Book contents
- Interpreting Buridan
- Interpreting Buridan
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Philosopher as Arts Master
- 2 Principles in Buridan’s Logic of Consequences
- 3 Buridan on Paradox
- 4 Modality and Temporality in Buridan’s Logic
- 5 A Paradigm Change within Medieval Philosophy
- 6 Buridan’s Internalism
- 7 John Buridan on the Ontological Status of Artifacts
- 8 John Buridan on Final Causality
- 9 Female Physiology in John Buridan’s Quaestiones de secretis mulierum
- 10 Buridan on the Value of Emotions
- 11 Buridan on Happiness and the Good Life
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2024
Book contents
- Interpreting Buridan
- Interpreting Buridan
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Philosopher as Arts Master
- 2 Principles in Buridan’s Logic of Consequences
- 3 Buridan on Paradox
- 4 Modality and Temporality in Buridan’s Logic
- 5 A Paradigm Change within Medieval Philosophy
- 6 Buridan’s Internalism
- 7 John Buridan on the Ontological Status of Artifacts
- 8 John Buridan on Final Causality
- 9 Female Physiology in John Buridan’s Quaestiones de secretis mulierum
- 10 Buridan on the Value of Emotions
- 11 Buridan on Happiness and the Good Life
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interpreting BuridanCritical Essays, pp. 229 - 248Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Primary Sources
Albert the Great (1916–20) De animalibus, 2 vols, ed. Stadler, H.. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Albert the Great (1955) Quaestiones super De animalibus, ed. Filthaut, E.. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1974) Les Auctoritates Aristotelis: un florilège médiéval. Étude historique et édition critique, ed. Hamesse, J.. Leuven and Paris: Publications Universitaires–B. Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1888–1903) Summa theologiae, vols. 4–11. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita. Rome, 1882–.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1954) In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis Expositio, ed. Maggiòlo, P. M.. Turin and Rome: Marietti.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1956) Quaestiones de quolibet, Quodlibet IX, ed. and trans. Busa SJ, R.. Corpus Thomisticum. https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/q09.html.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1969) Sententia libri Ethicorum, vol. 47. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita. Rome, 1882–.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1938) Categories, De Interpretatione, Prior Analytics, trans. H. P Cooke and H. Tredennick (Loeb Classical Library). London: Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1963) Categories and De interpretatione, trans. J. L. Ackrill (Clarendon Aristotle Series). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1965) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1992) De animalibus, Michael Scot’s Arabic–Latin Translation, Part Three, Books XV–XIX: Generation of Animals, ed. Van Oppenraaij, A. M. I.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2001) Topica, Trans. W. A. Pickard-Cambridge, in McKeon, R. (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2009) Prior Analytics Book I, trans. Gisela Striker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1955) De civitate Dei, ed. Dombart, B. and Kalb, A.. In Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina, vols. 47–48. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Averroes, (Ibn Rushd) (1550) Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De caelo. In Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Cordubensis commentariis. Venice.Google Scholar
Averroes, (Ibn Rushd) (1562) Sermo de substantia orbis. Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Commentariis, vol. IX. Venetiis apud Junctas; repr. Frankfurt a.M.: Minerva, 1962.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger (2013) On Signs, trans. T. S. Maloney. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Boethius, (1934) Consolatio Philosophiae, in Weinberger, W. (ed.), Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, vol. 67. Vienna: Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, (1493) Perlustratio Sancti Bonauenture in Primum Librum Sententiarum. Friburg: Kilianus Piscator.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1513) Quaestiones super decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Paris. Repr. as Super decem libros Ethicorum. Frankfurt a.M.: Minerva, 1968.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1637) Quaestiones in decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Oxford: n.p.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1942) Quaestiones super libros De caelo et mundo, ed. Moody, E. A.. Cambridge, MA: The Mediaeval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1964 [1518]) In Metaphysicen Aristotelis Questiones argutissimae. Paris. Repr. as Kommentar zur Aristotelischen Metaphysik. Frankfurt a.M.: Minerva.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1966) Sophisms on Meaning and Truth, ed. Scott, T. K.. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1967) “Jean Buridan’s De motibus animalium,” ed. Scott, F. and Shapiro, H.. Isis, 58: 533–52.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1976) Tractatus de consequentiis, ed. Hubien, H.. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1982) John Buridan on Self-Reference, trans. Hughes, G. E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1983a) Il cielo e il mondo: commento al trattato Del cielo di Aristotele, trans. A. Ghisalberti. Milan: Rusconi.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1983b) Questiones longe super librum Perihermeneias / Johannes Buridanus, ed. van Der Lecq, Ria. Nijmegen: Ingenium.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1983c) Quaestiones in Praedicamenta, ed. Schneider, J.. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1984) John Buridan on the Soul and Sensation: An Edition of Book II of His Commentary on Aristotle’s Book on the Soul with an Introduction and a Translation of Question 18 on Sensible Species, ed. P. Sobol. PhD Thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1986) Les Questiones super tres libros Metheororum Aristotelis de Jean Buridan: étude suivie de l’édition du livre I, ed. S. Bages. PhD Thesis, École nationale des chartes.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1989) John Buridan’s Philosophy of Mind: An Edition and Translation of Book III of His Questions on Aristotle’s De anima (Third Redaction), with Commentary and Critical and Interpretative Essays, ed. J. Zupko. PhD Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1994) Quaestiones elencorum, ed. der Lecq, Ria van and Braakhuis, H. A. G.. Nijmegen: Ingenium.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1996) Expositio et Quaestiones in Aristotelis De caelo, ed. Patar, B.. Louvain, la-Neuve, and Paris: Éditions de l’Institut supérieur de philosophie–Peeters.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1998) Summulae de suppositionibus, ed. van der Lecq, L.. Artistarum 10/4. Nijmegen: Ingenium.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2001a) Summulae de demonstrationibus, ed. de Rijk, L. M.. Artistarium10/8. Groningen-Haren: Ingenium.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2001b) Summulae de dialectica, trans. G. Klima. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2004) Summulae de practica sophismatum, ed. Pironet, F.. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2008) Lectura Erfordiensis in I–VI Metaphysicam together with the 15th-Century Abbreviatio Caminensis, ed. de Rijk, L. M. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2010) Quaestiones super libros De generatione et corruptione Aristotelis: A Critical Edition with an Introduction, ed. Streijger, M., Bakker, P. J. J. M., and Thijssen, J. M. M. H.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2015a) Jana Burydana: Quaestiones super Parva naturalia Aristotelis. Edycja krytyczna i analiza historyczno-filozoficzna, ed. M. Stanek. Ph.D. Thesis, Katowice.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2015b) Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam): Libri I–II, ed. Streijger, M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buridan, John (2015c) Treatise on Consequences, trans. S. Read. