Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T13:13:10.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Lee Ward
Affiliation:
University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, Hans. “The State of Nature and the Nature of Man in Locke.” In John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Yolton, John, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969: 99–136.Google Scholar
Aaron, Richard I. John Locke, 2nd Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Ahrensdorf, Peter and Pangle, Thomas. Justice among Nations: On the Moral Basis of Power and Peace. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Law, Morality and Politics, 2nd ed. Baumgarth, William P. and Regan, Richard J., eds. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar
Aquinas, ThomasPolitical Writings, Dyson, R.W., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1274] 2002.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Oswald, Martin, trans. New York: MacMillan, 1962.Google Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. “Trade, Plantations, and Property: John Locke and the Economic Defense of Colonialism.”Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 55, no. 4 (October 1994): 591–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, BarbaraJohn Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnhart, Larry. “The ‘God-Like Prince’: John Locke, Executive Prerogative, and the American Presidency.”Presidential Studies Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 2 (Spring 1979): 121–30.Google Scholar
Ashcraft, Richard. “Locke's State of Nature: Historical Fact or Moral Fiction?”American Political Science Review, vol. 42, no. 3 (September 1968): 898–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcraft, RichardRevolutionary Politics & Locke's Two Treatises. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Ashcraft, RichardLocke's Two Treatises of Government. London: Allen & Unwin, 1987.Google Scholar
Augustine, St. City of God. New York: Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael. Locke: Epistemology & Ontology, Vol. I & II. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Balibar, Etienne. Spinoza and Politics. Peter Snowdon, trans. Verso: New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Becker, Ronald. “The Ideological Commitment of Locke: Freemen and Servants in the Two Treatises of Government.”History of Political Thought, vol. 8, no. 4 (1992): 631–56.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. “Humanitarian Responsibilities and Interventionist Claims in International Society.”Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 3 (July 2003): 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol. I. London, 1791.Google Scholar
Bou-Habib, Paul. “Locke, Sincerity and the Rationality of Persecution.”Political Studies, vol. 51, no. 4 (December 2003): 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Michelle. “The Nature of Virtue in a Politics of Consent: John Locke on Education.”International Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 2 (June 2005): 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brailey, Malcolm. “Pre-emption and Prevention: An Ethical and Legal Critique of the Bush Doctrine and Anticipatory Use of Force in Defence of the State.”Institute of Strategic Studies Singapore (November 2003): 1–22.Google Scholar
Brennan, Teresa and Pateman, Carole. “‘Mere Auxiliaries to the Commonwealth’: Women and the Origins of Liberalism.”Political Studies, vol. 27, no. 2 (1979): 183–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley. “The Grotian Conception of International Society.” Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin, eds. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1966: 51–73.Google Scholar
Bull, HedleyThe Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Melissa. “Early Liberal Roots of Feminism: John Locke and His Attack on Patriarchy.”American Political Science Review, vol. 72, no. 1 (March 1978): 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry. “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR.”Review of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 3 (July 2001): 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Craig and Seidler, Michael. “Pufendorf, Sociality and the Modern State.”History of Political Thought, vol. 13, no. 3 (Autumn 1996): 352–78.Google Scholar
Carrig, Joseph. “Liberal Impediments to Liberal Education: The Assent to Locke.”Review of Politics, vol. 63, no. 1 (Winter 2001): 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Las, Casas, Bartholome, . In Defence of the Indians. Poole, Stafford, trans. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1992 [1552].Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere. “Power in Locke's Essay.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke's “Essay Concerning Human Understanding.”Newman, Lex, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 130–52.Google Scholar
Clark, Lorenne. “Women and Locke: Who Owns the Apples in the Garden of Eden?” In The Sexism of Social and Political Theory. Clark, Lorenne and Lange, Lynda, eds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979: 16–40.Google Scholar
