Book contents
- Kant on Pleasure and Judgment
- Kant on Pleasure and Judgment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Early Reception of the Third Critique
- 2 The Completion of the System of the Powers of the Mind, 1770–1790
- 3 Kant’s Theory of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure (I)
- 4 Kant’s Theory of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure (II)
- 5 Consequences of the Theory
- 6 The Principle(s) of the Power of Judgment
- 7 The Interest of the Reflecting Power of Judgment and the Deduction of Judgments of Taste
- 8 The Imagination in Its Freedom
- 9 The Transition from Nature to Freedom
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2024
Book contents
- Kant on Pleasure and Judgment
- Kant on Pleasure and Judgment
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Early Reception of the Third Critique
- 2 The Completion of the System of the Powers of the Mind, 1770–1790
- 3 Kant’s Theory of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure (I)
- 4 Kant’s Theory of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure (II)
- 5 Consequences of the Theory
- 6 The Principle(s) of the Power of Judgment
- 7 The Interest of the Reflecting Power of Judgment and the Deduction of Judgments of Taste
- 8 The Imagination in Its Freedom
- 9 The Transition from Nature to Freedom
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant on Pleasure and JudgmentA Developmental and Interpretive Account, pp. 213 - 222Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Primary Sources
Kant, Immanuel (1900–): Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie Ausgabe). Berlin: Reimer, later deGruyter.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Guyer, P./Wood, A. (general editors). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992–.Google Scholar
Lectures on Logic. Young, J. M. (ed., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.Google Scholar
Opus Postumum. Foerster, E./Rosen, M. (eds., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.Google Scholar
Practical Philosophy. Gregor, M. (ed., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.Google Scholar
Religion and Rational Theology. Wood, A./diGiovanni, G. (eds., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.Google Scholar
Lectures on Ethics. Heath, P./Schneewind, J. (eds., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.Google Scholar
Lectures on Metaphysics. Ameriks, K./Naragon, S. (eds., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.Google Scholar
Critique of Pure Reason. Guyer, P./Wood, A. (eds., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.Google Scholar
Critique of the Power of Judgment. Guyer, P./Matthews, E. (eds., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000.Google Scholar
Notes and Fragments. Guyer, P. (ed.), C. Bowman et al. (transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1792): “Vergleichung des Baumgartenschen und Kantischen Begriffs der Schönheit.” Neue Bibliothek der schönen Wissenschaften und der freyen Künste 46, 163–91.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander (1735 [1954]): Reflections on Poetry. Aschenbrenner, K./Holther, W. (eds., transl.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander (1783): Metaphysik. Transl. Meier, G. F.. 2nd ed. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Boileau-Despréaux, Nicolas (1674 [1970]): L’art poetique. Buck, A. (ed.). Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August (1767): Anweisung vernünftig zu leben. 3rd ed. Leipzig: Gleditsch.Google Scholar
De Pouilly, Louis Jean Lévesque (1751): Theorie der angenehmen Empfindungen …. F. J. Biel (transl.). Leipzig: Wendler.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1985): The Passions of the Soul. In: Descartes, , Philosophical Writings. Vol. 1. J. Cottingham et al. (transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 326–404.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1991): Philosophical Writings. Vol. 3. J. Cottingham et al. (transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dubos, Jean-Baptiste (1748): Critical Reflections on Poetry, Painting and Music. 5th ed. Transl. Th. Nugent. 3 vols. London: John Nourse.Google Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August (1786): Theorie der schönen Wissenschaften. 2nd ed. Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Eberhard, Johann August (1791): “Einige Anmerkungen über die Recension meiner Theorie der schönen Künste und Wissenschaften in der Allg. Litt. Zeit.” Philosophisches Magazin 4, 148–70.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1962): “Versuch eines erklärenden Auszugs aus Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft.” In: Nachgelassene Schriften 1780–1791 (Gesamtausgabe, vol. II.1, Lauth, R. et al. [eds.]) Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Fromann-Holzboog, 319–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garve, Christian (1779): “Versuch über die Prüfung der Fähigkeiten.” In: Gesammelte Werke. Vol. I.5. Wölfel, K. (ed.). Hildesheim: Olms, 8–115.Google Scholar
Gellert, Christian Fürchtegott (1774): “Wie weit sich der Nutzen der Regeln in der Beredsamkeit und Poesie erstrecke.” In: Gellerts Abhandlungen und Reden. Karlsruhe: Schmieder, 154–86.Google Scholar
Gerard, Alexander (1774 [1966]): An Essay on Genius. Fabian, B. (ed.). Munich: Fink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottsched, Johann Christoph (1730 [1962]): Versuch einer Critischen Dichtkunst …. Darmstadt: WBG.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg (1965): Briefwechsel. Vol. 5. Henkel, A. (ed.). Frankfurt: Insel.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried (1775 [1887]): “Ursachen des gesunknen Geschmacks bei den verschiednen Völkern, da er geblühet.” In: Sämmtliche Werke. Vol. 5. Suphan, B. (ed.). Berlin: Weidmann, 599–655.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2004): An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Leidhold, W. (ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Kames, Henry Home (1785 [2005]): Elements of Criticism. Vol. 1., 6th ed. Jones, P. (ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1860): Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff. Gerhardt, C. I. (ed.). Halle: H. W. Schmidt.