Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T14:09:01.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2024

Daniel Smyth
Daniel Smyth
Affiliation:
Wesleyan University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Intuition in Kant
The Boundlessness of Sense
 , pp. 243 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelung, Johann Christoph. 1793. Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart. Leipzig: Breitkopf.Google Scholar
Allais, Lucy. 2009. “Kant, Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47(3): 383–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy. 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy, and Callanan, John (eds.) 2020. Kant and Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. 1983. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Revised and expanded edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Robert. 2004. The Five Books of Moses: A Translation and Commentary. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 2000. Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier. 2004. “It Adds Up After All: Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic in Light of the Traditional Logic.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69(3): 501–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier. 2005. “The Wolffian Paradigm and Its Discontents: Kant’s Containment Definition of Analyticity in Historical Context.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87(1): 22–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier. 2015. The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquila, Richard. 1994. “The Holistic Character of Kantian Intuition.” In Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, edited by Parrini, Paolo, 309–329. Boston, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1994. Truth. 3 vols. Translated by Robert Mulligan, James McGlynn, and Robert Schmidt. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. [Abbreviated “De Veritate”.]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 2022. Summa Theologiae. Translated by Alfred J. Freddoso. www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/summa-translation/TOC.htm [Abbreviated “ST”].Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Translated by Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, Richard T. W. 1998. “Infinite Aggregates and Phenomenal Wholes: Leibniz’s Theory of Substance as a Solution to the Continuum Problem.” The Leibniz Review 8: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, Richard T. W. 1999. “Infinite Number and the World Soul: In Defence of Carlin and Leibniz.” The Leibniz Review 9: 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, Richard T. W. 2001. “Leibniz on Infinite Number, Infinite Wholes, and the Whole World: A Reply to Gregory Brown.” The Leibniz Review 11: 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. 2013 [1757]. Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes and Related Materials. Translated and edited by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Beck, Jacob Sigismund. 1796. Grundriß der critischen Philosophie. Halle: Renger.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. 1965 [1955]. “Can Kant’s Synthetic Judgments Be Made Analytic?” In his Studies in the Philosophy of Kant, 74–91. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. 1948–1957. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. 9 vols. Edited by Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E.. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Bernecker, Sven. 2010. “Kant on Spatial Orientation.” European Journal of Philosophy 20(4): 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecher, Ian. 2018. “Kant’s Principles of Modality.” European Journal of Philosophy 26(3): 932–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul. 2014. “What Is Inference?” Philosophical Studies 169(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Matthew. 2011. “Transparent Self-Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 85: 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Matthew. 2015. “Die Spontaneität des Verstandes bei Kant und einigen Neokantianern.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 53(4): 705–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Matthew. Forthcoming-a. “Kant’s Hylomorphism and the Thing-in-Itself.” In Gobsch and Land (eds.).Google Scholar
Boyle, Matthew. Forthcoming-b. “Kant on Categories and the Activity of Reflection.” In The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Analytic Philosophy, edited by Conant, James and Held, Jonas. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. 1998. “Transzendentale Ästhetik, §§1–3 (A19/B33-A30/B45).” In Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, edited by Mohr, Georg and Willaschek, Marcus, 81–106. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Kimberly. 2022. “Kant’s Theory of the Intuitive Intellect.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 39(2): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittan, Gordon. 1978. Kant’s Theory of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Gregory. 1998. “Who’s Afraid of Infinite Numbers? Leibniz and the World Soul.” The Leibniz Review 8: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Gregory. 2000. “Leibniz on Wholes, Unities, and Infinite Number.” The Leibniz Review 10: 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büchel, Gregor. 