Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-wgjn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-18T11:48:08.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography of works cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Rachel Zuckert
Rachel Zuckert
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant on Beauty and Biology
An Interpretation of the 'Critique of Judgment'
 , pp. 388 - 395
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

KantImmanuel, . Kants gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902–).Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, . Anthropology from a Practical Point of View [Anth], tr. Mary Gregor. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, . Blomberg Logic, Jäsche Logic [JL], Vienna Logic, in Logic Lectures, tr. J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Judgment, tr. Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of the Power of Judgment [CJ], tr. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Practical Reason [CPrR], tr. L. W. Beck. New York: Macmillan/Library of Liberal Arts, 1989.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Pure Reason [CPR], tr. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, tr. N. K. Smith. New York: St. Martin's, 1989.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals [GW], tr. L. W. Beck. New Jersey: Prentice Hall/Library of Liberal Arts, 1997.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science [MFNS], tr. James Ellington. New York: Library of Liberal Arts, 1970.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Metaphysics of Morals [MM], in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Philosophical Correspondence 1759–99, tr. Arnulf Zweig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics [Prol], tr. Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. “Kant's Antinomy of Teleological Judgment,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, HenryKant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, HenryKant's Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, HenryKant's Transcendental Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry“Pleasure and Harmony in Kant's Theory of Taste: A Critique of the Causal Reading,” in Parret, Herman, ed., Kants Ästhetik/Kant's Aesthetics/L'esthétique de Kant. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1999, 466–83.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “How to Save Kant's Deduction of Taste,” Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1982), 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, KarlInterpreting Kant's Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquila, Richard. “A New Look at Kant's Aesthetic Judgements,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 87–114.Google Scholar
Aquila, Richard“Unity of Organism, Unity of Thought, and the Unity of the Critique of Judgment,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 139–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Stephen. “Beauty and Induction in Kant's Third Critique,” in Meerbote, Ralf and Hudson, Hud, eds., Kant's Aesthetics, vol. i. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1991, 49–61.Google Scholar
Baum, Manfred. “Subjektivität, Allgemeingültigkeit and Apriorität des Geschmacksurteils bei Kant,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 39 (1991), 272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Reflections on Poetry, tr. Karl Aschenbreener and William B. Holther. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebTheoretische Ästhetik, tr. and ed. Rudolph Schweizer, Hans. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar
Bäumler, Alfred. Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18 Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. Commentary on Kant's “Critique of Practical Reason”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Bell, David. “The Art of Judgment,” Mind 96 (1987), 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencivenga, Ermanno. “Economy of Expression and Aesthetic Pleasure,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (1987), 615–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. Kant's Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bennett, JonathanKant's Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhardt. “The Deductions in the Critique of Judgment,” in Förster, Eckhart, ed., Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1989, 177–90.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm. “Kant on Aesthetic Appreciation,” Parts i, ii, iii, British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1998), 1–18, 117–26, 211–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Butts, Robert. “Teleology and Scientific Method,” Nous 24 (1990), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caranti, Luigi. “Logical Purposiveness and the Principle of Taste,” Kant-Studien 96 (2005), 364–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, Martin. “Kant's Theory of Matter and His Views on Chemistry,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ted. “Three Problems in Kant's Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2002), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ted“Why Beauty Is a Symbol of Morality,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 221–36.Google Scholar
Coleman, Francis X. J.The Harmony of Reason: A Study in Kant's Aesthetics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Crawford, Donald. Kant's Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. “The Claims of Perfection: A Revisionary Defense of Kant's Theory of Dependent Beauty,” International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1986), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, Paul. “The Significance of Kant's Pure Aesthetic Judgement,” British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Robert. “Functional Analysis,” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975), 741–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düsing, Klaus. Die Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff. Kant-Studien Ergängzungshefte 96. Bonn: H. Bouvier u. Co. Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. K. “The Unity of Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgement,” British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (1968), 244–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Barrie. “Having What We Want,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1991), 171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. “Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity,” in Parret, Herman, ed., Kants Ästhetik/Kant's Aesthetics/L'esthétique de Kant (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998), 192–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, Cristel. “Explaining the Inexplicable: The Hypothesis of the Faculty of Reflective Judgment in Kant's Third Critique,” Nous 24 (1990), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, CristelKants Theorie des reinen Geschmacksurteil. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990.