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2016) Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam): Libri III–IV, ed. Streijger, M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buridan, John (2019) “John Buridan’s Quaestiones de secretis mulierum: Edition and Introduction,” ed. Beneduce, C. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Vivarium, 57, 1–2: 127–81.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2022) Joël Biard and Christophe Grellard, ‘Les Questiones circa librum de Physionomia de Jean Buridan’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 89: 237–442.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2023) Questions on Aristotle’s De anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, ed. Klima, Gyula, Sobol, Peter G., Hartman, Peter, and Zupko, Jack. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2024) Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam): Libri V–VIII, ed. Streijger, M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (n.d. 1) Quaestiones in Analytica Posteriorum, ed. H. Hubien. www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Authors/Buridan/In_libros_posteriorum_analyticorum.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (n.d. 2) Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Priorum Analyticorum, ed. H. Hubien. http://individual.utoronto.ca/pking/resources.html.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter (1955) De puritate artis logicae tractatus longior (with a Revised Edition of the Tractatus brevior), ed. Boehner, P.. New York: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter (2000) On the Purity of the Art of Logic, trans. P. V. Spade. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent (1520) Summae quaestionem ordinariarum. Paris. Repr. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute (1953).Google Scholar
Hippocrates, (1931) Aphorisms, ed. Jones, W. H. S.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns (1950) Ordinatio. In Opera Omnia, ed. Balic, C. et al. , vols. 1–14. Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Google Scholar
Cicero, (1998) De finibus bonorum et malorum, ed. Reynolds, L. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gerald of Odo (Giraldus Odonis) (1500) Sententia et expositio cum quaestiones super libros Ethicorum. Venice.Google Scholar
Gerald of Odo (Giraldus Odonis) (1997) Logica (Opera Philosophica I), ed. De Rijk, L. M.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, L. (ed.) (1998) Aristoteles Latinus III 1–4: translatio Boethii (recensiones duae), translatio anonyma, Pseudo-Philoponi aliorumque scholia, specimina translationum recentiorum. Editio altera adiunctis scholiorum in Analytica Priora supplementis a James Shiel compositis. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ockham, William (1974) Summa Logicae, ed. Boehner, P. et al. New York: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Ockham, William (1984) Summula philosophiae naturalis, c. 20 (De forma rei artificialis), ed. Brown, S.. St. Bonaventure, NY: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar
Ockham, William (1998) Ockham’s Theory of Terms: Part I of the Summa Logicae. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Oresme, Nicole (2013) Questiones super Physicam II.4, ed. Carot, S.i, Celeyrette, J., Kirschner, S., and Mazet, E.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Albert the Great (1992) Women’s Secrets: A Translation of Pseudo-Albertus Magnus’ De secretis mulierum with Commentaries, ed. Lemay, H. R.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Albert the Great (2012) El De secretis mulierum atribuido a Alberto Magno: estudio, edición crítica y traducción, ed. Nieto, J. P. Barragán. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Seneca the Younger (1917–25) Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, ed. and trans. Gummere, R., 3 vols. (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca the Younger (1928) De ira. In Seneca: Moral Essays, vol. 1 (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 106–355.Google Scholar
Seneca the Younger (1989) De vita beata. In Moral Essays, trans. Basore, J., vol. 2 (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
William of Sherwood (1966) William of Sherwood’s Introduction to Logic. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Albert the Great (1916–20) De animalibus, 2 vols, ed. Stadler, H.. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Albert the Great (1955) Quaestiones super De animalibus, ed. Filthaut, E.. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1974) Les Auctoritates Aristotelis: un florilège médiéval. Étude historique et édition critique, ed. Hamesse, J.. Leuven and Paris: Publications Universitaires–B. Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1888–1903) Summa theologiae, vols. 4–11. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita. Rome, 1882–.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1954) In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis Expositio, ed. Maggiòlo, P. M.. Turin and Rome: Marietti.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1956) Quaestiones de quolibet, Quodlibet IX, ed. and trans. Busa SJ, R.. Corpus Thomisticum. https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/q09.html.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1969) Sententia libri Ethicorum, vol. 47. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita. Rome, 1882–.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1938) Categories, De Interpretatione, Prior Analytics, trans. H. P Cooke and H. Tredennick (Loeb Classical Library). London: Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1963) Categories and De interpretatione, trans. J. L. Ackrill (Clarendon Aristotle Series). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1965) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1992) De animalibus, Michael Scot’s Arabic–Latin Translation, Part Three, Books XV–XIX: Generation of Animals, ed. Van Oppenraaij, A. M. I.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2001) Topica, Trans. W. A. Pickard-Cambridge, in McKeon, R. (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2009) Prior Analytics Book I, trans. Gisela Striker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1955) De civitate Dei, ed. Dombart, B. and Kalb, A.. In Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina, vols. 47–48. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Averroes, (Ibn Rushd) (1550) Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De caelo. In Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Cordubensis commentariis. Venice.Google Scholar
Averroes, (Ibn Rushd) (1562) Sermo de substantia orbis. Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Commentariis, vol. IX. Venetiis apud Junctas; repr. Frankfurt a.M.: Minerva, 1962.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger (2013) On Signs, trans. T. S. Maloney. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
Boethius, (1934) Consolatio Philosophiae, in Weinberger, W. (ed.), Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, vol. 67. Vienna: Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, (1493) Perlustratio Sancti Bonauenture in Primum Librum Sententiarum. Friburg: Kilianus Piscator.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1513) Quaestiones super decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Paris. Repr. as Super decem libros Ethicorum. Frankfurt a.M.: Minerva, 1968.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1637) Quaestiones in decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Oxford: n.p.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1942) Quaestiones super libros De caelo et mundo, ed. Moody, E. A.. Cambridge, MA: The Mediaeval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1964 [1518]) In Metaphysicen Aristotelis Questiones argutissimae. Paris. Repr. as Kommentar zur Aristotelischen Metaphysik. Frankfurt a.M.: Minerva.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1966) Sophisms on Meaning and Truth, ed. Scott, T. K.. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1967) “Jean Buridan’s De motibus animalium,” ed. Scott, F. and Shapiro, H.. Isis, 58: 533–52.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1976) Tractatus de consequentiis, ed. Hubien, H.. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1982) John Buridan on Self-Reference, trans. Hughes, G. E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1983a) Il cielo e il mondo: commento al trattato Del cielo di Aristotele, trans. A. Ghisalberti. Milan: Rusconi.