Ackerman, Bruce. “Liberating Abstraction.” In The Bill of Rights and the Modern State, edited by Stone, Geoffrey R., Epstein, Richard A., and Sunstein, Cass R., 317–48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. “Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.” Faculty Scholarship Series, no. 149 (1984). Accessed June 3, 2014. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/149.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations (volume 1, 1991). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations (volume 2, 1998). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ahmar, Akhil Reed. America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By. New York: Basic Books, 2012.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry. “Originalism, The Why and the What.” Fordham Law Review 82 (Fall 2013): 539–44.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry, and Sherwin, Emily. Demystifying Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balkin, Jack M. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A., and Fleming, James E.. Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Randy E. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Bellos, David. Is That a Fish in Your Ear? Translation and the Meaning of Everything. New York: Faber & Faber, 2011.Google Scholar

Bennett, Robert W., and Solum, Lawrence B.. Constitutional Originalism: A Debate. New York: Cornell University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, Mitchell N. “Originalism Is Bunk.” NYU Law Review 84 (2009): 1–96.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.Google Scholar

Bix, Brian H. “Legal Positivism.” In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, edited by Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A., 29–49. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobbitt, Philip. Constitutional Fate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Bogongiari, D. ed. The Political Ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: Haffner, 1969.Google Scholar

Bolick, Clint. David’s Hammer: The Case for an Activist Judiciary. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2007.Google Scholar

Brest, Paul. “Interpretation and Interest.” Stanford Law Review 34 (April 1982): 765–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breyer, Stephen. Active Liberty. New York: Vintage Books, 2005.Google Scholar

Breyer, Stephen. Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View. New York: Knopf, 2010.Google Scholar

Brink, David O. “Legal Interpretation, Objectivity, and Morality.” In Objectivity in Law and Morals, edited by Leiter, Brian, 12–65. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Brink, David O. “Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation, and Judicial Review.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 17, no. 2 (Spring 1988): 105–48.Google Scholar

Buckley, F.H., ed. The American Illness: Essays on the Rule of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calabresi, Steven, ed. Originalism: A Quarter Century of Debate. Washington, DC: Regnery, 2007.Google Scholar

Cardozo, Benjamin. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1921.Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin. “In Defense of Judicial Review: The Perils of Popular Constitutionalism.” University of Illinois Law Review (2004): 673–90.Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn. An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “Comment.” In A Matter of Interpretation, edited by Gutmann, Amy, pp. 115–27. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Justice in Robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “‘Natural’ Law Revisited.” University of Florida Law Review 34 (1982): 165–88.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “Unenumerated Rights: Whether and How Roe Should be Overturned.” In The Bill of Rights and the Modern State, edited by Stone, Geoffrey R., Epstein, Richard A., and Sunstein, Cass R., 381–432. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, Frank H. “Abstraction and Authority.” In The Bill of Rights and the Modern State, edited by Stone, Geoffrey R., Epstein, Richard A., and Sunstein, Cass R., 349–80. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar

Edlin, Douglas E. Judges and Unjust Laws: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, Melvin Aron. The Nature of the Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher J. Constitutional Self Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher J. “Should Constitutional Judges be Philosophers?” In Exploring Law’s Empire, edited by Hershovitz, Scott, 5–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. Design for Liberty: Private Property, Public Administration, and the Rule of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2006.Google Scholar

Fallon, Richard. “‘The Rule of Law’ as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse.” Columbia Law Review 97 (January 1997): 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. “Fish v Fiss.” In Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, edited by Levinson, Sanford and Mailloux, Steven, 251–68. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. “Intention Is All There Is: A Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak’s ‘Purposive Interpretation in Law.’” Cardozo Law Review 29 (2008): 1109–46.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen M. “Objectivity and Interpretation.” In Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader, edited by Levinson, Sanford and Mailloux, Steven, 229–50. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Fleming, James E. “The Balkinazation of Originalism.” University of Illinois Law Review 3 (2012): 669–82.Google Scholar

Fleming, James E. “Fidelity, Change, and the Good Constitution.” American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (Summer 2014): 515–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleming, James E. “The Place of History and Philosophy in the Moral Reading of the American Constitution.” In Exploring Law’s Empire, edited by Hershovitz, Scott 23–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Fordham Law Review 82, no. 2, Fall 2013. Symposium: “The New Originalism in Constitutional Law.”Google Scholar

