Abbott, Kenneth W., ‘Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers’, 14 (1989) Yale Journal of International Law, pp. 335–411.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan, ‘Law, Legalization, and Politics: An Agenda for the Next Generation of IL/IR Scholars’, Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 33–56.Google Scholar

Allison, Dorothy, ‘A Question of Class’, in Holstrom, Nancy (ed.) The Socialist Feminist Project: A Contemporary Reader in Theory and Politics (Delhi: Aakar, 2011), pp. 30–45.Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E., ‘Contemporary International Law: An “Empire of Law” or the “Law of Empire”’, 24 (2009) American University International Law Review, pp. 811–842.Google Scholar

Alvarej, José E., ‘Book Review’, 95 (2001) The American Journal of International Law, pp. 459–464.Google Scholar

Alexandrowicz, C. H., An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies (16th, 17th and 18th centuries) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Ammoun, Judge, Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Limited, Second Phase, I. C. J. Reports, 1970 pp. 287–333.Google Scholar

Amos, Valerie and Parmar, Pratibha, ‘Challenging Imperial Feminism’, 17 (1984) Feminist Review, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar

Anand, R. P., ‘Attitude of the Asian-African States Toward Certain Provisions of International Law’, 15 (1966) The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 55–75.Google Scholar

Anand, R. P., New States and International Law (Delhi: Vikas Publishing House, 1972).Google Scholar

Anand, R. P., ‘Maritime Practice in South-East Asia until 1600 A.D. and the Modern Law of the Sea’, 30 (1981) International and Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 440–454.Google Scholar

Anand, R. P., The Origin and Development of Law of the Sea (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983).Google Scholar

Anand, R. P., Development of Modern International Law and India (New Delhi: Indian Society of International Law, 2006), pp. 24–25.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kenneth, ‘The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society’, 11 (2000) European Journal of International Law, pp. 91–120.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kenneth, ‘Squaring the Circle? Reconciling Sovereignty and Global Governance through Global Government Networks’, 118 (2005) Harvard Law Review, pp. 1255–1312.Google Scholar

Anderson, Kenneth, ‘“Accountability” as “Legitimacy”: Global Governance, Global Civil Society and the United Nations’, 36 (2011) Brooklyn Journal of International Law, pp. 841–890.Google Scholar

Anderson, Perry, Considerations on Western Marxism (London: New Left Books, 1976).Google Scholar

Anderson, Perry, Arguments with English Marxism (London: Verso, 1980).Google Scholar

Anderson, Perry, In the Tracks of Historical Materialism (London: Verso, 1984).Google Scholar

Anderson, Stanley V., ‘A Critique of Professor Myres S. McDougal Doctrine of Interpretation by Major Purposes’, 57 (1963) American Journal of International Law, pp. 378–383.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, ‘The Heart of My Home: Colonialism, Environmental Damage and the Nauru Case’, 34 (1993) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 445–506.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, ‘Francisco de Vitoria and the Colonial Origins of International Law’, 5 (1996) Social Legal Studies, pp. 321–336.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, ‘Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth Century International Law’, 40 (1999) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 1–80.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, ‘Colonialism and the Birth of International Institutions: Sovereignty, Economy and the Mandate System of the League of Nations’, 34 (2002) The New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, pp. 513–633.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, Imperialism, Sovereignty and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, ‘TWAIL: Past and Future’, 10 (2008) International Community Law Review, pp. 479–482.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, ‘Identifying Regions in the History of International Law’ in Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 1058−1081.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony and Chimni, B. S. ‘Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts’, 2 (2003) Chinese Journal of International Law, pp. 77–105.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony and Chimni, B. S. ‘Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflict’ in Ratner and Slaughter, Methods of International Law, pp. 185–211.Google Scholar

Anheier, Helmut K., Glasius, Marlies and Kaldor, Mary, ‘Introducing Global Civil Society’, in Anheier, Helmut K., Glasius, Marlies and Kaldor, Mary (eds.) Global Civil Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar

Aoki, Keith, ‘Space Invaders: Critical Geography and the “Third World” in International Law and Critical Race Theory’, 45 (2000) Villanova International Law Review, pp. 913–958.Google Scholar

Ashcroft, Bill and Ahluwalia, Pal, Edward Said (London: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Ashcroft, Bill, Griffiths, Gareth and Tiffin, Helen, The Post-Colonial Studies Reader (New York: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

Aurobindo, Sri, The Human Cycle, The Ideal of Human Unity, War and Self-Determination, 2nd edn (Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1970).Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Badiou, Alain, ‘The Communist Idea and the Question of Terror’, in Zizek, Slavoj (ed.) The Idea of Communism, vol. 2 (London: Verso, 2013), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Bagchi, A. K., Perilous Passage: Mankind and the Global Ascendancy of Capital (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Bagchi, A. K., Colonialism and Indian Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S., Language, Sense and Nonsense: A Critical Investigation into Modern Theories of Language (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S., Scepticism, Rules and Language (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar

Baetens, Freya, ‘The Forgotten Peace Conference: The 1915 International Congress for Women’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010) available at http://opil.ouplaw.com/home/epil (accessed on 29 June 2015)Google Scholar

Balbus, Isaac D., ‘Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the “Relative Autonomy” of the Law’, 11 (1977) Law & Society Review, pp. 571–588.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond, Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Barkawi, Tarak, ‘Empire and Order in International Relations and Security Studies’, in Denemark, Robert A. (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, Blackwell Publishing, Blackwell reference online; The International Studies Encyclopedia, Vol. III (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 1360–1379 (available online). Available at www.academia.edu/348812/Empire_and_Order_in_International_Relations_and_Security_Studies (accessed 4 June 2015).Google Scholar

Bartholomew, Amy, ‘Should a Marxist Believe in Marx on Rights?’, (1990) Socialist Register, pp. 244–264.Google Scholar

Bartlett, Katherine and Kennedy, Rosanne (eds.), Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich and Willms, Johannes, Conversations with Ulrich Beck (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Beckett, Jason A., ‘Rebel Without a Cause? Martti Koskenniemi and the Critical Legal Project’, 7 (2006) German Law Journal, pp. 1045–1088.Google Scholar

Beckett, Jason A., ‘Faith and Resignation: A Journey through International Law’, in Stone, Matthew, Wall, Illan rua and Douzinas, Costas (eds.) New Critical Thinking: Law and the Political (New York: Routledge, 2012), pp. 145–167.Google Scholar

Bedjaoui, Mohammed, Towards a new international economic order (New York: Holmes & Meir Publishers Inc., 1979).Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles R., Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Beneyto, Jose Maria and Kennedy, David (eds.), New Approaches to International Law: The European and the American Experiences (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Benton, Ted, ‘Marxism and Natural Limits: An Ecological Critique and Reconstruction’, 178 (1989) New Left Review, pp. 51–86.Google Scholar

Benton, Ted, ‘Ecology, Socialism and the Mastery of Nature’, 194 (1992) New Left Review, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter, The Capitalist Revolution (New York: Basic Books Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar

Berki, R. N., On Political Realism (London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1981).Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, in Sandel, Michael J. (ed.) Liberalism and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 15–36.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, ‘A Pluralist Approach to International Law’, 32 (2007) Yale Journal of International Law, pp. 301–329.Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, In Defense of Globalization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Bhargava, Rajeeva, Individualism in Social Science (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Bhargava, Rajeeva, What is Political Theory and Why Do We Need It? (New Delhi: Oxford University Press 2010), pp. 315–326.Google Scholar

Bhatia, Amar, ‘The South of the North: Building on Critical Approaches to International Law with Lessons from the Fourth World’, 14 (2012) Oregon Review of International Law, pp. 131–176.Google Scholar

