 1966–2000. Tokyo: Japan National Institute for Defense Studies.Google Scholar
Andranik, Migranyan. 2008. Voices from Afar: Russia Makes Partner. In Johnson, . Russia List #194, October 24, www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/.
Miller, Benjamin. 2007. States, Nations and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1992. International Theories of Cooperation. World Politics, 44: 466–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minden, Karen, Galant, Nicole, and Irwin, Paul. 1997. Canada's Role in APEC. In Hampsen, Fen Osler, Molot, Maureen Appel and Rudner, Martin, eds., Asia Pacific Face-Off, Canada Among Nations. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
Mittleman, James M. 2000. The Globalization Syndrome: Transformation and Resistance. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molander, Per. 1985. The Optimal Level of Generosity in a Selfish, Uncertain Environment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29: 611–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, . 1951. Réflexions sur la monarchie universelle en Europe. In Œuvres complètes. Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, . 1989 [1750]. The Spirit of the Laws, ed. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia C., and Stone, Harold S.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, . 1991. Pensées, ed. Desgraves, Louis. Paris: Collection Bouquins.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, . 1998. Correspondance, ed. Desgraves, Louis, and Mass, Edgar. Œuvres complètes, vol. 18. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Moore, Thomas G. 2000. China and Globalization. In Kim, Samuel S., ed., East Asia and Globalization. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Moore, Thomas G. and Yang, Dixia. 2001. Empowered and Restrained: Chinese Foreign Policy in the Age of Economic Interdependence. In Lampton, D., ed. Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. and Thompson, Kenneth W.. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 6th ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Mummendey, Amelie, Klink, Andreas, Mielke, Rosemarie, Wenzel, Michael, and Blanz, Mathias. 1999. Socio-structural Characteristics of Intergroup Relations and Identity Management Strategies: Results from a Field Study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 259–85.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummendey, Amelie and Schreiber, Hans-Joachim. 1984. “Different” Just Means “Better”: Some Obvious and Some Hidden Pathways to In-Group Favouritism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 363–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murnigham, J. K. 1978. Models of Coalition Behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 85: 1130–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, Roger B. 1991. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nash, John F. 1950. The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica, 18: 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, Stephen C. 1990. Friends but No Allies: Economic Liberalism and the Law of Nations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2003. Explaining the Pattern of Aid Giving. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Edward. 2007. A Crisis in Global Institutions? Multilateralism and International Security. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newman, Edward, Thakur, Ramesh, and Tirman, John, eds. 2006. Multilateralism Under Challenge? International Order, and Structural Change. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Nicolson, Sir Harold. 1963. Diplomacy. Oxford: Galaxy.Google Scholar
Noguez, Maria-Isabel Studer. 2002. The Global Strategies of Multinationals and Government Policies. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Nossal, Kim Richard. 1992. A European Nation? The Life and Times of Atlanticism in Canada. In English, John and Hillmer, Norman, eds., Making a Difference? Canada's Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order. Toronto: Lester Publishing.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin A. and Sigmund, K.. 1992. Tit for Tat in Heterogeneous Populations. Nature, 355: 250–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Martin A. and Sigmund, K.. 1993. A strategy of Win–Stay, Lose–Shift that Outperforms Tit-for-Tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Nature, 364: 56–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, Martin A. and Sigmund, K.. 1998. Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring. Nature, 393: 573–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nye, Joseph 2002. The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go It Alone. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
,Office of the Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense. 2008. Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People's Republic of China 2008, available at www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/China_Military_Report_.08.pdf.