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1983b) Questiones longe super librum Perihermeneias / Johannes Buridanus, ed. van Der Lecq, Ria. Nijmegen: Ingenium.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1983c) Quaestiones in Praedicamenta, ed. Schneider, J.. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1984) John Buridan on the Soul and Sensation: An Edition of Book II of His Commentary on Aristotle’s Book on the Soul with an Introduction and a Translation of Question 18 on Sensible Species, ed. P. Sobol. PhD Thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1986) Les Questiones super tres libros Metheororum Aristotelis de Jean Buridan: étude suivie de l’édition du livre I, ed. S. Bages. PhD Thesis, École nationale des chartes.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1989) John Buridan’s Philosophy of Mind: An Edition and Translation of Book III of His Questions on Aristotle’s De anima (Third Redaction), with Commentary and Critical and Interpretative Essays, ed. J. Zupko. PhD Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1994) Quaestiones elencorum, ed. der Lecq, Ria van and Braakhuis, H. A. G.. Nijmegen: Ingenium.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1996) Expositio et Quaestiones in Aristotelis De caelo, ed. Patar, B.. Louvain, la-Neuve, and Paris: Éditions de l’Institut supérieur de philosophie–Peeters.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (1998) Summulae de suppositionibus, ed. van der Lecq, L.. Artistarum 10/4. Nijmegen: Ingenium.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2001a) Summulae de demonstrationibus, ed. de Rijk, L. M.. Artistarium10/8. Groningen-Haren: Ingenium.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2001b) Summulae de dialectica, trans. G. Klima. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2004) Summulae de practica sophismatum, ed. Pironet, F.. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2008) Lectura Erfordiensis in I–VI Metaphysicam together with the 15th-Century Abbreviatio Caminensis, ed. de Rijk, L. M. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2010) Quaestiones super libros De generatione et corruptione Aristotelis: A Critical Edition with an Introduction, ed. Streijger, M., Bakker, P. J. J. M., and Thijssen, J. M. M. H.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2015a) Jana Burydana: Quaestiones super Parva naturalia Aristotelis. Edycja krytyczna i analiza historyczno-filozoficzna, ed. M. Stanek. Ph.D. Thesis, Katowice.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2015b) Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam): Libri I–II, ed. Streijger, M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buridan, John (2015c) Treatise on Consequences, trans. S. Read. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2016) Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam): Libri III–IV, ed. Streijger, M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buridan, John (2019) “John Buridan’s Quaestiones de secretis mulierum: Edition and Introduction,” ed. Beneduce, C. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Vivarium, 57, 1–2: 127–81.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2022) Joël Biard and Christophe Grellard, ‘Les Questiones circa librum de Physionomia de Jean Buridan’, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 89: 237–442.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2023) Questions on Aristotle’s De anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, ed. Klima, Gyula, Sobol, Peter G., Hartman, Peter, and Zupko, Jack. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (2024) Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam): Libri V–VIII, ed. Streijger, M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (n.d. 1) Quaestiones in Analytica Posteriorum, ed. H. Hubien. www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Authors/Buridan/In_libros_posteriorum_analyticorum.Google Scholar
Buridan, John (n.d. 2) Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Priorum Analyticorum, ed. H. Hubien. http://individual.utoronto.ca/pking/resources.html.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter (1955) De puritate artis logicae tractatus longior (with a Revised Edition of the Tractatus brevior), ed. Boehner, P.. New York: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter (2000) On the Purity of the Art of Logic, trans. P. V. Spade. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent (1520) Summae quaestionem ordinariarum. Paris. Repr. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute (1953).Google Scholar
Hippocrates, (1931) Aphorisms, ed. Jones, W. H. S.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns (1950) Ordinatio. In Opera Omnia, ed. Balic, C. et al. , vols. 1–14. Vatican City: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Google Scholar
Cicero, (1998) De finibus bonorum et malorum, ed. Reynolds, L. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gerald of Odo (Giraldus Odonis) (1500) Sententia et expositio cum quaestiones super libros Ethicorum. Venice.Google Scholar
Gerald of Odo (Giraldus Odonis) (1997) Logica (Opera Philosophica I), ed. De Rijk, L. M.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, L. (ed.) (1998) Aristoteles Latinus III 1–4: translatio Boethii (recensiones duae), translatio anonyma, Pseudo-Philoponi aliorumque scholia, specimina translationum recentiorum. Editio altera adiunctis scholiorum in Analytica Priora supplementis a James Shiel compositis. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ockham, William (1974) Summa Logicae, ed. Boehner, P. et al. New York: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Ockham, William (1984) Summula philosophiae naturalis, c. 20 (De forma rei artificialis), ed. Brown, S.. St. Bonaventure, NY: Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar
Ockham, William (1998) Ockham’s Theory of Terms: Part I of the Summa Logicae. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
Oresme, Nicole (2013) Questiones super Physicam II.4, ed. Carot, S.i, Celeyrette, J., Kirschner, S., and Mazet, E.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Albert the Great (1992) Women’s Secrets: A Translation of Pseudo-Albertus Magnus’ De secretis mulierum with Commentaries, ed. Lemay, H. R.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Albert the Great (2012) El De secretis mulierum atribuido a Alberto Magno: estudio, edición crítica y traducción, ed. Nieto, J. P. Barragán. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Seneca the Younger (1917–25) Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, ed. and trans. Gummere, R., 3 vols. (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seneca the Younger (1928) De ira. In Seneca: Moral Essays, vol. 1 (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 106–355.Google Scholar
Seneca the Younger (1989) De vita beata. In Moral Essays, trans. Basore, J., vol. 2 (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
William of Sherwood (1966) William of Sherwood’s Introduction to Logic. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Adams, M. M. (1998) “Ockham on Final Causality: Muddying the Waters,” Franciscan Studies 56: 1–46.Google Scholar
Agrimi, A. (1991) “Les Quaestiones de sensu attribuées à Albert de Saxe: quelques remarques sur les rapports entre philosophie naturelle et médecine chez Buridan, Oresme et Albert,” in Biard, J. (ed.), Itinéraires d’Albert de Saxe. Paris–Vienne au XIVe siècle. Paris: Vrin, 191–204.Google Scholar
Agrimi, A. and Crisciani, C. (1993) “Savoir médical et anthropologie religieuse: les représentations et les fonctions de la vetula (XIIIe–XVe siècle),” Annales: economies, sociétés, civilisations, 48: 1281–1308.Google Scholar
Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P. (1996) Logic or the Art of Thinking, ed. Buroker, Jill Vance (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, P. J. J. M. (2001) “Aristotelian Metaphysics and Eucharistic Theology: John Buridan and Marsilius of Inghen on the Ontological Status of Accidental Being,” in Thijssen, J. M. M. H. and Zupko, J. (eds.), The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden: Brill: 247–64.Google Scholar
Bakker, P. J. J. M. (2002) “Inhérence, univocité et separabilité des accidents eucharistiques: observations sur les rapports entre métaphysique et théologie au XIVe siècle,” in Solère, J.-L. and Kaluza, Z. (eds.), La servante et la consolatrice : la philosophie dans ses rapports avec la théologie au Moyen Age. Paris: Persée: 193–245.Google Scholar
