Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the third edition
- Preface to the second edition
- Preface to the first edition
- Table of cases
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The shaping factors
- 3 Controls by the host state
- 4 The liability of multinational corporations and home state measures
- 5 Bilateral investment treaties
- 6 Multilateral instruments on foreign investment
- 7 Settlement of investment disputes: contract-based arbitration
- 8 Treaty-based investment arbitration: jurisdictional issues
- 9 Causes of action: breaches of treatment standards
- 10 The taking of foreign property
- 11 Compensation for nationalisation of foreign investments
- 12 Defences to responsibility
- Bibliography
- Index
8 - Treaty-based investment arbitration: jurisdictional issues
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface to the third edition
- Preface to the second edition
- Preface to the first edition
- Table of cases
- List of abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The shaping factors
- 3 Controls by the host state
- 4 The liability of multinational corporations and home state measures
- 5 Bilateral investment treaties
- 6 Multilateral instruments on foreign investment
- 7 Settlement of investment disputes: contract-based arbitration
- 8 Treaty-based investment arbitration: jurisdictional issues
- 9 Causes of action: breaches of treatment standards
- 10 The taking of foreign property
- 11 Compensation for nationalisation of foreign investments
- 12 Defences to responsibility
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Consent of the parties is the basis of all arbitration. In contract-based arbitration, the consent is specific to disputes arising from the contract. It is usually expressed in the arbitration clause. In treaty-based arbitration, the consent of the state is said to be given to all present and potential investors who satisfy nationality criteria and whose investment is protected by the treaty in advance of the dispute. The rule can be so simply put. But, much dispute has arisen as to the jurisdictional criteria that have to be satisfied before an arbitral tribunal can proceed to the merits of a case. In virtually every treaty-based dispute that has arisen, the jurisdiction of the tribunal has been queried. So, it is necessary to examine the jurisdictional criteria that need to be established. Since most treaty-based arbitrations take place before ICSID tribunals, the rules are best stated on the basis of ICSID arbitration, which is likely to provide the standard for other types of treaty-based arbitration.
As may be realised, with an increase in the number of claims, states have invested much effort in exploring the methods of excluding jurisdiction, and have met with a measure of success. Cases are fought with tenacity, and states are resistant to the use of treaties for the imposition of responsibility. This, again, raises doubts as to the utility of treaties as an investment protection device.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The International Law on Foreign Investment , pp. 306 - 331Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010