Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System
  • Cited by 4
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2015
Print publication year:
2015
Online ISBN:
9781316335246
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316335246
Subjects:
Area Studies, American Studies, American Government, Politics and Policy, Law, Politics and International Relations, Jurisprudence
Information

Book description

How should courts interpret the law? While all agree that courts must be objective, people differ sharply over what this demands in practice: fidelity to the text? To the will of the people? To certain moral ideals? In Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System, Tara Smith breaks through the false dichotomies inherent in dominant theories - various forms of originalism, living constitutionalism, and minimalism - to present a new approach to judicial review. She contends that we cannot assess judicial review in isolation from the larger enterprise of which it is a part. By providing careful clarification of both the function of the legal system as well as of objectivity itself, she produces a compelling, firmly grounded account of genuinely objective judicial review. Smith's innovative approach marks a welcome advance for anyone interested in legal objectivity and individual rights.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References

Select Bibliography

Ackerman, Bruce. “Liberating Abstraction.” In The Bill of Rights and the Modern State, edited by Stone, Geoffrey R., Epstein, Richard A., and Sunstein, Cass R., 317–48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Ackerman, Bruce. “Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.” Faculty Scholarship Series, no. 149 (1984). Accessed June 3, 2014. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/149.
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations (volume 1, 1991). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations (volume 2, 1998). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ahmar, Akhil Reed. America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By. New York: Basic Books, 2012.
Alexander, Larry. “Originalism, The Why and the What.” Fordham Law Review 82 (Fall 2013): 539–44.
Alexander, Larry, and Sherwin, Emily. Demystifying Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Balkin, Jack M. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2011.
Barber, Sotirios A., and Fleming, James E.. Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Barnett, Randy E. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
Bellos, David. Is That a Fish in Your Ear? Translation and the Meaning of Everything. New York: Faber & Faber, 2011.
Bennett, Robert W., and Solum, Lawrence B.. Constitutional Originalism: A Debate. New York: Cornell University Press, 2011.
Berman, Mitchell N. “Originalism Is Bunk.” NYU Law Review 84 (2009): 1–96.
Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.
Bix, Brian H. “Legal Positivism.” In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, edited by Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A., 29–49. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005.
Bobbitt, Philip. Constitutional Fate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Bogongiari, D. ed. The Political Ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Haffner, 1969.
Bolick, Clint. David’s Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2007.
Brest, Paul. “Interpretation and Interest.” Stanford Law Review 34 (April 1982): 765–73.
Breyer, Stephen. Active Liberty. New York: Vintage Books, 2005.
Breyer, Stephen. Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View. New York: Knopf, 2010.
Brink, David O. “Legal Interpretation, Objectivity, and Morality.” In Objectivity in Law and Morals, edited by Leiter, Brian, 12–65. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Brink, David O. “Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 17, no. 2 (Spring 1988): 105–48.
Buckley, F.H., ed. The American Illness: Essays on the Rule of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013.
Calabresi, Steven, ed. Originalism: A Quarter Century of Debate. Washington, DC: Regnery, 2007.
Cardozo, Benjamin. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1921.
Chemerinsky, Erwin. “In Defense of Judicial Review: The Perils of Popular Constitutionalism.” University of Illinois Law Review (2004): 673–90.
Dicey, Albert Venn. An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982.
Dworkin, Ronald. “Comment.” In A Matter of Interpretation, edited by Gutmann, Amy, pp. 115–27. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2011.
Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.
Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Dworkin, Ronald. “‘Natural’ Law Revisited.” University of Florida Law Review 34 (1982): 165–88.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Dworkin, Ronald. “Unenumerated Rights: Whether and How Roe Should be Overturned.” In The Bill of Rights and the Modern State, edited by Stone, Geoffrey R., Epstein, Richard A., and Sunstein, Cass R., 381–432. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Easterbrook, Frank H. “Abstraction and Authority.” In The Bill of Rights and the Modern State, edited by Stone, Geoffrey R., Epstein, Richard A., and Sunstein, Cass R., 349–80. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1992.