Bakker, P. J. J. M. and Streijger, M. (2022) “John Buridan's Physics Commentaries Revisited: Manuscripts and Redaction,” Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale, 64: 67–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. M. (1990) “Anthropos anthropon genna. ‘Human is Generated by Human’,” in Dunstan, G. R. (ed.), The Human Embryo: Aristotle and the Arabic and European Traditions. Exeter: University of Exeter Press: 20–31.Google Scholar
Barragán Nieto, J. P. (2010) “Secretos de las mujeres: sangre menstrual y mujer venenosa en la Baja Edad Media,” in de la Rosa Cubo, C. (ed.), Innovación Educativa e Historia de las Relaciones de Género. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid: 91–104.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. H. (1955) “The Philosopher Laurence of Lindores,” The Philosophical Quarterly 5.21: 348–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2217079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2014) “John Buridan’s Commentary on Pseudo-Albertus Magnus’ De secretis mulierum,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale, 56: 221–45.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2016) “Conoscenza sensibile e nutrizione: il cardiocentrismo di Giovanni Buridano tra filosofia naturale e medicina,” in Garfagnini, G. and Rodolfi, A. (eds.), Scientia humana e scientia divina. Conoscenza del mondo e conoscenza di Dio. Pisa: ETS: 133–46.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2017) Natural Philosophy and Medicine in John Buridan: With an Edition of Buridan’s Quaestiones de secretis mulierum. Ph.D. Thesis, Pisa and Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2018) “John Buridan on Complexion: Natural Philosophy and Medicine in the Fourteenth Century,” in Beneduce, C. and Vincenti, D. (eds.), Oeconomia corporis: The Body’s Normal and Pathological Constitution at the Intersection of Philosophy and Medicine. Pisa: ETS: 41–49.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2019a) “La fisiologia del tatto nel XIV secolo: il caso di Giovanni Buridano,” in Grassi, O. and Catapano, G. (eds.), Rappresentazioni della natura nel Medioevo, Florence: SISMEL–Edizioni del Galluzzo: 207–20.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2019b) “Personalized Medicine and Complexio: ‘What is Human?’ as a Medical Question,” in Biancu, S. (ed.), The Human Measure: Perspectives on Humanism, special issue of Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics, 21.2: 89–98.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2019c) “La teoria buridaniana dell’umido radicale tra filosofia naturale e medicina,” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, 111, 3: 597–605.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2020) “Filosofia naturale e medicina nella teoria buridaniana della generazione,” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, 112. 1: 165–86.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2022a) “Are Touch and Taste Necessary? Some Answers from Fourteenth-Century Natural Philosophy,” in Forlivesi, M. and Ventura, I. (eds.), The Philosophies of Physicians: Texts and Doctrines from the 12th to the 17th Century/Le filosofie dei medici: testi e dottrine dal XII al XVII secolo, special issue of Itinerari, 61: 107–23.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2022b) “‘Is Touch One Sense or Several?’ A Late Medieval Scientific Question,” in Gensler, M., Mansfeld, M., and Michałowska, M. (eds.), The Embodied Soul: Aristotelian Psychology and Physiology in Medieval Europe between 1200 and 1420, Dordrecht: Springer: 253–75.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2023a) “John Buridan: The Human Body at the Intersection of Natural Philosophy and Medicine,” in Zupko, J. A (ed.), The Philosophy of John Buridan, special issue of American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 97.2: 161–82.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. (2023b) “Utrum tactus sit terrae a dominio: Natural Philosophy and Medicine in Three Fourteenth-Century Questions on De sensu et sensato,” in Aristotle’s De sensu in the Latin Tradition 1150–1650, special issue of Micrologus: Nature, Sciences and Medieval Societies, 31: 191–208.Google Scholar
Beneduce, C. and Bakker, P. J. J. M. (2017) “John Buridan and Blasius of Parma on the Localization of the Common Sense,” in Grellard, C. (ed.), Miroir de l’amitié. Mélanges offerts à Joël Biard, Paris: Vrin: 285–308.Google Scholar
Biard, J. (1998) “La place de la félicité intellectuelle dans l’Éthique buridanienne,” in Aertsen, J. A. and Speer, A. (eds.), Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Akten des X. Internationalen Kongresses für mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 26). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Biard, J. (2002) “L’être et la mesure dans l’intension et la rémission des formes (Jean Buridan, Blaise de Parme),” Medioevo 27: 415–47.Google Scholar
Bildhauer, B. (2005) “The Secrets of Women (c. 1300): A Medieval Perspective on Menstruation,” in Shail, A. and Howie, G. (eds.), Menstruation: A Cultural History. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 65–73.Google Scholar
Black, D. (2019) “Avicenna on Knowledge,” in Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury: 9–34.Google Scholar
Bolton, Robert (2015), “The Origins of Aristotle’s Natural Teleology in Physics II,” in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 121–43.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P. (1983) Marsilius of Inghen: Treatises on the Properties of Terms. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, G. (2016) “Perfectionism,” in Fletcher, Guy (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, D. (1997) Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas’s Moral Science. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Cadden, J. (1995) Meanings of Sex Difference in the Middle Ages: Medicine, Science and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canet, J. L. (1996–97) “La mujer venenosa en la época medieval,” Lemir. Revista de Literatura Española Medieval y del Renacimiento, 1: http://parnaseo.uv.es/Lemir/Revista/Revista1/Mujer_venenosa.html.Google Scholar
Caroti, S. (2004) “Some Remarks on Buridan’s Discussion of Intension and Remission,” Vivarium 42.1: 58–85.Google Scholar
Celeyrette, J. (2004) “La Problématique du point chez Jean Buridan,” Vivarium 42.1: 86–108.Google Scholar
Celeyrette, J. (2017a) “Les Questions sur la Physique du ms Cesena Malatestiana S VIII 5,” in Grellard, C. (ed.), Miroir de l’amitié: mélanges offerts à Joël Biard. Paris: Vrin:353–69.Google Scholar
Celeyrette, J. (2017b) “La réception parisienne des travaux anglais sur la vitesse d’un mouvement local au milieu du XIVe siècle,” in Suarez-Nani, T., Ribordy, O., and Petagine, A. (eds.), Lieu, espace, mouvement: physique, métaphysique et cosmologie (XIIIe–XVIe siècles). Barcelona and Rome: Brepols: 165–80.Google Scholar
Chandelier, J. (2020) “Medicine and Philosophy,” in Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500. Dordrecht: Springer: 1138–46.Google Scholar
Chandelier, J., and Robert, A. (2013) “Nature humaine et complexion du corps chez les médecins italiens de la fin du Moyen Âge,” Revue de synthèse 4.134: 473–510.Google Scholar
Charles, D. (1991), “Teleological Causation in the Physics,” in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 101–28.Google Scholar
Charlton, W. (1970), Aristotle’s Physics, Books I-II, trans. W. Charlton. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Choi, P. (2019) “Reliabilism, Scepticism, and evidentia in Ockham,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27.1: 23–45. DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2018.1509836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, M. (2018) Intellectual Self-Knowledge in Latin Commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima from 1250–1320: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses. Ph.D. Dissertation: Saxo Institute, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Clagett, M. (1959) The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1985) “Aristotle on the Goods of Fortune,” Philosophical Review 94.2: 173–96.Google Scholar