Ogata, Sadako. 1988. Normalization with China. Berkeley: UCB Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Barry. 1994. A Survey of Game Theory Models on Peace and War. In Aumann, R. and Hart, S., eds., Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 995–1053.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Barry. 1999. Honor, Symbols, and War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organski, A. F. K. 1958. World Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Osborne, Martin J. and Rubinstein, Ariel. 1994. A Course in Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, Charles E. 1962. An Alternative to War or Surrender. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ouwerkerk, Jaap W. and Ellemers, Naomi. 2002. The Benefits of being Disadvantaged: Performance-Related Circumstances and Consequences of Intergroup Comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32: 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overbeck, Jennifer R., Jost, John T., Mosso, Cristina O., and Flizik, Agnieszka. 2004. Resistant versus Acquiescent Responses to Ingroup Inferiority as a Function of Social Dominance Orientation in the USA and Italy. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7 (1): 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A., ed. 1986a. Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Oye, Kenneth A. 1986b. The Sterling-Dollar-Franc Triangle: Monetary Diplomacy 1929–1937. In Oye, , ed., Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 173–99.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. 1995. Lords of All the World. Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France, 1500–1800. New Haven: Yale University Press,Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas L., and Ahrensdorf, Peter L.. 1999. Justice among Nations: On the Moral Basis of Power and Peace. Laurence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A. 2005. Soft Balancing against the United States. International Security 30 (1): 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, Stewart. 2002. Multilateralism and Its Discontents: The Causes and Consequences of US Ambivalence. In Patrick, Stewart, and Forman, Shepard, Multilateralism and US Foreign Policy. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Patrick, Stewart and Forman, Shepard, eds. 2002. Multilateralism and US Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Paul, T. V. 2004. Introduction: The Enduring Axioms of Balance of Power Theory and Their Contemporary Relevance. In Paul, T. V., Wirtz, James M., and Fortmann, Michel, eds., Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. Stanford University Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Pauly, J. 2005. US Foreign Policy and the Persian Gulf: Safeguarding American Interests through Selective Multilateralism. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Pearson, Margaret M. 1999. The Major Multilateral Economic Institutions Engage China. In Johnston, Alastair I. and Ross, Robert S. eds. Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Saadia M. 2005. Bilateralism, Multilateralism, or Regionalism? Japan's Trade Forum Choices. Journal of East Asian Studies, 5 (1): 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrot, Jean-Claude. 1990. Une Histoire intellectuelle de l'économie politique (XVIIe–XVIIIe siècle). Paris: Editions de l'EHESS.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire. The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1985. Virtue, Commerce and History. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. ed. 1993. The Varieties of British Political Thought, 1500–1800. Cambridge University Press.
Porter, Tony. 2001. The Democratic Deficit in the Institutional Arrangements for Regulating Global Finance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 7: 427–40.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 2001–02. The Struggle against Terrorism: Grand Strategy, Strategy, and Tactics. International Security, 26 (3): 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry R. and Ross, Andrew L.. 1996–97. Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy. International Security, 21 (3): 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Barry. 1993. The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict. In Brown, Michael, ed., Ethnic Conflict and International Security. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Colin L. 2004. A Strategy of Partnerships. Foreign Affairs, January/February: 32.
Powell, Robert. 1991. Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory. American Political Science Review, 85: 1303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jeremy. 2008. Warring Friends: Alliance Restraint in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pruitt, Dean G. 1998. Social Conflict. In Gilbert, Daniel T., Fiske, Susan T., and Lindzey, Gardner, eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., vol. 2. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 470–503.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. 1934 [1672]. De Jure Naturae et Gentium, ed. Scott, James Brown, trans. , C. H. and Oldfather, W. A.. Classics of International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Purdum, Todd, S. 2002. NATO Strikes Deal to Accept Russia In a Partnership. New York Times, May 15: 1.Google Scholar
Pushkov, Alexander. 1998. The “Primakov Doctrine” and a New European Order. International Affairs (Moscow), 44 (2): 1–13.Google Scholar
Pushkov, Alexander. 2000. Russia and the New World Order. International Affairs (Moscow) 6.