Friedman, Michael. “Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science,” in Guyer, Paul, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, 161–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, MichaelKant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael“Regulative and Constitutive,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1992), 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. The Idea of Form. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Sarah. Kant's Theory of Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” in Reath, Andrews, Herman, Barbara, and Korsgaard, Christine, eds., Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 329–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure,” Inquiry 46 (2003), 164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 231–58.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Lawfulness Without Law,” Philosophical Topics 12 (1997), 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Reflective Judgment and Taste,” Nous 24 (1990), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, HannahThe Role of Taste in Kant's Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland, 1990.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976.Google Scholar
Gracyzk, Theodore. “Kant's Shifting Debt to British Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1986), 204–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. “Feeling, Desire, and Interest in Kant's Theory of Action,” Kant-Studien 92 (2001), 153–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Michelle. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guevara, Daniel. Kant's Theory of Moral Motivation. Boulder: Westview, 2000.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “From Nature to Morality: Kant's New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 314–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant's Conception of Empirical Law,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant's Principles of Reflecting Judgment,” in Guyer, Paul, ed., Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003, 1–61.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Natural Ends and the Ends of Nature,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Organisms and the Unity of Science,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 259–81.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Pleasure and Society in Kant's Theory of Taste,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 21–54.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Purpose in Nature: What Is Living, and What Is Dead in Kant's Teleology?,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 343–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity,” Nous 24 (1990), 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.Faith and Knowledge, tr. Walter Cerf and H. S. Harris. Albany: Suny Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, tr. Richard Taft. Fifth edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant's Philosophy, ed. Richard Velkley, tr. Jeffrey Edwards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hogarth, William. The Analysis of Beauty, ed. Paulson, Ronald. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Horstmann, R. -P. “Why Must There Be a Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Judgment?,” in Förster, Eckhart, ed., Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1989, 157–76.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1977.Google Scholar
Hume, David“Of the Standard of Taste,” in Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1987, 226–49.Google Scholar
Hume, DavidTreatise of Human Nature, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Arnold. “Critical Communication,” in Isenberg, Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism, ed. Callaghan, William, Cauman, Leigh, and Hempel, Carl. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, 156–71.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Kant's Aesthetics and the ‘Empty Cognitive Stock’,” Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1997), 459–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. “Projecting the Order of Nature,” in Kitcher, Patricia, ed., Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998, 219–38.Google Scholar
Kolb, Daniel. “Kant, Teleology, and Evolution,” Synthese 91 (1992), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, Michael. “Kant's Theory of Teleology,” International Philosophical Quarterly 22 (1982), 41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulenkampff, Jens. Kants Logik des ästhetischen Urteils. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1978.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Essays, tr. Daniel Garber and Roger Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991.Google Scholar
Lessing, G.Hamburgische Dramaturgie, tr. Helen Zimmern. New York: Dover, 1962.Google Scholar
Lessing, G.Laocoön, tr. E. A. McCormick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge, tr. Charles T. Wolf. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lorand, Dorit Barchana. “The Kantian Beautiful or the Utterly Useless Prolegomena to Any Future Aesthetics,” Kant-Studien 93 (2002), 309–23.Google Scholar
Lorand, Ruth. “Free and Dependent Beauty,” British Journal of Aesthetics 29:1 (1989), 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löw, Reinhard. Philosophie des Lebendigen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. “Causes and Conditions,” in Sosa, Ernest and Tooley, Michael, eds., Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 33–55.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolph. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolph“Regulative and Reflective Uses of Purposiveness in Kant,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaband, Philip. “Understanding Kant's Distinction between Free and Dependent Beauty,” Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002), 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marc-Wogau, Konrad. Vier Studien zu Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Uppsala: Lundequistka Bokhandeln, 1938.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. “The Ontological Peculiarity of Works of Art,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (1977), 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Mary. Kant's Aesthetic. Albany: SUNY Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McFarland, J. D.Kant's Concept of Teleology. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 1970.Google Scholar
McGhee, Michael. “A Fat Worm of Error?,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (1991), 222–9.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. Kant's Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. Lewistown, NY: Mellen, 1990.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. McT. E. “Time,” in Gale, Richard, ed., The Philosophy of Time. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1967, 86–79.Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf. “Reflections on Beauty,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 55–86.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings, tr. and ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979.Google Scholar
Morisson, Iain. “Pleasure in Kant,” Journal of Philosophical Research, forthcoming.