Crisciani, C. (2012) “Note sul pensiero scientifico medievale: storiografia, questioni, ricerche,” in Bevilacqua, F. and Contardini, P. (eds.), Storia, Didattica, Scienze. Pavia 1975–2010. Atti del Convegno. Università di Pavia, 7 maggio 2010. Pavia: Pavia University Press: 21–34.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P., Normore, C., and Parsons, T. (2014) Peter of Spain: Summaries of Logic: Text, Translation, Introduction, and Notes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, W. (2004) “The University of Paris at the Time of Jean Buridan and Nicole Oresme,” Vivarium 42.1: 3–17.Google Scholar
Courtenay, W. (2008) Ockham and Ockhamism: Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of His Thought (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, 99). Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Crombie, C. (1952 and subsequent editions) Augustine to Galileo: The History of Science A. D. 400–1650. London: Falcon Educational Book.Google Scholar
de Asúa, M. (1999) Medicine and Philosophy in Peter of Spain’s Commentary on De animalibus, in Steel, C., Guldentops, G. and Beullens, P. (eds.), Aristotle’s Animals in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Leuven: Leuven University Press: 189–211.Google Scholar
de Asúa, M. (2013) “War and Peace. Medicine and Natural Philosophy in Albert the Great,” in Resnick, I. M. (ed.), A Companion to Albert the Great. Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences. Leiden–Boston: Brill: 269–297.Google Scholar
de Leemans, P. (2020) “Parva naturalia, Commentaries on Aristotle’s,” in Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy between 500 and 1500. Dordrecht: Springer: 1385–97.Google Scholar
Decaix, V. (2017) “La conception buridanienne de la mémoire dans les Parva naturalia,” in Grellard, C. (ed.), Miroirs de l’amitié, Mélanges offerts à Joël Biard. Paris: Vrin: 309–29.Google Scholar
Decaix, V. (2023) “Is Memory a Matter of Complexion? On Memory Disorders in the Latin Commentaries on De memoria (1250–1300),” in Beneduce, C. (eds.), Complexio: Across Disciplines, special issue of Early Science and Medicine, 28.3–5, 452–471.Google Scholar
Dekker, D.-J. 2004. “John Buridan’s Treatise, De dependentiis, diversitatibus, et convenientiis: An Edition,” Vivarium 42.1: 109–49.Google Scholar
Demaitre, L., and Travill, A. A. (1980) “Human Embryology and Development in the Works of Albertus Magnus,” in Weisheipl, J. A. (ed.), Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies: 406–40.Google Scholar
De Rijk, L. M. (1966) “Some Notes on the Medieval tract De Insolubilibus, with the edition of a tract dating from the end of the twelfth century,” Vivarium 4: 83–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rijk, L. M. (1993) “On Buridan’s View of Accidental Being,” in Bos, E. P. and Krop, H. A. (eds.), John Buridan: A Master of Arts. Some Aspects of His Philosophy. Nijmegen: Brepols: 41–51.Google Scholar
Dewender, T. (2016) “Responses to Ockham: John Buridan,” in Rode, Christian (ed.), A Companion to Responses to Ockham, Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 65, Leiden: Brill: 173–96.Google Scholar
Devriese, L. (2017) “An Inventory of Medieval Commentaries on pseudo-Aristotle’s Physiognomonica,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale, 59: 215–46.Google Scholar
Drake, S. (1976) “A Further Reappraisal of impetus Theory: Buridan, Benedetti and Galileo,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 7: 319–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, I. (2016) John Duns Scotus on the Role of the Moral Virtues. University of Toronto: Dissertation. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/72964.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1913–59) Le système du monde: histoire des doctrines cosmologiques de Platon à Copernic. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dumont, S. (1989) “The Scientific Character of Theology and the Origin of Duns Scotus’s Distinction between Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition,” Speculum 64: 579–99.Google Scholar
Dunstan, G. R. (ed.) (1990) The Human Embryo. Aristotle and the Arabic and European Traditions. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1986) “The chimera’s diary,” in Knuuttila, S. and Hintikka, J. (eds.), The Logic of Being. Dordrecht: Reidel: 115–43.Google Scholar
Feldman, F. (2006) Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. (1998) Aquinas: Moral, Legal, and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freddoso, A. J. and Schuurman, H. (1980) Ockham’s Theory of Propositions: Part II of the Summa Logicae. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A., and Jolif, J. Y. (1958) L’Éthique à Nicomaque. Louvain and Paris: T. I.Google Scholar
Ghisalberti, A. (1979) “Somatologia tardomedievale. I problemi del corpo in Giovanni Buridano,” in Il corpo, perché? Saggi sulla struttura corporea della persona. Contributi del XXXIII Convegno del Centro di studi filosofici di Gallarate (30 marzo–1 aprile). Brescia: Morcelliana: 195–210.Google Scholar
Grant, E. (1971) (and subsequent editions) Physical Science in the Middle Ages. New York: Wiley .Google Scholar
Grant, E. (1977) Physical Science in the Middle Ages. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, E. (1981) “The Medieval Doctrine of Place: Some Fundamental Problems and Solutions,” in Maierù, A. and Paravicini Bagliani, A. (eds.), Studi sul XIV secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura: 57–79.Google Scholar
Graver, M. (2009) “The Weeping Wise: Stoic and Epicurean Consolations in Seneca’s 99th Epistle,” in Fögen, Thorsten (ed.), Tears in the Graeco-Roman World. Berlin: De Gruyter: 235–52.Google Scholar
Green, M. H. (2005) “Flowers, Poisons and Men: Menstruation in Medieval Western Europe,” in Shail, A. and Howie, G. (eds.), Menstruation: a Cultural History. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 51–63.Google Scholar
Grellard, C. (2005) Croire et savoir : Les principes de la connaissance selon Nicolas d’Autrécourt. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Grellard, C. (2010) “La réception médiévale du De somno et vigilia. Approches épistémologiques et anthropologiques du rêve d’Albert le Grand à Jean Buridan,” in Morel, P. M. and Grellard, C. (eds.), Les Parva Naturalia d’Aristote. Fortune antique et médiévale. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne: 221–37.Google Scholar
Grellard, C. (2014) “How is it Possible to Believe Falsely? John Buridan, the vetula, and the Psychology of Error,” in Denery, D. G. II, Ghosh, K., and Zeeman, N. (eds.), Uncertain Knowledge: Scepticism, Relativism, and Doubt in the Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols: 91–113.Google Scholar
Goodenough, H. (2004) It Could Have Been Otherwise: Contingency and Necessity in Dominican Theology at Oxford, 1300–1350. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Guerizoli, R. (2015) “Pleasure and Knowledge in John Buridan’s Solution to the Debate over the Extension of the Aristotelian Supreme Good,” Quaestio 15: 711–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, P. J. (2017) “Durand of St.-Pourçain and John Buridan on Species: Direct Realism with and without Representation,” in Klima, G. (eds.), Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others. Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action, vol 3. Cham: Springer. DOI.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51763-6-7.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1997) “Saving the Phainomena: A Note on Aristotle’s Definition of Anger,” Classical Quarterly 47: 452–54.Google Scholar
Hodges, W. (2018) “Nicole Oresme,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/tarski-truth/.Google Scholar
Hodges, W., and Johnston, S. (2017) “Medieval Modalities and Modern Methods: Avicenna and Buridan,” IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 4.4: 1029–73.Google Scholar
Hopwood, N., Flemming, R., and Kassell, L., eds. (2018) Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubien, H. (ed.) (1976) Iohannis Buridani Tractatus de consequentiis. Philosophes Médiévaux 16. Louvain: Publications universitaires.Google Scholar
Hughes, G. (1989) “The Modal Logic of John Buridan,” in Corsi, G., Mangione, C., and Massimo, M. (eds.), Atti del Convegno internationale di storia della logica: le teorie delle modalita. Bologna: Editrice Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice: 93–111.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (2013) Essays and Treatises on Philosophical Subjects, ed. Falkenstein, L. and MacArthur, N.. Petersburough, Ontario: Broadview.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1985) “Permanent Happiness: Aristotle and Solon,” in Annas, J. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 89–124.Google Scholar
