Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:21:15.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - A New Global Order Based on International Law and Multilateralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2009

Thomas J. Schoenbaum
Affiliation:
Tokyo Christian University
Get access

Summary

A NEW GLOBAL ORDER

The realist idea that each state has only isolated, individual interests has reduced validity today. In our world of the twenty-first century there is growing interest convergence – a growing harmony of interests – among states. States all over the world now have shared interests in peace, security, economic well-being, environmental quality, and even human rights. Therefore, international cooperation cannot be exceptional, as the realist model would have it; we need a system in which cooperation is the norm. In addition, states today are not the only international actors. International organizations, transnational companies, and international NGOs are as important or more important than many states.

The United States in particular should not take a narrow view of its national interest. As the preeminent global power the United States cannot appear to be acting as if its own self-interest is all that matters. The United States must act and be perceived as acting to benefit all humanity. U.S. policies uniquely affect all nations and peoples. If America exercises its power for narrow, partisan reasons, it inspires only resentment and condemnation. The global interests of the United States demand this broad view of its national interest. Taking a global approach instead of a narrow partisan view is not “international social work”; it is rational self-interest. The United States more than any nation is threatened by disorder anywhere in the world and benefits from a stable world order based on the rule of law.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Relations
The Path Not Taken
, pp. 54 - 95
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Henkin, Louis, International Law: Politics and Values (1995).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (1994).Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (1991).Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law (6th ed., 2004).Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal and Hirsch, Moshe (eds.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation (2003).Google Scholar
Charney, Jonathan, “Universal International Law,” 87 American Journal of International Law 529 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
For the debate over neo-realism, see Keohane, Robert O. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (1986), and Baldwin, David A. (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (1993).Google Scholar
Kennan's views may be found in George Kennan, Realities of Amending Foreign Policy (1954).
The first path-breaking book challenging realist assumptions was Keohane, R. O. and Nye, Joseph, Transnational Relations and World Politics (1971).Google Scholar
Martin Wight, a partisan of the English international society approach, sets out a theory that there are basically three traditions in IR: realism, rationalism, and revolutionism. See Wight, M., International Theory: The Three Traditions (1991).Google Scholar
There is controversy over whether the origin of international law is the work of Hugo Grotius, On the Law of War and Peace (De Jure Belli ac Pacis) published in 1625, or the sixteenth-century writings of two Spanish authors, Francesco Suarez and Francesco de Vitoria. See James Brown Scott, The Spanish Origin of International Law (1934).
The writings of the most important historical figures of international law/law of nations are available in the multivolume work, The Classics of International Law, edited by James Brown Scott (1933). This work features the writings of Alberico Gentile, E. Vattel, H. Grotius, C. Zouche, S. Pufendorf, F. Suarez, F. de Vitoria, Christian Wolff, John Selden, and Frederic de Martens.
See Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (2d ed., 1995).Google Scholar
Harold Hongu Koh, “Why do Nations Obey International Law?” 106 Yale Law Journal 2599 (1997). This puts forth a theory of participation as the basic reason why states observe international law.
For the classic argument against coercion as the essence of law, see Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave (2d ed., 1979).Google Scholar
Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace (Beck, Lewis White, ed, 1957, originally published in 1795).Google Scholar
Christian Wolff, Jus Gentium (1749) is available in German in Wolff, Gesammelte Werke (Marcel Thomman ed. 1972).
For regime theory, see Stephen. D. Krasner, International Regimes (1983); Andrease Hassenclever, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes (1997); Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (1984); and R. O. Keohane, International Institutions: Two Approaches (1988).
Lauterpacht, H., The Function of Law in the International Community (1933).Google Scholar
Sereni, A. P., The Italian Conception of International Law (1943).Google Scholar
The best-known contemporary work on justice is A Theory of Justice by John Rawls (1971). His distributive justice argument is what he calls the “difference principle” that social and economic inequalities are permissible if and only if the arrangements generating them work out better for the most disadvantaged person (the worst-off person) than any more equal structure. This is certainly a debatable proposition and in any case is not intended to apply to the international context.
Allott, Philip, “The True Function of Law in the International Community,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 5 (1998) develops the idea that relations constitutes the true function of law.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (1990); Fairness in International Law and Institutions (1995).Google Scholar
For morality and international relations, see Frost, Mervyn, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (1992).Google Scholar
Some legal scholars and IR specialists are collaborating on joint research. Legalization in World Politics (Judith L. Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne Marie Slaughter, eds., 2001). See also “International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship,” by Anne Marie Slaughter, Andrew S. Tulnells, and Stepan Wood, 92 American Journal of International Law 367 (1998).
A landmark of constructivist political thought is Arend, Anthony Clark, International Legal Rules (1996).Google Scholar
The basic book on neo-realism is Waltz, Kenneth, Theory of International Politics (1979).Google Scholar
For a discussion of game theory, see Abbott, Kenneth W., “Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers,” 14 Yale Journal of International Law 335 (1989).Google Scholar
See Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (1977) for the complex interdependence theory.Google Scholar
The most influential traditional realist text is Morgenthau, Hans, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (1948).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry, Diplomacy (1994).Google Scholar
For a constructivist view of international relations, see Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, Rosemary, Gaddis, John Lewis, and Hurrell, Andrew, eds., Order and Justice in International Relations (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, J. Craig, International Law and International Relations (2000).Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Ian, Globalization and International Relations Theory (1999).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (1989).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., The Function of Law in the International Community (1933).Google Scholar
Allott, Phillip, Eunomia: A New World Order for a New World (1990).Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, John F., The United States and the Rule of Law in International Affairs (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×