Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T06:42:29.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The legal obstacles and solutions to online arbitration and online mediation

from PART IV - Online dispute resolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Faye Fangfei Wang
Affiliation:
Bournemouth University
Get access

Summary

Online dispute resolution (ODR) brings efficiency and convenience to the resolution of conflicts but at the same time it faces a number of challenges due to technology, management and legal obstacles. This chapter will focus on the legal obstacles to the facilitation of online arbitration and mediation, discuss the modernisation of the current legislation in the field of private international law and alternative dispute resolution and evaluate the necessity for harmonisation of international standards of ODR services and implementation of the proposed solutions through the reform of the existing international, regional and national laws or by supplementing it with new subject-specific legislation.

Legal obstacles to ODR

ODR is certainly much younger than most of the existing laws. Whether the existing laws can provide a sufficient legal basis for cases resolved through ODR is very controversial. Whether new laws should consider the inclusion of provisions tailored for the new information technology is also debatable. However, the bottom line is that ODR has become a reality due to its increasing use. The interpretation of the rules determining the validity of electronic arbitration and mediation agreements and the enforcement of electronic arbitral awards and settlement agreements differs in different countries. In order to encourage and enable ODR to proceed, legal obstacles must be removed.

Online arbitration

Online arbitration is one of the most complicated ODR processes as its non-localisation challenges the traditional concepts of “the arbitration agreements”, “the place of arbitration” and “the place of arbitral awards”.

Type
Chapter
Information
Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
Legal Practices in the EU, US and China
, pp. 156 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×