Pushkov, Alexey K. 2007. Missed Connections. National Interest, May–June: 53.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42: 427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quandt, William B. 2001. Peace Process, rev. ed. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1960. Fights, Games, and Debates. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1966. Two-Person Game Theory: The Essential Ideas. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol and Chammah, Albert M. (with the collaboration of Carol J. Orwant). 1965. Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol and Chammah, Albert M.. 1969. The Game of Chicken. In Buchler, Ira R., and Nutini, Hugo G., eds., Game Theory in the Behavioral Sciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 151–75.Google Scholar
Rauch, Jonathan. 2002. Seeing Around Corners. Atlantic Monthly: 35–48.Google Scholar
Reinicke, Wolfgang H. 1999–2000. The Other World Wide Web: Global Public Policy Networks. Foreign Policy, 117 (Winter): 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, August. 2001. Securing the Accountability of International Organizations. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 7: 131–50.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2004. American Power and World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
,RFE/RL Newsline. 2007. February 2, 9, 12, 20, available at www.rferl.org/archive/en-newsline/20070101/683/683.html.
RIA Novosti. 2002. June 27, http://en.rian.ru.
RIA Novosti, September 30, 2008, http://en.rian.ru.
Rieber, Alfred F. 2007. How Persistent Are Persistent Factors? In Legvold, Robert, ed., Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-first Century and the Shadow of the Past. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter, Boyd, Robert, and Henrich, Joseph. 2003. Cultural Evolution of Human Cooperation. In Hammerstein, Peter, ed., The Genetic and Cultural Origins of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Jeremy. 2004. The European Dream: How Europe's Vision of the Future is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1962. Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, P. W. J. 1978. The Union of England and Scotland: A Study in Anglo-Scottish Politics of the Eighteenth Century. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rischard, F. 2002. High Noon: 20 Global Problems: 20 Years to Solve Them. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. Let's Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54 (1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John. 2005. The Case for the Enlightenment: Scotland and Naples 1680–1760. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John. ed. 1995. A Union for Empire. Political Thought and the British Union of 1707. Cambridge University Press.
Roche, Daniel. 1993. La France des Lumières. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Romberg, Alan D. 2003. Rein In at the Brink of the Precipice: American Policy toward Taiwan and US–PRC Relations. Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 1990. L'Etat en France de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard, ed. 2001. The New Great Power Coalition: Toward a World Concert of Nations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Rosenau, James N. 1997. The Person, the Household Community, the Community, and the Globe: Notes for a Theory of Multilateralism in a Turbulent World. In Cox, Robert, ed., The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order. New York: United Nations University.
Ross, Dennis 2004. The Missing Peace. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Ross, Robert S. 1995. Negotiating Cooperation: The United States and China, 1969–1989. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Robert S. 1999. Engagement in US–China Policy. In Johnston, A. and Ross, , eds., Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power. New York: Routledge, 176–206.Google Scholar
Ross, Robert S. 2000. The 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and the Use of Force. International Security, 25 (2): 87–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Robert S. 2005. Assessing the China's Threat. National Interest, 81 (Fall): 81–87.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Ariel, 1982. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica, 50: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Jeffrey Z. and Bert, R. Brown. 1975. The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jeffrey Z., Pruitt, Dean G., and Kim, Sung Hee. 1994. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1992. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. International Organization, 46 (Summer): 569–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, 1993a. Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution. In Ruggie, , ed., Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. ed. 1993b. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1997. The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy. International Security, 21 (4): 108.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Ariel, 2003. The United Nations and Globalization: Patterns and Limits of Institutional Adaptation. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 9: 301–22.Google Scholar
Sanger, David E. 2002. NATO Gives Russia a Formal Welcome. New York Times, May 29.
Schelling, Thomas. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1950. Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum. Cologne: Greven Verlag.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Paul W. 2004. The Nineteenth Century System: Balance of Power or Political Equilibrium? In Paul, Schroeder et al., eds., Systems, Stability, and Statecraft: Essays on the International History of Modern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, David. 1988. Games of Chicken: Four Decades of US Nuclear Policy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall. 1999a. Managing the Rise of Great Powers: History and Theory. In Iain Johnston, Alastair, and Ross, Robert S., eds. Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. 1999b. Realism and the Present Great Power System: Growth and Positional Conflict Over Scarce Resources. In Kapstein, Ethan and Mastanduno, Michael, eds., Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press, 28–68.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. and Reese, Michael J.. 2004. The Peculiar Absence of Balancing Against US Polarity: Delegitimation and Entrepreneurial Revisionism, paper presented at the American Political Science Association Convention, Chicago, September.
