Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T01:12:19.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Journalism and the ethics of writing: Borges, García Márquez, Vargas Llosa, Poniatowska

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2009

Aníbal González
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

One of the virtues for which I prefer Protestant nations to those of the Catholic tradition is their concern with ethics.

Jorge Luis Borges, prologue to Elogio de la sombra (1969)

[T]here is a peculiar and unexpected relation between the affirmation of a universal moral law and storytelling. It would seem that such a law would stand by itself and that its connection either to narration as such or to any particular narrative would be adventitious and superficial at best. Nevertheless … the moral law gives rise by an intrinsic necessity to storytelling, even if that storytelling in one way or another puts into question or subverts the moral law. Ethics and narration cannot be kept separate, though their relation is neither symmetrical nor harmonious.

J. Hillis Miller, The Ethics of Reading (1987), p. 2

For nineteenth-century Spanish American narrators, journalistic discourse went from an important auxiliary in their textual struggle for political and social modernization to an oppressive set of rules promoted by the institution of the press, which severely curtailed the writers' desire for greater artistic freedom. Such early-nineteenth-century writers as José Joaquín Fernández de Lizardi, Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, and Ricardo Palma, to mention three major figures, all saw journalistic discourse as an ally in the modernizing projects they variously set forth in such works as El Periquillo Sarniento, Facundo, and Tradiciones peruanas. In contrast the turn-of-the-century modernistas - Martí, Nájera, Darío, Casal, and many others - despite their reliance on journalism to earn a living, felt that journalism as an institution was totally opposed to the ideals of artistic autonomy and authorial dignity for which they strived.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×