Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Further reading
- Note on the text and translation
- Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View
- Preface
- Contents
- Part I Anthropological Didactic. On the way of cognizing the interior as well as the exterior of the human being
- Part II Anthropological Characteristic. On the way of cognizing the interior of the human being from the exterior
- A The character of the person
- B The character of the sexes
- C The character of the peoples
- D The character of the races
- E The character of the species
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy
E - The character of the species
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Further reading
- Note on the text and translation
- Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View
- Preface
- Contents
- Part I Anthropological Didactic. On the way of cognizing the interior as well as the exterior of the human being
- Part II Anthropological Characteristic. On the way of cognizing the interior of the human being from the exterior
- A The character of the person
- B The character of the sexes
- C The character of the peoples
- D The character of the races
- E The character of the species
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy
Summary
In order to indicate a character of a certain being's species, it is necessary that it be grasped under one concept with other species known to us. But also, the characteristic property (proprietas) by which they differ from each other has to be stated and used as a basis for distinguishing them. – But if we are comparing a kind of being that we know (A) with another kind of being that we do not know (non-A), then how can one expect or demand to indicate a character of the former when the middle term of the comparison (tertium comparationis) is missing to us? – The highest species concept may be that of a terrestrial rational being; however, we shall not be able to name its character because we have no knowledge of non-terrestrial rational beings that would enable us to indicate their characteristic property and so to characterize this terrestrial being among rational beings in general. – It seems, therefore, that the problem of indicating the character of the human species is absolutely insoluble, because the solution would have to be made through experience by means of the comparison of two species of rational being, but experience does not offer us this.
Therefore, in order to assign the human being his class in the system of animate nature, nothing remains for us than to say that he has a character, which he himself creates, in so far as he is capable of perfecting himself according to ends that he himself adopts.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant: Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View , pp. 225 - 238Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006