Sebenius, James K. 2002. International Negotiation Analysis. In Kremenyuk, Victor A., ed., International Negotiations: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Semmel, Bernard. 1993. The National Economists against Free-Trade Empire. In Semmel, B., The Liberal Ideal and the Demons of Empire: Theories of Imperialism from Adam Smith to Lenin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 57–84.Google Scholar
Shales, Amity. 2004. Bush Has It Right on Nuclear Proliferation. Financial Times, October 4: 19.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, David. 2005. China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order. International Security 29 (3): 64–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shambaugh, David. 2006. Return to the Middle Kingdom? China and Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century. In Shambaugh, , ed., Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 23–47.Google Scholar
Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M., 1954. A Method of Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System. American Political Science Review, 48 (3): 787–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shlapentokh, Vladimir. 2002. Is the ‘Greatness Syndrome’ Eroding?Washington Quarterly, 25 (1): 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheetz, Mark S. 1997–98. Correspondence: Debating the Unipolar Moment. International Security, 22 (3): 168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, Richard B. 1985. Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shevtsova, Lilia. 2003. Putin's Russia. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
Shevtsova, Lilia. 2007. Russia – Lost in Transition: The Yeltsin and Putin Legacies, trans. Arch Tait. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
Sigal, Leon V. 2000. The United States and North Korean Cooperative Security on the Agreed Framework and Beyond. In Haass, Richard and O'Sullivan, Meghan, eds., Honey and Vinegar: Incentives, Sanctions and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Simai, Mihaly. 1994. The Future of Global Governance: Managing Risk and Change in the International System. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Simes, Dimitri K. 2007. Losing Russia. Foreign Affairs, 86 (6): 36–52.Google Scholar
Simmons, P. J. and Jonge Oudraat, Chantal. 2001. From Agenda to Accord. In Simmons, and Jonge Oudraat, , eds., Managing Global Issues. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
Sisk, Timothy. 1995. Democratization in South Africa. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. The New World Order. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1981 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1982 [1766]. Lectures on Jurisprudence, ed. Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D., and Stein, P. G.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1984 [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric A. 2003. Human Cooperation. In Hammerstein, Peter, ed., The Genetic and Cultural Origins of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985a. Coordination vs. Prisoner's Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes. American Political Science Review, 79: 923–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985b. The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory. International Organization, 39 (4): 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991. Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation. American Political Science Review, 85: 701–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1993. Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation. In Baldwin, David A., ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. 1971. ‘Prisoner's Dilemma’ and ‘Chicken’ Models in International Politics. International Studies Quarterly, 15: 66–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. and Diesing, Paul. 1977. Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott and Sloan Wilson, David. 1998. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spar, Debora and Dail, James. 2002. Of Measurement and Mission: Accounting for Performance in Non-governmental Organizations. Chicago Journal of International Law, 3: 171–81.Google Scholar
Spears, Russell, Doosje, Bertjan, and Ellemers, Naomi. 1997. Self-stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: the Role of Group Identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 5 May: 538–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, Bertram I. and Zartman, I. William, eds. 2003. Getting It Done: Post-Agreement Negotiations and International Regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Spiro, Peter. 2002. Accounting for NGOs. Chicago Journal of International Law, 3: 161–69.Google Scholar
Spitz, Jean-Fabien. 1995. La Liberté politique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Stanger, Allison. 2004. Replicating Cohen, Riolo, and Axelrod: A Docking Challenge. Working Paper Series. Jena: Max-Planck Institute.Google Scholar
Starr, Penny. 2008. Global Governance Advocates Blame US for Economic Crisis. CNS News, November 17, available at www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=39418.