Edlin, Douglas E. Judges and Unjust Laws: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008.
Eisenberg, Melvin Aron. The Nature of the Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Eisgruber, Christopher J. Constitutional Self Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Eisgruber, Christopher J. “Should Constitutional Judges be Philosophers?” In Exploring Law’s Empire, edited by Hershovitz, Scott, 5–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Epstein, Richard A. The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.
Epstein, Richard A. Design for Liberty: Private Property, Public Administration, and the Rule of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
Epstein, Richard A. How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2006.
Fallon, Richard. “‘The Rule of Law’ as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse.” Columbia Law Review 97 (January 1997): 1–56.
Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
Fish, Stanley. “Fish v Fiss.” In Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, edited by Levinson, Sanford and Mailloux, Steven, 251–68. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1988.
Fish, Stanley. “Intention Is All There Is: A Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak’s ‘Purposive Interpretation in Law.’” Cardozo Law Review 29 (2008): 1109–46.
Fiss, Owen M. “Objectivity and Interpretation.” In Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, edited by Levinson, Sanford and Mailloux, Steven, 229–50. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1988.
Fleming, James E. “The Balkinazation of Originalism.” University of Illinois Law Review 3 (2012): 669–82.
Fleming, James E. “Fidelity, Change, and the Good Constitution.” American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (Summer 2014): 515–45.
Fleming, James E. “The Place of History and Philosophy in the Moral Reading of the American Constitution.” In Exploring Law’s Empire, edited by Hershovitz, Scott 23–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Fordham Law Review 82, no. 2, Fall 2013. Symposium: “The New Originalism in Constitutional Law.”
Friedman, Barry. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.
Fuller, Lon. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.
Gardner, John. “Can There Be a Written Constitution?” In Law As a Leap of Faith, edited by Gardner, John, 89–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Gerber, Scott D. To Secure These Rights: The Declaration of Independence and Constitutional Interpretation. New York: New York University Press, 1995.
Ghate, Onkar. “Comments on Michael Moore’s ‘Semantics, Metaphysics, and Objectivity in the Law.’” Paper presented at Conference on Objectivity in the Law, University of Texas at Austin, April 2008.
Ghate, Onkar. “Natural Kinds and Rand’s Theory of Concepts: Reflections on Griffiths.” In Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 148–59. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.
Gotthelf, Allan. “Ayn Rand’s Theory of Concepts: Rethinking Abstraction and Essence.” In Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 3–40. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.
Green, Christopher R. “Originalism and the Sense-Reference Distinction.” St. Louis University Law Journal 50 (2006): 555–627.
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James and Jay, John. The Federalist: The Gideon Edition, edited by Carey, George W. and McClellan, James. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001.
Hannan, Daniel. Inventing Freedom: How the English-Speaking Peoples Made the Modern World. New York: Harper Collins, 2013.
Harriman, David. The Logical Leap: Induction in Physics. New York: Penguin, 2010.
Hart, H.L.A. “American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream.” In Essays in Jurisprudence, 123–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Hershovitz, Scott, ed. Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Hogue, Arthur R. Origins of the Common Law. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1966.
Kelly, J.M. A Short History of Western Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Kozinski, Alex, and Tseytlin, Misha. “You’re (Probably) a Federal Criminal.” In In the Name of Justice, edited by Lynch, Timothy, 43–56. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2009.
Kramer, Larry D. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Kramer, Matthew H. Objectivity and the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Kramer, Matthew H. “On the Moral Status of the Rule of Law.” Cambridge Law Journal 63 (March 2004): 65–97.
Lawson, Gary. “Dead Document Walking.” Boston University Law Review 92, no. 4 (July 2012): 1225–36.
Lawson, Gary. “Originalism Without Obligation.” Boston University Law Review 93 (July 2013): 1309–18.
Leiter, Brian. “The End of Empire: Dworkin and Jurisprudence in the 21st Century.” Rutgers Law Journal 36 (2004–2005): 165–76.