Friedman, Barry. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Gardner, John. “Can There Be a Written Constitution?” In Law As a Leap of Faith, edited by Gardner, John, 89–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerber, Scott D. To Secure These Rights: The Declaration of Independence and Constitutional Interpretation. New York: New York University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Ghate, Onkar. “Comments on Michael Moore’s ‘Semantics, Metaphysics, and Objectivity in the Law.’” Paper presented at Conference on Objectivity in the Law, University of Texas at Austin, April 2008.Google Scholar

Ghate, Onkar. “Natural Kinds and Rand’s Theory of Concepts: Reflections on Griffiths.” In Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 148–59. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, Allan. “Ayn Rand’s Theory of Concepts: Rethinking Abstraction and Essence.” In Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 3–40. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Christopher R. “Originalism and the Sense-Reference Distinction.” St. Louis University Law Journal 50 (2006): 555–627.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James and Jay, John. The Federalist: The Gideon Edition, edited by Carey, George W. and McClellan, James. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001.Google Scholar

Hannan, Daniel. Inventing Freedom: How the English-Speaking Peoples Made the Modern World. New York: Harper Collins, 2013.Google Scholar

Harriman, David. The Logical Leap: Induction in Physics. New York: Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A. “American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream.” In Essays in Jurisprudence, 123–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hershovitz, Scott, ed. Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hogue, Arthur R. Origins of the Common Law. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1966.Google Scholar

Kelly, J.M. A Short History of Western Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kozinski, Alex, and Tseytlin, Misha. “You’re (Probably) a Federal Criminal.” In In the Name of Justice, edited by Lynch, Timothy, 43–56. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2009.Google Scholar

Kramer, Larry D. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Matthew H. Objectivity and the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Matthew H. “On the Moral Status of the Rule of Law.” Cambridge Law Journal 63 (March 2004): 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawson, Gary. “Dead Document Walking.” Boston University Law Review 92, no. 4 (July 2012): 1225–36.Google Scholar

Lawson, Gary. “Originalism Without Obligation.” Boston University Law Review 93 (July 2013): 1309–18.Google Scholar

Leiter, Brian. “The End of Empire: Dworkin and Jurisprudence in the 21st Century.” Rutgers Law Journal 36 (2004–2005): 165–76.Google Scholar

Leiter, Brian. “Introduction,” Objectivity in Law and Morals, 1–11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Leiter, Brian. “Objectivity, Morality and Adjudication.” In Objectivity in Law and Morals, 66–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Lennox, James G. “Concepts, Context, and the Advance of Science.” In Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 112–38. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Leoni, Bruno. Freedom and the Law. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991.Google Scholar

Levy, Robert A., and Mellor, William. The Dirty Dozen: How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2009.Google Scholar

Lewis, John. “Constitution and Fundamental Law: The Lessons of Classical Athens.” Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (2011): 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Goodwin, Karlan, Pamela S, and Schroeder, Christopher H., eds. Keeping Faith with the Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Karl. The Common Law Tradition. Boston: Little Brown, 1960.Google Scholar

Locke, John. A Letter on Toleration. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Second Treatise on Government, edited by MacPherson, C.B.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980.Google Scholar

Marmor, Andrei. “The Rule of Law and Its Limits.” Law and Philosophy 23 (2004): 1–43.Google Scholar

Mayler, Bernadette A. “Towards a Common Law Originalism.” Stanford Law Review 59 (2006): 551–600.Google Scholar

Miller, Fred D. Jr., and Mossoff, Adam. “Political Theory – A Radical for Capitalism,” In A Companion to Ayn Rand, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Salmieri, Gregory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, in press.Google Scholar

Moore, Michael S. “A Natural Law Theory of Interpretation.” Southern California Law Review 58 (1985): 277–398.Google Scholar

Moore, Michael S. “Semantics, Metaphysics, and Objectivity in the Law.” Paper presented at Conference on Objectivity in the Law, University of Texas at Austin, April 2008.Google Scholar

Murphy, Mark C. Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Mark C. “Natural Law Theory.” In Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, edited by Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A., 15–28. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Neily, Clark M. “No Such Thing: Litigating Under the Rational Basis Test.” NYU Journal of Law and Liberty 1, no. 2 (2005): 897–913.Google Scholar

Neily, Clark M. Terms of Engagement: How Our Courts Should Enforce the Constitution’s Promise of Limited Government. New York: Encounter Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Paulsen, Michael Stokes. “The Intrinsically Corrupting Influence of Precedent.” Constitutional Commentary 22 (2005): 289–98.Google Scholar

Peikoff, Leonard. Objective Communication. Edited by Wood, Barry. New York: Penguin, 2013.Google Scholar