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1966): Theodicy. Allen, D. (ed.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1981): New Essays on Human Understanding. Remnant, P./Bennet, J. (eds., transl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1989): Philosophical Essays. Ariew, R./Garber, D. (eds.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de (1750): Versuch in der moralischen Weltweisheit, übersetzt aus dem Französischen des Herrn von Maupertuis. Halle: Gebauer.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (1744): Theoretische Lehre von den Gemütsbewegungen überhaupt. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (1754): Anfangsgründe aller schönen Wissenschaften. 3 vols. Halle: Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1755 [1971]): Über die Empfindungen. In: Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. Vol. 1. Bamberger, F. et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Frommann, 41–123.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1757 [1971]): Über die Hauptgrundsätze der schönen Wissenschaften und Künste. In: Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. Vol. 1. Bamberger, F. et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Frommann, 425–52.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1764 [1971]): Abhandlung über die Evidenz in Metaphysischen Wissenschaften. In: Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. Vol. 2. Bamberger, F. et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Frommann, 267–330.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1770? [1971]): “Bemerkungen zu den ‘Philosophischen Schriften,’ 1761.” In: Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. Vol.1. Bamberger, F. et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Frommann, 223–26.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1771 [1971]): Über die Empfindungen. In: Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. Vol. 1. Bamberger, F. et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Frommann, 233–334.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1771a [1971]): “Rhapsodie oder Zusätze zu den Briefen ….” In: Gesammelte Schriften. Jubiläumsausgabe. Vol.1. Bamberger, F. et al. (eds.). Stuttgart: Frommann, 381–424.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm (1788 [1975]): “Rezension der ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft’.” In: Materialien zu Kants “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft.” Bittner, R. et al. (eds). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 179–96.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Andreas (1721): Anweisung zu der Zufriedenheit der menschlichen Seele …. Leipzig: Coerner.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich (1992): Briefwechsel. Schillers Briefe 1. 3. 1790 – 17. 5. 1794 (= Schillers Werke. Nationalausgabe, Vol. 26). Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm (1989): “Vorlesungen über schöne Literatur und Kunst.” In: Vorlesungen über Ästhetik I. Behler, E. (ed.). Paderborn: Schöningh, 179–472.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich (1797): “Über das Studium der griechischen Poesie.” In: Schriften zur Literatur. Rasch, W. (ed.). München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 84–192.Google Scholar
Sulzer, Johann Georg (1771): Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Sulzer, Johann Georg (1774): Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Tetens, Johann Nicolas (1777 [1913]): Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwickelung. Vol.1. Reprint. Berlin: Kantgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1751): Vernünfftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen. Halle: Renger.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry (1990): Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (1996): Idealism and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2001): Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2003): “Reply to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg.” Inquiry 46, 182–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2004): Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2020): Kant’s Conception of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William P. (1967): “Pleasure.” In: Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 6. London: Macmillan, 341–47.Google Scholar
Altmann, Alexander (1969): Moses Mendelssohns Frühschriften zur Metaphysik. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2003): Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2012): Kant’s Elliptical Path. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier (2015): The Poverty of Conceptual Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Anonymous] (1790): [Review of J. A. Eberhard, Theorie der schönen Künste und Wissenschaften, 3rd ed.] Allgemeine Litteratur-Zeitung 344, 778–84.Google Scholar
Aydede, Murat (2000): “An Analysis of Pleasure vis-à-vis Pain.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61, 537–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydede, Murat (2018): “A Contemporary Account of Sensory Pleasure.” In: Pleasure. A History. Shapiro, L. (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239–66.Google Scholar
Bayerer, Wolfgang (1968): “Bemerkungen zu einer vergessenen Reflexion Kants über das Gefühl der Lust und Unlust.” Kant-Studien 59, 266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1960): A Commentary on Kant’s “Critique of Practical Reason.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (1987): The Fate of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (2005): Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (2006): “Moral Faith and the Highest Good.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Guyer, P. (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 588–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (2009): Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard (1989): “Analytic/Dialectic.” In: Reading Kant. Schaper, E./Vossenkuhl, W. (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 179–95.