Coby, Patrick J. “The Law of Nature in Locke's Second Treatise: Is Locke a Hobbesian?”Review of Politics, vol. 49, no. 1 (Winter 1987): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, John. John Locke's Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Coole, Diana. Women in Political Theory. Boulder: Lynne Reinner, 1979.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale C. “A Realist Critique of the English School.”Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 3 (July 2003): 427–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, John. “Cartesian Dualism: Theology, Metaphysics and Science.” The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cottingham, John, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992: 236–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Richard. Locke on War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Creppell, Ingrid. “Locke on Toleration: The Transformation of Constraint.”Political Theory, vol. 24, no. 2 (May 1996): 200–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crittenden, P. J. “Thoughts about Locke's Thoughts about Education.”Journal of Philosophy of Education, vol. 15, no. 2 (1981): 149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, James. Sir Robert Filmer and English Political Thought. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Hannah. “Locke on Language in (Civil) Society.”History of Political Thought, vol. 26, no. 3 (Autumn 2005): 397–425.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes Vol. I & II. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald, eds. and trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Desch, Michael. C. “It Is Kind to Be Cruel: the Humanity of American Realism.”Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 3 (July 2003): 415–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, H. T. Liberty and Property. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1977.Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred. “Pufendorf.” In Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, Mark, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991: 561–88.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. “Consent in the Political Theory of John Locke.”The Historical Journal, vol. 10, no. 2 (1967): 153–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, JohnThe Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John “What Is Living and What Is Dead in the Political Theory of John Locke?” In Interpreting Political Responsibility: Essays 1981–89. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John “The dilemma of humanitarian intervention: the executive power of the Law of Nature, after God.” In The History of Political Theory and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 136–47.Google Scholar
Dunn, John “Measuring Locke's Shadow.” In Two Treatises and a Letter Concerning Toleration. Shapiro, Ian, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003: 257–85.Google Scholar
Eisenach, Eldon. Two Worlds of Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean B. Public Man, Private Woman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Farr, James and Roberts, Clayton. “John Locke on the Glorious Revolution: A Rediscovered Document.”The Historical Journal, vol. 28, no. 2 (June 1985): 385–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatovic, Clement. “Constitutionalism and Contingency: Locke's Theory of Prerogative.”History of Political Thought, vol. 25, no. 2 (Summer 2004): 276–97.Google Scholar
Fatovic, Clement“The Anti-Catholic Roots of Liberal and Republican Conceptions of Freedom in English Political Thought.”Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 66, no. 1 (2005): 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Robert. Richard Hooker and the Politics of a Christian England. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Faulkner, Robert“The First Liberal Democrat: Locke's Popular Government.”Review of Politics, vol. 61, no. 3 (Fall 2001): 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filmer, Robert. Patriarcha and Other Writings. Somerville, Johann, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliegelman, Jay. Prodigals and Pilgrims: The American Revolution against Patriarchal Authority 1750–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Forde, Steven. “Hugo Grotius on Ehtics and War.”American Political Science Review, vol. 92, no. 3 (September 1998): 639–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, Steven“Natural Law, Theology, and Morality in Locke.”American Journal of Political Science, vol. 45, no. 2 (April 2001): 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forde, Steven“What Does Locke Expect Us to Know?”Review of Politics, vol. 68, no. 1 (2006): 232–58.Google Scholar
Forster, Greg. John Locke's Politics of Moral Consensus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, David. “Taming the Father: John Locke's Critique of Patriarchal Fatherhood.”Review of Politics, vol. 56, no. 3 (Fall 1994): 641–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Julian. Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Pegasus, 1968.Google Scholar
Franklin, JulianJohn Locke and the Theory of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Gay, Peter. “Introduction.” John Locke on Education, Gay, Peter, ed. New York: Columbia University, 1964: 1–14.Google Scholar
Galeotti, Anna Elisabetta. Toleration as Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David P. “The Role of Inheritance in Locke's Political Theory.”Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, vol. 32, no. 1 (February 1966): 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. “Structural Realism in a More Complex World.”Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 3 (July 2003): 403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauser, Wayne. “Three Approaches to Locke and the Slave Trade.”Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 51, no. 2 (April 1990): 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Gary D. “Inalienable Rights and Locke's Argument for Limited Government: Political Implications of a Right to Suicide.”Journal of Politics, vol. 46, no. 1 (February 1984): 80–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, Mark. “John Locke and Anglican Royalism.” In John Locke: Critical Assessments, Vol. 1. Ashcraft, Richard, ed. New York: Routledge, 1991: 152–75.Google Scholar