Stein, Arthur. 1982. Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World. International Organization, 36: 294–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Arthur. 1990. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice. 1995. Getting to the Table: The Processes of International Prenegotiation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice and Pauly, Louis, eds. 1993. Choosing to Cooperate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Steinberg, James, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Daalder, Ivo, and Campbell, Kurt. 2008. Strategic Leadership: Framework for a 21st Century National Security Strategy, available at www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2008/07_national_security_brainard/07_national_security_brainard.pdf.
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization, 56 (2): 339–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1999. The Westfailure System. Review of International Studies, 25: 345–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surkov, Vladislav. 2006. Sovereignty – Political Synonym of Competitiveness. address to the students of the United Russia party study center, Moskovskie Novosti, 8, March 10–16: 10–11.Google Scholar
Swaine, Michael D. 2004. China: Exploiting a Strategic Opening. In Ashley, J.Tellis, , and Wills, Michael, eds., Strategic Asia 2004–2005: Confronting Terrorism in the Pursuit of Power. Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.Google Scholar
Swaine, Michael D. and Tellis, Ashley J.. 2000. Interpreting China's Grand Strategy: Past, Present and Future. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, ed. 1978. Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John C.. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In Austin, William G. and Worchel, Stephen, eds., The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 33–47.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John C.. 1986. The Social Identity Theory of InterGroup Behavior. In Worchel, S. and Austin, W. G., eds., Psychology of Inter-group Relations.Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tarp, Finn, et al. 1999. Danish Aid Policy: Theory and Empirical Evidence. In Gupta, Kanhaya L, ed., Foreign Aid: New Perspectives. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 149–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taverniese, Sabrina. 2002. Western Companies Warm to Russia. New York Times, May 30: W1.
Taylor, Brendan. 2008. The Bush Administration and Asia Pacific Multilateralism: Unrequited Love? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 62 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Michael. 1976. Anarchy and Cooperation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Taylor, Michael. 1987. The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tepperman, Jonathan D. 2004. Some Hard Truths about Multilateralism. World Policy Journal, June.
Tesfatsion, Leigh. 2002. Agent-Based Computational Economics: Growing Economies from the Bottom Up. Artificial Life, 8 (1): 55–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tessman, Brock F. and Chan, Steve. 2004. Power Cycles, Risk Propensity, and Great-Power Deterrence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48 (2): 131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh. 2001. Global Norms and International Humanitarian Law. International Review of the Red Cross, 841: 19–44.Google Scholar
Torkunov, Anatolii. 2000. International Relations in the Post-Kosovo Context. International Affairs (Moscow), 46 (1): 74–81.Google Scholar
Touval, Saadia. 1982. The Peace Brokers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Touval, Saadia. 1989. Multilateral Negotiation: An Analytic Approach. Negotiation Journal, 5 (2): 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touval, Saadia. 1994. Why the UN Fails: It Cannot Mediate. Foreign Affairs, 73 (5): 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touval, Saadia. 2002. Mediation in the Yugoslav Wars: The Critical Years, 1990–1995. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touval, Saadia, and William Zartman, I.. 2001. International Mediation in the Post-Cold War Era. In Crocker, C. A., Hampson, F. O., and Aall, P., eds., Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Toynbee, Arnold J. 1954. A Study of History, vol. 9. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traulsen, A. and Nowak, Martin, 2006. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103: 13367.
Trenin, Dmitri. 2002. The End of Eurasia: Russia on the Border Between Geopolitics and Globalization. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Trenin, Dmitri. 2003–04. Pirouettes and Priorities: Distilling a Putin Doctrine. National Interest (Winter): 76–83.