1987. Philosophie und Geometrie: zum Verhältnis beider Vernunftwissenschaften im Fortgang von der Kritik der reinen Vernunft zum Opus postumum. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buroker, Jill Vance. 1981. Space and Incongruence: The Origins of Kant’s Idealism. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, John. 2013. “Kant on Nativism, Scepticism and Necessity.” Kantian Review 18(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, John. 2017. “Kant on the Spontaneous Power of Mind.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25(3): 565–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Georg. 1966 [1888]. “Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten.” In his Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts, edited by Zermelo, Ernst, 378–439. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Carlin, Laurence. 1997. “Infinite Accumulations and Pantheistic Implications: Leibniz and the ‘Anima Mundi’.” The Leibniz Review 7: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Andrew. 1998. Kant’s Earliest Solution to the Mind/Body Problem. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Carson, Emily. 1997. “Kant on Intuition in Geometry.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27(4): 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassam, Quassim. 2016. “Knowledge and Its Objects: Revisiting The Bounds of Sense.” European Journal of Philosophy 24(4): 907–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, Rosalind. 2022. “Kant on the Givenness of Space and Time.” European Journal of Philosophy 30(3): 877–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, Rosalind. MS. “Idealism, Infinity, and Indeterminacy: Kant’s Solution to the Second Antinomy.”Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2007a. “Kant’s Concepts of Justification.” Nous 41(1): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2007b. “Belief in Kant.” Philosophical Review 116(3): 323–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2014. “Modal Motivations for Noumenal Ignorance: Knowledge, Cognition, Coherence.” Kant-Studien 105(4): 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2017. “Kant on Cognition, Givenness, and Ignorance.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(1): 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Yoon. 2019. “Spontaneity and Self-Consciousness in the ‘Groundwork’ and the B-Critique.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49(7): 936–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, Alan. 2008. “Aristotelian Colors as Causes.” In Festschrift for Julius Moravcsik, edited by Føllesdall, Dagfinn and Woods, John, 235–242. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Coope, Ursula. 2013. “Aquinas on Judgment and the Active Power of Reason.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13(20): 1–19.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. 1984. “Philosophers Trim the Tree of Knowledge: The Epistemological Strategy of the Encyclopédie.” In his The Great Cat Massacre and Other Episodes in French Cultural History, 191–214. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
de Jong, Willem. 1995. “Kant’s Analytic Judgments and the Traditional Theory of Concepts.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33(4): 613–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Willem. 2010. “The Analytic–Synthetic Distinction and the Classical Model of Science: Kant, Bolzano, and Frege.” Synthese 174(2): 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Risi, Vincenzo. 2016. Leibniz on the Parallel Postulate and the Foundations of Geometry: The Unpublished Manuscripts. New York: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René. 1897–1910. Oeuvres de Descartes. Edited by Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. 11 vols. Reprint: Paris: Vrin. [Abbreviated “AT”.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domski, Mary. 2008. “Kant’s Argument for the Infinity of Space”. In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. 2, edited by Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo, Almeida, Guido de and Ruffing, Margit, 149–159. Berlin. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey. 2014. Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey. 2017. “The Principles of Apperception.” In Immanuel Kant: Die Einheit des Bewusstseins, edited by Thiel, Udo and Motta, Giuseppe, 32–46. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey. Forthcoming. “The ‘Aristotle of Königsberg’?: Kant and the Aristotelian Mind.” In Gobsch and Land (eds.).Google Scholar
Ellis, Addison. 2017. “The Case for Absolute Spontaneity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” Con-Textos Kantianos 6: 138–164.Google Scholar
Emundts, Dina. 2007. “Kant über innere Erfahrung.” In Was ist und Was sein soll. Natur und Freiheit bei Immanuel Kant, edited by Kern, Udo, 189–205. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. 2006. “Understanding and Sensibility.” Inquiry 49(1): 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. 2009. The Form of Practical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. 2013. “Unity of Apperception.” Studi Kantiani XXVI: 37–54.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. 2016. “Self-Consciousness and the Unity of Knowledge.” In Consciousness – International Yearbook of German Idealism, edited by Emundts, Dina and Sedgwick, Sally, 25–47. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. 2017. “Knowledge and Its Object.” In Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”: A Critical Guide, edited by O’Shea, James, 28–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. Forthcoming. “Truth, Falsity, and the Capacity to Judge.” In Gobsch and Land (eds.).Google Scholar
