Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword by Paul F.A. Van Look
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction and overview
- 2 Defining reproductive tract infections and other gynaecological morbidities
- 3 The social context of gynaecological morbidity: correlates, consequences and health seeking behaviour
- 4 Reproductive health: men's roles and men's rights
- 5 Study design for the measurement of gynaecological morbidity
- 6 Alternatives to community-based study designs for research on women's gynaecological morbidity
- 7 Community interaction in studies of gynaecological morbidity: experiences in Egypt, India and Uganda
- 8 Definitions of clinically diagnosed gynaecological morbidity resulting from reproductive tract infection
- 9 Laboratory tests for the detection of reproductive tract infections
- 10 Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of reproductive tract infections and selected conditions in population-based studies
- 11 The value of the imperfect: the contribution of interview surveys to the study of gynaecological ill health
- 12 Qualitative methods in gynaecological morbidity research
- 13 Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in research on reproductive health
- 14 Interpreting results from different sources of data
- 15 Turning research into action
- Appendix A Notes on contributors
- Index
10 - Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of reproductive tract infections and selected conditions in population-based studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword by Paul F.A. Van Look
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction and overview
- 2 Defining reproductive tract infections and other gynaecological morbidities
- 3 The social context of gynaecological morbidity: correlates, consequences and health seeking behaviour
- 4 Reproductive health: men's roles and men's rights
- 5 Study design for the measurement of gynaecological morbidity
- 6 Alternatives to community-based study designs for research on women's gynaecological morbidity
- 7 Community interaction in studies of gynaecological morbidity: experiences in Egypt, India and Uganda
- 8 Definitions of clinically diagnosed gynaecological morbidity resulting from reproductive tract infection
- 9 Laboratory tests for the detection of reproductive tract infections
- 10 Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of reproductive tract infections and selected conditions in population-based studies
- 11 The value of the imperfect: the contribution of interview surveys to the study of gynaecological ill health
- 12 Qualitative methods in gynaecological morbidity research
- 13 Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in research on reproductive health
- 14 Interpreting results from different sources of data
- 15 Turning research into action
- Appendix A Notes on contributors
- Index
Summary
This chapter focuses on advances in reproductive health research that permit sample and data collection within population-based studies in a wide range of nonclinical settings, including the home. Areas of interest are assessment of classical sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and other reproductive tract infections, including oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV), the principal causal agent of cervical cancer. Assessment of pregnancy loss is also addressed. The importance of linking behavioural data with biological sampling, in order to provide interpretable information for the development and evaluation of disease prevention and control programmes, is discussed. Finally, a number of strategies are proposed for the incorporation of biological sampling into survey research.
The study of reproductive morbidity in population-based studies was hindered for many years by the difficulty of diagnosis and the selectivity of the populations studied. Biological samples to assess many reproductive tract infections and STIs could only be obtained through genital and/or pelvic examination. In addition, available tests for many conditions required specialized handling of samples (in the case of gonorrhoea culture, for example) or immediate testing (such as wet mounts for trichomonas). Thus, studies were largely restricted to selected clinic-based populations, including users of antenatal or STD (sexually transmitted diseases) clinics, and results could not be generalized to the population as a whole. These limitations were particularly acute in rural settings with poor access to clinical services and laboratories, to say nothing of basics such as water and electricity
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Investigating Reproductive Tract Infections and Other Gynaecological DisordersA Multidisciplinary Research Approach, pp. 261 - 282Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
- 2
- Cited by