Trenin, Dmitri. 2006. Russia Leaves the West. Foreign Affairs, 85 (4): 88–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenin, Dmitri. 2007. Russia Redefines Itself and Its Relations with the West. Washington Quarterly, 30 (2): 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. 1971. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46 (1): 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsygankov, Andrei. 2006. Russia's Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1977. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1983. Grotius, Carneades and Hobbes. Grotiana, 4: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1987. The Modern Theory of Natural Law. In Pagden, Anthony, ed., The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James, 1993a. An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James, 1993b. Placing the Two Treatises. In Phillipson, Nicolas and Skinner, Quentin, eds., Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge University Press, 253–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. and Brown, R.. 1978. Social Status, Cognitive Alternatives, and Intergroup Relations. In Tajfel, Henri, ed., Differentiation between Social Groups. New York: Academic Press, in cooperation with European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, 201–34.Google Scholar
Udalov, Vadim. 1995. National Interests and Conflict Resolution. In Zartman, I. William and Kremenyuk, Victor, eds., Cooperative Security: Reducing Third World Wars. Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Underdal, Arild. 1994. Leadership Theory: Rediscovering the Arts of Management. In William Zartman, I., ed., International Multilateral Negotiation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
,USInfo. 2005. US Academic Experts Advise Against Security Council Expansion, available at www.usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive/2005/Aug/11–509220.html.
Valdez, Jonathan. 1995. The Near Abroad, the West, and National Identity in Russian Foreign Policy. In Dawisha, Adeed and Dawisha, Karen, eds., The Making of Foreign Policy in Russia and the New States of Eurasia. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennstra, Kristine and Haslam, S. Alexander. 2000. Willingness to Participate in Industrial Protest: Exploring Social Identification in Context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vladislav Surkov's Secret Speech: How Russia Should Fight International Conspiracies. 2005. July 11, available at www.rferl.org.
Vogel, Gretchen. 2004. The Evolution of the Golden Rule. Science, 303 (February 20): 1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waever, Ole. 1998. Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European Non-war Community. In Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities. Cambridge University Press, 81–93.Google Scholar
Wallace, Michael D. 1973. War and Ranks Among Nations. Lexington: Heath.Google Scholar
Wallander, Celeste A. 1996. Ideas, Interests, and Institutions in Russian Foreign Policy. In Wallander, , ed. The Sources of Russian Foreign Policy After the Cold War. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origin of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2001–02. Beyond bin Laden: Reshaping US Foreign Policy. International Security, 26 (3): 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2002. Keeping the World “Off Balance”: Self Restraint and US Foreign Policy. In John Ikenberry, G., ed., America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 121–54.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2005. Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York and St. Louis: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wapner, Paul. 2002. Defending Accountability in NGOs. Chicago Journal of International Law, 3: 197–205.Google Scholar
Ward, Hugh. 1990. Three Men in a Boat, Two Must Row: An Analysis of a Three-Person Chicken Pregame. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34: 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warkentin, Craig and Mingst, Karen. 2000. International Institutions, the State, and Global Civil Society in the Age of the World Wide Web. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 6 (2): 237–58.Google Scholar
Washburn, John L. 2001. The United Nations' Relations with the United States: The UN Must Look Out for Itself. In Diehl, Paul F., ed., The Politics of Global Governance, 2nd ed. Boulder: Lynne Rienner: 467–82.Google Scholar
Watkins, Kevin and Woods, Ngaire. 2004. Africa Must Be Heard in the Councils of the Rich. International Herald Tribune, October 2–3: 8.Google Scholar
Weber, Steve. 1992. Shaping the Postwar Balance of Power: Multilateralism in NATO. International Organization, 46 (3): 633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehberg, Hans. 1959. Pacta sunt Servanda. American Journal of International Law, 53: 775–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. 2003. The Illusion of UN Security Council Reform. Washington Quarterly, 26 (4): 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G. and Hubert, Don. 2001. The Responsibility to Protect: Research, Bibliography, and Background. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Wells, Clare. 1987. The UN, UNESCO, and the Politics of Knowledge. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, Allen S. 1997. ASEAN Eyes China: The Security Dimension. Asian Survey, 37 (4): 292–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1991. International Theory. The Three Traditions. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Willetts, Peter. 2000. From “Consultative Arrangements” to “Partnership”: The Changing Status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 6: 191–212.Google Scholar