Biersteker, Thomas J, Spiro, Peter J., Sriram, Chandralekha and Raffo, Veronica (eds.), International Law and International Relations: Bridging theory and practice (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Boldizar, Alexander and Korhonen, Outi ‘Ethics, Morals and International Law’, 10 (1999) European Journal of International Law, pp. 279–311.Google Scholar

Boldrin, Michele and Levine, David K., Against Intellectual Monopoly (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve, The New Spirit of Capitalism (London: Verso, 2005).Google Scholar

Bottomore, Tom and Patrick, Goode (eds.), Austro-Marxism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, ‘The Social Conditions of the International Circulation of Ideas’, in Schusterman, Richard (ed.) Bourdieu: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999), pp. 220–228.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Masculine Domination (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Sapiro, Gisele and McHale, Brian ‘Fourth Lecture. Universal Corporatism: The Role of Intellectuals in the Modern World’, 12 (1991) Poetics Today, pp. 655–669.Google Scholar

Bowett, D. W., The Law of International Institutions, 3rd edn (London: Stevens and Sons, 1975).Google Scholar

Bowring, Bill, The Degradation of the International Legal Order?: The Rehabilitation of Law and the Possibility of Politics (Oxford: Routledge-Cavendish, 2008)Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan and Chinkin, Christine, The Making of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Boyle, Francis Anthony World Politics and International Law (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Brenkert, George G., ‘Marx and Human Rights’, 24 (1986) Journal of the History of Philosophy, pp. 55–77.Google Scholar

Brenner, Johanna, ‘Intersections, Locations, and Capitalist Class Relations: Intersectionality from a Marxist Perspective’, in Holmstrom, Nancy (ed.) The Socialist Feminist Project: A Contemporary Reader in Theory and Politics (Delhi: Aakar, 2011), pp. 336–348.Google Scholar

Briggs, Herbert W. The Law of Nations (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952).Google Scholar

Brilmayer, Lea, ‘Realism Revisited: The Moral Priority of Means and Ends in Anarchy’, in Shapiro, Ian and Brilmayer, Lea (eds.) Global Justice (New York: New York University Press, 1999), pp. 192–215.Google Scholar

Briskin, Linda, ‘Socialist Feminism: From the Standpoint of Practice’, 30 (1989) Studies in Political Economy, pp. 87–114.Google Scholar

Brooks, Rosa Ehrenreich, ‘Feminism and International Law: An Opportunity for Transformation’, 14 (2002) Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, pp. 345–361.Google Scholar

Brown, Heather, ‘Marx on Gender and the Family’, (June 2014) Analytical Monthly Review, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, ‘The Expansion of International Society: The Consequences for the Law of Nations’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), pp. 357–370.Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, 4th edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allan E., Marx and Justice: The Radical Critique of Liberalism (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld, 1982).Google Scholar

Buchanan, Allen E., ‘Marx, Morality, and History: An Assessment of Recent Analytical Work on Marx’, 98 (1987) Ethics, pp. 104–136.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley, ‘The Theory of International Politics 1919–1969’, in Potter, Brian (ed.) The Aberystwith Papers: International Politics 1919–1969 (London: Oxford University Press, 1972), pp. 30–55.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley, ‘New Directions in the Theory of International Relations’, 14 (1975) International Studies (New Delhi), pp. 277–286.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Burawoy, Michael and Wright, Erik Olin, ‘Sociological Marxism’, in Turner, Jonathan H. (ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory (New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002), pp. 459–486.Google Scholar

Burkett, P., ‘Some Common Misconceptions About Nature and Marx’s Critique of Political Economy’, 7 (1996) Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, pp. 57–80.Google Scholar

Burkett, P., ‘Nature in Marx Reconsidered’, 10 (1997) Organization and Environment, pp. 164–83.Google Scholar

Caglar, Gulay, ‘Feminist Strategies and Social Learning in International Economic Governance’, in Caglar, GulayPrugl, Elisabeth and Zwingel, Sussane (eds.) Feminist Strategies in International Governance (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 249–266.Google Scholar

Caglar, Gulay, Prugl, Elisabeth and Zwingel, Sussane, ‘Introducing Feminist Strategies in International Governance’, in Caglar, GulayPrugl, Elisabeth and Zwingel, Sussane (eds.) Feminist Strategies in International Governance (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Callinicos, Alex, ‘Does Capitalism Need the State System?’, 20 (2007) Cambridge Review of International Affairs, pp. 533–549.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, ‘Imperial Delusions’ Issue 142 (30 March 2014) at www.isj.org.uk/index.php4?id=959&issue=142 (accessed on 4 June 2015).Google Scholar

Campbell, A., ‘International Law and Primitive Law’, 8 (1988) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caroll, William K., The Making of a Transnational Capitalist Class: Corporate Power in the 21st Century (London: Zed Books, 2010).Google Scholar

Carr, E. H., Twenty Years Crisis (London: Macmillan & Co, 1940).Google Scholar

Carr, E. H., Michael Bakunin (New York: Vintage Books, 1961).Google Scholar

Carr, E. H., The Twenty Years’ Crisis: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edn (New York: Palgrave, 2001).Google Scholar

Carty, Anthony, ‘Critical International Law: Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law’, 2 (1991) European Journal of International Law, pp.1–26.Google Scholar

Cassesse, Antonio, ‘Ex iniura ius oritur: Are We Moving Towards International Legitimation of Forcible Countermeasures in the World Community?’, 10 (1999) European Journal of International Law, pp. 23–30.Google Scholar

Castledine, Jacqueline ‘“In a Solid Bond of Unity”: Anticolonial Feminism in the Cold War Era’, 20 (2008) Journal of Women’s History, pp. 57–81.Google Scholar

Castree, Noel, ‘Marxism and the Production of Nature’, 72 (2000) Capital & Class, pp. 5–36.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh, ‘Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for “Indian” Pasts?’, in Ranajit Guha, (ed.) A Subaltern Studies Reader 1986–1995 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 263–294.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe, 2nd edn (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony, ‘The Climate of History: Four Theses’, 35 (2009) Critical Inquiry, pp. 197–222.Google Scholar

Chammalas, Martha, Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory (New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2013).Google Scholar

Chandhoke, Neera, ‘How Global is Global Civil Society?’, 11 (2005) Journal of World-Systems Research, pp. 355–371.Google Scholar

Chandhoke, Neera, ‘“Seeing” the State in India’, 40 (2005) Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 1033–1039.Google Scholar

Chang, Ha Joon, Why Developing Countries Need Tariffs (South Centre, Geneva, 2005) can be accessed at http://allanpatricknet.wdfiles.com/local–files/por-que-nacoes-em-desenvolvimento-devem-adotar-protecoes-lf/WhyDevCountriesNeedTariffsNew.pdfGoogle Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Subversive Trends in the Jurisprudence of International Law’, (1992) ASIL Proceedings, pp. 125–131.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Feminist Critiques of International Law and Their Critics’, 13 (1995) Third World Legal Studies-1994, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Martha Nussbaum’s Feminist Internationalism’, 111 (2000) Ethics, pp. 64–78.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Author! Author!: A Response to David Kennedy’, 15 (2002) Harvard Human Rights Journal, pp. 127–131.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘International Law: A Discipline of Crisis’, 65 (2002) The Modern Law Review, pp. 377–392.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Feminist Methods in International Law’, in Ratner, Steven R. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (eds.) The Methods of International Law (Washington, DC: The American Society of International Law, 2004).Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Feminist Ambivalence about International Law’, 11 (2005) International Legal Theory, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Talking to Ourselves: Should International Lawyers Take a Break from Feminism?’, in Kouvo, Sari and Pearson, Zoe (eds.) Between Resistance and Compliance? Feminist Perspectives on International Law in Era of Anxiety and Terror (Oxford: Hart, 2011), pp. 17–32.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Book Review: Catherine A MacKinnon, Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues’, 107 (2013) American Journal of International Law, pp. 719–214.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, Democracy and International Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2015).Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary and Chinkin, Christine The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary and Chinkin, Christine ‘Editorial Comment: Sex, Gender and September 11’, 96 (2002) American Journal of International Law, pp. 600–605.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary and Chinkin, Christine ‘The New United Nations “Gender Architecture”: A Room with a View?’, in A. von Bogdandy, A. Peters and R. Wolfrum (eds.) 17 (2013) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, and Larking, Emma (eds.), Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, Chinkin, Christine and Wright, Shelley, “Feminist Approach to International Law”, 85 (1991) American Journal of International Law, pp. 613–645.Google Scholar

