Adair, E. R. 1929, The Exterritoriality of Ambassadors in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar

Adorno, R. 2012, ‘Court and Chronicle: A Native Andean’s Engagement with Spanish Colonial Law’, in Belmessous, S. (ed.), Native Claims: Indigenous Law against Empire 1500–1920, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63–84Google Scholar

Adams, J. 2007, The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Adams, R. & Cox, R. (eds.) 2011, Diplomacy and Early Modern Culture, Basingstoke: PalgraveGoogle Scholar

Aglietti, M., Herrero Sanchez, M., & Zamora Rodriguez, F. (eds.) 2013, Los cónsules de extranjeros en la Edad Moderna y a principios de la Edad Contemporánea, Madrid: Ediciones Doce CallesGoogle Scholar

Alexandrowicz, C. H. 1967, An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies (16th, 17th and 18th Centuries), Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Allain, T. 2018, ‘Relations de pouvoir et enjeux marchands autour du réseau consulaire néerlandais en Méditerranée (XVII–XVIIIe siècles)’, in Bartolomei, A., Calafat, G., Grenet, M., & Ulbert, J. (eds.), De l’utilité commerciale des consuls: L’institution consulaire et les marchands dans le monde méditerranéen (XVIIe–XXe siècle), Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome, 421–438Google Scholar

Alston, D. 2018, ‘Scottish Slave Owners in Suriname 1651–1863’ Northern Scotland, 9, 17–43Google Scholar

Amir, M. & Sela, R. 2016, Extraterritorialities in Occupied Worlds, Puctum BooksGoogle Scholar

Amirell, S. E. & Müller, L. (eds.) 2014, Persistent Piracy: Maritime Violence and State-Formation in Global Historical Perspective, New York: PalgraveGoogle Scholar

Anderson, M. S. 1993, The Rise of Modern Diplomacy 1450–1919, New York: LongmansGoogle Scholar

Anderson, P. 1974, Lineages of the Absolutist State, London: NLBGoogle Scholar

Anderson, S. P. 1989, An English Consul in Turkey: Paul Rycaut at Smyrna, 1667–1678, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Anghie, A. 1999, ‘Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in 19th Century International Law’, Harvard International Law Journal, 40(1), 1–80Google Scholar

Anghie, A. 2005, Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Anievas, A. (ed.) 2010, Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Anievas, A. & Matin, K. (eds.) 2016, Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée, Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Anievas, A. & Nişancioğlu, K. 2015, How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism, London: PlutoGoogle Scholar

Ariste, P. 1667, Traicté des consulz de la nation françoise aux paÿs estrangersGoogle Scholar

Armitage, D. 2000, The Ideological Origins of the British Empire, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Aron, R. 1986, History, Truth and Liberty: Selected Writings, Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Armitage, D. & Pitts, J. (eds.) 2016, C. H. Alexandrowicz, The Law of Nations in Global History, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D., Farell, T., & Lambert, H. 2007, International Law and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Arrighi, G. 2002 [1994] The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Time, London: VersoGoogle Scholar

d’Aspremont, J. 2019, ‘Critical Histories of International Law and the Repression of Disciplinary Imagination’, London Review of International Law, 7(1), 89–115Google Scholar

Aston, T. H. & Philpin, C. H. E. (eds.) 1985, The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University pressGoogle Scholar

Baars, G. 2019, The Corporation, Law and Capitalism: A Radical Perspective on the Role of Law in the Global Political Economy, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Baber, R. J. 2012, ‘Law, Land and Legal Rhetoric in Colonial New Spain: A Look at the Changing Rhetoric of Indigenous Americans in the Sixteenth Century’, in Belmessous, S. (ed.), Native Claims: Indigenous Law against Empire 1500–1920, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 41–62Google Scholar

Bachand, R. & Lapointe, T. 2010 ‘Beyond Presentism: Rethinking the Enduring Co-Constitutive Relationships between International Law and International Relations’, International Political Sociology, 4, 271–286Google Scholar

Baillou, J. (ed.) 1984, Les affaires étrangères et le corps diplomatique français, I: de l’Ancien Régime au Second Empire, Paris: Editions du CNRSGoogle Scholar

Banaji, J. 2007, ‘Islam, the Mediterranean and the Rise of Capitalism’, Historical Materialism, 15(1), 47–74Google Scholar

Banaji, J. 2011, Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Banaji, J. 2018, ‘Globalising the History of Capital: Ways Forward’, Historical Materialism, 26(3), 143–166Google Scholar

Banaji, J. 2019, ‘State and Capital in the Era of Primitive Accumulation’, keynote lecture for conference ‘IISG towards a Global History of Primitive Accumulation’, Amsterdam, 6 May 2019, unpublished paper, www.academia.edu/39761764/State_and_Capital_in_the_Era_of_Primitive_Accumulation [accessed 28 October 2019]Google Scholar

Banaji, J. forthcoming, ‘Merchant Capitalism’, in Farris, S. R., Skeggs, B., & Toscano, A. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of MarxismGoogle Scholar

Barbano, M. 2018, ‘“A Lucrative, Dangerous Business” Le consulat anglais à Alger, Tunis et Tripoli dans la deuxième moitié du XVIIe siècle’, in Bartolomei, A., Calafat, G., Grenet, M., & Ulbert, J. (eds.), De l’utilité commerciale des consuls: L’institution consulaire et les marchands dans le monde méditerranéen (XVIIe–XXe siècle), Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome, 253–263Google Scholar

Barbour, V. 1928 ‘Consular Service in the Reign of Charles II’, American Historical Review, 33, 553–578.Google Scholar

Barreto, M. J. 2017, ‘Jus Gentium and the Transformation of Latin American Nature: One More Reading of Vitoria?’, in Koskenniemi, M., Rech, W., & Jimenez Fonseca, M. (eds.), International Law and Empire: Historical Explorations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123–148Google Scholar

Bartelson, J. 1995, A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Bartolomei, A. 2018a, ‘Introduction’, in Bartolomei, A., Calafat, G., Grenet, M., & Ulbert, J. (eds.), De l’utilité commerciale des consuls: L’institution consulaire et les marchands dans le monde méditerranéen (XVIIe–XXe siècle), Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome, 1–16Google Scholar

Bartolomei, A. 2018b, ‘Entre l’état, les intérêts marchands et l’intérêt personnel, l’agence des consuls. Introduction’, in Bartolomei, A., Calafat, G., Grenet, M., & Ulbert, J. (eds.), De l’utilité commerciale des consuls: L’institution consulaire et les marchands dans le monde méditerranéen (XVIIe–XXe siècle), Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome, 391–402Google Scholar

Bartolomei, A., Calafat, G., Grenet, M., & Ulbert, J. (eds.) 2018, De l’utilité commerciale des consuls: L’institution consulaire et les marchands dans le monde méditerranéen (XVIIe–XXe siècle), Rome: Publications de l’École française de RomeGoogle Scholar

Beaulac, S. 2004, The Power of Language in the Making of International Law, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Beik, W. 1985, Absolutism and Society in Seventeenth-Century France: State Power and Provincial Aristocracy in Languedoc, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Beik, W. 2000, Louis XIV and Absolutism: A Brief Study with Documents, Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martin’sGoogle Scholar

Beik, W. 2005, ‘Review Article: The Absolutism of Louis XIV as Social Collaboration’, Past and Present, 188 (August), 195–224Google Scholar

Beik, W. 2009, A Social and Cultural History of Early Modern France, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Belissa, M. 1998, Fraternité Universelle et Intérêt National (1713–1795): Les cosmopolitiques du droit des gens, Paris: Éditions KiméGoogle Scholar

Bell, G. M. 1990, A Handlist of British Diplomatic Representatives 1509–1688, London: Royal Historical SocietyGoogle Scholar

Bell, D. A. 1994, Lawyers and Citizens: The Making of a Political Elite in Old Regime France, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Belmessous, S. (ed.) 2012, Native Claims: Indigenous Law against Empire 1500–1920, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Belmessous, S. (ed.) 2015, Empire by Treaty: Negotiation European Expansion 1600–1900, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bély, L. 1990, Espions et ambassadeurs au temps de Louis XIV, Paris: FayardGoogle Scholar

Bély, L. 2005, ‘Les temps modernes (1515–1789)’, in Autrand, F. et al. (eds.), Histoire de la diplomatie française I. Du Moyen Age à l’Empire, Paris: Perrin, 181–460Google Scholar

Bély, L. 2007, L’art de la paix en Europe: Naissance de la diplomatie moderne, XVIe–XVIIIe siècle, Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar

Bénazet, C. 1982, Ambassadeurs et Ministres de France de 1748 à 1791. Étude institutionnelle et sociale, Thèse de l’École des ChartesGoogle Scholar

Bénazet-Béchu, C. 1998, ‘Les ambassadeurs français au XVIIIe siècle’, in Bély, L. & Richefort, I. (eds.), L’invention de la diplomatie, Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar

Benton, L. 2002, Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Benton, L. 2006, ‘Constitutions and Empire: A Review’, Law and Social Enquiry, 177–198Google Scholar

Benton, L. 2010, A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires 1400–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Benton, L. 2011, ‘Possessing Empire: Iberian Claims and Interpolity Law’, in Belmessous, S. (ed.), Native Claims: Indigenous Law against Empire 1500–1920, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–40Google Scholar

Benton, L. 2018, ‘Afterward: The Space of Political Community and the Space of Authority’, Global Intellectual History, 3(2), 254–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benton, L. 2019, ‘Beyond Anachronism: Histories of International Law and Global Legal Politics’, Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international, 21(1), 7–40Google Scholar