Peikoff, Leonard. Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York: Dutton, 1991.Google Scholar

Peikoff, Leonard. Understanding Objectivism. Edited by Berliner, Michael. New York: Penguin, 2012.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael. “What is the Constitution? (and Other Fundamental Questions).” In Constitutionalism, edited by Alexander, Larry, 99–150. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Peters, Christopher J. “Assessing the New Judicial Minimalism.” Columbia Law Review 100 (2000): 1454–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Richard. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. “Legal Reasoning from the Top Down and From the Bottom Up: The Question of Unenumerated Constitutional Rights.” In The Bill of Rights and the Modern State, edited by Stone, Geoffrey R., Epstein, Richard A., and Sunstein, Cass R., 433–50. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Prakash, Saikrishna. “Radicals in Tweed Jackets: Why Extreme Left Wing Law Professors Are Wrong for America.” (Review of Cass Sunstein, Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right Wing Courts are Wrong for America.) Columbia Law Review 106 (2006): 2207–33.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. “Montesquieu’s Natural Rights Constitutionalism.” Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (2012): 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “Causality vs. Duty.” In Philosophy: Who Needs It, 114–22. New York: Bobbs Merrill, 1982.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “Censorship: Local and Express.” In Philosophy: Who Needs It, 211–30. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1982.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. 2nd edition, edited by Binswanger, Harry, New York: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “Man’s Rights.” In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 367–77. New York: Signet-Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “The Nature of Government.”In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 378–87. New York: Signet-Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “The Objectivist Ethics.” In The Virtue of Selfishness, 13–39. New York: New American Library, 1964.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “The Pull Peddlers.” In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 184–90. New York: Signet-Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “Thought Control” (in 3 parts). Ayn Rand Letter, II, no. 26, and III, nos. 1 and 2 (1973): 243–46, 247–50, and 251–56.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “What is Capitalism?” In Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, 1–29. New York: Signet-Penguin, 1986.Google Scholar

Rand, Ayn. “Who Is the Final Authority in Ethics?” In The Voice of Reason, edited by Peikoff, Leonard, 17–22. New York: Penguin, 1988.Google Scholar

Rappaport, Michael, and McGinnis., Michael Originalism and the Good Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “About Morality and the Nature of Law.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “Formalism and the Rule of Law.” In Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays, edited by George, Robert, 309–40. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions.” In Constitutionalism, edited by Alexander, Larry, 152–93. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, 210–29. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roosevelt, Kermit. The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Rubenfeld, Jed. Revolution by Judiciary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Salmieri, Gregory. “Conceptualization and Justification.” In Concepts and Their Role in Knowledge: Reflections on Objectivist Epistemology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 41–84. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandefur, Timothy. The Conscience of the Constitution: The Declaration of Independence and the Right to Liberty. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2013.Google Scholar

Sandefur, Timothy. “In Defense of Substantive Due Process, or the Promise of Lawful Rule.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 35 (2012): 283–350.Google Scholar

Sandefur, Timothy. “Scalia’s Basic Contradiction, or, Words Mean (A Potentially Infinite Number of) Things.” Positive Liberty. Last modified November 2005. Retrieved from http://positiveliberty.com/2005/11/scalia%e2%80%99s-basic-contradiction-or-words-mean-a-potentially-infinite-number-of-things.html.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin. A Matter of Interpretation, edited by Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin. “On Interpreting the Constitution.” Wriston Lecture, given at the Manhattan Institute, November 17, 1997.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin. “Review of Steven D. Smith’s Law’s Quandary.” Catholic University Law Review 55 (2006): 687–94.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin, and Garner, Bryan A.. Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West, 2012.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Is the Common Law Law?” California Law Review 77, 1989: 455–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Christopher W. “Popular Constitutionalism on the Right: Lessons from the Tea Party.” Denver University Law Review 88 (2011): 523–57.Google Scholar

Seidman, Michael. On Constitutional Disobedience. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senior, Jennifer. “In Conversation: Antonin Scalia.” New York Magazine. October 6, 2013. Accessed June 4, 2014. http://nymag.com/news/features/antonin-scalia-2013-10/Google Scholar