Gough, J. W. John Locke's Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth. John Locke's Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth “John Locke on Women and the Family.” In Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration. Shapiro, Ian, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003: 286–308.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace, 3 Vols. Tuck, Richard, ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005 [1625].Google Scholar
Harris, Ian. The Mind of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Harris, Ian “Tolérance, église et état chez Locke,” Les fondements philosophiques de la tolerance en France et en Angleterre au xviie siècle, 3 vols. Zarka, Yves Charles, Lessay, Franck, Rogers, John, eds. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2002. Vol. 1: 175–218.Google Scholar
Harrison, Ross. Hobbes, Locke and Confusion's Masterpiece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Harvey, Martin. “Grotius and Hobbes.”British Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 14, no. 1 (February 2006): 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, Gary B. Thomas Hobbes: The Unity of Scientific and Moral Wisdom. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, Curley, Edwin, ed. Indianapolis, Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Stanley. “Sovereignty and the Ethics of Intervention.” In The Ethics and Politics of Humanitarian Intervention. Hoffman, Stanley, ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996: 12–37.Google Scholar
Hooker, Richard. Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity. McGrade, Arthur Stephen, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989 [1593].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopfl, Harro and Thompson, Martyn. “The History of Contract as a Motif in Political Thought.”American Historical Review, vol. 84, no. 4 (October 1979): 919–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Robert. “John Locke and the Preservation of Liberty: A Perennial Problem of Civic Education.” In The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, Third Edition. Horwitz, Robert H., ed. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1986: 136–64.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Selby-Bigge, L. A., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hume, David “Of the Original Contract.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary. Miller, Eugene, ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985 [1748]: 465–87.Google Scholar
,International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, JonathanEnlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. Notes on the State of Virginia. New York: Palgrave, 2002 [1785].Google Scholar
Jeffreys, M. V. C. John Locke: Prophet of Common Sense. London: Methuen & Co, 1967.Google Scholar
Jesseph, Douglas. “Hobbes and the Method of Natural Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Sorrel, Tom, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 86–107.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas. “Locke on Faith and Reason.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Newman, Lex, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 436–55.Google Scholar
Jolley, Nicholas “The Reception of Descartes' Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cottingham, John, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992: 393–423.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. “Toleration, Recognition and Identity.”The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 14, no. 2 (2006): 123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, Peter. The Great Art of Government: Locke's Use of Consent. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002.Google Scholar
Kendall, Willmoore. John Locke and the Doctrine of Majority-Rule. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Kessler, Sanford. “John Locke's Legacy of Religious Freedom.”Polity, vol. 17, no. 3 (Spring 1985): 484–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, Robert. “Calvinism and Resistance Theory, 1550–1580.” In Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700. Burns, J. H. and Goldie, Mark, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991: 194–218.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew. John Locke and the Origins of Private Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraynak, Robert. “John Locke: From Absolutism to Toleration.”American Political Science Review, vol. 74, no. 1 (March 1980): 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiger, Leonard. The Politics of Discretion: Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. “Introductory Essay.” In Two Treatises of Government. Locke, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988: 3–122.Google Scholar
Lerner, Ralph. The Thinking Revolutionary. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Leyden, Wolfgang. “Locke's Strange Doctrine of Punishment.” In John Locke: Symposium Wolfenbuttel 1979. Brandt, Reinhard, ed. Berlin: Walter de Ruyter, 1981: 113–27.Google Scholar
Little, Richard. “The English School's Contribution to the Study of International Relations.”European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3 (2000): 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Richard“The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language?”Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 3 (July 2003): 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. The Works of John Locke, 10 Vols. London: Thomas Tegg, 1823 [1692].Google Scholar
Locke, John “A Third Letter Concerning Toleration,” The Works of John Locke. 10 Vols. London: Thomas Tegg, 1823 [1692]. Vol. 6: 141–546.Google Scholar
Locke, John “Letter from a Person of Quality.” The Works of John Locke. 10 Vols. London: W. Sharpe & Sons, 1823 [1676]. Vol. 10: 200–46.
Locke, JohnEssays on the Law of Nature. 2nd Ed. Leyden, W., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958 [1660].