Jacquart, D. (1984) “De crasis à complexio: note sur le vocabulaire du temperament en latin médiéval,” in Sabbah, G. (ed.),Textes médicaux latins antiques. Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Université de Saint-Etienne: 71–76.Google Scholar
Jacquart, D. (1993) “La scolastica medica,” in Grmek, M. D. (ed.), Storia del pensiero medico occidentale, 1. Antichità e Medioevo, Rome and Bari: Laterza: 261–322.Google Scholar
Jacquart, D. (1998) “La place d’Isaac Israeli dans la médecine médiévale,” Vesalius, 4: 19–27.Google Scholar
Jacquart, D. and Micheau, F. (1990) La médecine arabe et l’Occident medieval. Paris: G. -P. Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Jacquart, D., and Thomasset, C., (1981) “Albert le Grand et les problémes de la sexualité,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 3.1: 73–93.Google Scholar
Jacquart, D., and Thomasset, C., (1985) Sexualité et savoir medical au Moyen Age. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Johnston, S. (2014) “A Formal Reconstruction of Buridan’s Modal Syllogism,” History and Philosophy of Logic 36.1: 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, B. (2003) “Rethinking Moral Dispositions,” in Williams, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 352–76.Google Scholar
Kent, B. (2008) “Aristotle’s Ethics, Situationist Psychology, and a Fourteenth-Century Debate,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25: 95–114.Google Scholar
Kent, B. (2013) “Losable Virtue: Aquinas on Character and Will,” in Hoffmann, T., Müller, J., and Perkams, M. (eds.), Aquinas and the ‘Nicomachean Ethics’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 91–109.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, J. (ed. and trans.) (2012) “Jean Buridan, Questions on Book X of the Ethics,” in McGrade, A. S., Kilcullen, J., and Kempshall, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts. Volume II: Ethics and Political Philosophy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press: 498–586.Google Scholar
King, P. (1985) Jean Buridan’s Logic: The Treatise on Supposition, the Treatise on Consequences, trans. P. King. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Kirschner, S. (2017) “Nicole Oresme,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/nicole-oresme/.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (2020)”John Buridan Being After Certainty,” in Hall, A., Klima, G., and Klein, M. (eds.), Medieval and Early Modern Epistemology: After Certainty. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 21–36.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (1996) “The Semantic Principles Underlying Saint Thomas Aquinas’s Metaphysics of Being,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5: 87–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, G. (1999) “Ockham’s Semantics and Ontology of the Categories,” in Spade, P. V. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 118–42.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2001) “Buridan’s Theory of Definitions in his Scientific Practice,” in Thijssen, J. M. M. H. and Zupko, J. (eds.), The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden: Brill: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, G. (2002a) “Aquinas’ Theory of the Copula and the Analogy of Being,” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 5: 159–76.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2002b) “Man = Body + Soul: Aquinas’s Arithmetic of Human Nature,” in Davies, B. (ed.), Thomas Aquinas: Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 257–73.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2005) “The Essentialist Nominalism of John Buridan,” The Review of Metaphysics 58: 301–15.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2008a) John Buridan (Great Medieval Thinkers). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2008b) “The Nominalist Semantics of Ockham and Buridan: A Rational Reconstruction,” in Gabbay, D. and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Amsterdam: North Holland: 389–431.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2010) “Nominalist Semantics,” in Pasnau, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 159–72.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2012) “Aquinas vs. Buridan on Essence and Existence, and the Commensurability of Paradigms,” in Novák, L., Novotný, D., Sousedík, P., and Svoboda, D. (eds.), Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic. Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag: 169–84.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2013) “Being, Unity, and Identity in the Fregean and Aristotelian Traditions,” in Feser, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 146–68.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2014) “Nominalist Semantics,” in Pasnau, R. and Dyke, C. Van (eds.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, vol. 1, rev. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2018) “Aquinas’ Balancing Act: Balancing the Soul Between the Realms of Matter and Pure Spirit,” Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 21: 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1075/bpjam.00022.kliGoogle Scholar
Klima, G. (2019) “John Buridan on Knowledge,” in Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury, 191–211.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2020) “Aquinas on the Union of Body and Soul,” in Skrzypek, J. W. (ed.), HYLOMORPHISM: Ancient, Medieval, and Contemporary Approaches, special issue of Quaestiones Disputatae 10.2: 31–52.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2021) “The Hylomorphism of Aquinas and Contemporary Metaphysics,” Divinitas 1.62: 175–89.Google Scholar
Klima, G. (2022) “Aquinas vs. Buridan on the Universality of Human Concepts and the Immateriality of the Human Intellect,” Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 30.1–2: 33–47. DOI: 10.5840/philosophica20228163.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. (1981a) “Duns Scotus’ Criticism of the ‘Statistical’ Interpretation of Modality,” in Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter, vol. 13/1. Miscellanea Mediaevalia. Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. (1981b) “Time and Modality in Scholasticism,” in Reforging the Great Chain of Being. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. (1996) “Duns Scotus and the Foundations of Logical Modalities,” in John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. (2001) “Necessities in Buridan’s Natural Philosophy,” in The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. (2004) Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. (2008) “Medieval Modal Theories and Modal Logic,” in Handbook of the History of Logic: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Boston, MA: Elsevier Press.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2006) The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Korolec, J. B. (1975) “Les principes de la philosophie morale de Jean Buridan,” Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 21: 53–72.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. (1970) “Medieval Logicians on the Meaning of the Proposition,” The Journal of Philosophy 67: 767–87.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1957 and subsequent editions) The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2002) “Buridan’s Theory of Free Choice and Its Influence,” in Lagerlund, H. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.), Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes. Dordrecht: Springer: 173–203.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2006) “What is Singular Thought? Ockham and Buridan on Singular Terms in the Language of Thought,” in Hirvonen, V., Holopainen, T. and Tuominen, M. (eds.), Mind and Modality: Studies in the History of Philosophy in Honour of Simo Knuuttila. Leiden: Brill: 217–38.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2012) “Leibniz (and Ockham) on the Language of Thought, or How the True Metaphysics is Derived from the True Logic,” in Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2014) “Singular Terms and Vague Concepts in Late Medieval Mental Language Theory or the Decline and Fall of Mental Language,” in Klima, G. (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press: 122–40.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2019) “Medieval Scepticism and Divine Deception,” in Veltri, G., Haliva, R., Schmid, S. and Spinelli, E. (eds.), Sceptical Paths: Enquiry and Doubt from Antiquity to the Present, Berlin: De Gruyter: 127–46.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (2020) Skepticism in Philosophy: A Comprehensive, Historical Introduction. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, T. (1990) Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. (1992) The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, 600 B. C. to A. D. 1450. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lines, D. A. (2005) “Sources and Authorities for Moral Philosophy in the Italian Renaissance: Thomas Aquinas and Jean Buridan on Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Kraye, J. and Saarinen, R. (eds.), Moral Philosophy on the Threshold of Modernity. Dordrecht: Springer: 7–29.Google Scholar