Charnowitz, Steve, ‘Nongovernmental Organizations and International Law’, 100 (2006) American Journal of International Law, pp. 348–372.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Introduction: The Wages of Freedom: Fifty Years of Indian Nation-State’, in Chatterjee, Partha (ed.) Wages of Freedom: Fifty Years of Indian Nation-State (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, Partha, The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World (Delhi: Permanent Black, 2004).Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia Handler, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Chibber, Vivek, Post Colonial Theory and the Specter of Capital (New Delhi: Navayana Publishing Pvt. Ltd, 2013).Google Scholar

Chibber, Vivek, ‘Capitalism, Class and Universalism: Escaping the Cul-de-Sac of Postcolonial Theory’, (2014) Socialist Register, pp. 63–79.Google Scholar

Chibber, Vivek, ‘Confronting Postcolonial Theory-A Response to Critics’, 20 (2014) American Sociological Association, pp. 311–317.Google Scholar

Childs, Peter and Williams, R. J. Patrick, ‘Introduction: Points of Departure’ in Childs, Peter and Williams, R. J. Patrick (eds.) An Introduction to Post-Colonial Theory (London: Prentice Hall, 1997), pp.1–25.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., International Commodity Agreements: A Legal Study (London: Croom Helm, 1986).Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘The Political Economy of the Uruguay Round of Negotiations: A Perspective’, 29 (1992) International Studies, pp. 135–158.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘The Geopolitics of Refugee Studies: A View from the South’, 11 (1998) Journal of Refugee Studies, pp. 350–374.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Globalization, Humanitarianism and the Erosion of Refugee Protection’, 13 (2000) Journal of Refugee Studies, pp. 243–264.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘WTO and Environment: The Shrimp-Turtle and EC-Hormone cases’, (13 May 2000) Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 1752–1761.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Post-conflict Peace-building and the Return of Refugees: Concepts, Practices, and Institutions’, in Newman, Edward and van Selm, Joanne (eds.) Refugees and Forced Displacement: International Security, Human Vulnerability, and the State (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2002), pp. 195–211.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Towards a Radical Third World Approach to Contemporary International Law’, 5 (2002) ICCLP Review (Tokyo University School of Law Publication), pp. 16–30.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘WTO and Environment: The Legitimization of Unilateral Trade Sanctions’, (12–18 January 2002) Economic and Political Weekly, pp.133–140.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘An Outline of a Marxist Course on Public International Law’, 17 (2004) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making’, 15 (2004) European Journal of International Law, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Cooption and Resistance: Two faces of Global Administrative Law’, 37 (2005) New York University Journal of Law and Politics, pp. 799–827.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Developing Countries and the GATT/WTO System: Some Reflections on the Idea of Free Trade and Doha Round Trade Negotiations’, in Thomas, Chantal and Trachtman, Joel (eds.) Developing Countries in the WTO Legal System (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 21–45.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘The Birth of a “Discipline”: From Refugee to Forced Migration Studies’, 22 (2009) Journal of Refugee Studies, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘China, India and the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Towards an Interpretative Strategy’, in Sornarajah, M. and Wang, J. (eds.) China, India and the International Economic Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 217–250.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘International Law Scholarship in Post Colonial India: Coping With Dualism’, 23 (2010) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 23–51.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Prolegomena to a Class Approach to International Law’, 21 (2010) European Journal of International Law, pp. 57–82.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Sovereignty, Rights and Armed Intervention’, in Charlesworth, Hilary and Coicaud, Jean-Marc (eds.) Faultlines of International Legitimacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 303–325.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Capitalism, Imperialism and International Law in the Twenty First Century’, 14 (2012) Oregon Review of International Law, pp. 17–45.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘For Epistemological and Prudent Internationalism’, Harvard Human Rights Journal. Available at http://harvardhrj.com/2012/11/for-epistemological-and-prudent-internationalism/Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Legitimating International Rule of Law’, in Crawford, James and Koskenniemi, Martti (eds.) Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 290–309.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘The Self, Modern Civilization and International Law: Learning from Mohandas Karmchand Gandhi’s Hind Swaraj’, 23 (2012) European Journal of International Law, pp. 1159–1173.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Peace through Law: Lessons of 1914, 3 (2015) London Review of International Law, pp. 245–265.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine, ‘A Gendered Perspective to the International Use of Force’, 11 (1991) Australian Yearbook of International Law, pp. 279–293.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine, ‘Feminist Interventions into International Law’, 19 (1997) Adelaide Law Review, pp. 13–24.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine, ‘Gender Inequality and International Human Rights Law’, in Hurrell, Andrew and Woods, Ngaire (eds.) Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 95–121.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine and Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Building Women into Peace: The International Legal Framework’, 27 (2006) Third World Quarterly, pp. 937–957.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine and Kaldor, Mary, ‘Gender and New Wars’, 67 (2013) Journal of International Affairs, Fall/Winter pp. 167–187.Google Scholar

Cho, Sumi, Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams and McCall, Leslie, ‘Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis’, 38 (2013) Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, pp. 785–810.Google Scholar

Chowdhury, Cyra Akila, ‘Governance Feminism’s Imperial Misadventure: Progress, International Law, and the Security of Afghan Women’, FIU Legal Studies Research Paper No.14-04, February 2014 at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2320004Google Scholar

Churchich, Nicholas, Marxism and Morality: A Critical Examination of Marxist Ethics (Cambridge: James Clarke & Co, 1994).Google Scholar

Clark, Brett and Foster, John Bellamy, ‘Marx’s Ecology in the 21st Century’, 1 (2010) World Review of Political Economy, pp. 142–156.Google Scholar

Clark, Grenville and Sohn, Louis B., World Peace through World Law, 3rd edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

ClaudeJr, Inis L., Power and International Relations (New York: Random House, 1962).Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A., Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Cohen, Marshall, ‘Moral Skepticism and International Relations’, 13 (1984) Philosophy and Public Affairs, pp. 299–346.Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh, Marxism and Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Commoner, Barry, The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, Technology (New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc., 1971).Google Scholar

Conaghan, Joanne (ed.), Feminist Legal Studies: Critical Concepts in Law, vols. I-IV (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar

Conaghan, Joanne, ‘Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law’, in Douzinas, Costas and Perrin, Colin (eds.) Critical Legal Theory: Critical Concepts in Law, vol. III (London: Routledge, 2012), pp.108–142.Google Scholar

Connolly, William E., The Fragility of Things: Self-organizing Processes, Neo-liberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Conway, Janet, ‘Analysing Hegemonic Masculinities in the Anti- Globalization Movement(s)’, 13 (2011) International Feminist Journal of Politics, pp. 225–230.Google Scholar

Coogan-Gehr, Kelly, The Geopolitics of the Cold War and Narratives of Inclusion: Excavating a Feminist Archive (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar

Correa, Carlos M., Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries: The TRIPS Agreement and Policy Options (London: Zed Books, 2000).Google Scholar