Williams, Frances. 2004. WIPO to Head Concerns of Poor. Financial Times, October 4: 8.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1978. Adam Smith's Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1983. Adam Smith's Enduring Particular Result: A Political and Cosmopolitan Perspective. In Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, eds., Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press, 253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1991. Adam Smith's Politics Revisited. Quaderni di Storia dell'Economica Politica, 9: 3–27.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1992. Adam Smith: Scottish Moral Philosopher as Political Economist. Historical Journal, 35: 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1996. Riches and Poverty. An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750–1834. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winham, Gilbert and DeBoer-Ashworth, Elizabeth. 2000. Asymmetry in Negotiating the Canada–US Free Trade Agreement. In Zartman, I. William and Rubin, Jeffrey Z., eds., Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. 1999. The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security, 24 (1): 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, John and Sarah, Chang. 2003. China–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Shaping Future Economic Relations. Asian Survey, 43: 507–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Ngaire. 2001. Making the IMF More Accountable. International Affairs, 77 (1): 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, David. 1986. Divine Right and Democracy: An Anthology of Political Writing in Stuart England. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. 1965. A Study of War, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Anne. 2005. What China Whispers to North Korea. Washington Quarterly 28 (2): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xinbo, Wu. 2005–2006. The End of the Silver Lining: A Chinese View of the US–Japanese Alliance. Washington Quarterly, 29 (1): 119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xinhua, . 1996. 30 December in FBIS-CHI-1996–251.
Yang, Dali L. 2002. China in 2001: Economic Liberalization and Its Political Discontents. Asian Survey, 42 (1): 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran. 1989. International Cooperation. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zagoria, Donald S. 2006. The US–China–Taiwan Triangle: Towards Equilibrium. May 23, available at www.nautilus.org/fora/security/0640Zagoria.html.
Zakaria, Fareed. 2004. Bush's Quiet Multilateralism. Newsweek, May 10, available at http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4880290/.
Zartman, I. William. 1989. Ripe for Resolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. ed. 1994a. International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.
Zartman, I. William. 1994b. Introduction. In William Zartman, I., ed. International Multilateral Negotiation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 1995. Negotiations in South Africa. In Zartman, I. William, ed. Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars. Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 1997a. Ripeness. PINPoints, 11: 2–3.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 1997b. The Structuralist Dilemma in Negotiation. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 6: 227–45.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 2000. Beyond the Hurting Stalemate: Ripeness Revisited. In Stern, Paul and Druckman, Daniel, eds, International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. ed. 2001. Preventive Negotiation: Avoiding Conflict Escalation. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zartman, I. William. 2005a. Comparative Case Studies. International Negotiation, 10 (1): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 2005b. Cowardly Lions: Missed Opportunities to Prevent State Collapse and Deadly Conflict. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 2005c. Resolving the Toughness Dilemma. In Faure, Guy Olivier, ed., La Negociation: regards sur sa diversité. Paris: Publibook.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. ed. 2008. Imbalance of Power: The Post-bipolar System of World Order. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Zartman, I. William and Berman, Maureen. 1982. The Practical Negotiator. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William and Rubin, Jeffrey Z., eds. 2000. Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Zartman, I. William et al. 1996. Negotiation as a Search for Justice. International Negotiation, 1 (1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yunling and Tang, Shiping. 2005. China's Regional Strategy. In Shambaugh, David, ed., Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 1990. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Wynberg, Cape: Rustica Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by I. William Zartman, The Johns Hopkins University, Saadia Touval, The Johns Hopkins University
  • Book: International Cooperation
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761119.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by I. William Zartman, The Johns Hopkins University, Saadia Touval, The Johns Hopkins University
  • Book: International Cooperation
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761119.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by I. William Zartman, The Johns Hopkins University, Saadia Touval, The Johns Hopkins University
  • Book: International Cooperation
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761119.013
Available formats
×