Leiter, Brian. “Introduction,” Objectivity in Law and Morals, 1–11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Leiter, Brian. “Objectivity, Morality and Adjudication.” In Objectivity in Law and Morals, 66–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Lennox, James G. “Concepts, Context, and the Advance of Science.” In Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 112–38. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.
Leoni, Bruno. Freedom and the Law. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991.
Levy, Robert A., and Mellor, William. The Dirty Dozen: How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2009.
Lewis, John. “Constitution and Fundamental Law: The Lessons of Classical Athens.” Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (2011): 25–49.
Liu, Goodwin, Karlan, Pamela S, and Schroeder, Christopher H., eds. Keeping Faith with the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Llewellyn, Karl. The Common Law Tradition. Boston: Little Brown, 1960.
Locke, John. A Letter on Toleration. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983.
Locke, John. Second Treatise on Government, edited by MacPherson, C.B.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980.
Marmor, Andrei. “The Rule of Law and Its Limits.” Law and Philosophy 23 (2004): 1–43.
Mayler, Bernadette A. “Towards a Common Law Originalism.” Stanford Law Review 59 (2006): 551–600.
Miller, Fred D. Jr., and Mossoff, Adam. “Political Theory – A Radical for Capitalism,” In A Companion to Ayn Rand, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Salmieri, Gregory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, in press.
Moore, Michael S. “A Natural Law Theory of Interpretation.” Southern California Law Review 58 (1985): 277–398.
Moore, Michael S. “Semantics, Metaphysics, and Objectivity in the Law.” Paper presented at Conference on Objectivity in the Law, University of Texas at Austin, April 2008.
Murphy, Mark C. Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Murphy, Mark C. “Natural Law Theory.” In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, edited by Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A., 15–28. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005.
Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Neily, Clark M. “No Such Thing: Litigating Under the Rational Basis Test.” NYU Journal of Law and Liberty 1, no. 2 (2005): 897–913.
Neily, Clark M. Terms of Engagement: How Our Courts Should Enforce the Constitution’s Promise of Limited Government. New York: Encounter Books, 2013.
Paulsen, Michael Stokes. “The Intrinsically Corrupting Influence of Precedent.” Constitutional Commentary 22 (2005): 289–98.
Peikoff, Leonard. Objective Communication. Edited by Wood, Barry. New York: Penguin, 2013.
Peikoff, Leonard. Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York: Dutton, 1991.
Peikoff, Leonard. Understanding Objectivism. Edited by Berliner, Michael. New York: Penguin, 2012.
Perry, Michael. “What is the Constitution? (and Other Fundamental Questions).” In Constitutionalism, edited by Alexander, Larry, 99–150. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Peters, Christopher J. “Assessing the New Judicial Minimalism.” Columbia Law Review 100 (2000): 1454–537.
Posner, Richard. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.
Posner, Richard. “Legal Reasoning from the Top Down and From the Bottom Up: The Question of Unenumerated Constitutional Rights.” In The Bill of Rights and the Modern State, edited by Stone, Geoffrey R., Epstein, Richard A., and Sunstein, Cass R., 433–50. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Posner, Richard. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Prakash, Saikrishna. “Radicals in Tweed Jackets: Why Extreme Left Wing Law Professors Are Wrong for America.” (Review of Cass Sunstein, Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right Wing Courts are Wrong for America.) Columbia Law Review 106 (2006): 2207–33.
Rahe, Paul. “Montesquieu’s Natural Rights Constitutionalism.” Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2012): 51–81.
Rand, Ayn. “Causality vs. Duty.” In Philosophy: Who Needs It, 114–22. New York: Bobbs Merrill, 1982.
Rand, Ayn. “Censorship: Local and Express.” In Philosophy: Who Needs It, 211–30. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1982.
Rand, Ayn. Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. 2nd edition, edited by Binswanger, Harry, New York: Penguin, 1990.
Rand, Ayn. “Man’s Rights.” In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 367–77. New York: Signet-Penguin, 1986.
Rand, Ayn. “The Nature of Government.”In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 378–87. New York: Signet-Penguin, 1986.