Cox, Robert, ‘The “British School” in the Global Context’, 14 (2009) New Political Economy, pp. 315–328.Google Scholar

Cozette, Muriel, ‘Reclaiming the Critical Dimension of Realism: Hans J. Morgenthau on the Ethics of Scholarship’, 34 (2008) Review of International Studies, pp. 5–27.Google Scholar

Craig, Campbell, Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau and Waltz (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law. General Course on Public International Law (Brill, 2014).Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Kimberle, ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’, (1989) University of Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 139–167.Google Scholar

Dakolias, Maria, ‘Legal and Judicial Development: The Role of Civil Society in the Reform Process’, 24 (2000) Fordham International Law Journal, pp. S-26–S55.Google Scholar

Dallmayr, Fred, ‘“Self and Other”: Gadamer and the Hermeneutics of Difference’, 5 (1993) Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, pp. 507–529.Google Scholar

D’Amato, Anthony ‘Book Review: Rebecca J. Cook ed., Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives’, 89 (1995) American Journal of International Law, pp.840–844.Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S., ‘Old Approaches to International Law’, 36 (1995) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 509–512.Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, Eve, ‘Postcolonial Theories of Law’, in Banakar, Reza and Travers, Max (eds.) An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, 2nd edn (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 247–264.Google Scholar

Das, Samir Kumar, ‘Introduction: Surveying the Literature on State in Post-Independence India’, in, Das, Samir Kumar (ed.) Political Science: The Indian State, vol. 1 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 1–53.Google Scholar

D’aspremont, Jean, ‘Wording in International Law’, 25 (2012) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 575–602.Google Scholar

Davenport, Andrew, ‘Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist Fate’, 19 (2011) European Journal of International Relations, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar

Davison, Andrew, Muppidi, Himadeep, Irani, Freya and Ladin, Dror ‘Europe and Its Boundaries: Toward a Global Hermeneutic Political Theory’, in Davison, Andrew and Muppidi, Himadeep (eds.) Europe and Its Boundaries: Words and Worlds, Within and Beyond (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2009), pp. 83–111.Google Scholar

de la Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio, ‘Martti Koskenniemi and the Spirit of the Beehive in International Law’, 10 (2010) Global Jurist, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Karl and Hoffman, Stanley (eds.), The Relevance of International Law (New York: Anchor Books, 1971), pp. 34–66.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Laura A., ‘Toward a “New” New Haven School of International Law’, 32 (2007) The Yale Journal of International Law, pp. 547–552.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram, ‘International Law as a Primitive Legal System’, 19 (1986–87) New York Journal of International Law and Politics, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif, ‘The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism’, 20 (1994) Critical Inquiry, pp. 328–356.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif, ‘Thinking Modernity Historically: Is “Alternative Modernity” the Answer?’, 1 (2013) Asian Review of World Histories, pp. 5–34.Google Scholar

Dobb, Maurice, Studies in the Development of Capitalism (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd., 1947).Google Scholar

Donert, Celia, ‘Women’s Rights in Cold War Europe: Disentangling Feminist Histories’, 8 (2013) Past and Present, pp. 178–202.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack, Realism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Donovan, Josephine, Feminist Theory: The Intellectual Traditions, 4th edn, Revised and Expanded (New York: Continuum, 2012).Google Scholar

Drago Luis, M., and Edward Nettles, H., ‘The Drago Doctrine in International Law and Politics’, 8 (1928) The Hispanic American Historical Review, pp. 201–233.Google Scholar

Drahos, Peter, and Braithwate, John, Information Feudalism (London: Earthscan, 2002).Google Scholar

Duncan, Graeme, Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Dunn, Frederick Sherwood, The Protection of Nationals: A Study in the Application of International Law (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1932).Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., “Engaging the Writings of Martti Koskenniemi: Introduction to the Symposium’, 27 (2013) Temple International & Comparative Law Journal pp.207–214.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., ‘From Interdisciplinarity to Counterdisciplinarity: Is There Madness in Martti’s Method?’, 27 (2013) Temple International & Comparative Law Quarterly, pp. 309–338.Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, ‘Some Reflections on Contemporary International Law and the Appeal to Universal Values: A Response to Martti Koskenniemi’, 16 (2005) European Journal of International Law, pp. 131–137.Google Scholar

Duvall, Raymond and Varadarajan, Latha, ‘Travelling in Paradox: Edward Said and Critical International Relations’, 36 (2007) Millennium: Journal of International Studies, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (London: Fontana Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry, ‘Introduction Part 1’, in Eagleton, Terry and Milne, Drew (eds.) Marxist Literary Theory: A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1996), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Eckstein, George, ‘Hans Morgenthau: A Personal Memoir’, 48 (1981) Social Research, pp. 641–652.Google Scholar

Ehrenreich, Barbara, ‘What is Socialist Feminism?’, (2005) Monthly Review. Available at http://monthlyreview.org/2005/07/01/what-is-socialist-feminism (accessed on 21 July 2013). (Originally published in WIN Magazine on 3 June 1976.)Google Scholar

Elliot, Anthony, Concepts of the Self (Cambridge: Polity, 2001).Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, ‘Marxism, Functionalism and Game Theory: The Case for Methodological Individualism’, 11 (1982) Theory and Society, pp. 453–482.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, Making Sense of Marx (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Engels, Frederick, Dialectics of Nature (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1954).Google Scholar

Engels, Frederick, The Condition of the Working Class in England (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1977).Google Scholar

Engle, Karen, ‘International Human Rights and Feminisms: When Discourses Keep Meeting’, in Buss, Doris and Manji, Ambreena (eds.) International Law: Modern Feminist Approaches (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005) pp. 47–66.Google Scholar

Engle, Karen, ‘Liberal Internationalism, Feminism, and the Suppression of Critique: Contemporary Approaches to Global Order in the United States’, 46 (2005) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 427–439.Google Scholar