Benton, L. & Clulow, A. 2017, ‘Webs of Protection and Interpolity Zones in the Early Modern World’, in Benton, L., Clulow, A., & Attwood, B. (eds.), Protection and Empire: A Global History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–71Google Scholar

Benton, L., Clulow, A., & Attwood, B. (eds.), 2017, Protection and Empire: A Global History, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Benton, L. & Ford, L. 2016 Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800–1850, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Benton, L. & Ross, R. J. (eds.) 2013, Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850, New York: New York University PressGoogle Scholar

Berman, H. J. 1983, Law and Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar

Berridge, G. R., 2009, British Diplomacy in Turkey, 1583 to the Present, Leiden: Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar

Besson, S. 2012, ‘The Extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights: Why Human Rights Depend on Jurisdiction and What Jurisdiction Amounts to’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 24(4), 857–884Google Scholar

Bhambra, G. 2007, Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Bhambra, G. 2010, ‘Historical Sociology, Modernity, and Postcolonial Critique’, American Historical Review, 116(3), 653–662Google Scholar

Biedermann, Z. 2014, The Portuguese in Sri Lanka and South India: Studies in the History of Diplomacy, Empire and Trade, 1500–1650. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz VerlagGoogle Scholar

Bilder, M. S. 2004, The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Bilgin, P. 2016, ‘How to Remedy Eurocentrism in IR? A Complement and a Challenge for The Global Transformation’, International Theory, 8(3), 492–501Google Scholar

Binns, P. 1980, ‘Law and Marxism’, Capital and Class, 4, 100–113Google Scholar

Birr, C. 2018, ‘Dominium in the Indies. Juan López de Palacios Rubios’ Libellus de insulis oceanis quas vulgus indias appelat (1512–1516)’, Rechtgeschichte, 26, 264–283Google Scholar

Bittner, L., Gross, L., & Santifaller, L. (eds.) 1936–1965, Repertorium der diplomatischen Vertreter aller Länder (3 vols.), Zurich: Fretz & WasmuthGoogle Scholar

Black, J. 2001, British Diplomats and Diplomacy 1688–1800, Exeter: University of Exeter PressGoogle Scholar

Boogert, van der M. H. 2003, ‘Consular Jurisdiction in the Ottoman Legal System in the Eighteenth Century’, Oriente Moderno, 22(3), 613–634Google Scholar

Borah, W. 1983, Justice by Insurance: The General Indian Court of Colonial Mexico and the Legal Aides of the Half-Real, Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Boulanger, P. 2006, ‘Les appointements des consuls de France à Alger au XVIIIe siècle’, in Ulbert, J. & Le Bouëdec, G. (eds.), La fonction consulaire à l’époque moderne: L’affirmation d’une institution économique et politique (1500–1800), Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 123–146Google Scholar

Bowden, B. 2005, ‘The Colonial Origins of International Law. European Expansion and the Classical Standard of Civilization’, Journal of the History of International Law, 7, 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowring, B. 2008, The Degradation of the International Legal Order? The Rehabilitation of Law and the Possibility of Politics, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Bozeman, A. 1960 Politics and Culture in International History: From the Ancient Near East to the Opening of the Modern Age, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Brabazon, H. (ed.) 2016, Neoliberal Legality: Understanding the Role of Law in the Neoliberal Project, Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Branch, J. 2013, The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Brandon, P. 2011, ‘Marxism and the “Dutch Miracle”: The Dutch Republic and the Transition Debate’, Historical Materialism, 19(3), 106–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandon, P. 2015, War, Capital, and the Dutch State (1588–1795), Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Brandon, P. 2019, ‘Between the Plantation and the Port: Racialization and Social Control in Eighteenth-Century Paramaribo’, International Review of Social History, 64Google Scholar

Brandon, P. & Fatah-Black, K. 2015, ‘“For the Reputation and Respectability of the State”: Trade, the Imperial State, Unfree Labor, and Empire in the Dutch Atlantic’, in Donoghue, John & Jennings, Evelyn P. (eds.), Building the Atlantic Empires: Unfree Labor and Imperial States in the Political Economy of Capitalism, ca. 1500–1914, Leiden: Brill, 84–108Google Scholar

Breen, M. P. 2007, Law, City and King: Legal Culture, Municipal Politics, and State Formation in Early Modern Dijon, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester PressGoogle Scholar

Brenner, R. 1972, ‘The Social Basis of English Commercial Expansion 1550–1650’, in Subrahmanyam, S. (ed.), Merchant Networks in the Early Modern World, 1450–1800, London: Routledge, 1996, 280–302 [orig. pub. in Journal of Economic History [1972] 32(1), 361–384]Google Scholar

Brenner, R. 1976, ‘Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe’, Past and Present, 70Google Scholar

Brenner, R. 1977, ‘The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’, in New Left Review, 104, 25–92Google Scholar

Brenner, R. 1997, ‘Property Relations and the Growth of Agricultural Productivity in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe’, in Bhaduri, A. & Skarstein, R. (eds.), Economic Development and Agricultural Productivity, London: Edward Elgar, 9–44Google Scholar

Brenner, R. 2001, ‘The Low Countries in the Transition to Capitalism’, in Hoppenbrouwers, Peter & van Zanden, Jan Luiten (eds.), Peasants into Farmers?: The Transformation of Rural Economy and Society in the Low Countries (Middle Ages–19th Century) in Light of the Brenner Debate, Turnhout: Brepols, 275–338Google Scholar

Brenner, R. 2003, Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London’s Overseas Traders, 1550–1653, London: VersoGoogle Scholar

Brenner, R. 2007a, ‘Property and Progress: Where Adam Smith Went Wrong’, in Wickham, Chris (ed), Marxist History-writing for the Twenty First Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49–111Google Scholar

Brenner, R. 2007b, ‘Structure versus Conjuncture’, New Left Review, II(43) (Jan.–Feb.), 33–59Google Scholar

Brett, A. 2011, Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Brett, A. 2017, ‘Protection as a Political Concept in English Political Thought, 1603–1651’, in Benton, L., Clulow, A., & Attwood, B. (eds.), Protection and Empire: A Global History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 93–113Google Scholar

Brophy, S. 2017, ‘An Uneven and Combined Theory of Law: Initiation’, Law Critique, 28: 167Google Scholar

Buckley, M. 1966, ‘Origins of Diplomatic Immunity in England’, University of Miami Law Review, 21, 349–365Google Scholar

Bull, H. 1977, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Bull, H. & Watson, A. (eds.) 1984, The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Burkholder, M. A. & Chandler, D. S. 1977, From Impotence to Authority: The Spanish Crown and the American Audiencias, 1687–1808 Columbia: University of Missouri PressGoogle Scholar

Burrage, M. 2006, Revolution and the Making of the Contemporary Legal Profession: England, France and the United States, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bush, R., Bujra, J., & Littlejohn, G. 2011, ‘The Accumulation of Dispossession’, Review of African Political Economy, 38(128), 187–192Google Scholar

Butler, G. & Maccoby, S. 1928, The Development of International Law, London: LongmansGoogle Scholar

Butterfield, H. & Wight, M. (eds.) 1966, Diplomatic Investigations, London: Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar

Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. 2014, ‘Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations 20(2), 437–462Google Scholar

Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. 2015 The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

van Caenegem, R. C. 1987 Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Caenegem, R. C. 2002, European Law in the Past and the Future: Unity and Diversity over Two Millennia, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Calafat, G. 2018a, ‘Les juridictions du consul: une institution au service des marchands et du commerce? Introduction’, in Bartolomei, A., Calafat, G., Grenet, M., & Ulbert, J. (eds.), De l’utilité commerciale des consuls: L’institution consulaire et les marchands dans le monde méditerranéen (XVIIe–XXe siècle), Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome, 143–153Google Scholar

Calafat, G. 2018b, ‘La juridiction des consuls français en Méditerranée; litiges marchands, arbitrages et circulations des procès’, in Bartolomei, A., Calafat, G., Grenet, M., & Ulbert, J. (eds.), De l’utilité commerciale des consuls: L’institution consulaire et les marchands dans le monde méditerranéen (XVIIe–XXe siècle), Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome, 155–172Google Scholar

Calafat, G. 2018c, ‘A “Nest of Pirates”? Consuls and Diplomatic Intermediaries in Algiers during the 1670s’, Studi e Materiali di Storia delle Religioni, 84(2), 529–547Google Scholar

Calafat, G. 2019, Une mer jalousée. Contribution à l’histoire de la souveraineté (Méditerranée, XVIIe siècle), Paris: Éditions du SeuilGoogle Scholar

Calafat, G. & Monnet, E. 2017, ‘The Return of Economic History?’, Books & Ideas (30 Jan.), https://booksandideas.net/The-Return-of-Economic-History.html [accessed 27 October 2019]Google Scholar

Callières, François de. 1716, De la manière de négocier avec les souverains : de l'utilité des négociations, du choix des ambassadeurs et des envoyez, et des qualitez necessaires pour réussir dans ces emplois. Amsterdam: La CompagnieGoogle Scholar

Calvin’s Case 7 Coke Report 1a, 77 English Reports, 377, 1608Google Scholar

Cammack, P. 2017, ‘How The West Came to Rule Reviewed’, Progress in Political Economy Blog, http://ppesydney.net/west-came-rule-reviewed [accessed 27 October 2019]Google Scholar

Cañizares-Esguerra, J. (ed.) 2018 Entangled Empires: Anglo-Iberian Atlantic Worlds 1500–1830; the Atlantic in Global History, 1500–2000, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar

