Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part One Technology, security and culture
- Part Two Post-war missile defence
- Part Three The Strategic Defense Initiative
- Part Four Contemporary missile defence
- 7 Ballistic missile defence: ‘Technology, working for you now’
- 8 The iron cage of proliferation
- Conclusion: common sense and the strategic use of ‘technology’
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
7 - Ballistic missile defence: ‘Technology, working for you now’
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part One Technology, security and culture
- Part Two Post-war missile defence
- Part Three The Strategic Defense Initiative
- Part Four Contemporary missile defence
- 7 Ballistic missile defence: ‘Technology, working for you now’
- 8 The iron cage of proliferation
- Conclusion: common sense and the strategic use of ‘technology’
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International Relations
Summary
Introduction
Under the presidency of George W. Bush, missile defence – as both a programme and a concept – underwent something of a renaissance. Campaigning for the presidency in 1999 Bush made a firm commitment to investment in missile defence and defence spending in general, promising to deploy anti-ballistic missile systems ‘at the earliest possible date’. He based this promise on the familiar self-image of American strength in technology which had created ‘a revolution in the technology of war … This revolution perfectly matches the strengths of our country – the skill of our people and the superiority of our technology. The best way to keep the peace is to redefine war on our terms.’ To achieve this redefinition of war, however, increased spending would be required: ‘The real goal is to move beyond marginal improvements – to replace existing programs with new technologies and strategies. To use this window of opportunity to skip a generation of technology. This will require spending more – and spending more wisely.’ In signing the defence appropriations bill in January 2001, Bush was even more succinct in tying together the themes of technological advance and missile defence as a justification for an overhaul of defence funding:
Our nation must also look even farther into the future so that the next generations of weaponry take advantage of our nation's decisive technological edge. That's why I'm pleased to see that this year's defense bill contains almost $50 billion for research and development, including nearly $8 billion for missile defense.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Justifying Ballistic Missile DefenceTechnology, Security and Culture, pp. 181 - 214Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009