Locke, JohnThe Reasonableness of Christianity. Ramsey, I. T., ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958 [1695].Google Scholar
Locke, JohnThe Two Tracts of Government. Abrams, Philip, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967 [1661].Google Scholar
Locke, John “Letter to Mrs. Clarke, February 1685.” Locke's Educational Writings. Axtell, James, ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Locke, JohnAn Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, Peter, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975 [1700, 4th ed.].Google Scholar
Locke, JohnThe Correspondence of John Locke, Vol. 5. Beer, E. S., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Locke, JohnThe Correspondence of John Locke, Vol. 6. Beer, E. S., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Locke, JohnA Letter Concerning Toleration. Tully, James H., ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983 [1689].Google Scholar
Locke, JohnTwo Treatises of Government. Laslett, Peter, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 [1689].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, JohnSome Thoughts Concerning Education and Of the Conduct of the Understanding. Grant, Ruth and Tarcov, Nathan, eds. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996.Google Scholar
Locke, John “Some Thoughts Concerning Reading and Study for a Gentleman.” In Political Essays. Goldie, Mark, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997: 348–55.Google Scholar
Locke, John “An Essay on the Poor Law.” In Political Essays. Goldie, Mark, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997: 182–98.Google Scholar
Locke, John “Venditio.” In Political Essays. Goldie, Mark, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 [1695]: 393–43.Google Scholar
Locke, John “The Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina.” In Political Essays. Goldie, Mark, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 [1669]: 160–81.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, David. “Tradition and Prudence in Locke's Exceptions to Toleration.”American Journal of Political Science, vol. 47, no. 2 (April 2003): 248–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenthal, David. “Locke on Conquest.” In Understanding the Political Spirit: Philosophical Investigations from Socrates to Nietzsche. Zuckert, Catherine, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988: 126–35.Google Scholar
Mabbott, J. D. John Locke. London: MacMillan, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay. The Federalist Papers. Rossiter, Clinton, ed. New York: New American Library, 1961 [1788].Google Scholar
Makus, Ingrid. Women, Politics and Reproduction. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey. Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power. New York: Free Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey “On the Political Character of Property in Locke.” In Powers, Possessions, and Freedoms: Essays in Honour of C. B. MacPherson. Kontos, Alkis, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979: 23–38.Google Scholar
Marshall, John. John Locke: Resistance, Religion, and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, A. P. Hobbes. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Matar, Nabil. “John Locke and the ‘Turbanned Nations’.”Journal of Islamic Studies, vol. 2, no. 1 (1991): 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayall, James. World Politics: Progress and Its Limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
McCabe, David. “John Locke and the Argument against Strict Separation.”The Review of Politics, vol. 59, no. 2 (Spring 1997): 233–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Edwin. “Locke on Substance.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke's “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”. Newman, Lex, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 157–91.Google Scholar
McClure, Kirstie. “Difference, Diversity, and the Limits of Toleration.”Political Theory, vol. 18, no. 3 (August 1990): 361–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, KirstieJudging Rights: Lockean Politics and the Limits of Consent. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday Singh. Liberalism and Empire: A Study of Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Mehta, Uday SinghThe Anxiety of Freedom: Imagination and Individuality in Locke's Political Thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mendle, Michael. Henry Parker and the English Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. “A Few Words on Non-Intervention.” In Dissertations and Discussions, Vol. III. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co, 1873 [1859]: 238–63.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “On Liberty.” In The Basic Writings of John Stuart Mill. New York: Modern Library, 2002 [1859]: 17–76.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Joshua. “John Locke and the Theological Foundations of Liberal Toleration: A Christian Dialectic of History.”The Review of Politics, vol. 52, no. 1 (Winter 1990): 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics among Nations. 2nd ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1954.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sanka. Enlightenment against Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Myers, Peter C. Our Only Star and Compass: Locke and the Struggle for Political Rationality. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry. “The Moral Basis of Humanitarian Intervention.”Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 16, no. 1 (April 2002): 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, Alex. “Locke on Habituation, Autonomy, and Education.”Journal of the History of Philosophy, vol. 27, no. 2 (April 1989): 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nidditch, Peter. “Foreword.” In An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Locke, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Owen, Judd. Religion and the Demise of Liberal Rationalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. “Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe's Imperial Legacy.”Political Theory, vol. 31, no. 2 (April 2003): 171–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangle, Thomas. The Spirit of Modern Republicanism: The Moral Vision of the American Founders and the Philosophy of Locke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Parry, Geraint. John Locke. London: Allen & Unwin, 1978.Google Scholar