Cardim, P., Herzog, T., Ibanez, , & Sabatini, G. (eds.) 2012, Polycentric Monarchies: How Did Early Modern Spain and Portugal Achieve and Maintain a Global Hegemony? Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Carrió-Invernizzi, D. 2014, ‘A New Diplomatic History and the Networks of Spanish Diplomacy in the Baroque Era’, International History Review, 36(4), 603–618Google Scholar

Carter, C. H. 1966, ‘The Ambassadors of Early Modern Europe: Patterns of Diplomatic Representation in the Early 17th Century’, in Carter, C. H. (ed.), From the Renaissance to the Counter Reformation: Essays in Honour of Garrett Mattingly, London: Jonathan CapeGoogle Scholar

Cassel, P. K. 2012, Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

de Carvalho, B., Leira, H., & Hobson, J. M. 2011, ‘The Big Bangs of IR: The Myths that Your Teachers Still Tell You about 1948 and 1919’, Millennium, 39(3): 735–758.Google Scholar

Casey, J. 1999, Early Modern Spain: A Social History, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Cavallar, G. 2008, ‘Vitoria, Grotius, Pufendorf, Wolff and Vattel: Accomplices of European Colonialism and Exploitation or True Cosmopolitans?’, Journal of the History of International Law, 10, 181–209Google Scholar

Cavanagh, E. 2014, ‘Possession and Dispossession in Corporate New France, 1600–1663: Debunking a “Juridical History” and Revisiting Terra Nullius’, Law and History Review, 32, 97–125Google Scholar

Cavanagh, E. 2017, ‘The Atlantic Prehistory of Private International Law: Trading Companies of the New World and the Pursuit of Restitution in England and France, 1613–1643’, Itinerario, 41(3), 452–483Google Scholar

Chambre de Commerce de Marseille Archives J141, J1602, J176, J180, J2, B3Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S. 1993, International Law and World Order: A Critique of Contemporary Approaches, New Delhi: SageGoogle Scholar

Chimni, B. S. 1999, ‘Marxism and International Law: A Contemporary Analysis’, Political and Economic Weekly, 337–349Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S. 2007, ‘The Past, Present and Future of International Law: A Critical Third World Approach’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 8(2), 499Google Scholar

Chimni, B. S. 2008, ‘An Outline of a Marxist Course on Public International Law’, in Marks, Susan (ed.), International Law on the Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–91Google Scholar

Chorley, J. 2018, ‘Law and Primitive Accumulation: Canadian Settler Colonialism’, Legal Form Blog (6 Jan.), https://legalform.blog/2018/01/06/law-and-primitive-accumulation-canadian-settler-colonialism-jasmine-chorley [accessed 27 October 2019]Google Scholar

Colás, A. 2016, ‘Barbary Coast in the Expansion of International Society: Piracy and Corsairing as Primary Institutions’, Review of International Studies, 42(5), 840–857Google Scholar

Coller, I. 2011, ‘Cosmopolitanism and Extraterritoriality: Regulating Europeans in 18th Century Turkey’, in Schmidt-Haberkamp, Barbara (ed.), Europa und die Türkei im 18. Jahrhundert/Europe and Turkey in the Eighteenth Century. Grenzüberschreitungen in kosmopolitischer Zeit, Bonn: V&R Unipress, 205–218Google Scholar

Comninel, G. 1987, Rethinking the French Revolution: Marxism and the Revisionist Challenge, London: VersoGoogle Scholar

Comninel, G. 2000, ‘English Feudalism and the Origins of Capitalism’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 27(4), 1–53Google Scholar

Cooper, L. 2017, ‘The Global Transformation: Critical Reflections on the Historical Sociology of the Long Nineteenth Century [review]’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 31: 78– 91Google Scholar

Corrigan, P. & Sayer, D. 1981, ‘How the Law Rules: Variations on Some Themes in Karl Marx’, in Fryer, B. et al. (eds.), Law, State and Society, London: Croom Helm, 21–51Google Scholar

Craig, G. A. 1979, ‘On the Nature of Diplomatic History: The Relevance of Some Old Books’, in Lauren, P. Gordon (ed.), Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy, New York: Free Press, 21–42.Google Scholar

Cras, J. 2006, ‘Une approche archivistique des consulats de la Nation française: Les actes de chancellerie consulaire sous l’Ancien Régime’, in Ulbert, J. & Le Bouëdec, G. (eds.), La fonction consulaire à l’époque moderne: L’affirmation d’une institution économique et politique (1500–1800), Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 51–84Google Scholar

Crawford, M. J., 2014, The Fight for Status and Privilege in Late Medieval and Early Modern Castile, 1465–1598, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar

Crespo Solano, A. 2006, ‘Merchants under Close Scrutiny: Spanish Monopoly with America and Laws against Foreigners’ Illegal Commerce’, in Lars Nilson CD-ROM Stads-och (ed.), Urban Europe in Comparative Perspective, Kommun: Historika. InstitutetGoogle Scholar

Crespo Solano, A. 2014 ‘A Network-Based Merchant Empire: Dutch Trade in the Spanish Atlantic 1680–1740’, in Oostindie, G. & Roitman, J. V. (eds.), Dutch Atlantic Connections 1600–1800: Linking Empires, Bridging Borders, Leiden: Brill, 139–158Google Scholar

Curtis, D. R. & Campopiano, M. 2014, ‘Medieval Land Reclamation and the Creation of New Societies: Comparing Holland and the Po Valley, c. 800–1500’, Journal of Historical Geography, 44, 93–108Google Scholar

Cutler, A. C. 1997, ‘Artifice, Ideology and Paradox: The Public/Private Distinction in International Law’, Review of International Political Economy, 4(2), 261–285Google Scholar

Cutler, A. C. 2001, ‘Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organizations: A Crisis of Legitimacy’, Review of International Studies, 27, 133–150Google Scholar

Cutler, A. C. 2002, ‘Historical Materialism, Globalization, and Law: Competing Conceptions of Property’, in Rupert, M. & Smith, H. (eds.), Historical Materialism and Globalization, London: Routledge, 230–256Google Scholar

Cutler, A. C. 2003, Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Cutler, A. C. 2008, ‘Toward a Radical Political Economy Critique of Transnational Economic Law’, in Marks, Susan (ed.), International Law on the Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199–219Google Scholar

Cutler, A. C. 2014, ‘New Constitutionalism and the Commodity Form of Global Capitalism’, in Gill, S. & Cutler, A. C. (eds.), New Constitutionalism and World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–62Google Scholar

Cutler, A. C. & Gill, S. (eds.) 2015, New Constitutionalism and World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (eds.) 1999, Private Authority and International Affairs, Albany, NY: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar

Davidson, N. 2010, ‘Scotland: Birthplace of Passive Revolution?’ Capital and Class, 34(3), 343–359Google Scholar

Davis-Cross, M. 2007, The European Diplomatic Corps: Diplomats and International Cooperation from Westphalia to Maastricht, New York: PalgraveGoogle Scholar

De Luca, K. A. 2008, ‘Beyond the Sea: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and English Law, c. 1575–c. 1640’ (DPhil. dissertation, University of Columbia)Google Scholar

van Deusen, N. E. 2015, Global Indios: The Indigenous Struggle for Justice in Sixteenth-Century Spain, Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar

Dewar, H. 2011, ‘Souveraineté dans les colonies, souveraineté en métropole: le rôle de la Nouvelle-France dans la consolidation de l’autorité maritime en France, 1620–1628’, Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française, 64(3–4), 63–92Google Scholar

Dewar, H. 2012, ‘Y establir nostre auctorité’: Assertions of Imperial Sovereignty through Proprietorships and Chartered Companies in New France, 1598–1663 (PhD thesis, University of Toronto)Google Scholar

Dewar, H. 2013, ‘Litigating Empire: The Role of French Courts in Establishing Colonial Sovereignties’, in Benton, L. & Ross, R. J. (eds.), Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850, New York: New York University Press, 49–79Google Scholar

Dhondt, F. 2016, ‘Recent Research in the History of International Law’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis/Revue d’histoire du droit/Legal History Review, 84(1–2), 313–334Google Scholar

Dickason, O. P. 1989, ‘Concepts of Sovereignty at the Time of the First Contacts’, in Green, L. C. & Dickason, O. P., The Law of Nations in the New World, Alberta: University of Alberta Press, 141–295Google Scholar

Dimmock, S. 2014, The Origin of Capitalism in England 1400–1600, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Dimmock, S. 2017, ‘The Eastern Origins of Capitalism?’, Historical Materialism Blog, www.historicalmaterialism.org/book-review/eastern-origins-capitalism [accessed 27 October 2019]Google Scholar

Dimmock, S. 2019, ‘Expropriation and the Political Origins of Agrarian Capitalism in England’, in Lafrance, X. & Post, C. (eds.), Case Studies in the Origins of Capitalism, London: Palgrave, 39–62Google Scholar

Donlan, S. P. & Heirbaut, D. eds., 2015, The Law’s Many Bodies: Studies in Legal Hybridity and Jurisdictional Complexity, c. 1600–1900, Berlin: Duncker & HumblotCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dorsett, S. & McVeigh, S. 2012, Jurisdiction, New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Dover, P. & Scott, H. 2015, ‘The Growth of Diplomacy, c. 1450–1815’, in Scott, Hamish M. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern European History, 1350–1750, Volume II: Cultures and Power, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Dufour, F. G. 2008, ‘Le retour du juridique comme dimension constitutive des théories critiques des relations internationales ?’, Études internationales, 39(1), 63–81Google Scholar

Dupuy, P., & Chetail, V. (eds.) 2013, The Roots of International Law/Les fondements du droit international, Leiden: Brill/NijhoffGoogle Scholar

Durchardt, H. 2004, ‘Peace Treaties from Westphalia to the Revolutionary Era’, in Lesaffer, R. (ed.), Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–58Google Scholar