Erdmann, Benno. 1878. Kants Kriticismus in der ersten und in der zweiten Auflage der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Euler, Leonhard. 1768. Lettres à une princesse d’Allemagne sur divers sujets de physique & de philosophie. Tome premier. Saint Petersburg: Imprint of the Imperial Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, Lorne. 1990. “Kant’s Account of Sensation.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20(1): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, Lorne. 1995. Kant’s Intuitionism: A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo. 2019. “Method in Kant and Hegel.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27(2): 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Eckart. 2002a. “Die Bedeutung von §§76, 77 der Kritik der Urteilskraft für die Entwicklung der nachkantischen Philosophie [Teil 1].” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 56(2): 169–190.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart. 2002b. “Die Bedeutung von §§76, 77 der Kritik der Urteilskraft für die Entwicklung der nachkantischen Philosophie [Teil II].” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 56(3): 321–345.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart. 2018. Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie. Eine systematische Rekonstruktion. 3rd improved ed. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2000. “Geometry, Construction, and Intuition in Kant and his Successors.” In Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons, edited by Sher, Gila and Tieszen, Richard, 186–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2012. “Kant on Geometry and Spatial Intuition.” Synthese 186: 231–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2020. “Space and Geometry in the B Deduction.” In Posy and Rechter (eds.), 200–228.Google Scholar
Gava, Gabriele. 2015. “Kant’s Synthetic and Analytic Method in the Critique of Pure Reason and the Distinction between Philosophical and Mathematical Syntheses.” European Journal of Philosophy 23(3): 728–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gava, Gabriele. 2018. “Kant, Wolff, and the Method of Philosophy.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 8: 271–303.Google Scholar
George, Rolf. 1981. “Kant’s Sensationism.” Synthese 47(2): 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordanetti, Piero, Pozzo, Riccardo, and Scarbi, Marco (eds.) 2012. Kant’s Philosophy of the Unconscious. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gobsch, Wolfram, and Land, Thomas (eds.). Forthcoming. The Aristotelian Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. 1987. Schriften zur Morphologie. Edited by Kuhn, Dorothea. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag. [Abbreviated “FA 24”.]Google Scholar
Golob, Sacha. 2020. “What Do Animals See? Intentionality, Objects, and Kantian Nonconceptualism.” In Allais and Callanan (eds.), 66–88.Google Scholar
Gomes, Anil, and Stephenson, Andrew (eds.). 2017. Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graubner, Hans. 1972. Form und Wesen: ein Beitrag zur Deutung des Formbegriffs in Kants “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Grüne, Stephanie. 2017. “Are Kantian Intuitions Object-Dependent?” In Gomes and Stephenson (eds.), 67–85.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2018. “The Infinite Given Magnitude and Other Myths about Space and Time.” In Nachtomy and Winegar (eds.), 181–204.Google Scholar
Haag, Johannes. 2007. Erfahrung und Gegenstand: Das Verhältnis von Sinnlichkeit und Verstand. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 2007. “Trees of Logic, Trees of Porphyry.” In Advancements of Learning: Essays in Honour of Paulo Rossi, edited by Heilbron, John L., 219–261. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert. 2005. “Kant and Nonconceptual Content.” European Journal of Philosophy 13(2): 247–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Robert. 2008. “Kantian Non-Conceptualism.” Philosophical Studies 147: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmer, Adam. 2014. “Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22(2): 236–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1995. Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants “Kritik der reinen Vernunft” (Wintersemester 1927–28). Edited by Görland, Ingtraud. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. [Abbreviated “GA 25”.]Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2010 [1929]. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Edited by von Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann. [Abbreviated “GA 3”.]Google Scholar