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard (1979): A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchenau, Stefanie (2013): The Founding of Aesthetics in the German Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, Malcolm (2001): “The Pure Judgment of Taste as an Aesthetic Reflective Judgment.” British Journal of Aesthetics 41, 247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, Malcolm (2002): The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caranti, Luigi (2005): “Logical Purposiveness and the Principle of Taste.” Kant-Studien 96, 364–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2007): “Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85, 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, Robert (2009): The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, Robert (2023): The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2017): “Kant on Beauty and Cognition.” In: Thinking about Science and Reflecting on Art. Bueno, O. et al. (eds.). London: Routledge, 140–54.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2018): “Rational Feelings.” In: Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Sorensen, K./Williamson, D. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ted (1993): “The Relation of Pleasure and Judgment in Kant’s Aesthetics.” In: Kant and Critique. New Essays in Honor of W.H. Werkmeister. Dancy, R. M. (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 117–24.Google Scholar
Crawford, Donald W. (1982): “Kant’s Theory of Creative Imagination.” In: Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics. Cohen, T./Guyer, P. (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 151–78.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George (2005): Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobe, Jennifer (2018): “Kant’s A Priori Principle of Judgments of Taste.” In: Freedom and Spontaneity in Kant. Moran, K. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 68–88.Google Scholar
Dumouchel, Daniel (1994): “La découverte de la faculté de juger réflechissante.” Kant-Studien 85, 419–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey (2016): “Spontaneity before the Critical Turn.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 54, 625–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, R. K. (1968): “The Unity of Kant’s ‘Critique of Aesthetic Judgement’.” British Journal of Aesthetics 8, 244–59.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2007): “Kant on the Agreeable and the Good.” In Moral Psychology. Tenenbaum, S. (ed.). Amsterdam: Rodopoi, 111–60.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2010): “The ‘Triebfeder’ of Pure Practical Reason.” In: Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide. Reath, A./Timmermann, J. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbianelli, Faustino (2004): “Einleitung.” In: K. L. Reinhold, Beiträge zur Berichtigung bisheriger Missverständisse der Philosophen. Vol. 2. Fabbianelli, K. L. (ed.). Hamburg: Meiner, ix–ciii.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich (1790): [Review of KU]. Göttingische Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen 114, 1137–47.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich (1791): “Kant’s Critik der Urtheilskraft.” Philosophische Bibliothek 4, 180–94.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart (2000): Kant’s Final Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart (2008): “Von der Eigentümlichkeit unseres Verstandes in Ansehung der Urteilskraft.” In: Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Höffe, O. (ed.). Berlin: Akademie, 259–74.Google Scholar
Fricke, Christel (1990): Kants Theorie des reinen Geschmacksurteils. Berlin: deGruyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992): “Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Guyer, P. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161–99.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992a): Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2014): Kant’s Empirical Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2018): “‘A New Sort of A Priori Principles.’ Psychological Taxonomies and the Origin of the Third Critique.” In: Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Sorensen, K./Williamson, D. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–29.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido (2022): Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (1990): The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2017): “In Defense of the One-Act View: Reply to Guyer.” British Journal of Aesthetics 57, 421–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2018): “Why Must We Presuppose the Systematicity of Nature?” In: Kant and Laws. Breitenbach, A./Massimi, M. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giordanetti, Piero (1999): “Kants Entdeckung der Apriorität des Geschmacksurteils.” In: Aufklärung und Interpretation. Klemme, H. et al. (eds.). Würzburg: Königshausen, 171–96.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1993): Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1997): Kant and the Claims of Taste. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2005a): Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2008): “The Psychology of Kant’s Aesthetics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39, 483–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guyer, Paul (2014): A History of Modern Aesthetics. Vol.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2014a): “Freedom, Happiness, and Nature: Kant’s Moral Teleology.” In: Kant’s Theory of Biology. Goy, I./Watkins, E. (eds.). Berlin: deGruyter, 221–37.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2017): “One Act or Two? Hannah Ginsborg on Aesthetic Judgment.” British Journal of Aesthetics 57, 407–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2018): “What Is It Like to Experience the Beautiful and Sublime?” In: Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Sorensen, K./Williamson, D. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–65.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2020): Reason and Experience in Mendelssohn and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathwood, Christopher (2007): “The Reduction of Sensory Pleasure to Desire.” Philosophical Studies 133, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1960): “Der Begriff der sittlichen Einsicht und Kants Lehre vom Faktum der Vernunft.” In: Die Gegenwart der Griechen. Henrich, et al. (eds.). Tübingen: Mohr, 77–115.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1963 [1984]): “Ethik der Autonomie.” In: Selbstverhältnisse. Stuttgart: Reclam, 6–56.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1992): Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hogrebe, Wolfram (1992 [1981]): “Die ursprüngliche Lust der Prädikation.” In: Metaphysik und Mantik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 73–79.Google Scholar