Duroselle, J. B. 1953, Histoire diplomatique de 1919 à nos jours Paris: DallozGoogle Scholar

Duvé, T. (ed.) 2014a, Entanglements in Legal History: Conceptual Approaches, Global Perspectives on Legal History, Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Open Access PublicationGoogle Scholar

Duvé, T. 2014b, ‘Introduction’, in Duvé, T. (ed.), Entanglements in Legal History: Conceptual Approaches, Global Perspectives on Legal History, Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Open Access Publication, 3–25Google Scholar

Duvé, T. & Pihlajamäki, H. (eds.) 2015, New Horizons in Spanish Colonial Law Contributions to Transnational Early Modern Legal History, Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Open Access PublicationGoogle Scholar

Duzgun, E. 2020, ‘Against Eurocentric Anti-Eurocentrism: International Relations, Historical Sociology and Political Marxism’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 23(2), 285–307Google Scholar

Duzgun, E. 2018b, ‘The International Relations of “Bourgeois Revolutions”: Disputing the Turkish Revolution’, European Journal of International Relations, 24(2), 414–439.Google Scholar

Dyson, T. 2013, ‘English Diplomatic Agents 1603–1688’ (PhD thesis, Oxford University)Google Scholar

Ebben, M. A. 2017, ‘Lodewijck Huygens’ Spanish Journal, 1660–1661: Perceptions of Spain and Confirmation of the Identity of the Dutch Republic’, Dutch Crossing: Journal of Low Countries Studies, 42(2), 118–134Google Scholar

Ebben, M.2018, ‘Cross-Confessional and Diplomatic Incidents: Dutch Ambassadors in Madrid, 1648–72’, in Fernández-Santos, Jorge and Luis Colomer, José (eds.), Ambassadors in Golden-Age Madrid: The Court of Philip IV ‘The Planet King’ through Foreign Eyes, Madrid: CEEH, 247–272Google Scholar

Elliott, J. H. 1963, Imperial Spain 1469–1716, London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar

Elliott, J. H. 1983, ‘A Question of Reputation? Spanish Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth Century’, Journal of Modern History, 55(3), 475–483Google Scholar

Elliott, J. H. 1992, ‘A Europe of Composite Monarchies’, Past & Present, 137, 48–71Google Scholar

Elliott, J. H. 2006, Empires of the Atlantic World: Britain and Spain in America, 1492–1830, London: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Elliott, J. H. 2012, History in the Making, New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Emmer, P. C. 2014, ‘The Rise and Decline of the Dutch Atlantic, 1600–1800’, in Oostindie, G. & Roitman, J. V. (eds.), Dutch Atlantic Connections 1600–1800: Linking Empires, Bridging Borders, Leiden: Brill, 339–356Google Scholar

Eslava, L. 2019, ‘TWAIL Coordinates’, Critical Legal Thinking Blog, http://criticallegalthinking.com/2019/04/02/twail-coordinates [accessed 27 October 2019]Google Scholar

Eslava, L., Nesiah, V. and Fakhri, M. (eds.) 2016, Bandung, Global History and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Ewald, W. 1995, ‘Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants’, American Journal of Comparative Law 43, 489–510Google Scholar

Faivre d’Arcier, A. 2006, ‘Le service consulaire au Levant à la fin du XVIIIe siècle et son évolution sous la Révolution’, in Ulbert, J. & Le Bouëdec, G. (eds.), La fonction consulaire à l’époque moderne: L’affirmation d’une institution économique et politique (1500–1800), Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 161–188Google Scholar

Farganel, J. P. 1996, ‘Négociants marseillais au Levant et dirigisme commercial: l’émergence d’une contestation nouvelle de l’autorité monarchique (1685–1789)’, Provence Historique, 183, 3–25Google Scholar

Fedele, D. 2016, ‘The Renewal of Early-Modern Scholarship on the Ambassador: Pierre Ayrault on Diplomatic Immunity’, Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international 18, 4, 449–468Google Scholar

Fedele, D. 2017, Naissance de la diplomatie moderne (XIIIe–XVIIe siècles) L’ambassadeur au croisement du droit, de l’éthique et de la politique, Baden-Baden: Nomos VerlagsgesellschaftGoogle Scholar

Federici, S. 2014, Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation, 2nd rev. ed., New York: AutonomediaGoogle Scholar

Fernández Castro, A. 2014, ‘A Transnational Empire Built on Law: The Case of the Commercial Jurisprudence of the House of Trade of Seville (1583–1598)’, in Duvé, T. (ed.), Entanglements in Legal History: Conceptual Approaches, Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, 187–212Google Scholar

Fernández Chavez, M. & Gamero Rojas, M. 2017, ‘Nations? What Nations? Business in the Shaping of International Trade Networks’, in Herrero Sanchez, M. & Kaps, K. (eds.), Merchants and Trade Networks in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean 1550–1800, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 145–168Google Scholar

Fine, B. 2002 [1984], Democracy and the Rule of Law: Marx’s Critique of the Legal Form, Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn PressGoogle Scholar

Fine, B., Kinsey, R., Lea, J., Picciotto, S., & Young, J. (eds.) 1979, Capitalism and the Rule of Law: From Deviancy Theory to Marxism, London: HutchinsonGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, A. Humanism and America: Intellectual History of English Colonisation 1500–1625, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, A. 2014, Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Ford, L. 2010, Settler Sovereignty: Jurisdiction and Indigenous People in America and Australia, 1788–1836, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Ford, L. & Rowse, T. (eds.), 2013, Between Indigenous and Settler Governance, Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Ford, R. T. 1999, ‘Law’s Territory (A History of Jurisdiction)’, Michigan Law Review, 97, 843–93Google Scholar

Fradera, J. M. 2018, The Imperial Nation: Citizens and Subjects in the British, French, Spanish, and American Empires, trans. MacKay, Ruth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Frey, L. S. & Frey, M. L. 1999, The History of Diplomatic Immunity, Columbus: Ohio State University PressGoogle Scholar

Frigo, D. (ed.) 2000, Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy: Structure of Diplomatic Practice 1450–1800, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Fryer, B., Hunt, A., McBarnet, D., & Moorhouse, B. 1981, ‘Law, State and Society’, in Fryer, B. et al. (eds.), Law, State and Society, London: Croom Helm, 9–20Google Scholar

Fusaro, M. 2010, ‘After Braudel: A Reassessment of Mediterranean History between the Northern Invasion and the Caravane Maritime’, in Fusaro, M., Heywood, C. J., & Omri, M.-S. (eds.), Trade and Cultural Exchange in the Early Modern Mediterranean. Braudel’s Maritime Legacy, London: I.B. Tauris, 1–22Google Scholar

Fusaro, M. 2012, ‘Cooperating Mercantile Networks in the Early Modern Mediterranean’, Economic History Review, 65(2), 701–718Google Scholar

Fusaro, M. 2015, Political Economies of Empire in the Early Modern Mediterranean the Decline of Venice and the Rise of England 1450–1700, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Games, A. 2008, The Web of Empire: English Cosmopolitans in an Age of Expansion, 1560–1660, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Games, A. 2014, ‘A Dutch Moment in Atlantic Historiography’, in Oostindie, G. & Roitman, J. V. (eds.), Dutch Atlantic Connections 1600–1800: Linking Empires, Bridging Borders, Leiden: Brill, 363–Google Scholar

Garcia-Salmones, M. 2017, ‘The Disorder of Economy? The first Relectio de Indis in a Theological Perspective’, in Kadelbach, S., Kleinlein, T., & Roth-Isigkeit, D. (eds.), System, Order and International Law: The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 443–463Google Scholar

Garcia-Salmones, M. & Eslava, L. 2010, ‘Jurisdictional Colonisation in the Spanish and British Empires: Some Reflections on a Global Public Order and the Sacred’, in Ruiz Fabri, H., Wolfrum, R., & Gogolin, J. (eds.), Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, vol. II, London: Bloomsbury, 53–81Google Scholar

Gathii, J. 2000, ‘Neoliberalism, Colonialism and International Governance: Decentering the International Law of Governmental Legitimacy’, Michigan Law Review, 98, 1996–2065Google Scholar

Geevers, L. & Marini, M. 2016, Dynastic Identity in Early Modern Europe: Rulers, Aristocrats and the Formation of Identities, Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Gerstenberger, H. 2007, Impersonal Power: History and Theory of the Bourgeois State, trans. Fernbach, D., Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Giry-Deloison, C. 1987, ‘Le personnel diplomatique au début du XVIe siècle. L’exemple des relations franco-anglaises de l’avènement d’Henry VII au camp du Drap d’or (1485–1520)’, Journal des Savants, 3, 205–253Google Scholar

Go, J. 2013, ‘For a Postcolonial Sociology’, Theory and Society, 42(1), 25–55Google Scholar

Go, J. & Lawson, G. 2017, ‘For a Global Historical Sociology’, in Go, Julian and Lawson, George (eds.), Global Historical Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–34Google Scholar

Gong, G. W. 1984, The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Goodman, D. C., 1997, Spanish Naval Power, 1589–1665: Reconstruction and Defeat, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Goodrich, P. 2008, ‘Visive Powers: Colours, Trees and Genres of Jurisdiction’, Law and Humanities, 2, 213Google Scholar

Gorski, P. S. 2003, The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe, London: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Grafe, R. 2012, Distant Tyranny: Markets, Power, and Backwardness in Spain, 1650–1800, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Grafe, R. 2013, ‘Polycentric States: The Spanish Reigns and the “Failures” of Mercantilism’, in Stern, P. & Wennerlind, C. (eds.), Mercantilism Reimagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and Its Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241–262Google Scholar