Heis, Jeremy. 2020. “Kant on Parallel Lines: Definitions, Postulates, and Axioms.” In Posy and Rechter (eds.), 157–180.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko. 1969. “On Kant’s Notion of Intuition (Anschauung).” In The First Critique: Reflections on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Penelhum, T. and MacIntosh, J., 38–53. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Hoeppner, Till. 2021. Urteil und Anschauung: Kants metaphysische Deduktion der Kategorien. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Desmond. 2013. “Metaphysical Motives of Kant’s Analytic-Synthetic Distinction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47(3): 267–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Desmond. 2021. “Handedness, Idealism, Freedom.” The Philosophical Review 130(3): 385–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 2000 [1748]. An Enquiry concerning Human Nature. Edited by Beauchamp, Tom L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Abbreviated “Enquiry”.]Google Scholar
Hume, David. 2007 [1739]. A Treatise of Human Nature. 2 vols. Edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Abbreviated “Treatise”.]Google Scholar
Indregard, Jonas Jervell. 2017. “Self-Affection and Pure Intuition in Kant.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95(4): 627–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irani, Tushar. 2022. “Perfect Change in Plato’s Sophist.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 60: 45–93.Google Scholar
Jacquette, Dale. 2001. David Hume’s Critique of Infinity. New York: Brill.Google Scholar
Jauernig, Anja. 2019. “Finite Minds and Their Representations in Leibniz and Kant.” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 14: 47–80.Google Scholar
Jauernig, Anja. 2021. The World according to Kant: Appearances and Things in Themselves in Critical Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauernig, Anja. 2022. “Kant on the (Alleged) Leibnizian Misconception of the Difference between Sensible and Intellectual Representations.” In Look (ed.), 177–210.Google Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas. 1993. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas. 1999. Squaring the Circle: The War between Hobbes and Wallis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jorati, Julia (ed.). 2021. Powers: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, Larry. 2009. “The Principle of Continuity and Leibniz’s Theory of Consciousness.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47(2): 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1901–. Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Edited by Timmerman, Jens. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Kästner, Abraham. 1790. “Ueber den mathematischen Begriff des Raumes.” Philosophisches Magazin 2(4): 403–419.Google Scholar
Keill, John. 1739 [1702]. Introductio ad veram physicam et veram astronomiam. Leyden: Verbeek.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman. 1992 [1918]. A Commentary to Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Kern, Andrea. 2017. Sources of Knowledge: On the Concept of a Rational Capacity for Knowledge. Translated by Daniel Smyth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia. 2011. Kant’s Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1992 [1975]. “Kant and the Foundations of Mathematics.” In Posy (ed.), 109–131.Google Scholar
Koriako, Darius. 1999. Kants Philosophie der Mathematik. Grundlagen. Voraussetzungen. Probleme. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Kraus, Katharina. 2020. Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation: The Nature of Inner Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Rocca, Claudio. 2008a. “Der dunkle Verstand. Unbewusste Vorstellungen und Selbstbewusstsein bei Kant.” In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. 2, edited by Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo, and Almeida, Guido de, 447–458. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
La Rocca, Claudio. 2008b. “Unbewußtes und Bewußtsein bei Kant.” In Kant-Lektionen. Zur Philosophie Kants und zu Aspekten ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte, edited by Kugelstadt, Manfred, 47–68. Würzburg: Koenigshausen Neumann.Google Scholar
Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1786. “Theorie der Parallellinien.” Magazin für reine und angewandte Mathematik, 13–64 and 325–358. Reprinted in Die Theorie der Parallellinien von Euklid bis auf Gauss. Edited by Engel, Friedrich and Stäckel, Paul, 152–207. Leipzig: Teubner, 1895.Google Scholar
Land, Thomas. 2014. “Spatial Representation, Magnitude and the Two Stems of Cognition.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44(5–6): 524–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, Thomas. 2021 [2018]. “Epistemic Agency and the Self-Knowledge of Reason: On the Contemporary Relevance of Kant’s Method of Faculty Analysis. Synthese 198(Suppl. 13): 3137–3154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laywine, Alison. 2020. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: A Cosmology of Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1765. Œuvres philosophiques latines et françaises de feu Mr de Leibnitz, tirées des ses Manuscrits qui se conservant dans la Bibliothèque royale à Hanovre et publiées par M. Rud. Eric Raspe. Amsterdam: Jean Schreuder.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1768. Opera omnia nunc primum collecta in Classes distributa praefactionibus & indicibus exornata. Edited by Dutens, Ludovici. 6 vols. Geneva: Fratres de Tournes.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1875–90. Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Edited by Gerhardt, C. I.. Reprint. Hildesheim: Georg Olms. [Abbreviated “G”.]Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1923–. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Edited by Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. [Abbreviated “A”.]Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1989. Philosophical Essays. Edited by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. [Abbreviated “AG”.]Google Scholar