Nagel, Ernest. “Teleology Revisited,” in Teleology Revisited and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979, 275–316.Google Scholar
Pillow, Kirk. “Jupiter's Eagle and the Despot's Hand Mill: Two Views on Metaphor in Kant,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (2001), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillow, KirkSublime Understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2000.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. Kant's Theory of Form: An Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert“Leaving Nature Behind; or Two Cheers for Subjectivism,” in Smith, Nick, ed., Reading McDowell: Essays on Mind and World. New York and London: Routledge, 2002, 58–75.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert“The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic, and Reflective Judgement,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1996), 549–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold. Erscheinung bei Kant. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews. “Hedonism, Heteronomy, and the Principle of Happiness,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (1989), 42–72.Google Scholar
Rind, Miles. “Kant's Beautiful Roses, a Response to Cohen's ‘Second Problem’,” British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2003), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, Kenneth. Kant's Aesthetic: The Roles of Form and Expression. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986.Google Scholar
Rush, Fred. “The Harmony of the Faculties,” Kant-Studien 92 (2001), 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. “Pleasure,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supplemental vol. 28 (1954), 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santayana, George. The Sense of Beauty. New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar
Savile, Anthony. Kantian Aesthetics Pursued. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Schaper, Eva. Studies in Kant's Aesthetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Schrader, George. “The Status of Feeling in Kant's Philosophy,” in Pierre Laberge, François Duchesneau, and Bryan, E. Morrisey, eds., Actes du Congrès d'Ottawa sur Kant dans les traditions anglo-américaines et continentales/Proceedings of the Ottawa Congress on Kant in the Anglo-American and Continental Traditions, tenu du 10 au 14 octobre 1974. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1976, 143–64.Google Scholar
Schrader, George“The Status of Teleological Judgment in the Critical Philosophy,” Kant-Studien 45 (1953), 204–35.Google Scholar
Searle, John. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, Susan. The Embodiment of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip. “Preforming the Categories: Eighteenth Century Generation Theory and the Biological Roots of the A Priori,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2002), 229–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smit, Houston. “The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1999), 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stecker, Robert. “Free Beauty, Dependent Beauty, and Art,” Journal of Aesthetic Education 21 (1987), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F.The Bounds of Sense. London: Routledge, 1966.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. The Explanation of Behaviour. London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul, 1964.Google Scholar
Tüschling, B. “The System of Transcendental Idealism: Questions Raised and Left Open in the Kritik der Urteilskraft,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall. “Categories of Art,” Philosophical Review 79 (1970), 334–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel. “Kant's Dynamics,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Kant's Justification of the Laws of Mechanics,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, ed. Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1997), 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, David. “Response to Richard Wollheim,” Ratio 20 (1978), 52–68.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J.The History of Ancient Art Among the Greeks, tr. G. Henry Lodge. London: John Chapman, 1850.Google Scholar
Wohlfart, Günther. “Transzendentale Ästhetik und kritischer Ästhetik,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 36 (1982), 64–76.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “An Engagement with Kant's Theory of Beauty,” in Meerbote, Ralf and Hudson, Hud, eds., Kant's Aesthetics. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1991, 105–27.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry. “Functions,” Philosophical Review 82 (1973), 139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wubnig, J. “The Epigenesis of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien 60 (1968–9), 147–52.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. The Genesis of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zanetti, Véronique. “Die Antinomie der teleologischen Urteilskraft,” Kant-Studien 84 (1993), 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangwill, Nick. “Kant on Pleasure in the Agreeable,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1995), 167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumbach, Clark. The Transcendent Science: Kant's Conception of Biological Methodology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, . Kants gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1902–).Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, . Anthropology from a Practical Point of View [Anth], tr. Mary Gregor. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, . Blomberg Logic, Jäsche Logic [JL], Vienna Logic, in Logic Lectures, tr. J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Judgment, tr. Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of the Power of Judgment [CJ], tr. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Practical Reason [CPrR], tr. L. W. Beck. New York: Macmillan/Library of Liberal Arts, 1989.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Pure Reason [CPR], tr. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KantImmanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, tr. N. K. Smith. New York: St. Martin's, 1989.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals [GW], tr. L. W. Beck. New Jersey: Prentice Hall/Library of Liberal Arts, 1997.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science [MFNS], tr. James Ellington. New York: Library of Liberal Arts, 1970.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Metaphysics of Morals [MM], in Practical Philosophy, tr. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Philosophical Correspondence 1759–99, tr. Arnulf Zweig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
