Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T11:23:31.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - On State Self-Defense and Guantánamo Bay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Larry May
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Zachary Hoskins
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The United States is currently implementing a policy of indefinite imprisonment at detention facilities such as Camp Delta at Guantánamo Bay, as well as at numerous “black sites” around the world, for persons it deems enemy combatants. Since its inception in 2002, there have been approximately 800 such detainees at Guantánamo Bay. These enemy combatants are not treated as prisoners of war, and only a few have been charged with a crime. After seven years, only three detainees have been convicted of a crime. Many of the detainees have been, or were, held for years without any substantial review, and many have been subject to torture, or torture-like, techniques. According to former United States Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, an architect of the policy, it makes sense to imprison these people indefinitely because they are “hard core, well-trained terrorists.” Former Vice President Dick Cheney has stated that the detainees are “the worst of a very bad lot. They are very dangerous. They are devoted to killing millions of Americans.” President George W. Bush justified this policy of indefinite imprisonment for reasons grounded in a right of national or state self-defense. The policy, it was argued, was necessary to prevent future terrorist attacks similar to those of September 11, 2001.

The U.S. policies concerning indefinite imprisonment of non-U.S. citizens at Guantánamo Bay and at black sites have received much criticism, including criticism from the UN and other states. This criticism largely stems from concerns over violations of human rights (e.g.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glaberson, William, “Detainee Convicted on Terrorism Charges,” The New York Times (November 3, 2008)Google Scholar
Luban, David, “Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb,” 92 Virginia Law Review (2006), 1425Google Scholar
Luban, David, “The War on Terrorism and the End of Human Rights,” in Gehring, Verna V. (ed.), War After September 11 (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003)Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defense, 4th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 206–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Niaz A., “Self-Defense, Anticipatory Self-Defense and Pre-emption: International Law's Response to Terrorism,” 12 Journal of Conflict and Security Law (Spring 2007), 95–126, at 104–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 64–167Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, War Law (New York: Grove Press, 2005), 65–68Google Scholar
Dinstein, , War, Aggression and Self-Defense, 4th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 208–11, 237–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardam, Judith, Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodin, David, War and Self-Defense (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 110–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977), 81Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, International Law and the Use of Force by States, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963), 275–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Sir Robert and Watts, Sir Arthur, eds., Oppenheim's International Law, 9th ed. (London: Longman, 1996), 421–2
Bowett, D., Self-Defense in International Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1958), 187–93Google Scholar
Gray, , International Law and the Use of Force, 129–34
Arend, Anthony Clark and Beck, Robert J., International Law and the Use of Force (New York: Routledge, 1993), 53–5Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff, The Ethics of Killing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 402, 405–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, “Self-Defense,” 20(4) Philosophy & Public Affairs (1991), 283–311Google Scholar
Rodin, David, War & Self-Defense, 81–3
Nagel, Thomas, “War and Massacre,” in Beitz, Charles R., Cohen, Marshall, Scanlon, Thomas, and Simmons, A. John (eds.), International Ethics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), 68Google Scholar
Fullinwider, Robert, “War and Innocence,” in International Ethics, 92–3
Symposium: War and Self-Defense,” 18(1) Ethics & International Affairs (2004), 64
War as Self-Defense (Response to David Rodin),” 18(1) Ethics & International Affairs (2004)
Justification or Excuse: Saving Soldiers at the Expense of Civilians,” Supplementary Volume VIII Canadian Journal of Philosophy (1982), 166–9
Self-Defense,” 20(4) Philosophy & Public Affairs (1991), 283–310
McMahon, , “Self-Defense and the Problem of the Innocent Attacker,” 104 Ethics (1994), 255Google Scholar
Dinstein, , The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Lawrence, “Self-Defense and the Killing of Noncombatants: A Reply to Fullinwider,” in Beitz, Charles R., Cohen, Marshall, Scanlon, Thomas, and Simmons, A. John (eds.), International Ethics (1985), 102, 105Google Scholar
Mavrodes, George I., “Conventions and the Morality of War,” International Ethics, 75–89

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×