Rand, Ayn. “The Objectivist Ethics.” In The Virtue of Selfishness, 13–39. New York: New American Library, 1964.
Rand, Ayn. “The Pull Peddlers.” In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 184–90. New York: Signet-Penguin, 1986.
Rand, Ayn. “Thought Control” (in 3 parts). Ayn Rand Letter, II, no. 26, and III, nos. 1 and 2 (1973): 243–46, 247–50, and 251–56.
Rand, Ayn. “What is Capitalism?” In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 1–29. New York: Signet-Penguin, 1986.
Rand, Ayn. “Who Is the Final Authority in Ethics?” In The Voice of Reason, edited by Peikoff, Leonard, 17–22. New York: Penguin, 1988.
Rappaport, Michael, and McGinnis., Michael Originalism and the Good Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.
Raz, Joseph. “About Morality and the Nature of Law.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 1–15.
Raz, Joseph. “Formalism and the Rule of Law.” In Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays, edited by George, Robert, 309–40. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
Raz, Joseph. “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions.” In Constitutionalism, edited by Alexander, Larry, 152–93. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, 210–29. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1979.
Roosevelt, Kermit. The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.
Rubenfeld, Jed. Revolution by Judiciary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.
Salmieri, Gregory. “Conceptualization and Justification.” In Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 41–84. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.
Sandefur, Timothy. The Conscience of the Constitution: The Declaration of Independence and the Right to Liberty. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2013.
Sandefur, Timothy. “In Defense of Substantive Due Process, or the Promise of Lawful Rule.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 35 (2012): 283–350.
Sandefur, Timothy. “Scalia’s Basic Contradiction, or, Words Mean (A Potentially Infinite Number of) Things.” Positive Liberty. Last modified November 2005. Retrieved from http://positiveliberty.com/2005/11/scalia%e2%80%99s-basic-contradiction-or-words-mean-a-potentially-infinite-number-of-things.html.
Scalia, Antonin. A Matter of Interpretation, edited by Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Scalia, Antonin. “On Interpreting the Constitution.” Wriston Lecture, given at the Manhattan Institute, November 17, 1997.
Scalia, Antonin. “Review of Steven D. Smith’s Law’s Quandary.” Catholic University Law Review 55 (2006): 687–94.
Scalia, Antonin, and Garner, Bryan A.. Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West, 2012.
Schauer, Frederick. “Is the Common Law Law?” California Law Review 77, 1989: 455–71.
Schmidt, Christopher W. “Popular Constitutionalism on the Right: Lessons from the Tea Party.” Denver University Law Review 88 (2011): 523–57.
Seidman, Michael. On Constitutional Disobedience. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Senior, Jennifer. “In Conversation: Antonin Scalia.” New York Magazine. October 6, 2013. Accessed June 4, 2014. http://nymag.com/news/features/antonin-scalia-2013-10/
Sherry, Suzanna. “Why We Need More Judicial Activism.” In Constitutionalism, Executive Power, and Popular Enlightenment. Edited by Areshidze, Giorgi, Carrese, Paul, and Sherry, Suzanna. Albany: SUNY Press, 2014.
Sherry, Suzanna, and Farber, Daniel. Desperately Seeking Certainty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Siegan, Bernard H. Drafting a Constitution for a Nation or Republic Emerging into Freedom. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1994.
Silverglate, Harvey. Three Felonies a Day. New York: Encounter Books, 2011.
Smith, Tara. Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics – The Virtuous Egoist. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Smith, Tara. “Humanity’s Darkest Evil: The Lethal Destructiveness of Non-Objective Law.” In Essays on Ayn Rand’s. Atlas Shrugged. Edited by Mayhew, Robert, 335–61. New York: Lexington Books, 2009.
Smith, Tara. “The Importance of the Subject in Objective Morality: Distinguishing Objective from Intrinsic Value.” Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (2008): 126–48.
Smith, Tara. Moral Rights and Political Freedom. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995.
Smith, Tara. “Neutrality Isn’t Neutral: On the Value-Neutrality of the Rule of Law.” Washington University Jurisprudence Review 4 (2011): 49–95.