Erh-Soon Tay, Alice, ‘Marxism, Socialism and Human Rights’, in Kamenka, Eugene and Erh-Soon Tay, Alice (eds.) Human Rights (London: Edward Arnold, 1978), pp. 104–113.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni (ed.), Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N., ‘Gadamer/Statutory Interpretation’, 90 (1990) Columbia Law Review, pp. 609–681.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘International Legal Order: Alwyn V. Freeman vs. Myres S.McDougal’, 59 (1965) American Journal of International Law, pp. 66–71.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘Shimoda Case: A Legal Appraisal for the Atomic Attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki’, 59 (1965) American Journal of International Law, pp.759–793.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘International Law and the United States Role in the Vietnam War’, 75 (1966) Yale Law Journal, pp. 1122–1160.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘New Approaches to the Study of International Law’, 61 (1967) The American Journal of International Law, pp. 477–495.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, Legal Order in a Violent World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968), pp. 60–89.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, (ed.), The Vietnam War and International Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968, 1969, 1972 and 1976).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, The Status of Law in International Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘What We Should Learn from Vietnam’, 1 (1970–71) Foreign Policy, pp. 98–144.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, This Endangered Planet: Prospects and Proposals for Human Survival (New York: Random House, 1971).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘Comment I’, in Moore, John Norton (ed.), Law and Civil War in the Modern World (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), pp. 543–545.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘A New Paradigm for International Legal Studies: Prospects and Proposals’, 84 (1974–75) Yale Law Journal, pp. 969–1021.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, A Study of Future Worlds (New Delhi: Orient Longman, 1975).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘The Shaping of World Order Studies: A Response’, 42 (1980) The Review of Politics, pp. 18–30.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, Human Rights and State Sovereignty (New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers, Inc., 1981).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, The End of World Order: Essays on Normative International Relations (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1983).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, The Promise of World Order: Essays in Normative International Relations (Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books, 1987).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘The World Court’s Achievement’,) 81 (1987) American Journal of International Law, pp.106–112.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘Reflections on Democracy and the Gulf War’, 16 (1991) Alternatives, pp. 263–274.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘UN being made a tool of US Foreign Policy’, The Guardian Weekly, 27 January 1991.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, Explorations at the Edge of Time: The Prospects for World Order (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘Casting the Spell: The New Haven School of International Law’, 104 (1995) Yale Law Journal, pp. 1991–2008.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘Nuclear Weapons, International Law and the World Court: A Historic Encounter’, 91 (1997) The American Journal of International Law, pp. 64–75.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘The Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion and the New Jurisprudence of Global Civil Society’, 7 (1997) Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, pp. 333–352.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, Law in an Emerging Global Village: A Post-Westphalian Perspective (Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 1998).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, The Writings of Richard Falk: Towards Humane Global Governance (Delhi: Orient BlackSwan, 2012).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, Humanitarian Interventions and Legitimacy Wars: Seeking Peace and Justice in the 21st Century (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, Palestine: The Legitimacy of Hope (Charlottesville, VA: Just World Books, 2014).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, (Re)Imagining Humane Global Governance (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, ‘Towards a Legal Regime for Nuclear Weapons’, in Falk, RichardKratochwil, Friedrich and Mendlovitz, Saul H. (eds.), International Law: A Contemporary Perspective (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1985), pp. 453–473.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, and Krieger, David, The Path to Zero: Dialogues on Nuclear Dangers (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, and Strauss, Andrew, A Global Parliament: Essays and Articles (Berlin: Committee for a Democratic U.N., 2011).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, Meyrowitz, Lee and Sanderson, Jack, ‘Nuclear Weapons and International Law’, 20 (1980) Indian Journal of International Law, pp. 541–595.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Mendlovitz, Saul H., International Law: A Contemporary Perspective (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1985).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘International Law and the United States Role in Vietnam War’, 75 (1966) Yale Law Journal, pp. 1122–1160.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘The New States and International Legal Order’, II (1966) Recueil Des Cours (Leyden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1968), pp. 1–102.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘International Law and the United States Role in the Vietnam War: A Reply to Professor Moore’, 76 (1967) Yale Law Journal, pp. 1095–1158.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘New Approaches to the Study of International Law’, 21 (1967) American Journal of International Law, pp. 477–495.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘A New Paradigm for International Legal Studies: Prospects and Proposals’, 84 (1975) The Yale Law Journal, pp. 969–1021.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘The Role of the International Court of Justice’, 37 (1984) Journal of International Affairs, pp.253–268.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., ‘The ICJ Ruling on Israel’s Security Wall’, 99 (2005) The American Journal of International Law, pp. 42–52.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A. and Weston, Burns H., ‘The Relevance of International Law to Palestinian Rights in the West Bank and Gaza: In Legal Defense of the Intifida’, 32 (1991) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 129–157.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., Kim, Samuel S. and Mendlovitz, Saul H. (eds.), Towards a Just World Order (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A., Higgins, Rosalyn C., Michael Reisman, W. and Weston, Burns H., ‘Myres Smith McDougal (1906–1998)’, 92 (1998) American Journal of International Law, pp. 729–733.Google Scholar

Farrelly, Colin, “Patriarchy and Historical Materialism”, 26 (1) (2011) Hypatia, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 862–890.Google Scholar

Fellmeth, Aaron Xavier, ‘Feminism and International Law: Theory, Methodology, and Substantive Reform’, 22 (2000) Human Rights Quarterly, pp. 658–733.Google Scholar

Fine, Bob, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liberal Ideals and Marxist Critiques (London: Pluto Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Fine, Robert, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Marx’s Critique of the Legal Form (Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Firth, Raymond, Human Types: An Introduction to Social Anthropology, revised edn (New York: Mentor, 1958).Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Sir Gerald, ‘Vae Victis or, Woe to the Negotiators! Your Treaty or our “Interpretation” of it?’, 65 (1971) American Journal of International Law, pp. 358–373.Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy, Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy, ‘Marx’s Ecology in Historical Perspective’, 96 (2002) International Socialism. Available at www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/isj2/2002/isj2-096/foster.htm (accessed on 17 September 2015).Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy, ‘Ecology and the Transition from Capitalism to Socialism’, 60 (2008) Monthly Review. Available at http://monthlyreview.org/2008/11/01/ecology-and-the-transition-from-capitalism-to-socialism/ (accessed on 17 September 2015).Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy, ‘The Epochal Crisis’, 65 (2013) Monthly Review, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy, and Clark, Brett, ‘Ecological Imperialism: The Curse of Capitalism’, (2004) Socialist Register, pp. 186–201.Google Scholar

Foster, John Bellamy, Clark, Brett and York, Richard, The Ecological Rift: Capitalism’s War on Earth (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., ‘Who Killed Article 2(4)?’, 64 (1970) American Journal of International Law, pp. 809–837.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M., ‘Break It, Don’t Fake It’, (July/August 1999) Foreign Affairs, pp. 116–118.Google Scholar

Frank, Jerome, ‘A Conflict with Oblivion: Some Observations on the Founders of Legal Pragmatism’, (1954) Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 4092. Accessed at http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5109&context=fss_papersGoogle Scholar

Franks, Mary Anne, ‘Book Review’, 30 (2007) Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, pp. 257–267.Google Scholar

Fraser, Arvonne S., ‘Becoming Human: The Origins and Development of Women’s Human Rights’, 21 (1999) Human Rights Quarterly, pp. 853–906.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy, ‘Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History’, 56 (2009) New Left Review, pp. 97–117.Google Scholar

Freeman, Alwyn, ‘Professor McDougal’s Law and Minimum World Public Order’, 58 (1964) American Journal of International Law, pp. 711–716.Google Scholar

Freeman, M., Chinkin, C. and Rudolf, B. (eds.), The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Frei, Christopher, Hans J. Morgenthau: An Intellectual Biography (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Fricker, Miranda, and Hornsby, Jennifer (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Friedmann, Wolfgang, ‘Book Review’, 64 (1944) Columbia Law Review, pp. 606–615.Google Scholar

Gable, Peter, ‘Roll Over Beethoven’, 36 (1984) Stanford Law Review, pp. 1–55.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans–Georg, Truth and Method, 2nd revised edn (London: Continuum, 2005) First South Asian Edition.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Kevin P., Griffith-Jones, Stephany and Ocampo, Jose Antonio, ‘Historic Moment for the IMF’, Financial Times, 29 May 2012.Google Scholar

Galtung, Johann, The True Worlds: A Transnational Perspective (New York: Free Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas and Hathaway, James, ‘Non-Refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence’, 53 (2015) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, pp. 235–284.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Leela, Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction (St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin, 1998).Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuo, ‘Neoliberalism, Colonialism and International Governance: Decentering the International Law of Governmental Legitimacy’, 98 (2000) Michigan Law Review, pp. 1996–2055.Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuo, ‘Construing Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy Consistently with Facilitating Access to Affordable Aids Drugs to Low-End Income Consumers’, 53 (2001) Florida Law Review, pp. 728–788 at p. 727.Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuo, ‘The Legal Status of the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health Under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’, 15 (2002) Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, pp. 291–317.Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuo, ‘How Necessity May Preclude State Responsibility for Compulsory Licensing Under the TRIPS Agreement’, 31 (2006) North Carolina Journal of International Law and Regulation, pp. 943–970.Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuo, ‘Imperialism, Colonialism, and International Law’, 54 (2007) Buffalo Law Review, pp. 1013–1066.Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuo, ‘War’s Legacy in International Investment Law’, 11 (2009) International Community Law Review, pp. 353–386.Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuo, War, Commerce, and International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Geras, Norman, Marx and Human Nature: Refutation of a Legend (London: Verso, 1983).Google Scholar

