Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T09:25:53.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

33 - Complementarity and the construction of national ability

from PART VI - Complementarity in practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Carsten Stahn
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Mohamed M. El Zeidy
Affiliation:
International Criminal Court
Get access

Summary

This chapter considers the emphasis of the Rome Statute on the capacity of national institutions to investigate and prosecute international crimes, and its significance under the International Criminal Court (‘ICC's’) complementarity regime. In light of the importance placed on national ability under the Rome Statute, the chapter highlights difficulties national institutions may face in investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating core international crimes. The chapter goes on to introduce the Legal Tools platform which criminal justice institutions may draw on in the processing of international crimes. The ICC's Legal Tools, it concludes, make an effective infrastructure contribution to the construction of national ability and, by that, help states to fulfil their role under the ICC's complementarity regime.

Introduction

The ability of national institutions to seek justice for the commission of core international crimes is central to the regime created by the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’) that aims to put an end to impunity for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The institutional design of the ICC confirms that states have priority in the investigation and prosecution of international crimes. It is grounded in the idea that states will share the burden of establishing accountability for cases arising from the commission of mass atrocities. However, the complex nature of the process of criminal justice for atrocities, the resources and expertise required for the investigation and prosecution of international crimes and the relative incapacity of national justice institutions may prevent states from fulfilling the role they have pursuant to the Rome Statute.

Type
Chapter
Information
The International Criminal Court and Complementarity
From Theory to Practice
, pp. 1052 - 1070
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lee, R. S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (1999), 41
Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Where is the ICC Heading?’ (2006) 4 JICJ 421, 422Google Scholar
Turner, J., ‘Nationalizing International Criminal Law’ (2005) 41 Stan. J. Int'l L. 1, 3Google Scholar
Neuner, M. (ed.), National Legislation Incorporating International Crimes: Approaches of Civil and Common Law Countries (2003), 257
Schabas, W. A., ‘“Complementarity in Practice”: Some Uncomplimentary Thoughts’ (2008) 19(5) Crim. L.F. 33Google Scholar
Kleffner, J. and Kor, G. (eds.) Complementary Views on Complementarity – Proceedings of the International Roundtable on the Complementary Nature of the International Criminal Court (2006), 79–104
Slaughter, A.-M. and Burke-White, W., ‘The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, the European Way of Law)’, (2006) 47 Harv. Int'l L.J. 327, 341Google Scholar
Bekou, O. and Cryer, R., ‘The International Criminal Court and Universal Jurisdiction: A Close Encounter?’, (2007) 56 ICLQ 49, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. A., ‘The Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court: From 1947–2000 and Beyond’, (2000) 38 Osgoode Hall L. J. 297Google Scholar
Stahn, C., ‘The Geometry of Transitional Justice: Choices of Institutional Design’, (2005) 18 LJIL 425, 449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, C. P. R., ‘The Price of International Justice’, (2005)
Wippman, D., ‘The Costs of International Justice’, (2006)
Romano, C., Nollkaemper, A. and Kleffner, J. (eds.), Internationalized Criminal Courts and Tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor and Cambodia (2004), 272
Drumbl, M., Atrocity, Punishment and International Law (2007), 148
Sriram, C. L., ‘Revolutions in Accountability: New Approaches to Past Abuses’ (2003) 19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 301, 383Google Scholar
Stromseth, J. E., ‘Pursuing Accountability for Atrocities After Conflict: What Impact on Binding the Rule of Law’, (2007) 38 Geo J.Int'l L 251, 260Google Scholar
Cassese, A., ‘On Current Trends towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law’, (1998) 9 EJIL 1, 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferdinandusse, W., ‘The Prosecution of Grave Breaches in National Courts’ (2009) JICJ 723, 729–34
Radtke, H., Rössner, D., Schiller, T. and Form, W. (eds.), Historische Dimensionen von Kriegsverbrecherprozessen nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg (2007), 205
Kaufman, Z. and Clark, P. (eds.), After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Reconciliation in Rwanda and Beyond (2008), 357
Straus, S., ‘How Many Perpetrators Were There in the Rwandan Genocide? An Estimate’ (2004) 6(1) Journal of Genocide Research 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsmo, M., Helvig, K., Utmelidze, I. and Žagovec, G., ‘The Backlog of Core International Crimes Case Files in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, (2009) FICHL Publication Series, Number 3,
Bergsmo, M. (ed.), ‘Criteria for Prioritizing and Selecting Core International Crimes Cases’, (2009) FICHL Publication Series, Number 4,
Burke-White, W., ‘Implementing a Policy of Positive Complementarity in the Rome System of Justice’, (2008) 19 Crim. L.F. 59, 62Google Scholar
Burke-White, W., ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome Statute System of International Justice’ (2008) 49 Harv. Int'l L.J. 53Google Scholar
Concannon, B., ‘Beyond Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Prosecutions, A View from Haiti’, (2000) 32 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 201, 234Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×