Grafton Wilson, G. 1930, ‘The Exterritoriality of Ambassadors in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries by E. R. Adair [review]’, American Historical Review, 35(3), 592–593Google Scholar

Graubart, K. B. 2018, ‘Containing Law within the Walls: The Protection of Customary Law in Santiago del Cercado, Peru’, in Benton, L., Clulow, A., & Attwood, B. (eds.), Protection and Empire: A Global History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–46Google Scholar

Green, L. C. & Dickason, O. P. 1989, The Law of Nations in the New World, Alberta: University of Alberta PressGoogle Scholar

Grenier, B. 2004, ‘“Nulle terre sans seigneur?”: Une étude comparative de la présence seigneuriale (France–Canada), XVIIe–XIXe siècle’, French Colonial History, 5, 7–24Google Scholar

Grewe, W. G. 2000, The Epochs of International Law, Berlin: Walter de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Grisel, E. 1976, ‘The Beginnings of International Law and General Public Law Doctrine: Francisco de Vitoria’s De Indis Prior’, in Chiapelli, F. (ed.), First Images of America, Volume I The Impact of the New World on the Old, Berkeley: University of California Press, 305–325Google Scholar

Grotius, H. 1901, Rights to War and Peace Including the Law of Nature and of Nations. Translation of De jure belli et pacis by A. C. Campbell, Washington, DC: M. Walter DunneGoogle Scholar

Grotius, H. 1925, The Law of War and Peace in Three Books (1625) [De Jure Belli ac Pacis Libris Tres], trans. Kelsey, Francis W., Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Grotius, H. 2005, The Rights of War and Peace, edited with introduction by Richard Tuck, from the edition by Barbeyrac, Jean, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (3 vols.)Google Scholar

Grovogui, N. S. 2009, ‘Counterpoints and the Imaginaries behind Them: Thinking beyond North American and European Traditions’, International Political Sociology, 3(3), 327–331Google Scholar

Gulsah Capan, Z. 2017, ‘Decolonising International Relations?’, Third World Quarterly, 38(1), 1–15Google Scholar

Halperin, J. L. 2009, ‘The Concept of Law: A Western Transplant?’ Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 10(2), 333–354Google Scholar

Hamilton, B. 1963, Political Thought in Sixteenth-Century Spain: A Study of the Political Ideas of Vitoria, De Soto, Suarez, and Molina, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Hampton, T. 2009, Fictions of Embassy: Literature and Diplomacy in Early Modern Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Hanke, L. 1974, All Mankind Is One: A Study of the Disputation between Bartolomé de Las Casa and Juan Ginès de Sepúlveda on the Religious and Intellectual Capacity of the American Indian, Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University PressGoogle Scholar

Hardy, D. 2018, Associative Political Culture in the Holy Roman Empire: Upper Germany, 1346–1521, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. 1958, ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 593–629Google Scholar

Haskell, J. 2019, ‘Ways of Doing Extraterritoriality in Scholarship’, in Margolies, D. S., Özsu, U., Pal, M., & Tzouvala, N. (eds.), The Extraterritoriality of Law: History, Theory, Politics, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 13–29Google Scholar

Hébié, M. 2015, Souveraineté territoriale par traité: Une étude des accords entre puissances coloniales et entités politiques locales, Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar

Heine, C. & Teschke, B. 1996, ‘Sleeping Beauty and the Dialectical Awakening: On the Potential of Dialectic for International Relations’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 35, 399–423Google Scholar

Heinsen-Roach, E. 2012, ‘Consuls, Corsairs, and Captives: the creation of Dutch diplomacy in the early Modern Mediterranean, 1596–1699’ (DPhil. dissertation, University of Miami)Google Scholar

Heinsen-Roach, E. 2015, ‘Consuls-of-State and the Redemption of Slaves: The Dutch Republic and the Western Mediterranean, 1616–1651’, Itinerario, 39(1), 69–90Google Scholar

Hennings, J. 2016, Russia and Courtly Europe: Ritual and the Culture of Diplomacy, 1648–1725, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Herrero Sanchez, M. & Kaps, K. (eds.) 2017a, Merchants and Trade Networks in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean 1550–1800, Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Herrero Sanchez, M. & Kaps, K. 2017b, ‘Connectors, Networks, and Commercial Systems: Approaches to the Study of Early Modern Maritime Trade History’, in Herrero Sanchez, M. & Kaps, K. (eds.), Merchants and Trade Networks in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean 1550–1800, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 1– 36Google Scholar

Hernández, J. 2011, ‘Chapter Ten. A History of the Spanish Consular Service: An Institution in Its Own Right’, in Consular Affairs and Diplomacy (vol. VII), Leiden: Brill, 225–246Google Scholar

Herzog, T. 2015a, Frontiers of Possession: Spain and Portugal in Europe and the Americas, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Herzog, T. 2015b, ‘Struggling over Indians: Territorial Conflict and Alliance Making in the Heartland of South America (Seventeenth to Eighteenth Centuries)’, in Belmessous, Saliha (ed.), Empire by Treaty. Negotiation European Expansion 1600–1900, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 78–101Google Scholar

Hill, C. 1991, The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution, London: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. 1994, The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991, London: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Hobson, J. M. (1998), ‘The “Second Wave” of Weberian Historical Sociology - The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations. Review of International Political Economy, 5:2, 284–320Google Scholar

Hobson, J. H. 2002, ‘What’s at Stake in “Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations’? Transcending “Chronofetisism” and “Tempocentrism” in International Relations’, in Hobson, John M. & Hobden, Stephen (eds.), Historical Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–41Google Scholar

Hobson, J. H. 2012, The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics, Western International Theory, 1760–2010, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hobson, J. H. & Hobden, S. (eds.) 2002, Historical Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hobson, J. H. & Sajed, A. 2017, ‘Navigating beyond the Eurofetishist Frontier of Critical IR Theory: Exploring the Complex Landscapes of Non-Western Agency’, International Studies Review, 19(4), 547–572Google Scholar

Hobson, J. M. Lawson, G. & Rosenberg, J. 2010, ‘Historical Sociology’, in Denemark, Robert A. (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopaedia, Wiley-Blackwell; International Studies Association, UKGoogle Scholar

Holdsworth, S. 1945, A History of English Law, London: MethuenGoogle Scholar

Holmes, C. 1997, ‘The Legal Instruments of Power and the State in Early Modern England’, in Padoa-Schioppa, A. (ed.), Legislation and Justice, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 269–289Google Scholar

Horowitz, R. S. 2004, ‘International Law and State Transformation in China, Siam, and the Ottoman Empire during the Nineteenth Century’, Journal of World History, 15(4), 445–486Google Scholar

Horn, D. B. 1961, The British Diplomatic Service 1689–1789, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Horn, J. 2011, ‘Marseille et la question du mercantilisme: Privilège, liberté et économie politique en France, 1650–1750’, Histoire, économie & société, 2(30e), 95–111Google Scholar

Horn, J. 2015, Economic Development in Early Modern France: The Privilege of Liberty, 1650–1820, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hotman, J. 1603, L’ambassadeur, LondonGoogle Scholar

Houssiau, J. 2000, ‘Les ambassadeurs des Pays-Bas à Vervins: prémices d’une diplomatie “belge”?’, in Labourdette, J. F., Poussou, Jean-Pierre and Vignal, Marie-Catherine (eds.), Le Traité de Vervins Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne, 267–282Google Scholar

Houston, R. A. 2018, ‘The Composition and Distribution of the Legal Profession, and the Use of Law in Britain and Ireland, c. 1500–c. 1850’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis/Revue d’histoire du droit/Legal History Review, 86(1–2), 123–156Google Scholar

Hueck, I. J. 2001, ‘The Discipline of the History of International Law’, Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international, 3(2), 194–217Google Scholar

Hulsebosch, D. 2005, Constituting Empire: New York and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in the Atlantic World, 1664–1830, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar

Ince, O. U. 2014, ‘Primitive Accumulation, New Enclosures, and Global Land Grabs: A Theoretical Intervention’, Rural Sociology 79(1), 104–131Google Scholar

Ince, O. U. 2018, ‘Between Equal Rights: Primitive Accumulation and Capital’s Violence’, Political Theory, 46(6), 885–914Google Scholar

Israel, J. 1989, Dutch Primacy in World Trade 1585–1740, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

van Ittersum, M. J. 2006, Profit and Principle: Hugo Grotius, Natural Rights Theories and the Rise of Dutch Power in the East Indies, 1595–1615, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

van Ittersum, M. J. 2016, ‘Hugo Grotius: The Making of a Founding Father of International Law’, in Orford, Anne & Hoffmann, Florian (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 82–100Google Scholar

Ives, E. W. 1983, The Common Lawyers of Pre-Reformation England, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Jacobsen, H. 2011, Luxury and Power: The Material World of the Stuart Diplomat, 1660–1714, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Jahn, B. 2000, The Cultural Construction of International Relations, Basingstoke, UK: PalgraveGoogle Scholar

Jahn, B. (ed.) 2006, Classical Theory in International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Jettot, S. 2012, Représenter le Roi ou la Nation? Parlementaires dans la diplomatie anglaise 1660–1702, Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-SorbonneGoogle Scholar

Kadelbach, S., Kleinlein, T., & Roth-Isigkeit, D. (eds.) 2017, System, Order, and International Law: The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Kaiser, W. & Calafat, G. 2014, ‘Violence, Protection and Commerce: Corsairing and ars piratica in the Early Modern Mediterranean’, in Amirell, S. E. & Müller, L. (eds.), Persistent Piracy: Maritime Violence and State-Formation in Global Historical Perspective, London: Palgrave, 69–92Google Scholar