Levey, Samuel. 1998. “Leibniz on Mathematics and the Actually Infinite Division of Matter.” Philosophical Review 107(1): 49–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, Samuel. 1999. “Matter and Two Concepts of Continuity in Leibniz.” Philosophical Studies 94(1–2): 81–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, Samuel. 2012. “On Unity, Borrowed Reality and Multitude in Leibniz.” The Leibniz Review 22: 97–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levey, Samuel. 2021. “The Continuum, the Infinitely Small, and the Law of Continuity in Leibniz.” In Shapiro and Hellman (eds.), 123–157.Google Scholar
Lindberg, David C. 1976. Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Translated by Charles T. Wolfe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 2017. I, Me, Mine: Back to Kant and Back Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Look, Brandon. 2022. “Kant’s Leibniz: A Historical and Philosophical Study.” In Leibniz and Kant, edited by Look, Brandon C., 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping. 2013. “The Objects and the Formal Truth of Kantian Analytic Judgments.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 30(2): 177–193.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping. 2018a. Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping. 2018b. “Epigenesis of Pure Reason and the Source of Pure Cognitions.” In Rethinking Kant, vol. 5, edited by Muchnik, Pablo and Thorndike, Oliver, 35–70. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, John. 2002. “Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism.” Philosophical Review 111(1): 25–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, Benjamin. 2019. “Conceptualizing Kant’s Mereology.” Ergo 6(14): 374–404.Google Scholar
Marshall, Colin. 2014. “Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52(3): 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Gareth B. 2003. “Augustine on the Mind’s Search for Itself.” Faith and Philosophy 20(4): 415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. 2011. Perception as a Capacity for Knowledge. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin. 2011. “Kant on Animal Consciousness.” Philosophers’ Imprint 11(15): 1–16.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin. 2014. “The Kantian (Non-)Conceptualism Debate.” Philosophy Compass 9(11): 769–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLear, Colin. 2015. “Two Types of Unity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53(1): 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLear, Colin. 2016. “Getting Acquainted with Kant.” In Schulting (ed.), 171–197.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin. 2017. “Intuition and Presence.” In Gomes and Stephenson (eds.), 86–103.Google Scholar
McLear, Colin. 2020. “Animals and Objectivity.” In Allais and Callanan (eds.), 42–65.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. 1752. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Johann Justinus Gebauer. [Abbreviated “Auszug”.]Google Scholar
Melamedoff-Vosters, Damian. 2023. “Kant’s Argument for Transcendental Idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic Revisited.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105(1): 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnick, Arthur. 1973. Kant’s Analogies of Experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mendell, Henry. 2015. “What’s Location Got to Do with It? Place, Space, and the Infinite in Classical Greek Mathematics.” In Mathematizing Space: Objects of Geometry from Antiquity to the Early Modern Age, edited by De Risi, Vincenzo, 15–64. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen. 1994. “The Origins of Aristotle’s Concept of energeia.” Ancient Philosophy 14(1): 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen. 1998. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. 2013. Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2009. “Reflection, Enlightenment, and the Significance of Spontaneity in Kant.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17(5): 981–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2010. “Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of Space and Time: An Essay on the Philosophical Resources of the Transcendental Aesthetic.” Kantian Review 14(2): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2011. “Kant’s Argument for the Apperception Principle.” European Journal of Philosophy 19(1): 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. 2018. Kant on Reflection and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, James. 2014. “Kant on the Unity of Space and the Synthetic Unity of Apperception.” Kant-Studien 105(1): 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, James. 2015. “Conceptual Analysis and the Essence of Space: Kant’s Metaphysical Exposition Revisited.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 97(4): 416–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messina, James. 2018. “Kant’s Stance on the Relationalist-Substantivalist Debate and Its Justification.