Gilman, Nils, ‘The Cold War as Intellectual Force Field’, (First View Article) (2015) Modern Intellectual History, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Gimenez, Martha E., ‘Capitalism and Oppression of Women: Marx Revisited’, 69 (2005) Science & Society, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar

Glasius, Marlies, The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Glasius, Marlies, ‘Does the Involvement of Global Civil Society Make International Decision-Making More Democratic? The Case of the International Criminal Court’. Available at www.orfaleacenter.ucsb.edu/sites/secure.lsit.ucsb.edu.gisp.d7_orfalea-2/files/sitefiles/publications/Glasius_OBii.pdf (accessed on 17 September 2015).Google Scholar

Glennon, M. J., ‘The New Interventionism’, (May/June 1999) Foreign Affairs, pp. 2–7.Google Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W., The Standard of ‘Civilisation’ in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Goodrich, Peter, Reading the Law: A Critical Introduction to Legal Method and Techniques (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Giddon, ‘The Conceptual World of the Yale School of International Law’, 21 (1968–69) World Politics, pp. 108–132.Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen Jay, The Mismeasure of Man (Middlesex: Penguin, 1981).Google Scholar

Gouldner, Alvin W., The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology (London: Heinemann, 1971).Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1978).Google Scholar

Gray, Mark M., Kittlison, Miki Caul and Sandholtz, Wayne, ‘Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000’, 60 (2006) International Organization, pp. 293–333.Google Scholar

Grewe, Wilhelm, The Epochs of International Law, translated and revised by Byers, Michael (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001).Google Scholar

Gross, Leo, ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Proper Role of an International Tribunal’, (1969) Proceedings of the American Society of International Law, pp. 108–122.Google Scholar

Gross, Leo, ‘Hans Kelsen’, 67 (1973) The American Journal of International Law, pp. 491–501.Google Scholar

Gross, Leo, ‘Problems of International Adjudication and Compliance with International Law: Some Simple Solutions’, in Gross, Leo, Essays on International Law and Organization, vol. 1 (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1984), pp. 399–410.Google Scholar

Gross, Leo, ‘Review of Reviving the World Court’, 82 (1988 ) American Journal of International Law, pp. 166–175.Google Scholar

Grundmann, Reiner, ‘The Ecological Challenge to Marxism’, 187 (1991) New Left Preview, pp. 103–121.Google Scholar

Grundmann, Reiner, Marxism and Ecology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Guha, Ranajit, ‘Introduction’ in Guha, Ranajit (ed.) A Subaltern Studies Reader 1986–1995 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. ix–xxii.Google Scholar

Guilhot, Nicolas (ed.), The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, The Rockefeller Foundation and the 1954 Conference on Theory (New York: University of Columbia Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T., ‘A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law’, 90 (2002) California Law Review, pp. 1826–1887.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, ‘A Review of Gadamer’s Truth and Method’, in Wachterhauser, B. R. (ed.), Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy (Albany, NY: The SUNY Press, 1986), pp. 243–276. Translated by Fred Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emile M., Victor, David G. and Lupu, Yonatan, ‘Political Science Research on International Law: The State of the Field’, 106 (2012) The American Journal of International Law, pp. 47–97.Google Scholar

Halley, Janet, Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Halley, Janet, Governance Feminism: An Introduction (October 2014). On file with author.Google Scholar

Halley, Janet, Kotiswaran, Prabha and Shamir, Hila, ‘From the International to the Local in Feminist Legal Responses to Rape, Prostitution/Sex Work, and Sex Trafficking: Four Studies in Contemporary Governance Feminism’, 29 (2006) Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, pp. 335–423.Google Scholar

Harcourt, Wendy, ‘Review Essay: “Beyond Smart Economics”: The World Bank 2012 Report on Gender and Equality’, 14 (2012) International Feminist Journal of Politics, pp. 307–312.Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio, Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio, Commonwealth (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael, and Weeks, Kethi (eds.), The Jameson Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).Google Scholar

Harrington, Carol, ‘Resolution 1325 and Post-Cold War Feminist Politics’, 13 (2011) International Feminist Journal of Politics, pp. 557–575.Google Scholar

Harris, Jerry, ‘Statist Globalization in China, Russia and the Gulf States’, 73 (2009) Science and Society, pp. 6–33.Google Scholar

Harris, Roy, The Language-Maker (London: Duckworth, 1980).Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Hartmann, Eva, ‘The Difficult Relation between International Law and Politics: The Legal Turn from a Critical IPE Perspective’, 16 (2011) New Political Economy, pp. 561–584.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Heidi L, ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards A More Progressive Union, 3 (1979) Capital and Class, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Harstock, Nancy C. M., ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’, in Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill B. (eds.) Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1983), pp. 283–310.Google Scholar

Harvey, David, ‘The Geography of Capitalist Accumulation: A Reconstruction of Marxist Theory’, in Peet, Richard (ed.) Radical Geography: Alternative Viewpoints on Contemporary Social Issues (London: Methuen & Co Ltd., 1977), pp. 283–284.Google Scholar

Harvey, David, The New Imperialism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona, ‘Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law’, 72 (2005) The University of Chicago Law Review, pp. 469–536.Google Scholar

Head, M., Evgeny Pashukanis: A Critical Appraisal (Oxford: Routledge-Cavendish, 2008).Google Scholar

Hennessy, Rosemary and Ingraham, Chrys, ‘Introduction: Reclaiming Anticapitalist Feminism’, in Hennessy, Rosemary and Ingraham, Chrysn (eds.) Materialist Feminism: A Reader in Class, Difference, and Women’s Lives (Routledge: London, 1997), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Hernandez, Gleider I., ‘A Reluctant Guardian: the International Court of Justice and the Concept of “International Community”’, 83 (2013) British Yearbook of International Law, pp. 13–60.Google Scholar

Heyes, Cressida J. (ed.), Philosophy and Gender: Critical Concepts in Philosophy, vol. 1 (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Policy and Impartiality: The Uneasy Relationship in International Law: Legal Order in a Violent World by Richard A. Falk’, 23 (1969) International Organization, pp. 914–931.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Integrations of Authority and Control: Trends in the Literature of International Law and International Relations’, in Reisman, Michael W. and Weston, Burns H. (eds.), Towards World Order and Human Dignity: Essays in Honour of Myres S. McDougal (New York: The Free Press, 1976), pp. 79–94.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Closing Remarks at the Conference to Honor the Work of Professor Michael Reisman’, 34 (2009) Yale Journal of International Law, pp. 605–613.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘Ethics and International Law’, 23 (2010) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 277–289.Google Scholar

Hill, Christopher, Reformation to Industrial Revolution, 1530–1780 (Hammondsworth: Penguin, 1969).Google Scholar

Hinsley, F. H., Sovereignty, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Hirst, Paul, On Law and Ideology (London: The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1979).Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. J., ‘The General Crisis of the European Economy in the 17th Century – I’, 5 (1954) Past and Present, pp. 33–53.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. J., ‘The General Crisis of the European Economy in the 17th Century – II’, 6 (1954) Past and Present, pp. 44–65.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. J., Industry and Empire: From 1750 to the Present Day (London: Penguin, 1968).Google Scholar

Hodgson, Geoffrey M., ‘The Enforcement of Contracts and Property Rights: Constitutive versus Epiphenomenal Conceptions of Law’, 13 (2003) International Review of Sociology, pp. 373–389.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Florian, ‘An Epilogue on an Epilogue’, 7 (2006) German Law Journal, pp. 1095–1102.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Stanley, Contemporary Theories of International Relations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1960).Google Scholar