Kaplan, B. J. 2002, ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Devotion: Embassy Chapels and the Toleration of Religious Dissent in Early Modern Europe’, Journal of Early Modern History, 6(4), 341–361Google Scholar

Kassan, S. 1935, ‘Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in the Ancient World’, American Journal of International Law, 29, 237Google Scholar

Kayaoglu, T. 2010, Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Keene, E. 2002, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Keene, E. 2013, ‘International Hierarchy and the Origins of the Modern Practice of Intervention’, Review of International Studies, 39, 1077–1090Google Scholar

Keene, E. 2017, ‘International Intellectual History and International Relations: Contexts, Canons and Mediocrities’, International Relations 31(3), 341–356Google Scholar

Keens-Soper, H. M. A. & Schweizer, K. W. (eds.) 1994, François de Callières, The Art of Diplomacy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar

Knafla, L. A. & Binnie, S. W. S. (eds.) 1995, Law, Society and the State: Essays in Modern Legal History, London: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar

Knafo, S. 2007, ‘Political Marxism and Value Theory: Bridging the Gap between Theory and History’, Historical Materialism, 15, 75–104Google Scholar

Knafo, S. 2010, ‘Critical Approaches and the Legacy of the Agent/Structure Debate in International Relations’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3), 493–516Google Scholar

Knafo, S. 2013, The Making of Modern Finance: Liberal Governance and the Gold Standard. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Knafo, S. 2017, ‘A Methodological Turn Long Overdue: Or, Why It Is Time for Critical Scholars to Cut Their Losses’, in Selby, Jan, Dyvik, Synne L., & Wilkinson, Rorden (eds.), What’s the Point of International Relations? London: Routledge, 242–252Google Scholar

Knafo, S. & Teschke, B. 2020, ‘The Rules of Reproduction of Capitalism: A Historicist Critique’, Historical Materialism, 28(3)Google Scholar

Knox, R. 2009, ‘Marxism, International Law, Political Strategy’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 22, 413–436Google Scholar

Knox, R. 2010, ‘Strategy and Tactics’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 21, 193–229Google Scholar

Knox, R. 2016a, ‘Valuing Race? Stretched Marxism and the Logic of Imperialism’, London Review of International Law’, 4(1), 81–126Google Scholar

Knox, R. 2016b, ‘Marxist Theories of International Law’, The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 306–326Google Scholar

Knox, R. 2018, ‘Marxist Approaches to International Law’, Oxford Bibliographies Online, www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199796953/obo-9780199796953-0163.xml [accessed 27 October 2019]Google Scholar

Kochi, T. 2017, ‘Dreams and Nightmares of Liberal International Law: Capitalist Accumulation, Natural Rights and State Hegemony’, Law Critique, 28, 23–41Google Scholar

Koenigsberger, H. G. 1986, Politicians and Virtuosi: Essays in Early Modern History, London: Hambledon PressGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 1992, ‘Introduction’, in Koskenniemi, Martti (ed.), International Law, Dartmouth: Aldershot, xi–xxxiiGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2000, ‘Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations’, in Byers, M. (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2001, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2004, ‘The History of International Law Today’, RechtsgeschichteGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2005, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2008, ‘What should international lawyers learn from Karl Marx?’, in Marks, Susan (ed.), International Law on the Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30–52Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2011, ‘International Law and Empire: The Real Spanish Contribution’, University of Toronto Law Journal, 61, 1–36Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2014, ‘International and the Emergence of Mercantile Capitalism: From Grotius to Smith’, in Dupuy, P. & Chetail, V. (eds.), The Roots of International Law/Les fondements du droit international, Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff, 3–38Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2016, ‘Expanding Histories of International Law’, American Journal of Legal History, 56, 104–112Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2017a, ‘Introduction’, in Koskenniemi, M., Rech, W., & Jimenez Fonseca, M. (eds.), International Law and Empire: Historical Explorations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–18Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. 2017b, ‘Sovereignty, Property and Empire: Early Modern English Contexts’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law 18, 355–389Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., Rech, W., & Jimenez Fonseca, M. (eds.) 2017, International Law and Empire: Historical Explorations, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Krasner, S. 1993, ‘Westphalia and All That’, in Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 235–65Google Scholar

Krever, T. 2018, ‘The Rule of Law and the Rise of Capitalism’, in May, Christopher and Winchester, Adam (eds.), Handbook on the Rule of Law, London: Edward Elgar, 184–200Google Scholar

Krynen, J. 2009, L’État de justice France, XIIIe–XXe siècle. Tome I: L’Idéologie de la magistrature ancienne, Paris: GallimardGoogle Scholar

Kugeler, H. 2006, ‘Le Parfait Ambassadeur: The Theory and Practice of Diplomacy in the Century Following the Peace of Westphalia’ (DPhil. thesis, University of Oxford)Google Scholar

Kuru, D. 2016, ‘Historicising Eurocentrism and Anti-Eurocentrism in IR: A Revisionist Account of Disciplinary Self-Reflexivity’, Review of International Studies, 42, 351–376Google Scholar

Lacher, H. 2006, Beyond Globalisation: Capitalism, Territoriality and the International Relations of Modernity, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Lachmann, R. 2018, ‘What Empires Can and Can’t Do’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 60(4), 1127–1142Google Scholar

Lachs, P. S. 1965, The Diplomatic Corps under Charles II and James II, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University PressGoogle Scholar

Lafrance, X. 2019, The Making of Capitalism in France, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Lafrance, X. & Post, C. (eds.) 2019a, Case Studies in the Origins of Capitalism, London: PalgraveGoogle Scholar

Lafrance, X. & Post, C. 2019b, ‘Introduction’, in Lafrance, Xavier & Post, Charles (eds.), Case Studies in the Origins of Capitalism, London: Palgrave, 1–38Google Scholar

Lapid, Y. 1989, ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era’, International Studies Quarterly, 33, 235–254Google Scholar

Lapointe, T. & Dufour, G. 2012, ‘Assessing the Historical Turn in IR: An Anatomy of Second Wave Historical Sociology’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(1), 97–121Google Scholar

Lee, M. Jr, 1966–1967, ‘The Jacobean Diplomatic Service’, American Historical Review, 72, 1276–1280Google Scholar

Legrand, P. 1997, ‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’, Maastricht Journal of European & Comparative Law, 4, 111–124Google Scholar

Leira, H. & Neumann, I. B. 2008, ‘Consular Representation in an Emerging State: The Case of Norway’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 3, 1–19Google Scholar

Leira, H. & Neumann, I. B. 2012, ‘Consular Diplomacy’, in Kerr, Pauline & Wiseman, Geoffrey (eds.), Diplomacy in a Globalizing World: Theories and Practices, New York: Oxford University Press, 160–175Google Scholar

Lesaffer, R. 2002, ‘The Grotian Tradition Revisited; Change and Continuity in the History of International Law’, in Crawford, James and Lowe, Vaughan (eds.), British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 73, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 103–139Google Scholar

Lesaffer, R. 2017, ‘Between Faith and Empire: The justification of the Spanish Intervention in the French Wars of Religion in the 1590s’, in Koskenniemi, M., Rech, W., & Jimenez Fonseca, M. (eds.), International Law and Empire: Historical Explorations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–122Google Scholar

Levillain, C.-E. 2016, ‘French Diplomacy and the Run-up to the Glorious Revolution (1688): A Critical Reading of Jean-Antoine d’Avaux’s Correspondence as Ambassador to the States General’, Journal of Modern History, 88(1), 130–150Google Scholar

Levin, M. J. 2002, ‘A New World Order: The Spanish Campaign for Precedence in Early Modern Europe’, Journal of Early Modern History, 6(3), 233–264Google Scholar

Lindemann, M., 2015, The Merchant Republics: Amsterdam, Antwerp, and Hamburg, 1648–1790, New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Little, R. 2000, ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 395–422Google Scholar

Liu, S. S. 1925, Extraterritoriality: Its Rise and Decline, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

McDougal, M. S. & Lasswell, H. D. 1996 [1959], ‘The Identification and Appraisal of Diverse Systems of Public Order’, in Beck, R., Clark Arend, A., & Vander Lugt, R. D. (eds.), International Rules: Approaches from International Law and International Relations, New York: Oxford University Press, 113–143Google Scholar

McNally, D. 2012, Monsters of the Market: Zombies, Vampires and Global Capitalism, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

McNally, D. 2020, Blood and Money: War, Slavery, and the State, Chicago: HaymarketGoogle Scholar

Macmillan, K. 2006, Sovereignty and Possession in English New World, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Mann, M. 1986, The Sources of Social Power Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Margolies, D. S., Özsu, U., Pal, M., & Tzouvala, N. (eds.) 2019, The Extraterritoriality of Law: History, Theory, Politics, Abingdon, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Marks, S. 1997, ‘The End of History? Reflections on some International Legal Theses’, European Journal of International Law, 3, 449–477Google Scholar

Marks, S. 2007, ‘International Judicial Activism and the Commodity Form Theory of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 18(1), 199–211Google Scholar

Marks, S. 2008, ‘Introduction’, in Marks, Susan (ed.) International Law on the Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–29Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1959, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 3, London: Lawrence & WishartGoogle Scholar

Marx, K. 1971, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, London: Lawrence & WishartGoogle Scholar

Marx, K. 1976, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Vol. 1, trans. Fowkes, Ben, London: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Marx, K. & Engels, F., 1939 [1854]. Revolution in Spain, London: Lawrence & WishartGoogle Scholar

