Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Note on citations
- Introduction
- KANT'S AESTHETICS IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT
- KANT'S AESTHETICS AND MORALITY: TOPICAL STUDIES
- Chapter 6 The beautiful and the sublime
- Chapter 7 Nature, art, and autonomy
- Chapter 8 Genius and the canon of art: a second dialectic of aesthetic judgment
- Chapter 9 Duties regarding nature
- Chapter 10 Duty and inclination
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 9 - Duties regarding nature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Note on citations
- Introduction
- KANT'S AESTHETICS IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT
- KANT'S AESTHETICS AND MORALITY: TOPICAL STUDIES
- Chapter 6 The beautiful and the sublime
- Chapter 7 Nature, art, and autonomy
- Chapter 8 Genius and the canon of art: a second dialectic of aesthetic judgment
- Chapter 9 Duties regarding nature
- Chapter 10 Duty and inclination
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
THE VALUE OF NATURE
In the Lectures on Ethics which he gave at the outset of the period of his mature work in the 1780s, Kant reported to his students a traditional conception of the philosophical basis for our duties to nonhuman nature:
Baumgarten speaks of duties towards inanimate objects. These duties are also indirectly duties towards mankind. Destructiveness is immoral; we ought not to destroy things which can still be put to some use. No man ought to mar the beauty of nature; for what he has no use for may still be of use to some one else. He need, of course, pay no heed to the thing itself, but he ought to consider his neighbor. Thus we see that all duties towards animals, towards immaterial beings and towards inanimate objects are aimed indirectly at our duties towards mankind.
Aside from the passing reference to beauty, the assumptions expressed in this remark were characteristic of a widespread attitude toward nature. The foundation of any duty to conserve nonhuman nature which we might acknowledge is our duty of consideration toward the needs of our fellow humans, and the indirect duty regarding nature to which this underlying duty can give rise is a duty to ensure that natural objects, whether animate or inanimate, are available for legitimate use by other persons as well as by ourselves.
A similar attitude, although founded upon explicitly theological reasoning absent from Kant's brief discussion, was also expressed in Locke's famous proviso restricting our appropriation and accumulation of the useful fruits and beasts “produced by the spontaneous hand of nature.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant and the Experience of FreedomEssays on Aesthetics and Morality, pp. 304 - 334Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1993
- 2
- Cited by