Macbride, F. (2013) “The Russell–Wittgenstein Dispute: A New Perspective,” in Textor, M. (ed.), Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology.Dordrecht: Springer: 206–41.Google Scholar
Machek, D. (2018) “Did Seneca Accede to metriopatheia in His Consolatory Texts?” Ancient Philosophy 38: 383–407.Google Scholar
Maier, A. (1949–58) Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik. Rome: Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Maier, A. (1955a) Metaphysische Hintergründe der spätscholastischen Naturphilosophie (Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik 4). Rome: Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Maier, A. (1955b) “Die naturphilosophische Bedeutung der scholastischen Impetus-theorie,” Theologie und Philosophie 30.3: 321–43.Google Scholar
Maier, A. (1958) Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik (Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik 5). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Maier, A. (1968) Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie, 3rd ed. (Studien zur Naturphilosophie der Spätscholastik 2). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Majcherek, K. (2019), “Walter Chatton’s Rejection of Final Causality,” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 7: 212–42.Google Scholar
Majcherek, K. (2020) “Paul of Venice’s Metaphysics of Artefacts,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martorelli Vico, R. (2000) “La medicina scolastica tra galenismo e aristotelismo,” Studi medievali 41: 311–38.Google Scholar
Martorelli Vico, R. (2002) Medicina e filosofia. Per una storia dell’embriologia medievale nel XIII e XIV secolo. Milan: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
Mattison, W. C., III. (2007) “Jesus’ Prohibition of Anger (Mt. 5:22): The Person/Sin Distinction from Augustine to Aquinas,” Theological Studies 68: 839–64.Google Scholar
Meeker, K. (2001) “Is Hume’s Epistemology Internalist or Externalist?” Dialogue 40.1: 125–46.Google Scholar
Michael, B. (1985) Johannes Buridan: Studien zu seinem Leben, seinen Werken und zu Rezeption seiner Theorien im Europa des späten Mittelalters, 2 vols. Ph.D. Dissertation, Frei Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Miteva, E. (2018) “Iam ergo patet veritas eius quod dixit Aristoteles, et causa deceptionis Galieni: Philosophers vs. Medics in Albertus Magnus’ Account on Conception,” in Speer, A. and Mauriège, M. (eds.), Irrtum – Error – Erreur. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter: 107–22.Google Scholar
Miteva, E., and Lenz, M. (2019) “Medicine and Philosophy: The longue durée of the Humoral Theory,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 61: 270–77.Google Scholar
Moody, E. A. (1966) “Galileo and His Precursors,” in Golino, C. L. (ed.), Galileo Reappraised. Berkeley: University of California Press: 23–43.Google Scholar
Müller, J. (2010) “Der Wille und seine Tugenden: Johannes Duns Scotus und das Ende der aristotelischen Tugendethik,” in Honnefelder, L. (eds.), Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus: Die philosophischen Perspektiven seines Werkes – Investigations into His Philosophy, vol. 3. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. E. (1991) “Pierre Duhem and the History of Late Medieval Science and Philosophy in the Latin West,” in Imbach, R. and Maierù, A. (eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra Otto e Novecento. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura: 253–302.Google Scholar
Newman, L. (2019) “Descartes’ Epistemology,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/descartes-epistemology/.Google Scholar
Normore, C. G. (2003) “Burge, Descartes, and Us,” in Hahn, M. and Ramberg, B. (eds.), Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 1–14.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001) The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, rev. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Obladen, M. (2017) “Hepar uterinum: A History of Ideas on Fetal Nutrition,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine 45.7: 779–86.Google Scholar
Ottosson, P. -G. (1984) Scholastic Medicine and Philosophy: A Study of Commentaries on Galen’s Tegni (ca. 1300–1400), Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Panaccio, C. (2015) “Ockham’s Externalism,” in Klima, G. (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press: 166–85.Google Scholar
Panaccio, C. (2017) “Linguistic Externalism and Mental Languge in Ockham and Buridan,” in Klima, G. (ed.), Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others: A Companion to John Buridan’s Philosophy of Mind. Dordrecht: Springer: 225–37.Google Scholar
Park, K. (2006) Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation and the Origin of Human Dissection. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Park, K. (2013) “Medicine and Natural Philosophy: Naturalistic Traditions,” in Bennett, J. and Karras, R. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and Gender in Medieval Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 84–100.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. (2001), “Intentionality and Final Causes,” in Perler, D. (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality, Brill, Leiden: Brill: 301–23.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. (2017) After Certainty: A History of Our Epistemic Ideals and Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patar, B. (2001) La Physique de Bruges de Buridan et le Traité du Ciel d’Albert de Saxe, 2 vols. Longueil: Presses Philosophiques.Google Scholar
Perini-Santos, E. (2011) “John Buridan’s Theory of Truth and the Paradox of the Liar,” Vivarium 49: 184–213.Google Scholar
Pickavé, M. (2017) “Buridan on the Psychology and Morality of Appetitive Acts,” in Klima, G. (ed.), Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others. Dordrecht: Springer: 169–82.Google Scholar
Pinborg, J. (ed.) (1976) The Logic of John Buridan: Acts of the Third European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics: Copenhagen, 16–21 November 1975. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Pironet, F. (1993) “John Buridan on the Liar Paradox: Study of an Opinion and Chronology of the Texts,” in Jacobi, K. (ed.), Argumentationstheorie, Leiden: Brill: 293–300.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2016) “Happiness,” in McCosker, P. and Turner, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Summa Theologiae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, M. (2019) The Rise of Analytic Philosophy, 1879–1930: From Frege to Ramsey. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Preus, A. (1970) “Science and Philosophy in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals,” Journal of the History of Biology 3.1: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preus, A. (1977) “Galen’s Criticism of Aristotle’s Conception Theory,” Journal of the History of Biology 10.1: 65–85.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975) “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’,” University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/185225.Google Scholar
Read, S. (2002) “The Liar Paradox from John Buridan back to Thomas Bradwardine,” Vivarium, 40.2: 189–218.Google Scholar
Read, S. (2019) “Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/medieval-terms/.Google Scholar
Restall, G. (2018) “Truth-Tellers in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth,” in Kann, C. et al. (eds.), Recherches de théologie et philosophie médievales. Leuven: Peeters: 143–54.Google Scholar