Sherry, Suzanna. “Why We Need More Judicial Activism.” In Constitutionalism, Executive Power, and Popular Enlightenment. Edited by Areshidze, Giorgi, Carrese, Paul, and Sherry, Suzanna. Albany: SUNY Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Sherry, Suzanna, and Farber, Daniel. Desperately Seeking Certainty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Siegan, Bernard H. Drafting a Constitution for a Nation or Republic Emerging into Freedom. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Silverglate, Harvey. Three Felonies a Day. New York: Encounter Books, 2011.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. Ayn Rand’s Normative Ethics – The Virtuous Egoist. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Tara. “Humanity’s Darkest Evil: The Lethal Destructiveness of Non-Objective Law.” In Essays on Ayn Rand’s. Atlas Shrugged. Edited by Mayhew, Robert, 335–61. New York: Lexington Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. “The Importance of the Subject in Objective Morality: Distinguishing Objective from Intrinsic Value.” Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (2008): 126–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Tara. Moral Rights and Political Freedom. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. “Neutrality Isn’t Neutral: On the Value-Neutrality of the Rule of Law.” Washington University Jurisprudence Review 4 (2011): 49–95.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. “Objective Law.” In A Companion to Ayn Rand, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Salmieri, Gregory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, in press.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. “Originalism, Vintage or Nouveau: He Said, She Said Law.” Fordham Law Review 82 (2013): 619–39.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. “Originalism’s Misplaced Fidelity: ‘Original’ Meaning is Not Objective.” Constitutional Commentary 26 (2009): 1–57.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. “Reckless Caution: The Perils of Judicial Minimalism,” NYU Journal of Law and Liberty 5 (2010): 347–93.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. “Rights Conflicts: The Undoing of Rights.” Journal of Social Philosophy 26 (1995): 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Tara. “‘Social’ Objectivity and the Objectivity of Value.” In Science, Values, and Objectivity, edited by Machamer, Peter and Walters, Gereon, 143–71. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. Viable Values: A Study of Life as the Root and Reward of Morality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar

Smith, Tara. “Why Originalism Won’t Die: Common Mistakes in Competing Theories of Judicial Interpretation.” Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy 2 (2007): 159–215.Google Scholar

Social Philosophy and Policy 28, no 1. Winter 2011. Theme: “What Should Constitutions Do?”Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence B. Legal Theory Lexicon. Retrieved from http://lsolum.typepad.com/legal_theory_lexicon/.Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence B. “Originalism and Constitutional Construction.” Fordham Law Review 82 (2013): 453–537.Google Scholar

Sosa, David. “The Unintentional Fallacy.” California Law Review 86 (1998): 919–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoner, James. Common-Law Liberty: Rethinking American Constitutionalism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2003.Google Scholar

Strauss, David A. “Common Law Constitutional Interpretation.” University of Chicago Law Review 63 (1996): 877–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, David A. The Living Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn’t Mean What It Meant Before. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. “Of Snakes and Butterflies: A Reply.” Columbia Law Review 106 (2006): 2234–43.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. One Case at a Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts are Wrong for America. New York: Basic Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Surowiecki, James. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economics, Societies and Nations. New York: Doubleday, 2004.Google Scholar

Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Bradley C. “The Revolutionary Origins of American Constitutionalism.” In History, on Proper Principles: Essays in Honor of Forrest McDonald, edited by Klugewicz, Stephen M. and Ealy, Lenore T., 1–27. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2010.Google Scholar

Toobin, Jeffrey. The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court. New York: Doubleday, 2007.Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence H., and Dorf, Michael C.. On Reading the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “The Concept and the Rule of Law.” Georgia Law Review 43 (2008): 1–20.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review.” 115 Yale Law Journal (2006): 1346–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure.” In Getting to the Rule of Law, edited by Fleming, James E., 3–31. New York: New York University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Thoughtfulness and the Rule of Law.” British Academy Review 18 (2011): 1–11. Retrieved from http://www.britac.ac.uk/review/18/index.cfm.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Vagueness and the Guidance of Action.” In Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law, edited by Marmor, Andrei and Soames, Scott, 58–82. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waluchow, W.J. A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Waluchow, W.J. “Constitutionalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/constitutionalism.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith E. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith E. “The New Originalism.” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy 2 (2004): 519–613.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, J. Harvie. Cosmic Constitutional Theory: Why Americans Are Losing Their Inalienable Right to Self-Governance. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Darryl. “Reason and Freedom in Ayn Rand’s Politics.” In The Philosophy of Capitalism: Objectivism and Alternative Approaches – Ayn Rand Society Philosophical Studies, volume 3, edited by Salmieri, Gregory and Mayhew, Robert. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, forthcoming 2016.Google Scholar

Zywicki, Todd. “The Rule of Law, Freedom, and Prosperity.” Foreword to Supreme Court Economic Review 10 (2003): 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar