Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T23:23:37.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Chinese Internet choice of law approaches

from PART III - Choice of law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Faye Fangfei Wang
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Get access

Summary

In China, the two general principles to determine applicable law in contracts are the same as those in the EU and US: the first is party autonomy, where parties are free to choose the applicable law governing the contract; second, the closest connection or the most significant relationship to the contract or transaction is regarded as a linking factor to determine the applicable law in the absence of choice by parties. However, China is a civil law country with written laws. There can be no choice of law element in a contract in China unless the contract includes an “international” factor. A contract is deemed to be “international” when (1) at least one party is not a Chinese citizen or legal person, (2) the subject matter of the contract is in a third country (i.e. the goods to be sold or purchased are located outside of China), or (3) the conclusion or performance of the contract is made in a third country.

Foreign-related cases have been dramatically increasing. In 2004, there were about 17,066 new foreign-related cases, an increase of about 8%.

Party autonomy/freedom of choice

In China, party autonomy is a paramount principle in determining the applicable law for contracts. The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China enacted a unified Contract Law, which has been in force since 1 October 1999. It also deals with the applicable law in foreign contracts. Article 126 of the Chinese Contract Law provides a party autonomy rule that:

Parties to a foreign related contract may select the applicable law for resolution of a contractual dispute, except as otherwise provided by law.

Type
Chapter
Information
Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
Legal Practices in the EU, US and China
, pp. 133 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×