Rieger Schmidt, A. (2018) “A solução de Geraldo Odon ao paradoxo do Mentiroso,” Universitas Philosophica 67: 303–19.Google Scholar
Roure, M. L. (1970) “La problématique des propositions insolubles au XIIIe siècle et au début du XIVe, suivie de l’édition des traités de W. Shyreswood, W. Burleigh et Th. Bradwardine,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 36–37: 205–326.Google Scholar
Sarnowsky, J. (2004) “Nicole Oresme and Albert of Saxony’s Commentary on the Physics: The Problem of Vacuum and Motion in a Void,” in Caroti, S. and Celeyrette, J. (eds.), Quia inter doctores est magna dissension: Les débats de philosophie naturelle à Paris au XIVe siècle. Florence: Olschki: 161–74.Google Scholar
Seifert, A. (1978) Logik zwischen Scholastik und Humanismus. Berlin: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Schabel, C. (2006) “Francis of Marchia’s virtus derelicta and the Context of Its Development,” Vivarium 44.1: 41–80.Google Scholar
Schabel, C., and Girard, C. (2022) “Gregory of Rimini,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/gregory-rimini/.Google Scholar
Siraisi, N. G. (1981)Taddeo Alderotti and his Pupils: Two Generations of Italian Medical Learning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Siraisi, N. G. (1990) Medieval and Early Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sirridge, M., and Ebbesen, S. (eds.) (2016) Master Richard Sophista: Abstractiones, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.Google Scholar
Sobol, P. (2017) “John Buridan on External and Internal Sensation,” in Klima, G. (ed.), Questions on the Soul by John Buridan and Others: A Companion to John Buridan’s Philosophy of Mind. Dordrecht: Springer: 95–106.Google Scholar
Spade, P. V. (1981) “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s theory of signification,” Medioevo: Revista di storia della filisofia medievale 7: 115–34.Google Scholar
Stenberg, J. (2016) “Aquinas on the Relationship between the Vision and Delight in Perfect Happiness,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90. 4: 665–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenberg, J. (forthcoming) Aquinas and the Ethics of Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylla, E. D. (2015) “Guide to the Text,” in Buridan, J., Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam). Libri I–II, ed. Streijger, M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill: xliii–clxxxvi.Google Scholar
Sylla, E. D. (2016) “Guide to the Text,” in Buridan, J., Quaestiones super octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis (secundum ultimam lecturam). Libri III–IV, ed. Streijger, M. and Bakker, P. J. J. M.. Leiden: Brill: xx–ccxviii.Google Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (1985) “The Short Redaction of John Buridan’s Questions on the Physics and their Relation to the Questions on the Physics Attributed to Marsilius of Inghen,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 52: 237–66.Google Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (2000) “Late-medieval Natural Philosophy: Some Recent Trends in Scholarship,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 67.1: 158–90.Google Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (2004) “The Buridan School Reconsidered: Johan Buridan and Albert of Saxony,” Vivarium 42.1: 18–42.Google Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (2005) “Prolegomena to a Study of John Buridan’s Physics,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79: 493–502.Google Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (2009) “The Debate Over the Nature of Motion: John Buridan, Nicole Oresme and Albert of Saxony. With an Edition of John Buridan’s Quaestiones super libros Physicorum, secundum ultimam lecturam, Book III, q. 7,” Early Science and Medicine 14: 186–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (2018) “The Condemnation of 1277,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/condemnation/.Google Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H., and Zupko, J. (eds.) (2001) The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Thom, P. (2012) The Logic of the Trinity: Augustine to Ockham. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2022) “A Stain on the Bronze: Some Medieval Latin Commentators on De insomniis 2, 459b23–460a32,” in Gensler, M., Mansfeld, M., and Michałowska, M. (eds.), The Embodied Soul: Aristotelian Psychology and Physiology in Medieval Europe between 1200 and 1420, Dordrecht: Springer: 57–71.Google Scholar
Trifogli, C. (2000) Oxford Physics in the Thirteenth Century (ca. 1250–1270). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Trifogli, C. (2007) “Thomas Wylton on Final Causality,” in Fidora, A. and Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds.), Erfahrung und Beweis: die Wissenschaften von der Natur im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Akademie Verlag: 249–64.Google Scholar
van der Lugt, M. (2004) Le ver, le démon et la vierge: les théories médièvales de la génération extraordinaire. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
van der Lugt, M. (2022) “Generation in the Middle Ages. Past, Present, Future,” in Jacquart, D. and Paravicini Bagliani, A. (eds.), Le Moyen Âge et les sciences. Florence: SISMEL-Edizioni del Galluzzo: 365–88.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. A. (1981a) “Galileo and Scholastic Theories of impetus,” in Maierù, A. and Bagliani, A. Paravicini (eds.), Studi sul XIV secolo in memoria di Anneliese Maier. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura: 275–97.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. A. (1981b) Prelude to Galileo: Essays on Medieval and Sixteenth-century Sources of Galileo’s Thought. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. (1966b) “Nominalism and Ethics: Some Remarks about Buridan’s Commentary,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 4: 1–13.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. (1975) “Some Relationships between Gerald Odo’s and John Buridan’s Commentaries on Aristotle’s ‘Ethics’,” Franciscan Studies 35: 237–75.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. (1980) “Teleology in the Ethics of Buridan,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 18: 265–86.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. (1986) “Buridan on the Connection of the Virtues,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24: 453–82.Google Scholar
Weijers, O. (2001) Le travail intellectuel à la faculté des arts de Paris: textes et maîtres (ca. 1200–1250), vol. 4. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Wieland, G. (1988) “Happiness: The Perfection of Man,” in Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., and Pinborg, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zanin, F. (2006) “Francis of Marchia, virtus derelicta, and Modifications of the Basic Principles of Aristotelian Physics,” Vivarium 44.1: 81–95.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. (2023) “Complexio and the Transformation of Learned Physiognomy ca. 1200–ca. 1500,” in Beneduce, C. (eds.), Complexio: Across Disciplines, special issue of Early Science and Medicine 28.3–5, 472–497.Google Scholar
Zupko, J. (1993a) “Buridan and Skepticism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 31.2: 191–221.Google Scholar
Zupko, J. (1993b) “Nominalism Meets Indivisibilism,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 3: 158–85.Google Scholar
Zupko, J. (2003) John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth-Century Arts Master. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Zupko, J. (2013) “Using Seneca to Read Aristotle: The Curious Methods of Buridan’s Ethics,” in Miller, J. (ed.), The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press: 155–70.Google Scholar
Zupko, J. (2015) “On the Several Senses of ‘intentio’ in Buridan,” in Klima, G. (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press: 251–72.Google Scholar
Zupko, J. (2018a) “Acts and Dispositions in John Buridan’s Faculty Psychology,” in Faucher, N. and Roques, M. (eds.), The Ontology, Psychology and Axiology of Habits in Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer: 333–46.Google Scholar
Zupko, J. (2018b) “John Buridan,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/buridan.Google Scholar
Zupko, J. (2018c), “‘Nothing in Nature is Naturally a Statue’: William of Ockham on Artifacts,” Metaphysics 1: 88–96.Google Scholar