Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:20:36.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Creativity Under the Northern Lights

Perspectives from Scandinavia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Gudmund J. W. Smith
Affiliation:
Lund University
Ingegerd Carlsson
Affiliation:
Ali Syd, Sweden
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

This chapter is meant to cover the Scandinavian region of Europe. It includes research mainly from the discipline of psychology, but with excursions to the fields of education and philosophy. Besides theoretical and empirical results from Denmark, Norway, and Finland, it reviews data from both applied and laboratory settings in Sweden. The time span covered stretches back approximately three decades. At the start, only a handful of pioneers can be spotted, but the number of creativity researchers has increased rapidly over the years.

While pondering on the catch in our net, we have come to the conclusion that there is no typically or coherent Scandinavian opinion about how creativity should be understood. Still, Scandinavian work does not unconditionally reflect mainline North American approaches to the matter. If most American researchers would probably agree with Mumford's (2003) emphasis on productivity when evaluating creative behavior, Scandinavian researchers would be more inclined to pay attention to Runco (2003), who gives more weight to potentials. Here creativity is rather understood as an attitude toward life, a way to come to grips with the problems of existence. We believe that an exclusive focus on tangible creative products may lose sight of many creative individuals who do not give priority to being in the limelight.

Thus, there has been more focus on different conditions that are positive or negative for creativity, whether they are prerequisites in the individual or conditions seen from other angles in a system's perspective (cf. Csikszentmihalyi, 1999).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1994). The team climate inventory (TCI) and group innovation: A psychometric test on a Swedish sample of work groups. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 67, 143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnér, G. (1997). Fear of flying in civil airline passengers. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Department of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Andersson, A. L. (1972). Personality as reflected in adaptive regulation of visual aftereffect perception: A review of concepts and empirical findings. In Andersson, A. L., Nilsson, A., Ruuth, E., & Smith, G. (Eds.), Visual aftereffects and the individual as an adaptive system. (pp. 159–171). Lund, Sweden: GleerupGoogle Scholar
Andersson, A. L. (1995). Defense Mechanism Test, modified. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Department of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Andersson, A. L., & Bengtsson, M. (1985). Percept–genetic defenses against anxiety and a threatened sense of self as seen in terms of the Spiral Aftereffect Technique. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, A. L., & Ryhammar, L. (1998). Psychoanalytic models of the mind, creative functioning, and percept–genetic reconstruction. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 21, 359–382Google Scholar
Andersson, Å.E., & Sahlin, N.-E. (1997). The complexity of creativity. New York: KluwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–2583.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvonen, J. (1995). Leadership behavior and coworker health. A study in process industry. Reports from Department of Psychology, 801. Sweden: Stockholm UniversityGoogle Scholar
Arvonen, J. (2002). Change, production and employees – An integrated model of leadership. Sweden: Stockholm University, Department of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Arvonen, J., & Pettersson, P. (2002). Leadership behaviours as predictors of cost and change effectiveness. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18, 101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boden, M. A. (1991). The creative mind. Myths and mechanisms. London: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Brinck, I. (1997). The gist of creativity. In Andersson, Å.E. & Sahlin, N.-E. (Eds.), The complexity of creativity (pp. 5–16). Dordrecht: KlüwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. W. (1991). Self and process: Brain states and the conscious present. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, I. (1992). The creative personality. Hemispheric variation and sex differences in defence mechanisms related to creativity. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Department of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, I. (2002). Anxiety and flexibility of defense related to creative functioning. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, I., Hoff, E. V., & Jönsson, P. (2005). Creativity and gender identity. In Columbus, F. (Ed.), The psychology of gender identity (pp. 81–93). Hauppauge, NY: Nova ScienceGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, I., Lilja, Å., Smith, G. J. W., & Johanson, A. (1991). Application of a percept genetic methodology to neuropsychology. In Hanlon, R. E. (Ed.), Cognitive microgenesis. A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 212–239). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, I., & Smith, G. J. W. (1987). Sex differences in defense mechanisms compared with creativity in a group of youngsters. Psychological Research Bulletin, 26 No. 1Google Scholar
Carlsson, I., Wendt, P., & Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between highly and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 873–885CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, B. T. (2002). The creative process and reality. An analysis of search and cognition in the creative process and a call for an ecological cognitive framework for creativity research. Psykologisk studieskriftserie, University of Aarhus. 3
