Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the third edition
- Preface to the second edition
- Preface to the first edition
- Table of cases
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The shaping factors
- 3 Controls by the host state
- 4 The liability of multinational corporations and home state measures
- 5 Bilateral investment treaties
- 6 Multilateral instruments on foreign investment
- 7 Settlement of investment disputes: contract-based arbitration
- 8 Treaty-based investment arbitration: jurisdictional issues
- 9 Causes of action: breaches of treatment standards
- 10 The taking of foreign property
- 11 Compensation for nationalisation of foreign investments
- 12 Defences to responsibility
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - Bilateral investment treaties
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the third edition
- Preface to the second edition
- Preface to the first edition
- Table of cases
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The shaping factors
- 3 Controls by the host state
- 4 The liability of multinational corporations and home state measures
- 5 Bilateral investment treaties
- 6 Multilateral instruments on foreign investment
- 7 Settlement of investment disputes: contract-based arbitration
- 8 Treaty-based investment arbitration: jurisdictional issues
- 9 Causes of action: breaches of treatment standards
- 10 The taking of foreign property
- 11 Compensation for nationalisation of foreign investments
- 12 Defences to responsibility
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
There was a massive proliferation of bilateral investment treaties in the 1990s. A World Bank study stated that in 1994 there were over 700 such treaties. By the end of the millennium, the figure had moved towards 2,600 treaties. It has now exceeded that mark. Investment chapters are also included in free trade agreements. Obviously, states which participate in the making of these treaties consider them to be necessary for a variety of reasons, the most important being the belief that they promote the flow of foreign investment. The question whether they do in fact promote foreign investment flows has been subjected to considerable doubt in recent literature. Yet, the treaties continue to be made, though there is a decline in their numbers in recent times. Other reasons are advanced for their making. One is their signalling function. The making of such treaties is an indication that a state previously committed to certain ideological stances inimical to foreign investment has changed its policy and is now prepared to accept standards of protection of investment and international arbitration to settle investment disputes. The activity of China and Vietnam, erstwhile communist states wedded to a concept of public ownership of property, is illustrative of this signalling function. The former East European states, liberated from communist ideology, also signed many such treaties. But, such treaty activity is also explicable on the basis of the need of these countries to enhance their competitive positions.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The International Law on Foreign Investment , pp. 172 - 235Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010