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 56(4): 697–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, George. 1999. “Are Dispositions Reducible?” The Philosophical Quarterly 49(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, George. 2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen. 2009. “Causal Powers and Capacities.” In The Oxford Handbook of Causation, edited by Beebee, Helen, Hitchcock, Christopher, and Menzies, Peter, 265–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nachtomy, Ohad. 2011. “A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza in 1675–78.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19(5): 935–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachtomy, Ohad, and Winegar, Reed (eds.) 2018. Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Alexandra. 2019. “Kant and the Transparency of the Mind.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49(7): 890–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunez, Tyke. 2018. “Logical Mistakes, Logical Aliens, and the Laws of Kant’s Pure General Logic.” Mind 128(512): 1149–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberhausen, Michael. 1997. Das neue Apriori: Kants Lehre von einer “ursprünglichen Erwerbung” apriorischer Vostellungen. Stuttgart: frommann-holzboog.Google Scholar
Onof, Christian, and Schulting, Dennis. 2014. “Kant, Kästner, and the Distinction between Metaphysical and Geometric Space.” Kantian Review 19(2): 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onof, Christian, and Schulting, Dennis. 2015. “Space as Form of Intuition and Space as Formal Intuition: On the Note to B160 in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” Philosophical Review 124(1): 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 1983 [1964]. “Infinity and Kant’s Conception of the ‘Possibility of Experience’.” In his Mathematics in Philosophy: Selected Essays, 95–109. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 1992 [1969]. “Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic.” In Posy (ed.), 43–80.Google Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 2012 [1992]. “The Transcendental Aesthetic.” In his From Kant to Husserl: Selected Essays, 5–41. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paton, H. J. 1936. Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience. 2 vols. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Patton, Lydia. 2011. “The Paradox of Infinite Given Magnitude: Why Kantian Epistemology Needs Metaphysical Space.” Kant-Studien 102(3): 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik (ed.). 2015. The Faculties: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert. 1982. Kant’s Theory of Form. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. 1987. “Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17(2): 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . 1997. Complete Works. Edited by Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin. 2017. Kant’s Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porphyry, , 2003. Introduction. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Posy, Carl (ed.). 1992. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics: Modern Essays. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posy, Carl. 2008. “Intuition and Infinity: A Kantian Theme with Echoes in the Foundations of Mathematics.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 63: 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posy, Carl, and Rechter, Ofra (eds.). 2020. Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Volume 1: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, C. Thomas. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman. 1980 [1951]. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In his From a Logical Point of View, 20–46. 2nd revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosefeldt, Tobias. 2022. “Kant on Decomposing Synthesis and the Intuition of Infinite Space.” Philosophers’ Imprint 22(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Rosenkoetter, Timothy. 2008. “Are Kantian Analytic Judgments about Objects?” In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants, vol. 5, edited by Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo, Almeida, Guido de, and Ruffing, Margit, 191–202. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rusnock, Paul, and George, Rolf. 1995. “A Last Shot at Kant and Incongruent Counterparts.” Kant-Studien 86(3): 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saccheri, Gerolamo. 2014 [1733]. Euclid Vindicated from Every Blemish. Edited by Risi, Vincenzo De. Translated by G. B. Halsted and L. Allegri. New York: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Brigitta. 2000. Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl. 2019. “Kant’s Constitutivism as Capacities-First Philosophy.” Philosophical Explorations 22(2): 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Karl. 2020a. “Transcendental Philosophy as Capacities-First Philosophy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103(3): 661–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Karl. 2020b. “A System of Rational Faculties: Additive or Transformative.” European Journal of Philosophy 29(4): 918–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Karl. 2021 [2018]. “A Kantian Virtue Epistemology: Rational Capacities and Transcendental Arguments.” Synthese 198(Suppl. 13): 3113–3136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Karl. 2022. “Kant’s Conception of Cognition and Our Knowledge of Things in Themselves.” In Sensible and Intelligible Worlds, edited by Stang, Nicholas and Schafer, Karl, 248–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, Karl. 2023. “Practical Cognition and Knowledge of Things-in-Themselves.” In The Idea of Freedom: New Essays on the Kantian Theory of Freedom, edited by Heide, Dai and Tiffany, Evan, 83–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechtman, Anat. 2018. “The Ontic and the Iterative: Descartes on the Infinite and the Indefinite.” In Nachtomy and Winegar (eds.), 27–44.Google Scholar