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Indications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Dackert, I. (2001). Integration and creative experiences after a merger of two organizations within the Social Insurance Service. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Department of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Dackert, I., Brenner, S-O., & Johansson, C. R. (2002). Team climate inventory with an merged organization. Psychological Reports, 91, 651–656CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dackert, I., Lööv, L-Å., & Mårtensson, M. (2004). Leadership and climate for innovation in teams. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 25(2), 301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G. (1983). Climate, structure and innovativeness of organizations: A theoretical framework and an experiment (Report 1). Stockholm: FA-rådet – The Swedish Council for Management and Work Life IssuesGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G. (1993). Creativity in project work: A longitudinal study of a product development. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2, 17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G. (1997). Organizational conditions and levels of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6, 195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G. (2000). Management and organizational philosophies and practices as stimulants or blocks to creative behavior: A study of engineers. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9, 94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J., 1991. Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7, 17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1994). Leadership profiles, situation and effectiveness. Creativity and Innovation Management, 3, 139–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G., Frankenhaeuser, M., & Parr, D. (1995). Change oriented leadership, stress and organizational climate. Stockholm: FA InstituteGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish university. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1989). Zero-based arts education: An introduction to Arts PROPEL. Studies in Art Education, 30(2), 71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gedo, J. E., & Goldberg, A. (1973). Models of the mind. A psychoanalytic theory. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. New York: International Universities PressGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. (2000). En målares gåta – en berättelse som utgångspunkt för att studera kreativitet hos 10-åringar. (A painter's mystery – a story as starting-point to study creativity in 10-year-old children). Nordisk Psykologi, 52(1), 37–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. V. (2003a). Imaginary companions, creativity, and self-image in middle childhood. Part of an unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. V. (2003b). A friend inside me: The forms and functions of imaginary companions. Part of an unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. V., & Carlsson, I. (2002). Shining lights or lone wolves? Creativity and self-image in primary school children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E. V., & Carlsson, I. (to be published). Teachers are not always right – Links between ratings and pupils' creativity scores, self-images and self-ratings in school subjects. Manuscript submitted for publication
Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. J. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (2000–2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jönsson, P., & Carlsson, I. (2000). Androgyny and creativity: A study of the relationship between a balanced sex-role and creative functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 269–274CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, G. (2002). What to measure? A new look at the concept of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, G. (2003). Expanding the mood–creativity equation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, G. (2003). The effect of mood on creativity in the innovative process. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.), International handbook of innovation (pp. 191–203). Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (1997). “Paradoxical” mood effects on creative problem solving. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 151–170Google Scholar
Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (2002). The effects of mood on early and late idea production. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivimäki, M., Kuk, G., Elovainio, M., Thomson, L., Kalliomaki-Levanto, T., & Heikkila, A. (1997). The team climate inventory (TCI) – four or five factors? Testing the structure of TCI in samples of low and high complexity jobs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 375–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M. (1935). A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic-depressive states. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 16, 145–174Google Scholar
Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities PressGoogle Scholar
Kragh, U. (1985). DMT, The defence mechanism test. Stockholm: PersonaGoogle Scholar
Kragh, U., & Smith, G. (Eds.). (1970). Percept–genetic analysis. Lund, Sweden: GleerupGoogle Scholar
Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: International Universities PressGoogle Scholar
Larsson, U. (2002). Cultures of creativity. The centennial exhibition of the Nobel price. Canton, MA: Science HistoryGoogle Scholar