Marzagalli, S. 2014, ‘The French Atlantic and the Dutch, Late Seventeenth-Late Eighteenth’, in Oostindie, G. & Roitman, J. V. (eds.), Dutch Atlantic Connections 1600–1800: Linking Empires, Bridging Borders, Leiden: Brill, 103–118Google Scholar

Marzagalli, S. 2016, ‘Was Warfare Necessary for the Functioning of Eighteenth-Century Colonial Systems? Some Reflections on the Necessity of Cross-Imperial and Foreign Trade in the French Case’, in Antunes, C. & Polónia, A. (eds.), Beyond Empires: Global, Self-Organizing, Cross-Imperial Networks, 1500–1800, Leiden: Brill, 253–277Google Scholar

Marzagalli, S. & Marnot, B. (eds.) 2006, Guerre et économie dans l’espace atlantique du XVIe au XXe siècles, Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de BordeauxGoogle Scholar

Masson, P. 1896, Histoire du commerce français dans le Levant au 18e siècle. Thèse, Paris: Librairie HachetteGoogle Scholar

Mate, M. E. 2006, Trade and Economic Developments, 1450–1550: The Experience of Kent, Surrey and Sussex, Woodbridge, UK: Boydell PressGoogle Scholar

Mather, J. 2011, Pashas, Traders and Travellers in the Islamic World, London: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Mattingly, G. 1955/1966, Renaissance Diplomacy, London: PenguinGoogle Scholar

van Meersbergen, G. 2017, ‘The Dutch Merchant–Diplomat in Comparative Perspective: Embassies in the Court of Aurangzeb 1660–1666’, in Sowerby, T. A. & Hennings, J. (eds.), Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World c. 1410–1800, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 147–165Google Scholar

Meguro, M. 2019, ‘Backlash Against International Law by the East? How the Concept of “Transplantation” Helps Us to Better Understand Reception Processes of International Law’, Völkerrechtsblog (11 Jan.) https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/backlash-against-international-law-by-the-east [accessed 27 October 2019]Google Scholar

Mézin, A., 1997, Les consuls de France au siècle des Lumières (1715–1792), Paris: La Documentation FrançaiseGoogle Scholar

Mézin, A., 2006, ‘La fonction consulaire dans la France d’Ancien Régime: origine, principes, prérogatives’, in Ulbert, J. & Le Bouëdec, G. (eds.), La fonction consulaire à l’époque modern: L’affirmation d’une institution économique et politique (1500–1800), Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 37–49Google Scholar

Mezzadra, S. 2011, ‘The Topicality of Prehistory: A New Reading of Marx’s Analysis of “So-called Primitive Accumulation”’, Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 23(3), 302–321Google Scholar

Midnight Notes, 1990, New Enclosures, Jamaica Plain, MA: Midnight NotesGoogle Scholar

Miéville, C. 2005, Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Miéville, C. 2008, ‘The Commodity-Form Theory of International Law’, in Marks, Susan (ed.), International Law on the Left: Re-examining Marxist Legacies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–132Google Scholar

Milanovic, M. 2011, Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Miles, K. 2019, ‘“Uneven Empires”: Extraterritoriality and the Early Trading Companies’, in Margolies, D. S., Özsu, U., Pal, M., & Tzouvala, N. (eds.), The Extraterritoriality of Law: History, Theory, Politics, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 87–104Google Scholar

Miller, S. 2008, State and Society in Eighteenth-Century France: A Study of Political Power and Social Revolution in Languedoc, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America PressGoogle Scholar

Moeglin, J.-M. & Pèquignot, S. 2017, Diplomatie et relations internationales au moyen-âge (IXe–XVe siècle), Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar

Mooers, C. 1991, The Making of Bourgeois Europe: Absolutism, Revolution and the Rise of Capitalism in England, France and Germany, London: VersoGoogle Scholar

Mooers, C. 2014, Imperial Subjects: Citizenship in an Age of Crisis and Empire, New York: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar

Moore, B. 1967, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Development: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, New York: BeaconGoogle Scholar

Moreno Zacarés, J. 2018, ‘Beyond Market Dependence: The Origins of Capitalism in Catalonia’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 18, 749–767Google Scholar

Morgan, K. 2014, ‘Anglo-Dutch Economic Relations in the Atlantic World 1688–1783’, in Oostindie, G. & Roitman, J. V. (eds.), Dutch Atlantic Connections 1600–1800: Linking Empires, Bridging Borders, Leiden: Brill, 119–138Google Scholar

Morgenthau, H. J. 1967, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4th ed. (rev. Kenneth W. Thompson) New York: KnopfGoogle Scholar

Morin, M. 2010, ‘Des nations libres sans territoire? Les Autochtones et la colonisation de l’Amérique française du XVIe au XVIIIe siècle’, Journal of the History of International Law, 12, 1–70Google Scholar

Moyn, S. & Sartori, A. (eds.) 2015, Global Intellectual History, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Napolitano, E. C. 2012, ‘Prospects of Statecraft: Diplomacy, Territoriality, and the Vision of French Nationhood in Rome, 1660–1700’ (PhD thesis, University of Toronto)Google Scholar

Neff, S. C. 2006, ‘A Short History of International Law’, in Evans, M. D. (ed.), International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29–55Google Scholar

Neff, S. C. 2014, Justice among Nations: A History of International Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Neocleous, M. 2012, ‘International Law as Primitive Accumulation; or, the Secret of Systematic Colonization’, European Journal of International Law, 23–4, 941–962Google Scholar

Nexon, D. H. 2009, The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires and International Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Noiriel, G. 2018, Une histoire populaire de la France: De la guerre de cent ans à nos jours, AgoneGoogle Scholar

Nordman, D. 1998, Frontières de France: De l’espace au territoire, XVIe–XIXe siècle Paris: GallimardGoogle Scholar

North, D. & Weingast, B. 1989, ‘Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England’, Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832Google Scholar

Nys, E., 1894. Les origines du droit international, Brussels: A. CastaigneGoogle Scholar

Numelin, R. J. 1950, The Beginnings of Diplomacy: A Sociological Study of Intertribal and International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, A. 1954, A Concise History of the Law of Nations, New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Nuzzo, L. 2011, ‘Colonial Law’, European History Online (EGO), Leibniz Institute of European History (IEG), Mainz, www.ieg-ego.eu/nuzzol-2011-en [accessed 28 October 2019]Google Scholar

Nuzzo, L. 2017, ‘Territory, Sovereignty, and the Construction of the Colonial Space’, in Koskenniemi, M., Rech, W., & Jimenez Fonseca, M. (eds.), International Law and Empire: Historical Explorations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 263–292Google Scholar

O’Connell, P. 2017, Masking Barbarism: Human Rights in the Contemporary Global Order, London: HartGoogle Scholar

O’Connell, P. 2018, ‘Law, Marxism and Method’, tripleC, 16(2), 647–655Google Scholar

O’Connell, P. & Öszu, U. (eds.) forthcoming, Handbook of Law and Marxism, London: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar

Odysseos, L. & Pal, M. 2017, ‘Towards Critical Pedagogies of the International? Student Resistance, Self-formation and Other-regardedness in the Neoliberal University’, International Studies Perspectives, 19(1), 1–26Google Scholar

Orford, A. 2009, ‘Jurisdiction without Territory: From the Holy Roman Empire to the Responsibility to Protect’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 30, 981–1015Google Scholar

Orford, A. 2017, ‘International Law and the Limits of History’, in Werner, W., De Hoon, M., & Galán, A. (eds.), The Law of International Lawyers: Reading Martti Koskenniemi, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 297–320Google Scholar

Osiander, A. 2001, ‘Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth’, International Organization, 55, 251–287Google Scholar

Owens, J. B. 2005, ‘By My Absolute Royal Authority’ Justice and the Castilian Commonwealth at the Beginning of the First Global Age, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester PressGoogle Scholar

Owensby B, P. 2011, Empire of Law and Indian Justice in Colonial Mexico, California: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Ozanam, D. 1999, Les diplomates espagnols du XVIIIe siècle: introduction et répertoire biographique, 1700–1808, Madrid: Casa de VelázquezGoogle Scholar

Özsu, U. 2012, ‘Ottoman Empire’, in Fassbender, Bardo & Peters, Anne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 429–448Google Scholar

Özsu, U. 2014, Formalizing Displacement: International Law and Population Transfers, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Özsu, U. 2019, ‘Grabbing Land Legally: A Marxist Analysis’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 32, 215–233Google Scholar

Pacheco, A. J. C. 2017, ‘Primitive Accumulation in Indigenous Mexico’, City, 21(3–4), 503–519Google Scholar

Pagano de Divitiis, G. 1997, English Merchants in Seventeenth-Century Italy, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Pagden, A. (ed.) 1987, The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Pagden, A. 1990, Spanish Imperialism and the Political Imagination: Studies in European and Spanish-American Social Political Theory 1513–1830, London: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Pagden, A. 1995, Lords of All the World: Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France, c. 1500–c. 1800, New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Pagden, A. 2003, ‘Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe’s Imperial Legacy’, Political Theory, 31(2), 171–199Google Scholar

Pahuja, S. 2011, Decolonizing International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Pahuja, S. 2013, ‘Laws of Encounter: A Jurisdictional Account of International Law’, London Review of International Law, 1(1), 63–98Google Scholar

Pal, M. 2018 ‘My Capitalism Is Bigger than Yours! Against Combining “How the West Came to Rule” with “the Origins of Capitalism”’, Historical Materialism, 26(3), 99–124Google Scholar

Pal, M. 2019, ‘Early Modern Extraterritoriality, Diplomacy and the Transition to Capitalism’, in Margolies, D. S., Özsu, U., Pal, M., & Tzouvala, N. (eds.), The Extraterritoriality of Law: History, Theory, Politics, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 69–86Google Scholar