KantImmanuel, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics [Prol], tr. Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. “Kant's Antinomy of Teleological Judgment,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, HenryKant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, HenryKant's Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, HenryKant's Transcendental Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry“Pleasure and Harmony in Kant's Theory of Taste: A Critique of the Causal Reading,” in Parret, Herman, ed., Kants Ästhetik/Kant's Aesthetics/L'esthétique de Kant. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1999, 466–83.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “How to Save Kant's Deduction of Taste,” Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1982), 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, KarlInterpreting Kant's Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquila, Richard. “A New Look at Kant's Aesthetic Judgements,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 87–114.Google Scholar
Aquila, Richard“Unity of Organism, Unity of Thought, and the Unity of the Critique of Judgment,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 139–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Stephen. “Beauty and Induction in Kant's Third Critique,” in Meerbote, Ralf and Hudson, Hud, eds., Kant's Aesthetics, vol. i. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1991, 49–61.Google Scholar
Baum, Manfred. “Subjektivität, Allgemeingültigkeit and Apriorität des Geschmacksurteils bei Kant,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 39 (1991), 272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Reflections on Poetry, tr. Karl Aschenbreener and William B. Holther. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander GottliebTheoretische Ästhetik, tr. and ed. Rudolph Schweizer, Hans. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar
Bäumler, Alfred. Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18 Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. Commentary on Kant's “Critique of Practical Reason”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Bell, David. “The Art of Judgment,” Mind 96 (1987), 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencivenga, Ermanno. “Economy of Expression and Aesthetic Pleasure,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (1987), 615–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. Kant's Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bennett, JonathanKant's Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhardt. “The Deductions in the Critique of Judgment,” in Förster, Eckhart, ed., Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1989, 177–90.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm. “Kant on Aesthetic Appreciation,” Parts i, ii, iii, British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1998), 1–18, 117–26, 211–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Butts, Robert. “Teleology and Scientific Method,” Nous 24 (1990), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caranti, Luigi. “Logical Purposiveness and the Principle of Taste,” Kant-Studien 96 (2005), 364–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, Martin. “Kant's Theory of Matter and His Views on Chemistry,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Must We Mean What We Say?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ted. “Three Problems in Kant's Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2002), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ted“Why Beauty Is a Symbol of Morality,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 221–36.Google Scholar
Coleman, Francis X. J.The Harmony of Reason: A Study in Kant's Aesthetics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Crawford, Donald. Kant's Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. “The Claims of Perfection: A Revisionary Defense of Kant's Theory of Dependent Beauty,” International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1986), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, Paul. “The Significance of Kant's Pure Aesthetic Judgement,” British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Robert. “Functional Analysis,” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975), 741–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düsing, Klaus. Die Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff. Kant-Studien Ergängzungshefte 96. Bonn: H. Bouvier u. Co. Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. K. “The Unity of Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgement,” British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (1968), 244–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Barrie. “Having What We Want,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1991), 171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. “Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity,” in Parret, Herman, ed., Kants Ästhetik/Kant's Aesthetics/L'esthétique de Kant (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1998), 192–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, Cristel. “Explaining the Inexplicable: The Hypothesis of the Faculty of Reflective Judgment in Kant's Third Critique,” Nous 24 (1990), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, CristelKants Theorie des reinen Geschmacksurteil. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990.
