Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T16:32:57.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Mini-States and a More Effective United Nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2009

Stephen M. Schwebel
Affiliation:
International Court of Justice
Get access

Summary

Fifty years ago, the First Assembly of the League of Nations demonstrated a higher sense of responsibility than did the General Assembly of the United Nations at its Twenty-Sixth Session, or at its preceding Sessions. The issue then was that of mini-States, an issue which has been very much with the United Nations for the last decade.

Liechtenstein was denied admission to the League by a vote which followed upon a report made to the Assembly. The report noted that:

Liechtenstein has been recognized de jure by many States. She has concluded a number of Treaties … The Principality of Liechtenstein possesses a stable Government and fixed frontiers … There can be no doubt that juridically the Principality of Liechtenstein is a sovereign State, but by reason of her limited area, small population, and her geographical position, she has chosen to depute to others some of the attributes of sovereignty … Liechtenstein has no army. For the above reasons, we are of the opinion that the Principality of Liechtenstein could not discharge all the international obligations which would be imposed on her by the Covenant.

In 1971, the General Assembly of the United Nations voted to admit Qatar to membership (along with Bahrain and Bhutan). The unanimous recommendation of the Security Council on which this action was based shows no signs of the judiciousness that characterized the League's proceedings of 1920. By 1920, Liechtenstein had been more or less independent for 200 years; by 1971, Qatar had been independent for some weeks. The population of Liechtenstein (not a United Nations Member any more than it was a League Member) is about 21,000; that of Qatar, about 80,000.

Type
Chapter
Information
Justice in International Law
Selected Writings
, pp. 326 - 336
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×