Lezac, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lilja, Å., Smith, G. J. W., Malmström, P., Salford, L., & Idvall, I. (1998). Psychological profile related to malignant tumors of different histopathology. Psychooncology, 7, 376–3863.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilja, Å., Smith, G., Malmström, P., Salford, , Leif, G., Idvall, I., & Horstman, V. (2003). Psychological profile in patients with Stages I and II breast cancer: Associations of psychological profile with tumor biological prognosticators. Psychological Reports, 92, 1187–1198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindström, L. (2001, September). Criteria for assessing students' creative skills in the visual arts. A teachers manual. Paper presented at the “A Must or a Muse. Arts and Culture in Education: Policy and Practice in Europe” conference, Rotterdam, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C., Anderson, K., Moore, K., & West, A. N. (1996). Creativity, oversensitivity, and rate of habituation. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. New York: FreemanGoogle Scholar
Norlander, T. (1999). Inebriation and inspiration? A review of the research on alcohol and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(1), 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norlander, T. (2000–2001). Conceptual convergence in creativity. Incubation and brain disease state. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norlander, T., Bergman, H., & Archer, T. (1998). Effects of flotation rest on creative problem solving and originality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norlander, T., Erixon, A., & Archer, T. (2000). Psychological androgyny and creativity: Dynamics of gender-role and personality trait. Social Behavior and Personality, 28(5), 423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norlander, T., Kjellgren, A., & Archer, T. (2002–2003). Effects of flotation- versus chamber-restricted environmental stimulation technique (rest) on creativity and realism under stress and non-stress conditions. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22(4), 341–357Google Scholar
Ouvinen-Birgerstam, P. (1999). Jag tycker jag är [How I think I am]. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget. (Original work published 1985)Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2003). Commentary on personal and potentially ambiguous creativity. You can't understand a butterfly unless you also watch the caterpillar. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryhammar, L. (1996). Kreativ funktion, perceptgenetisk rekonstruktion och organisatoriska förutsättningar för kreativ verksamhet: En studie av högskolelärare [Creative functioning, perceptgenetic reconstruction and organizational conditions for creative activity. A study of university teachers]. Lund, Sweden: Lund University PressGoogle Scholar
Ryhammar, A. L., & Smith, G. J. W. (1999). Creative and other personality functions as defined by percept–genetic techniques and their relations to organizational conditions. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlin, N.-E. (1997). Value-change and creativity. In Andersson, Å.E. & Sahlin, N.-E. (Eds.), The complexity of creativity (pp. 59–66). Dordrecht: KlüwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlin, N.-E. (2001). Kreativitetens filosofi [The philosophy of creativity]. Nora: Nya DoxaGoogle Scholar
Schoon, I. (1992). Creative achievement in architecture: A psychological study. Leiden, Netherlands: DSWO PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W. (1997). The internal breeding-ground of creativity. In Andersson, Å.E. & Sahlin, N.-E. (Eds.), The complexity of creativity (pp. 23–33). Dordrecht: KlüwerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W. (2001). A process approach to personality. New York: Plenum PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W., & Carlsson, I. (1990). The creative process: A functional model based on empirical studies from early childhood up to middle age. Psychological Issues, Monograph 57. New York: International Universities PressGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W., & Carlsson, I. (2001). CFT, the creative functioning test. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Department of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W., Carlsson, I., & Andersson, G. (1989). Creativity and the subliminal manipulation of projected self-images. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W., & Fäldt, E. (1999). Self-description and projection: Comparison of two methods to estimate creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W., Johnson, G., & Almgren, P.-E. (1989). MCT – the Meta-Contrast Technique. Stockholm: PsykologiförlagetGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W., Lilja, Å., & Salford, L. (2002). Creativity and breast cancer. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W., & Meer, G. (1990). Creativity in old age. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W., & Meer, G. (1994). Creativity through psychosomatics. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suler, J. R. (1980). Primary process thinking and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 144–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. B., & Greenstreet, R. L. (1972). Psychological characteristics in youth as predictors of five disease states: Suicide, mental illness, hypertension, coronary heart disease and tumor. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal, 132, 16–43Google Scholar
West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work. Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309–333). Chichester, U. K.: WileyGoogle Scholar
Westby, L., & Davidson, L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom?Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widenberg, L. (2003). Psykosocial forskningsmiljö och vetenskaplig produktivitet [Psychosocial research background and scientific productivity]. Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg, Department of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Wikström, B. M., Ekvall, G., & Sandström, S. (1994). Stimulating the creativity of elderly institutionalized women through works of art. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×