Hoffman, Stanley, ‘Report of the Conference on Conditions of World Order-June 12–19, 1965, Villa Serbelloni, Bellagio, Italy’, 95 (Spring 1966) Daedalus, pp. 455–478.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Stanley, Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1987).Google Scholar

Holmstrom, Nancy (ed.), The Socialist Feminist Project: A Contemporary Reader in Theory and Politics (New Delhi: Aakar Books, 2011).Google Scholar

Howard, Michael, ‘The Military Factor in European Expansion’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.) The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), pp. 32–42.Google Scholar

Howe, Stephen, ‘Edward Said: Anxieties of Influence’, 67 (2007) Cultural Critique, pp. 50–87.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert, and Teitl, Ruti, ‘Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters’, 1 (2010) Global Policy, pp. 127–136.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Stanley, ‘Does Humanity Law Require (or Imply) a Progressive Theory of History? (And Other Questions for Martti Koskenniemi)’, 27 (2013) Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, pp. 377–398.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan, ‘The Theory of Critical Legal Studies’, 6 (1986) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 1–45 reproduced in Douzinas, Costas and Perrin, Colin (eds.) Critical Legal Theory, vol. I (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 243–286.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. F. M. ‘“Forms of Life” in Wittgenstein’s “Philosophical Investigations”’, 5 (1968) American Philosophical Quarterly, pp. 233–243.Google Scholar

Husami, , Ziyad, ‘Marx on Distributive Justice’, 8 (1978) Philosophy & Public Affairs, pp. 27–64.Google Scholar

Jacquette, Jane S., ‘Feminism and the Challenges of the “Post-Cold War” World’, 5 (2003) International Feminist Journal of Politics, pp. 331–354.Google Scholar

Jalli, Indira, ‘Dalit Feminism and Indian Academics’, (2003) Indian Association for Women Studies Newsletter.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric, A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present (London: Verso, 2002).Google Scholar

Hoffman, Stanley, Valences of the Dialectic (London: Verso, 2009).Google Scholar

Jayawardena, Kumari, Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World (London: Zed, 1986).Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob, ‘Recent Theories of the Capitalist State’, 1 (1977) Cambridge Journal of Economics, pp. 353–373.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place (Cambridge: Polity, 1990).Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob, ‘From Micro-powers to Governmentality: Foucault’s Work on Statehood, State Formation, Statecraft and State Power’, 26 (2007) Political Geography, pp. 34–40Google Scholar

Johnson-Odim, Cheryl, ‘“For their freedoms”: The Anti-imperialist and International Feminist Activity of Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti of Nigeria’, 32 (2009) Women’s Studies International Forum, pp. 51–59.Google Scholar

Johnston, Adrian and Malabou, Catherine, Self and Emotional Life: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and Neuroscience (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Jouannet, Emmanuelle, ‘Koskenniemi: A Critical Introduction’, in Koskenniemi, Martti, The Politics of International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

Jouannet, Emmanuelle, The Liberal-Welfarist Law of Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Jütersonke, Oliver, ‘The Image of Law in Politics among Nations’, in Williams, Michael C. (ed.) Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 93–117.Google Scholar

Jütersonke, Oliver, Morgenthau, Law and Realism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Kagarlitsky, Boris, The Twilight of Globalization: Property, State and Capitalism (London: Pluto Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Kain, Phillip J., Marx and Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Kamenka, Eugene, Marxism and Ethics (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Kamenka, Eugene, ‘Marxism, Economics and Law’ (accessed on 7 May 2014) http://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx/libros/3/1014/7.pdf, pp.49–72Google Scholar

Kaplan, Morton A. and deB Katzenbach, Nicholas, The Political Foundations of International Law (New York: Wiley, 1961).Google Scholar

Kapur, Ratna, ‘Human Rights in the 21st Century: Take a Walk on the Dark Side’, 28 (2006) Sydney Law Review, pp. 665–687.Google Scholar

Kautsky, Karl, ‘On Political Reform and Socialism (The Dictatorship of the Proletariat)’, in Ishay, Micheline R. (ed.) The Human Rights Reader, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 2007), pp.239–246.Google Scholar

Kaviraj, Sudipta, ‘An Outline of a Revisionist Theory of Modernity’, 46 (2005) European Journal of Sociology, pp. 497–526.Google Scholar

Kaviraj, Sudipta, ‘Marxism in Translation: Critical Reflections on Radical Indian Thought’, in Rourke, Richard and Guess, Raymond (eds.) Political Judgment: Essays for John Dunn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 172–201.Google Scholar

Kelman, Mark, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, The Communist Theory of Law (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., 1955).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law, 2nd revised edn (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson, 1967).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Book Review: How Nations Behave (2nd edn) by Henkin’, Louis New York: Columbia University Press 1979; 21 (1980) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 301–320.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Theses about International Law Discourse’, (1980) German Yearbook of International Law, pp. 353–391.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Primitive Legal Scholarship’, 27 (1986) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 1–98.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, International Legal Structures (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1987).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The Sources of International Law’, 2 (1987) The American Journal of International Law and Policy, pp. 1–96.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Move to Institutions’, 8 (1987) Cardozo Law Review, pp. 841–988.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘A New Stream of International Law Scholarship’, 7 (1988) Wisconsin International Law Journal, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Book Review’, 31 (1990) Harvard International Law Journal, pp. 385–391.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘A New World Order: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow’, 4 (1994) Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, pp. 330–375.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘International Law and the Nineteenth Century: The History of an Illusion’, 17 (1997) QLR, pp. 99–136.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The Disciplines of International Law and Policy’, 12 (1999) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 9–135.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘My Talk at the ASIL: What Is New Thinking in International Law’, ASIL Proceedings of the 94^th Annual Meeting, April 5–8, 2000, pp. 104–125.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘When Renewal Repeats: Thinking Against the Box’, 32 (2000) New York Journal of International Law and Politics, p. 335.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem?’, 14 (2002) Harvard Human Rights Journal, pp. 101–126.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Tom Franck and the Manhattan School’, 35 (2003) NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, pp. 397–437.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing Humanitarianism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Challenging Expert Rule: The Politics of Global Governance’, 27 (2005) Sydney Journal of International Law, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, Of War and Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The Last Treatise: Project and Person’ (Reflections on Martti Koskenniemi’s Apology to Utopia)’, 7 (2006) German Law Journal, p. 982.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The “Rule of Law,” Political Choices, and Development Common Sense’, in Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 95–173.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘One, Two, Three, Many Legal Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Cosmopolitan Dream’, 31 (2006–07) N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change, pp. 641–659.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Speech: Assessing the Proposal for a Global Parliament: A Skeptics View’, XIII (2007) Widener Law Review, pp. 395–399.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The Mystery of Global Governance’, in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P. (eds.) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 37–68.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Lawfare and Warfare’, in Crawford, James and Koskenniemi, Martti (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 158–184.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘Law and the Political Economy of the World’, 26 (2013) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 7–48.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘The International Human Rights Regime: Still Part of the Problem’, in Dickinson, Rob, Katselli, Elena, Murray, Colin, and Pedersen, Ole W. (eds.) Examining Critical Perspectives on Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 19–34.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, ‘A complete list of publications’ at www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/dkennedy/publications/Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, and Tennant, Christopher, ‘New Approaches to International Law: A Bibliography’, 35 (1994) Harvard International Law Journal, p. 417.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David, and Fisher, William W. III (eds.), The Canon of American Legal Thought (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Kennedy, David W., ‘A New World Order: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow’, 4 (1994) Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, pp. 330–375.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’, 88 (1976) Harvard Law Review, p. 1685.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, ‘The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries’, 28 (1979) Buffalo Law Review, p. 205.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, ‘The Role of Law in Economic Thought: Essays on the Fetishism of Commodities’, 34 (1985) The American University Law Review, pp. 939–1001.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siecle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan, and Klare, Karl, ‘A Bibliography of Critical Legal Studies’, 94 (1984) Yale Law Journal, pp. 461–490.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of British Naval Mastery (London: The Macmillan Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law’, 19 (1998) Michigan Journal of International Law, pp. 345–372.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lasa Oppenheim’s Positive International Law’, 13 (2002) European Journal of International Law, pp. 401–436.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, 68 (2005) Law and Contemporary Problems, pp. 15–63.Google Scholar