Schechtman, Anat. 2019. “Three Infinities in Early Modern Philosophy.” Mind 128(52): 1117–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, Friederike. 2013. “On Kant’s Conception of Inner Sense: Self-Affection by the Understanding.” European Journal of Philosophy 23(4): 1044–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmucker, Josef. 1976. “Was entzündete in Kant das große Licht von 1769?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 58(4): 393–434.Google Scholar
Schulting, Dennis (ed.). 2016. Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Johann. 1784. Entdekte Theorie der Parallelen. Königsberg: Kanter.Google Scholar
Schultz, Johann. 1785. “Philosophie: Rezension von Institutiones Logicae et Metaphysicae.” Allgemeine Literartur-Zeitung 295(December 13, 1785): 297–299.Google Scholar
Schultz, Johann. 1786. Darstellung der vollkommenen Evidenz und Schärfe seiner Theorie der Parallelen. Königsberg: Hartung.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1970. “…this I or He or It (The Thing) which thinks…” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 44(1970–1971): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setiya, Kieran. 2004. “Transcendental Idealism in the ‘Aesthetic’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68(1): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severo, Rogério Passos. 2005. “Three Remarks on the Interpretation of Kant on Incongruent Counterparts.” Kantian Review 9: 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabel, Lisa. 2010. “The Transcendental Aesthetic.” In The Cambridge Companion to the “Critique of Pure Reason”, edited by Guyer, Paul, 93–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaddock, Justin. 2015. “Kant’s Transcendental Idealism and His Transcendental Deduction.” Kantian Review 20(2): 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Stewart, and Hellman, Geoffrey (eds.). 2021. The History of Continua: Philosophical and Mathematical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smit, Houston. 1999. “The Role of Reflection in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80(2): 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, Houston. 2000. “Kant on Marks and the Immediacy of Intuition.” Philosophical Review. 109(2): 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, Houston. 2009. “Kant on Apriority and the Spontaneity of Cognition.” In Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams, edited by Newlands, Sam and Jorgensen, Larry, 188–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Daniel. 2014. “Infinity and Givenness: Kant on the Intuitive Origin of Spatial Representation.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44(5–6): 551–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Daniel. 2015. Infinity and Givenness: Kant’s Critical Theory of Sensibility. PhD dissertation. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Smyth, Daniel. 2023 [2021]. “Kant’s Mereological Account of Greater and Lesser Actual Infinities.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105(2): 315–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Daniel. MS. “The Sinister Dexterity of Kant’s Idealism: Chirality and Embodiment.”Google Scholar
Sömmerring, Samuel Thomas. 1796. Über das Organ der Seele. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. 1925–. Spinoza Opera. Edited by Gebhardt, Carl. Heidelberg: Carl Winters. [Abbreviated “G”.]Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. 2002. The Complete Works. Edited by Morgan, Michael. Translated by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. [Abbreviated “SM”.]Google Scholar
Stang, Nicholas. 2016. Kant’s Modal Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Andrew. 2015. “Kant on the Object-Dependence of Intuition and Hallucination.” The Philosophical Quarterly 65(260): 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, Andrew. 2017. “Imagination and Inner Intuition.” In Gomes and Stephenson (eds.), 104–123.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel. 2004. “Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics and the Greek Mathematical Tradition.” Philosophical Review 113(2): 157–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel. 2017. “Kant’s Conception of Number.” Philosophical Review 126(2): 147–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel. 2021a. “Continuity and Intuition in Eighteenth-Century Analysis and in Kant.” In Shapiro and Hellman (eds.), 158–186.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel. 2021b. Kant’s Mathematical World: Mathematics, Cognition, and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tait, William. 2016. “Kant and Finitism.” Journal of Philosophy 113(5/6): 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Manley. 1972. “Singular Terms and Intuitions in Kant’s Epistemology.” The Review of Metaphysics 26(2): 314–343.Google Scholar