Smith, Tara. “Objective Law.” In A Companion to Ayn Rand, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Salmieri, Gregory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, in press.
Smith, Tara. “Originalism, Vintage or Nouveau: He Said, She Said Law.” Fordham Law Review 82 (2013): 619–39.
Smith, Tara. “Originalism’s Misplaced Fidelity: ‘Original’ Meaning is Not Objective.” Constitutional Commentary 26 (2009): 1–57.
Smith, Tara. “Reckless Caution: The Perils of Judicial Minimalism,” NYU Journal of Law and Liberty 5 (2010): 347–93.
Smith, Tara. “Rights Conflicts: The Undoing of Rights.” Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (1995): 141–58.
Smith, Tara. “‘Social’ Objectivity and the Objectivity of Value.” In Science, Values, and Objectivity, edited by Machamer, Peter and Walters, Gereon, 143–71. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004.
Smith, Tara. Viable Values: A Study of Life as the Root and Reward of Morality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
Smith, Tara. “Why Originalism Won’t Die: Common Mistakes in Competing Theories of Judicial Interpretation.” Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy 2 (2007): 159–215.
Social Philosophy and Policy 28, no 1. Winter 2011. Theme: “What Should Constitutions Do?”
Solum, Lawrence B. Legal Theory Lexicon. Retrieved from http://lsolum.typepad.com/legal_theory_lexicon/.
Solum, Lawrence B. “Originalism and Constitutional Construction.” Fordham Law Review 82 (2013): 453–537.
Sosa, David. “The Unintentional Fallacy.” California Law Review 86 (1998): 919–38.
Stoner, James. Common-Law Liberty: Rethinking American Constitutionalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2003.
Strauss, David A. “Common Law Constitutional Interpretation.” University of Chicago Law Review 63 (1996): 877–935.
Strauss, David A. The Living Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Sunstein, Cass R. A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn’t Mean What It Meant Before. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
Sunstein, Cass R. “Of Snakes and Butterflies: A Reply.” Columbia Law Review 106 (2006): 2234–43.
Sunstein, Cass R. One Case at a Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Sunstein, Cass R. Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts are Wrong for America. New York: Basic Books, 2006.
Surowiecki, James. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economics, Societies and Nations. New York: Doubleday, 2004.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Thompson, Bradley C. “The Revolutionary Origins of American Constitutionalism.” In History, on Proper Principles: Essays in Honor of Forrest McDonald, edited by Klugewicz, Stephen M. and Ealy, Lenore T., 1–27. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2010.
Toobin, Jeffrey. The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court. New York: Doubleday, 2007.
Tribe, Laurence H., and Dorf, Michael C.. On Reading the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Concept and the Rule of Law.” Georgia Law Review 43 (2008): 1–20.
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review.” 115 Yale Law Journal (2006): 1346–1406.
Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure.” In Getting to the Rule of Law, edited by Fleming, James E., 3–31. New York: New York University Press, 2011.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Thoughtfulness and the Rule of Law.” British Academy Review 18 (2011): 1–11. Retrieved from http://www.britac.ac.uk/review/18/index.cfm.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Vagueness and the Guidance of Action.” In Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law, edited by Marmor, Andrei and Soames, Scott, 58–82. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Waluchow, W.J. A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Waluchow, W.J. “Constitutionalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/constitutionalism.
Whittington, Keith E. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.
Whittington, Keith E. “The New Originalism.” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy 2 (2004): 519–613.
Wilkinson, J. Harvie. Cosmic Constitutional Theory: Why Americans Are Losing Their Inalienable Right to Self-Governance. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Wright, Darryl. “Reason and Freedom in Ayn Rand’s Politics.” In The Philosophy of Capitalism: Objectivism and Alternative Approaches – Ayn Rand Society Philosophical Studies, volume 3, edited by Salmieri, Gregory and Mayhew, Robert. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, forthcoming 2016.
Zywicki, Todd. “The Rule of Law, Freedom, and Prosperity.” Foreword to Supreme Court Economic Review 10 (2003): 11–14.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.