Friedman, Michael. “Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science,” in Guyer, Paul, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, 161–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, MichaelKant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael“Regulative and Constitutive,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1992), 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. The Idea of Form. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Sarah. Kant's Theory of Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. “Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” in Reath, Andrews, Herman, Barbara, and Korsgaard, Christine, eds., Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 329–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure,” Inquiry 46 (2003), 164–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 231–58.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Lawfulness Without Law,” Philosophical Topics 12 (1997), 37–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Reflective Judgment and Taste,” Nous 24 (1990), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, HannahThe Role of Taste in Kant's Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland, 1990.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah“Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability in Kant and Aristotle,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976.Google Scholar
Gracyzk, Theodore. “Kant's Shifting Debt to British Aesthetics,” British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1986), 204–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. “Feeling, Desire, and Interest in Kant's Theory of Action,” Kant-Studien 92 (2001), 153–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Michelle. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guevara, Daniel. Kant's Theory of Moral Motivation. Boulder: Westview, 2000.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “From Nature to Morality: Kant's New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 314–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant's Conception of Empirical Law,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant's Principles of Reflecting Judgment,” in Guyer, Paul, ed., Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003, 1–61.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Natural Ends and the Ends of Nature,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Organisms and the Unity of Science,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 259–81.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Pleasure and Society in Kant's Theory of Taste,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 21–54.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Purpose in Nature: What Is Living, and What Is Dead in Kant's Teleology?,” in Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 343–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity,” Nous 24 (1990), 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F.Faith and Knowledge, tr. Walter Cerf and H. S. Harris. Albany: Suny Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, tr. Richard Taft. Fifth edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant's Philosophy, ed. Richard Velkley, tr. Jeffrey Edwards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hogarth, William. The Analysis of Beauty, ed. Paulson, Ronald. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Horstmann, R. -P. “Why Must There Be a Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Judgment?,” in Förster, Eckhart, ed., Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1989, 157–76.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1977.Google Scholar
Hume, David“Of the Standard of Taste,” in Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1987, 226–49.Google Scholar
Hume, DavidTreatise of Human Nature, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Isenberg, Arnold. “Critical Communication,” in Isenberg, Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism, ed. Callaghan, William, Cauman, Leigh, and Hempel, Carl. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, 156–71.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. “Kant's Aesthetics and the ‘Empty Cognitive Stock’,” Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1997), 459–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. “Projecting the Order of Nature,” in Kitcher, Patricia, ed., Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998, 219–38.Google Scholar
Kolb, Daniel. “Kant, Teleology, and Evolution,” Synthese 91 (1992), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, Michael. “Kant's Theory of Teleology,” International Philosophical Quarterly 22 (1982), 41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulenkampff, Jens. Kants Logik des ästhetischen Urteils. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1978.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.Discourse on Metaphysics and Other Essays, tr. Daniel Garber and Roger Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991.Google Scholar
Lessing, G.Hamburgische Dramaturgie, tr. Helen Zimmern. New York: Dover, 1962.Google Scholar
Lessing, G.Laocoön, tr. E. A. McCormick. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge, tr. Charles T. Wolf. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lorand, Dorit Barchana. “The Kantian Beautiful or the Utterly Useless Prolegomena to Any Future Aesthetics,” Kant-Studien 93 (2002), 309–23.Google Scholar
Lorand, Ruth. “Free and Dependent Beauty,” British Journal of Aesthetics 29:1 (1989), 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löw, Reinhard. Philosophie des Lebendigen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. “Causes and Conditions,” in Sosa, Ernest and Tooley, Michael, eds., Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 33–55.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolph. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolph“Regulative and Reflective Uses of Purposiveness in Kant,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaband, Philip. “Understanding Kant's Distinction between Free and Dependent Beauty,” Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002), 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marc-Wogau, Konrad. Vier Studien zu Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Uppsala: Lundequistka Bokhandeln, 1938.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. “The Ontological Peculiarity of Works of Art,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (1977), 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Mary. Kant's Aesthetic. Albany: SUNY Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McFarland, J. D.Kant's Concept of Teleology. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 1970.Google Scholar
McGhee, Michael. “A Fat Worm of Error?,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (1991), 222–9.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter. Kant's Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. Lewistown, NY: Mellen, 1990.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. McT. E. “Time,” in Gale, Richard, ed., The Philosophy of Time. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1967, 86–79.Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf. “Reflections on Beauty,” in Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul, eds., Essays in Kant's Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982, 55–86.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings, tr. and ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979.Google Scholar
Morisson, Iain. “Pleasure in Kant,” Journal of Philosophical Research, forthcoming.