Tizzard, Jessica. 2018. “Kant on Space, Time, and Respect for the Moral Law as Analogous Formal Elements of Sensibility.” European Journal of Philosophy 26(1): 630–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tizzard, Jessica. 2020. “Why Does Kant Think We Must Believe in the Immortal Soul?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50(1): 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. 2007. Kant’s Conception of Logic. PhD dissertation. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. 2012. “The Generality of Kant’s Transcendental Logic.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(3): 417–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. 2016. “The Difference between Original, Metaphysical and Geometrical Representations of Space.” In Schulting (ed.), 257–285.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. 2021. “The Metaphysics of Powers in Kant and Hegel.” In Jorati (ed.), 243–270.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. 1974. “Leibniz on Innate Ideas and the Early Reactions to the Publication of the Nouveaux Essais (1765).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 11(4): 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. 1881. Kommentar zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Vol. I. Stuttgart: Spemann.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. 1892. Kommentar zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Vol. II. Stuttgart: Union Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Valaris, Markos. 2008. “Inner Sense, Self-Affection, and Temporal Consciousness in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” Philosophers’ Imprint 8(4): 1–18.Google Scholar
Valaris, Markos. 2020. “Reasoning, Defeasibility, and the Taking Condition.” Philosophers’ Imprint 20(28): 1–16.Google Scholar
Vanzo, Alberto. 2018. “Leibniz on Innate Ideas and Kant on the Origin of the Categories.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 100(1): 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verboon, Annemieke. 2010. Lines of Thought: Diagrammatic Representation in the Scientific Texts of the Arts Faculty, 1200–1500. PhD dissertation. Leiden University.Google Scholar
Verboon, Annemieke. 2014. “The Medieval Tree of Porphyry: An Organic Structure of Logic.” In The Tree: Symbol, Allegory, and Mnemonic Device in Medieval Art and Thought, edited by Salonius, Pippa and Worm, Andrea, 95–116. Turnhout: Brepolis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Barbara. 2015. Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel. 1998. “Kant and the Apriority of Space.” Philosophical Review 107(2): 179–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2004. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, and Willaschek, Markus. 2017. “Kant’s Account of Cognition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(1): 83–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, and Willaschek, Markus. 2020 [2017]. “Kant on Cognition and Knowledge.” Synthese 197: 3195–3213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. 2001. “Affektion und Kontingenz in Kants transzendentalem Idealismus.” In Idealismus als Theorie der Repräsentation?, edited by Schumacher, Ralph and Scholz, Oliver, 211–231. Paderborn: mentis.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. 2018. Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Diane, and Sorensen, Kelly (eds.). 2017. Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. 1995. “The Reception of Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, edited by Jolley, Nicholas, 442–474. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Kirk Dallas. 1975. “Kant on Intuition.” The Philosophical Quarterly 25(100): 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winegar, B. Reed. 2022. “Kant’s Three Conceptions of Infinite Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 60(4): 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1730. Philosophia prima sive ontologia methodo scientifica pertractata qua omnis cognitionis humanae principia continentur. Frankfurt. [Abbreviated “Ontologia”.]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1965 [1754]. Vernünftige Gedanken von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkenntnis der Wahrheit. Edited by Arndt, H. W.. Hildesheim: Olms. [Abbreviated “German Logic”.]Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1983 [1751]. Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Edited by Corr, Charles. Hildesheim: Olms. [Abbreviated “German Metaphysics”.]Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael. 1995. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuerth, Julian. 2014. Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Daniel Smyth, Wesleyan University, Connecticut
  • Book: Intuition in Kant
  • Online publication: 07 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009330305.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Daniel Smyth, Wesleyan University, Connecticut
  • Book: Intuition in Kant
  • Online publication: 07 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009330305.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Daniel Smyth, Wesleyan University, Connecticut
  • Book: Intuition in Kant
  • Online publication: 07 March 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009330305.011
Available formats
×