Kirk, Gwyn, ‘Standing on Solid Ground: A Materialist Ecological Feminism’, in Hennessy, Rosemary and Ingraham, Chrysn (eds.) Materialist Feminism: A Reader in Class, Difference, and Women’s Lives (Routledge: London, 1997), pp. 345–363.Google Scholar

Kishore, Vishal, Ricardo’s Gauntlet: Economic Fiction and the Flawed Case For Free Trade (London: Anthem Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘International Institutions’, in Crawford, James and Koskenniemi, Martti (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 228–244.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Towards a Culture of Formalism? Martti Koskenniemi and the Virtues’, 27 (2013) Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, pp. 417–436.Google Scholar

Klare, Karl E., ‘The Politics of Duncan Kennedy’s Critique’, 22 (2001) Cardozo Law Review, pp.1073–1103.Google Scholar

Knox, Robert, ‘Marxism, International Law, and Political Strategy’, 22 (2009) Leiden Journal of International Law, pp. 413–436.Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju,’ Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’, 106 (1996–97) Yale Law Journal, pp. 2599–2659.Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Is There a ‘New’ New Haven School of International Law’, 32 (2007) Yale Journal of International Law, pp. 559–573.Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Michael Reisman, Dean of the New Haven School of International Law’, 34 (2009) Yale Journal of International Law, pp. 501–504.Google Scholar

Kolakowski, Leszek, ‘Marxism and Human Rights’, 112 (1983) Daedalus, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar

Korany, B., ‘Strategic Studies and the Third World: A Critical Evaluation’, 110 (1986) International Social Science Journal, pp. 546–562.Google Scholar

Korhonen, Outi, ‘New International Law: Silence, Defence or Deliverance?’, 7 (1996) European Journal of International Law, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia (Helsinki: Lakimieslieton Kustannus, 1989).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Comments on chapters 1 and 2’, in Byers, Michael and Nolte, Georg (eds.) United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 91–100.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Letter to the Editors of the Symposium’, in Ratner, Steven R. and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (eds.) The Methods of International Law (Washington, DC: The American Society of International Law, 2004), pp. 109–126.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: the Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and Renewal’, 16 (2005) European Journal of International Law, pp. 113–124.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, 70 (2007) The Modern Law Review, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’, 15 (2009) European Journal of International Relations, pp. 395–422.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Case for Comparative International Law’, 20 (2009) Finnish Yearbook of International Law, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Empire and International Law: The Real Spanish Contribution’, 61 (2011) University of Toronto Law Journal, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Histories of International Law: Significance and Problems for a Critical View’, 27 (2013) Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, pp. 215–241.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘International Law and the Emergence of Mercantile Capitalism’. Available at www.helsinki.fi/eci/Publications/Koskenniemi/MKMercantileCapitalism.pdf (accessed on 21 January 2014).Google Scholar

Kothari, Rajni, Footsteps to the Future: Diagnosis of the Present World and a Design for an Alternative (New York: Free Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Kotiaho, Paavo, ‘A Return to Koskenniemi, or the Disconcerting Co-optation of Rupture’, 13 (2013) German Law Journal, pp. 483–496.Google Scholar

Kotiswaran, Prabha, Dangerous Sex, Invisible Labor: Sex Work and the Law in India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Kovel, J., The End of Capitalism: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World? 2nd edn (London: Zed Books, 2007).Google Scholar

Kumar, Pratibha, ‘Challenging Imperial Feminism’, 17 (1984) Feminist Review, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar

Kunz, Josef L., The Changing Law of Nations: Essays on International Law (Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Kutz, Christopher L., ‘Just Disagreement: Indeterminacy and Rationality in the Rule of Law’, 103 (1994) The Yale Law Journal, pp. 997–1030.Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, Emancipation(s) (London: Verso, 1996).Google Scholar

Lal, Vinay, The History of History (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Lang, Andrew and Marks, Susan, ‘People with Projects: Writing the Lives of International Lawyers’, 27 (2013) Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, pp. 437–453.Google Scholar

Lang, Anthony F., Political Theory and International Affairs: Hans J. Morgenthau on Aristotle’s The Politics (Greenwood, CT: Praeger, 2004).Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold D., World Politics and Personal Insecurity (New York: The Free Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold D., ‘In Collaboration with McDougal’, l (1971) Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, pp. 17–19.Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold D., ‘Introduction’, in Michael Reisman, W. and Weston, Burns H. (eds.) Towards World Order and Human Dignity: Essays in Honor of Myres S. McDougal (New York: The Free Press, 1976), pp. xiii–xviii.Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold and Kaplan, Abraham, Power and Society (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold D. and McDougal, Myres S., ‘Criteria for a Theory About Law’, 44 (1970–71) Southern California Law Review, pp. 362–394.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, We have Never Been Modern (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993). Translated by Catherine Porter.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, ‘Politics of Nature: East and West Perspectives’, 4 (2011) Ethics and Global Politics, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, International Law: Collected Papers, vol. 2, ‘The Law of Peace’, Part I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘The Grotian Tradition in International Law’, in Lauterpacht, Eli (ed.) International Law: Collected Papers, vol. II, Part I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 307–366.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch, International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, vol. 4 (ed.) Lauterpacht, E. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Laville, Helen, Cold War Women: The International Activities of American Women’s Organizations (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Legro, Jeffrey W., and Moravcsik, Andrew, ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’, 25 (1999) International Security, pp. 5–55.Google Scholar

Leiter, Brian, ‘Classical Realism’, 11 (2001) Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy, pp. 244–267.Google Scholar

Lenin, V. I., Selected Works, vols 1–3 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1975).Google Scholar

Lenin, V.I., On Dialectics (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1980).Google Scholar

Levine, Andrew, Sober, Elliot and Wright, Erik Olin, ‘Marxism and Methodological Individualism’, 162 (1987) New Left Review, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar

Levi-Strauss, Claude, Structural Anthropology, vol. 2 (Middlesex: Penguin, 1976).Google Scholar

Levitt, Janet Koven, ‘Bottom-Up International Law Making: Reflections on the New Haven School of Law Making’, 32 (2007) Yale Journal of International Law, pp. 393–420.Google Scholar

Levitt, Nancy, and Verchick, Robert R. M., Feminist Legal Theory: A Primer (New York: New York University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Lieber, Keir A. (ed.), War, Peace, and International Political Realism: Perspectives from The Review of Politics (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Lindner, Kolja, ‘Marx’s Eurocentrism. Postcolonial Studies and Marx Scholarship’, (2010) Radical Philosophy, pp. 27–41.Google Scholar

Linklater, Andrew, ‘Marxism and International Relations: Antithesis, Reconciliation and Transcendence’, in Higgott, Richard and Richardson, J. L. (eds.) International Relations: Global and Australian Perspectives on an Evolving Discipline (Canberra: Australian National University, 1991), pp. 70–91.Google Scholar

Lissitzyn, Oliver J., ‘Book Review’, 76 (1962–63), Harvard Law Review, pp. 668–672.Google Scholar

Little, Richard, The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Karl, ‘Some Realism about Realism’, in Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Lorca, Arnulf Becker, ‘Eurocentrism in the History of International Law’, in Fassbender, Bardo and Peters, Anne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 1034–1058.Google Scholar