Nagel, Ernest. “Teleology Revisited,” in Teleology Revisited and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979, 275–316.Google Scholar
Pillow, Kirk. “Jupiter's Eagle and the Despot's Hand Mill: Two Views on Metaphor in Kant,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (2001), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillow, KirkSublime Understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2000.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert. Kant's Theory of Form: An Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert“Leaving Nature Behind; or Two Cheers for Subjectivism,” in Smith, Nick, ed., Reading McDowell: Essays on Mind and World. New York and London: Routledge, 2002, 58–75.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert“The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic, and Reflective Judgement,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1996), 549–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold. Erscheinung bei Kant. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews. “Hedonism, Heteronomy, and the Principle of Happiness,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (1989), 42–72.Google Scholar
Rind, Miles. “Kant's Beautiful Roses, a Response to Cohen's ‘Second Problem’,” British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2003), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, Kenneth. Kant's Aesthetic: The Roles of Form and Expression. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1986.Google Scholar
Rush, Fred. “The Harmony of the Faculties,” Kant-Studien 92 (2001), 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Donald. Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. “Pleasure,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supplemental vol. 28 (1954), 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santayana, George. The Sense of Beauty. New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar
Savile, Anthony. Kantian Aesthetics Pursued. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Schaper, Eva. Studies in Kant's Aesthetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Schrader, George. “The Status of Feeling in Kant's Philosophy,” in Pierre Laberge, François Duchesneau, and Bryan, E. Morrisey, eds., Actes du Congrès d'Ottawa sur Kant dans les traditions anglo-américaines et continentales/Proceedings of the Ottawa Congress on Kant in the Anglo-American and Continental Traditions, tenu du 10 au 14 octobre 1974. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1976, 143–64.Google Scholar
Schrader, George“The Status of Teleological Judgment in the Critical Philosophy,” Kant-Studien 45 (1953), 204–35.Google Scholar
Searle, John. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, Susan. The Embodiment of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip. “Preforming the Categories: Eighteenth Century Generation Theory and the Biological Roots of the A Priori,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2002), 229–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smit, Houston. “The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1999), 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stecker, Robert. “Free Beauty, Dependent Beauty, and Art,” Journal of Aesthetic Education 21 (1987), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F.The Bounds of Sense. London: Routledge, 1966.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. The Explanation of Behaviour. London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul, 1964.Google Scholar
Tüschling, B. “The System of Transcendental Idealism: Questions Raised and Left Open in the Kritik der Urteilskraft,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 supplement (1991), 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall. “Categories of Art,” Philosophical Review 79 (1970), 334–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel. “Kant's Dynamics,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Kant's Justification of the Laws of Mechanics,” in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, ed. Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1997), 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, David. “Response to Richard Wollheim,” Ratio 20 (1978), 52–68.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J. J.The History of Ancient Art Among the Greeks, tr. G. Henry Lodge. London: John Chapman, 1850.Google Scholar
Wohlfart, Günther. “Transzendentale Ästhetik und kritischer Ästhetik,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 36 (1982), 64–76.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “An Engagement with Kant's Theory of Beauty,” in Meerbote, Ralf and Hudson, Hud, eds., Kant's Aesthetics. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1991, 105–27.Google Scholar
Wright, Larry. “Functions,” Philosophical Review 82 (1973), 139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wubnig, J. “The Epigenesis of Pure Reason,” Kant-Studien 60 (1968–9), 147–52.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. The Genesis of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zanetti, Véronique. “Die Antinomie der teleologischen Urteilskraft,” Kant-Studien 84 (1993), 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangwill, Nick. “Kant on Pleasure in the Agreeable,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1995), 167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumbach, Clark. The Transcendent Science: Kant's Conception of Biological Methodology. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography of works cited
  • Rachel Zuckert, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: Kant on Beauty and Biology
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487323.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography of works cited
  • Rachel Zuckert, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: Kant on Beauty and Biology
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487323.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography of works cited
  • Rachel Zuckert, Northwestern University, Illinois
  • Book: Kant on Beauty and Biology
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487323.013
Available formats
×