Pasquino, Pasquale. “Locke on King's Prerogative.”Political Theory, vol. 26, no. 2 (April 1998): 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, John. The Perfectibility of Man. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1970.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. A. “Locke and the Ethics of Belief.” In Locke. Chappell, Vere, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998: 279–99.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Pateman, CaroleThe Disorder of Women. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Perkinson, Henry J. Since Socrates: Studies in the History of Western Educational Thought. New York: Longman, 1981.Google Scholar
Pettit, Phillip. Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jacqueline. “The Family in Locke's Political Thought.”Polity, vol. 33, no. 4 (Summer 2001): 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . Republic. Bloom, Allan, trans. New York: Basic Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . “The Life of Lycurgus.” In The Lives of Noble Grecians and Romans. Dryden, John, trans. New York: Everyman, 1952.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. De Jure Naturae et Gentium. , C. H. and Oldfather, W. A., trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, SamuelOn the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law. Tully, James, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, SamuelOf the Nature and Qualification of Religion in Reference to Civil Society. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002.Google Scholar
Rabieh, Michael. “The Reasonableness of Locke, or the Questionableness of Christianity.”The Journal of Politics, vol. 53, no. 4 (November 1991): 933–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabkin, Jeremy. “Grotius, Vattel, and Locke: An Older View of Liberalism and Nationality.”Review of Politics, vol. 59, no. 2 (Spring 1997): 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahe, Paul. “John Locke's Philosophical Partisanship.”Political Science Reviewer, vol. 20 (1991): 1–43.Google Scholar
Rahe, PaulRepublics Ancient and Modern: Classical Republicanism and the American Revolution, 3 Vols. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, JohnPolitical Liberalism, Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rickless, Samuel C. “Locke's Polemic against Nativism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke's “Essay Concerning Human Understanding.”Newman, Lex, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 33–66.Google Scholar
Rogers, A. J. “The Intellectual Setting and Aims of the Essay.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke's “Essay Concerning Human Understanding.”Newman, Lex, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 7–32.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stanley. “Benedict Spinoza.” In History of Political Philosophy, 3rd ed. Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987: 456–75.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. On the Social Contract. Masters, Roger, ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978 [1762].Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-JacquesEmile, or On Education. Bloom, Allan, trans. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. Democracy's Discontents: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sandoz, Ellis. “The Civil Theology of Liberal Democracy: Locke and His Predecessors.”The Journal of Politics, vol. 34, no. 1 (February 1972): 2–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, William. “Liberal Democracy and the Empire of Speed.”Polity, Vol. 34, no. 1 (Fall 2001): 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schochet, Gordon. Patriarchalism in Political Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Schochet, Gordon “John Locke and Religious Toleration.” In The Revolution of 1688–89. Schwoerer, Lois, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992: 147–64.Google Scholar
Schouls, Peter A. Reasoned Freedom. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schuurman, Paul. “Locke's Way of Ideas as Context of His Theory of Education in Of the Conduct of the Understanding.”History of European Ideas, 27 (2001): 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, John. “The Sovereignless State and Locke's Language of Obligation.”American Political Science Review, vol. 94, no. 3 (September 2000): 547–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seliger, Martin. The Liberal Politics of John Locke. London: Allen & Unwin, 1969.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary. “Marriage Contract and Social Contract in Seventeenth Century English Political Thought.”Western Political Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1 (March 1979): 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. “John Locke's Democratic Theory.” In Two Treatises and a Letter Concerning Toleration. Shapiro, Ian, ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003: 309–40.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. JohnThe Edge of Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven B. Spinoza, Liberalism and the Question of Jewish Identity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Spellman, W. M. John Locke and the Problem of Depravity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. Ethics Including the Improvement of the Understanding. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Spinoza, BenedictA Theologico-Political Treatise and A Political Treatise. Mineola: Dover Publications, 2004.Google Scholar
Spragens, Thomas A. The Politics of Motion: The World of Thomas Hobbes. Lexington: University Press of Kansas, 1973.Google Scholar
Stanton, Timothy. “Locke and the Politics and Theology of Toleration.”Political Studies, vol. 54, no. 1 (March 2006): 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco. Selections from Three Works. Williams, Glwadys, trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1944 [1612].Google Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan. “Locke's Second Treatise and the ‘Best Fence against Rebellion’.”Review of Politics, vol. 43, no. 2 (April 1981): 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarcov, NathanLocke's Education for Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, CharlesPhilosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition.”Gutmann, Amy, ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993: 25–73.Google Scholar
Teson, Fernando R. Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality. Dobbs Ferry: Transnational Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. “Grotius and Selden.” In Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700. Burns, J. H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991: 499–529.Google Scholar
