Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:09:24.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Judges and non-judicial functions in the United Kingdom

from Part V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

H. P. Lee
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

From Lord Denning on the Profumo scandal to Lord Franks on the Falklands war, from Sir Richard Scott on the sale of arms to Iraq to Sir Anthony Hammond on the Hinduja brothers and the Dome, judicial inquiries have never destroyed governments. The evidence they collect is immensely useful. Eight years before he tore into a Labour government for overthrowing the genocidal Iraqi tyrant, Robin Cook used the facts revealed by the Scott inquiry to tear into the Conservative government for arming the genocidal Iraqi tyrant. But the judges’ punches are always pulled. In the case of the Scott report, no minister had to resign because Sir Richard presented a six-volume report that offered no damning conclusion – indeed, it had no conclusions whatsoever.

The United Kingdom constitution has witnessed significant change in recent years. The tremendous pace of change is part of an effort to modernise the constitution, which has had a significant impact on the judiciary. New developments include the ‘abolition’ of the office of Lord Chancellor (followed by a modification of this office), the establishment of the Judicial Appointments Commission, the opening up of some judicial appointments to public competition and the creation of the new Supreme Court for the United Kingdom. These reforms serve to ensure better separation of powers and to safeguard the independence of the judiciary.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hastings, M.Give us Inquiries into the Banking Crisis and Iraq, not Bloody SundayThe Guardian 2008 28Google Scholar
Hadfield, B.R v. Lord Saville of Newdigate, ex p. Anonymous Soldiers: What is the Purpose of a Tribunal of Inquiry? 1999 Public Law663Google Scholar
Beatson, J.Should Judges Conduct Public Inquiries? 2005 121 Law Quarterly Review221Google Scholar
Drewry, G.Judges and Political Inquiries: Harnessing a Myth? 1975 Political Studies58Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D.Matrix Churchill: A Case Study in Judicial Inquiries 1995 48 Parliamentary Affairs24Google Scholar
Pannick, D.The High Price to be Paid if Judges Examine our Historical EventsThe Times 2010 81Google Scholar
Jowell, J.The Wrong Man for the Job: The Continuing Fallout over the Hutton Report Proves that Judges and Politics don’t Mix’The Guardian 2004 8Google Scholar
Olowofoyeku, A. A.Suing JudgesOxford University Press 1993Google Scholar
Pannick, D.the courts have been deprived of an appellate judge for 12 yearsThe Times 2010 81Google Scholar
Oliver, D.Constitutional Reform in the UKOxford University Press 2003 333Google Scholar
Neal, S.The Scarman Report, the Macpherson Report and the Media: How Newspapers Respond to Race-centred Social Policy Interventions 2003 32 Journal of Social Policy55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollock, N.The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry 10 Years OnLondonThe Runnymede Trust 2009Google Scholar
Phillips, C.Facing Inwards and Outwards? Institutional Racism, Race Equality and the Role of Black and Asian Professional Associations 2005 5 Criminal Justice357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, A.Ruggiero, V.Crime, Punishment, and Ethnic Minorities in England and Wales 2008 2 Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Perspectives53Google Scholar
Lea, J.The MacPherson Report and the Question of Institutional Racism 2000 39 Howard Journal of Criminal Justice219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, N.Erdos, G.Al-Shahi, A.Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics: The Macpherson Report and the PoliceLondonCIVITAS 2000Google Scholar
Kettle, M.The Threat to the Media is Real. It Comes from WithinThe Guardian 2004 20Google Scholar
Morrison, D.My Report on Lord HuttonThe Guardian 2004 19Google Scholar
Bamforth, N.Political Accountability in Play: the Budd Inquiry and David Blunkett’s Resignation 2005 Public Law229Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×