Pal, M. forthcoming, ‘Historical Sociology in IR’, in Bukovansky, Keene & Spanu, Reus-Smit (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of History and International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Pal, M. forthcoming, ‘On the Methodological Limits of the Commodity Form Theory of Law in The Corporation, Law and Capitalism’, London Review of International LawGoogle Scholar

Parfitt, R. 2019, The Process of International Legal Reproduction: Inequality, Historiography, Resistance, Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar

Paris, R. 1957, Histoire du commerce de Marseille, tome V: De 1660 à 1789. Le Levant, Paris: PlonGoogle Scholar

Parker, D. 1989, ‘Sovereignty, Absolutism, and the Function of the Law in Seventeenth Century France’, Past and Present, 122 (Feb.), 30–74Google Scholar

Parker, D. 1996, Class and State in Ancien Régime France: The Road to Modernity? London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Parker, D. 2003, ‘Absolutism, Feudalism and Property Rights in the France of Louis XIV’, Past and Present, 179 (May), 60–96Google Scholar

Parry, J. H. 1990 [1966], The Spanish Seaborne Empire, Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Pashukanis, E. 1978, Law and Marxism: A General Theory, London: Ink LinksGoogle Scholar

Pashukanis, E. 2005, ‘International Law’ [entry in Encyclopedia of State and Law, 1925, Communist Academy] in Miéville, C., Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law, Leiden: Brill, 2005, 321–335Google Scholar

Pecquet, A. 1738, De l’art de negocier avec les souverains, ParisGoogle Scholar

Pennell, C. R. (ed.) 1989, Piracy and Diplomacy in Seventeenth Century North Africa: The Journal of Thomas Baker. English Consul in Tripoli 1677–1685, Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University PressGoogle Scholar

Pennell, C. R. 2009, ‘Treaty Law: The Extent of Consular Jurisdiction in North Africa from the Middle of the Seventeenth to the Middle of the Nineteenth Century’, Journal of North African Studies, 14:2, 235–256Google Scholar

Pennell, C. R. 2010, ‘The Origins of the Foreign Jurisdiction Act and the Extension of British Sovereignty’, Historical Research, 83(221), 465–485Google Scholar

Péquignot, S. & Belissa, M. 2016, ‘Thémis en diplomatie: regards croisés en guise de conclusion’, in Drocourt, N. & Schnakenbourg, E. (eds.), Thémis en diplomatie. Droits et arguments juridiques dans les relations internationales de l’Antiquité tardive à la fin du XVIIIe siècle, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 303–313Google Scholar

Perelman, M. 2000, The Invention of Capitalism: Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation, Durham, NC: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar

Pettigrew, W. A. & Stein, T. 2017, ‘The Public Rivalry between Regulated and Joint Stock Corporations and the Development of Seventeenth‐Century Corporate Constitutions’, Historical Research, 90(248), 341–362Google Scholar

Picavet, C. G. 1923, ‘La carrière diplomatique en France au temps de Louis XIV (1661–1715)’, Revue d’histoire économique et sociale, 11(3), 383–408Google Scholar

Pitts, J. 2017, ‘International Relations and the Critical History of International Law’, International Relations, 31(3), 282–298Google Scholar

Pitts, J. 2018, Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Platt, D. C. M. 1971, The Cinderella Service: British Consuls Since 1825, London: LongmansGoogle Scholar

Post, C. 2002, ‘Comments on the Brenner–Wood Exchange on the Low Countries’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 2(1), 88–95Google Scholar

Post, C. 2011, The American Road to Capitalism: Studies in Class Structure, Economic Development and Political Conflict 1620–1877, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Post, C. 2015, ‘The Separation of the “Economic” and the “Political” under Capitalism: “Capital-centric Marxism” and the Capitalist State’, Verso Books Blog, www.versobooks.com/blogs/2345-charles-post-the-separation-of-the-economic-and-the-political-under-capitalism-capital-centric-marxism-and-the-capitalist-state [accessed 18 July 2020]Google Scholar

Poumarède, G. 2001, ‘Naissance d’une institution royale: les consuls de la nation française en Levant et en Barbarie aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles’, Annuaire-bulletin de la société de l’histoire de France, 65–128Google Scholar

Poumarède, G. 2007, ‘“Ambassade” et “Ambassadeur” dans les dictionnaires français et italiens (XVIe–XIXe siècle)’, Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome. Italie et Méditerranée, 119(1), 7–16Google Scholar

Pradells Nadal, J. 1992, Diplomacía y comercio: La expansión consular española en el siglo XVIII, Alicante: Universidad de AlicanteGoogle Scholar

Premo, B. 2017, The Enlightenment on Trial: Ordinary Litigants and Colonialism in the Spanish Empire, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Premo, B. & Yanakakis, Y. 2019, ‘A Court of Sticks and Branches: Indian Jurisdiction in Colonial Mexico and Beyond’, American Historical Review, 124(1), 28–55Google Scholar

Putnam, T. 2016, Courts without Borders: Law, Politics and U.S. Extraterritoriality, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Rasulov, A. 2018, ‘A Marxism for International Law: A New Agenda’, European Journal of International Law, 29(2), 631–655Google Scholar

Raustiala, K. 2009, Does the Constitution Follow the Flag? The Evolution of Territoriality in American Law, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Rediker, M. 2019, ‘Afterword: Reflections on the Motley Crew as Port City Proletariat’, International Review of Social History, 64(27), 255–262Google Scholar

Renouvin, P. 1954, Histoire des relations internationales (4 vols.), Paris: Librairie HachetteGoogle Scholar

Reus-Smit, C. 2016, ‘Theory, History, and Great Transformations’, International Theory, 8(3), 422–435Google Scholar

Reynolds, J. 2017, Empire, Emergency and International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Roberts, W. C. 2017, ‘What Was Primitive Accumulation? Reconstructing the Origin of a Critical Concept’, European Journal of Political Theory, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1474885117735961?journalCode=epta#articleCitationDownloadContainer [accessed 21 July 2020]Google Scholar

Ronalds, F. S. 1930, ‘The Exterritoriality of Ambassadors in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries by E. R. Adair [review]’, Journal of Modern History, 2(1), 116–117Google Scholar

Roosen, W. 1973, ‘The True Ambassador: Occupational and Personal Characteristics of French Ambassadors under Louis XIV’, European History Quarterly, 3(2), 121–139Google Scholar

Roosen, W. 1976, The Age of Louis XIV: The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, Cambridge, MA: SchenkmanGoogle Scholar

Roosen, W. 1980, ‘Early Modern Diplomatic Ceremonial: A Systems Approach’, Journal of Modern History, 52(3), 452–476Google Scholar

Roper, L. H. & Ruymbeke, B. V. (eds.) 2007, Constructing Early Modern Empires: Proprietary Ventures in the Atlantic World, 1500–1750, Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, J. 1994, The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations, London: VersoGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, J. 2006, ‘Why Is There No International Historical Sociology?’ European Journal of International Relations, 2(3), 307–340Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. 2013, ‘The “Philosophical Premises” of Uneven and Combined Development’, Review of International Studies, 39(3), 569–597Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. 2016a, ‘International Relations in the Prison of Political Science’, International Relations, 30(2), 127–153Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. 2016b, ‘Uneven and Combined Development: “The International” in Theory and History’, in Anievas, A. & Matin, K. (eds.), Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 17–30Google Scholar

Rousseau de Chamoy, L. de 1697, L’Idée du parfait ambassadeur, ed. Delavaud, L., Paris, 1912Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G. 1983, ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, World Politics, 35(2), 261–285Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G. 1993, ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations’, International Organization, 47(1), 139–174Google Scholar

Rush, P. 1997, ‘An Altered Jurisdiction: Corporeal Traces of Law’, Griffith Law Review, 6, 144Google Scholar

Ruskola, T. 2013, Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Ryngaert, C. 2015, Jurisdiction in International Law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Sabaratnam, M. 2011, ‘IR in Dialogue … But Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39(3) 781–803Google Scholar

Sahlins, P. 1991, Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Salgado, P. 2020, ‘Agency and Geopolitics: Brazilian Formal Independence and the Problem of Eurocentrism in International Historical Sociology’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(3), 432–451Google Scholar

Sarraz du Franquesnay, J. de la, 1731, Le Ministre Public dans les cours étrangères: Ses fonctions et ses prérogatives, Paris: Etienne GaneauGoogle Scholar

Saunders, L. 1994, ‘The Motives, Pattern and Form of Anglo-Ottoman Diplomatic Relations, c. 1580–1661’ (PhD thesis, University of Oxford)Google Scholar

Scarfi, J. P. 2017, Hidden History of International Law in the Americas, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Schick, S. 2018, Des liaisons avantageuses: Ministres, liens de dépendance et diplomatie dans le saint-empire romain germanique, Paris: Editions SorbonneGoogle Scholar

de Schepper, H. 2007, ‘The Individual on Trial in 16th Century Netherlands’, in Parker, C. H. & Bentley, J. H. (eds.), Between the Middles Ages and Modernity: Individual and Community in the Early-Modern World, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 187–209Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. 2011, ‘To Order the Minds of Scholars: The Discourse of the Peace of Westphalia in International Relations Literature’, International Studies Quarterly, 55, 601–623Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2003, The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, trans. Ulmen, G. L., New York: Telos Publishing PressGoogle Scholar

Schwarzenberger, G. 1962, The Frontiers of International Law, London: Stevens & SonsGoogle Scholar

Schweizer, K. W. & Schumann, M. J. 2008, ‘The Revitalization of Diplomatic History: Renewed Reflections’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, 19, 149–186Google Scholar