Tuck, RichardThe Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Tuck, RichardNatural Rights Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuckness, Alex. Locke and the Legislative Point of View. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Tuckness, Alex“Punishment, Property, and the Limits of Altruism: Locke's International Assymetry.”American Political Science Review, vol. 102, no. 4 (November 2008): 467–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, JamesAn Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattel, Emerich. Le Droit des Gens, et les devoirs des citoyes, ou principe de la loi naturelle. Nime, 1793.Google Scholar
Vernon, Richard. The Career of Toleration: John Locke, Jonas Proast, and After. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Vile, J. M. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco. Political Writings. Pagden, Anthony and Lawrance, Jeremy, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1528].Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Locke: Toleration and the Rationality of Persecution.” In Justifying Toleration: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives. Mends, Susan, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988:61–86.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy“John Locke: Social Contract versus Political Anthropology.”Review of Politics, vol. 51, no. 2 (Winter 1989): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, JeremyThe Dignity of Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, JeremyGod, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy “Locke, Adam, and Eve.” In Feminist Interpretations of John Locke. Hirschmann, Nancy J. and McClure, Kirstie M., eds. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007: 247–67.Google Scholar
Walsh, Mary. “Locke and Feminism on Private and Public Realms of Activities.”Review of Politics, 57 (Spring 1995): 251–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Walzer, MichaelToleration. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ward, Lee. “The Problem of Courage in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.”American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 1 (March 2001): 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, LeeThe Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, David. “Leadership, Locke and the Federalist.”American Journal of Political Science, vol. 41, no. 2 (April 1997): 421–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Rachel. “The Family in the Exclusion Crisis: Locke versus Filmer Revisited.” In A Nation Transformed: England after the Restoration, Houston, Alan and Pincus, Steven, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 100–24.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. “Western Values in International Relations.” In Diplomatic Inverstigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1966: 89–131.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Anthony G. “Good Fences and Good Neighbors: John Locke's Positive Doctrine of Toleration.”Political Research Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 1 (March 1999): 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. “The Moral Epistemology of Locke's Essay.” The Cambridge Companion to Locke's “Essay Concerning Human Understanding.”Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 381–405.Google Scholar
Winstrup, George. “Freedom and Authority: The Ancient Faith of Locke's ‘Letter on Toleration’.”The Review of Politics, vol. 44, no. 2 (April 1982): 242–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Adam. “Toleration and Relativism: The Locke-Proast Exchange.”The Review of Politics, vol. 59, no. 2 (Spring 1997): 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. John Locke and the Ethics of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolhouse, Roger. Locke: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wood, Ellen Meiskins. “Locke against Democracy: Consent, Representation and Suffrage in the Two Treatises.”History of Political Thought, vol. 13, no. 4 (Winter 1992): 657–89.Google Scholar
Wood, Neal. The Politics of Locke's Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon. “Locke on Ideas of Identity and Diversity.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke's “Essay Concerning Human Understanding.”Newman, Lex, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 192–230.Google Scholar
Yolton, John. The Two Intellectual Worlds of John Locke. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Zagorin, Perez. “Hobbes without Grotius.”History of Political Thought, vol. 21, no. 1 (Spring 2000): 16–40.Google Scholar
Zarka, Yves Charles. “First Philosophy and the Foundations of Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Sorrel, Tom, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 62–85.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael. “Fools and Knaves: Reflections on Locke's Theory of Philosophical Discourse.”Review of Politics, vol. 36, no. 2 (1974): 544–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Michael“Of Wary Physicians and Weary Readers: The Debate on Locke's Way of Writing.”Independent Journal of Philosophy, 2 (1977): 55–66.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael“An Introduction to Locke's First Treatise.”Interpretation, 8 (January 1979): 58–74.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael “John Locke and the Problem of Civil Religion.” In The Moral Foundations of the American Republic. 3rd Horwitz, Ed. Robert H., ed. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1986: 181–203.Google Scholar
Zuckert, MichaelNatural Rights and the New Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Zuckert, MichaelLaunching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael“Locke – Religion – Equality.”Review of Politics, vol. 67, no. 3 (Summer 2005): 419–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Lee Ward, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Book: John Locke and Modern Life
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761461.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Lee Ward, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Book: John Locke and Modern Life
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761461.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Lee Ward, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Book: John Locke and Modern Life
  • Online publication: 05 July 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761461.010
Available formats
×