Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T13:51:29.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2009

Jeffrey Lewis
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Political Science, Cleveland State University
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

Not many international institutional environments can match the density or robustness of collective decision-making norms found in the European Union (EU). But there are surprisingly few empirical studies of how these collective norms operate in the EU. There is an even greater shortfall of research on the effects of this institutional environment on the basic actor properties of the national officials who participate in this system. How does the culture of decision making in the EU affect agents and their bargaining behavior? This article focuses on the Committee of Permanent Representatives (COREPER), a Brussels institution responsible for preparing upcoming ministerial meetings of the Council, and, as such, the heart of “everyday” EU decision making. The members of COREPER, known as the EU permanent representatives, are exemplars of “state agents” given their prominence in articulating, arguing, and defending national interests across the gamut of EU affairs. COREPER is thus a key laboratory to test whether and how state agents become socialized into a Brussels-based culture of EU decision making.

COREPER is the main preparatory body for the Council of the European Union, the legislative heart and unabashed defender of national interests in the EU. Composed of senior civil servants and career diplomats, COREPER members meet weekly and have evolved a style of decision making that is rooted in a collective culture with its own informal norms, rules, and discourse.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bjurulf, Bo, and Elgström, Ole. 2004. Negotiating Transparency: The Role of Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (2):249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostock, David. 2002. COREPER Revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2):215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Michael. 1986. Europe: More Than a Continent. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. 1997. Council Guide, Volume II: Comments on the Council's Rules of Procedure, Sept 1996. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
De Wilde d'Estmael, Tanguy, and Christian Franck. 1996. Belgium. In The European Union and Member States: Towards Institutional Fusion? edited by Rometsch, Dietrich and Wessels, Wolfgang, 37–60. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Dinan, Desmond, ed. 1998. Encyclopedia of the European Union. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 1999. Transcending Intergovemmentalism? Identity and Role Perceptions of National Officials in EU Decision Making. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (3):456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 2004. An Organisational Approach to European Integration: Outline of a Complementary Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 43 (2):199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten, Schaefer, Günther, and Trondal, Jarle. 2003. The Many Faces of EU Committee Governance. West European Politics 23 (3):19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eising, Rainer. 2002. Policy Learning in Embedded Negotiations: Explaining EU Electricity Liberalization. International Organization 56 (1):85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat, Statistical Office of the European Communities. 1996. Social Portrait of Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Evans, Peter. 1993. Building an Integrative Approach to International and Domestic Politics: Reflections and Projections. In Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, edited by Evans, Peter, Jacobson, Harold, and Putnam, Robert, 397–430. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Golub, Jonathan. 1999. In the Shadow of the Vote? Decision Making in the European Community. International Organization 53 (4):733–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, Ricardo, and Peterson, John. 2001. The EU's Impossibly Busy Foreign Ministers: ‘No One is in Control.’European Foreign Affairs Review 6 (1):53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, and Wallace, Helen. 1995. Executive Power in the European Union: The Functions and Limits of the Council of Ministers. Journal of European Public Policy 2 (4):559–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, and Wallace, Helen. 1997. The Council of Ministers. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization 53 (2):379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikle, Fred Charles. 1964. How Nations Negotiate. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Vos, Ellen, eds. 1999. EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law, and Politics. Portland, Ore.: Hart.Google Scholar
Jones, Bernie. 1994. A Comparison of Consensus and Voting in Public Decision Making. Negotiation Journal 10 (2):161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, Caporaso, James, and Checkel, Jeffrey. 2003. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1/2):7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1995. International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 1997. United Germany in an Integrating Europe. In Tamed Power: Germany in Europe, edited by Katzenstein, Peter, 1–48. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1986. Reciprocity in International Relations. International Organization 40 (l):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerremans, Bart. 1996. Do Institutions Make a Difference? Non-Institutionalism, Neo-Institutionalism, and the Logic of Common Decision-Making in the European Union. Governance 9 (2):217–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslowski, Rey. 1994. Intra-EU Migration, Citizenship and Political Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 32 (3):369–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, Roderick, and Messick, David, eds. 1995. Negotiation as a Social Process. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffan, Brigid. 2004. The European Union and Its Institutions as “Identity Builders.” In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Herrmann, Richard, Risse, Thomas, and Brewer, Mari-lynn, 75–96. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lax, David, and Sebenius, James. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey. 1997. Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the Failure of Internationalism. International Organization 51 (l):31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 1998. Constructing Interests: The Committee of Permanent Representatives and Decision-Making in the European Union. Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2000. The Methods of Community in EU Decision-Making and Administrative Rivalry in the Council's Infrastructure. Journal of European Public Policy 7 (2):261–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2002. National Interests: COREPER. In The Institutions of the European Union, edited by Peterson, John and Shackleton, Michael, 277–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2003. Institutional Environments and Everyday EU Decision Making: Rationalist or Constructivist?Comparative Political Studies 36 (l/2):97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Leon, and Scheingold, Stuart. 1970. Europe's Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
March, James, and Olsen, Johan. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4):943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Michael. 1997. Moving at Different Speeds: Spain and Greece in the European Union. In Tamed Power: Germany in Europe, edited by Katzenstein, Peter, 142–66. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Noël, Emile. 1967. The Committee of Permanent Representatives. Journal of Common Market Studies 5 (3):219–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Peter. 1996. Electoral Rights Under Article 8B of the Treaty of Rome. Common Market Law Review 33 (3):473–98.Google Scholar
Pruitt, Dean. 1981. Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Puetter, Uwe. 2003. Informal Circles of Ministers: A Way Out of the EU's Institutional Dilemmas?European Law Journal 9 (l):109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation: How to Resolve Conflict and Get the Best Out of Bargaining. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 1960. Fights, Games, and Debates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (l):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2004. European Institutions and Identity Change: What Have We Learned? In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Herrmann, Richard, Risse, Thomas, and Brewer, Mari-lynn, 247–71. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jeffrey, and Sander, Frank. 1988. When Should We Use Agents?: Direct vs. Representative Negotiation. Negotiation Journal 4 (4):395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2000. International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action in an Institutional Environment. European Journal of International Relations 6 (l):109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2004. Open-Door or Closed Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bargaining. International Organization 58 (4):667–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm. 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Trondal, Jarle. 2001. Administrative Integration Across Levels of Governance: Integration Through Participation in EU Committees. ARENA Report No. 01/7. Oslo, Norway: ARENA Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.
Trondal, Jarle. 2002. Beyond the EU Membership—Non-Membership Dichotomy? Supranational Identities among National EU Decision-Makers. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (3):468–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schendelen, M. P. C. M. 1996. ‘The Council Decides’: Does the Council Decide?Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (4):531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waever, Ole. 1995. Identity, Integration and Security: Solving the Sovereignty Puzzle in EU Studies. Journal of International Affairs 48 (2):389–431.Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen. 1973. National Governments and the European Communities. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Wallace, Helen. 2000. The Institutional Setting: Five Variations on a Theme. In Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th ed., edited by Wallace, Helen and Wallace, William, 3–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, William. 1994. Regional Integration: The West European Experience. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, William. 2000. Collective Governance. In Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th ed., edited by Wallace, Helen and Wallace, William, 523–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Richard, and McKersie, Robert, eds. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zartman, William, and Berman, Maureen. 1982. The Practical Negotiator. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×