Horstmann, Rolf Peter (2018): Kant’s Power of Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalkar, Brent (2006): The Demands of Taste in Kant’s Aesthetics. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (1998): “Kant on the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason.” Review of Metaphysics 52, 500–28.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner (2006): “Bibliography.” In: Kant, , Kritik der Urteilskraft. Klemme, H. (ed.). Hamburg: Meiner, 557–86.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner (2010): “The Origin and Aim of Kant’s ‘Critique of Practical Reason.’” In: Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide. Reath, A./Timmermann, J. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (2004): “Einleitung.” In: Immanuel Kant Vorlesung über die Moralphilosophie. Stark, W. (ed.). Berlin: deGruyter, vii–xxxv.Google Scholar
Kuhlenkampff, Jens (1978): Kants Logik des ästhetischen Urteils. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
La Rocca, Claudio (2012): “Von den regulativen Funktionen des Urteilskraftprinzips.” In: Worauf die Vernunft hinaussieht …. B. Dörflinger et al. (eds.). Hildesheim: Olms, 13–29.Google Scholar
Lin, Eden (2020): “Attitudinal and Phenomenological Theories of Pleasure.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100, 510–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Beatrice (1998): Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Beatrice (2003): “Kant’s Theory of Judgment and Judgments of Taste.” Inquiry 46, 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Beatrice (2005): Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, Bernd (2010): “Die ‘consequente Denkungsart der speculativen Kritik’. Kants radikale Umgestaltung seiner Freiheitlehre im Jahre 1786….” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58, 595–628.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf (1990): Imagination and Interpretation in Kant. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marc-Wogau, Konrad (1938): Vier Studien zu Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Uppsala: Lundequistka.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha (2013): “The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetic Ideas.” British Journal of Aesthetics 53, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAndrew, Matthew (2021): “Three Kantian Accounts of Concept Formation.” Kant-Studien 112, 159–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellin, G. S. A. (1798): “Dunkelheit.” In: Encyclopädisches Wörterbuch der kritischen Philosophie. Vol. 2. Züllichau/Leipzig: Frommann, 156–75.Google Scholar
Menke, Christoph (2008): Kraft. Ein Grundbegriff ästhetischer Anthropologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa M. (2014): “Kant on the Pleasures of Understanding.” In: Kant on Emotion and Value. Cohen, A. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 126–45.Google Scholar
Morrisson, Iain (2008): Kant and the Role of Pleasure in Moral Action. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Pollok, Anne (2018): “Beautiful Perception and Its Object. Mendelssohn’s Theory of Mixed Sentiments Reconsidered.” Kant-Studien 109, 207–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2006): “Von der Transzendentalphilosophie zum Vergnügen.” In: Die Vollendung der Transzendentalphilosophie in Kants “Kritik der Urteilskraft.” R. Hiltscher et al. (eds.). Berlin: Duncker&Humblot.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2017): Kant’s Theory of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold (1981): “Kants Theorie der ästhetischen Einstellung.” Dialectica 35, 266–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puls, Heiko (2016): Sittliches Bewusstsein und Kategorischer Imperativ in Kants “Grundlegung.” Berlin: deGruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews (2006): Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxfored University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicke, Rudolph (1889): Lose Blätter aus Kants Nachlass. Erstes Heft. Königsberg: Beyer.Google Scholar
Rind, Miles (2002): “Can Kant’s Deduction of Judgments of Taste Be Saved?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84, 20–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, Kenneth (2008): The Problem of Free Play in Kant’s Aesthetics. City University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rueger, Alexander (2008): “The Free Play of the Faculties and the Status of Natural Beauty in Kant’s Theory of Taste.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90, 298–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, Alexander (2008a): “Beautiful Surfaces: Kant on Free and Adherent Beauty in Nature and Art.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 16, 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, Alexander (2009): “Enjoying the Unbeautiful: From Mendelssohn’s Theory of ‘Mixed Sentiments’ to Kant’s Aesthetic Judgments of Reflection.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67, 181–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, Alexander (2011): “Aesthetics.” In: Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Clarke, D./Wilson, C. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–23.Google Scholar
Rueger, Alexander (2018): “Pleasure and Purpose in Kant’s Theory of Taste.” Kant- Studien 109, 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, Alexander (2018a): “Kant on Beauty and Morality c. 1784.” In: Proceedings of the XII. International Kant Congress (ed. Waibel, V. et al.). Vol. 4. Berlin: deGruyter, 3063–70.Google Scholar
Rueger, Alexander (2020): “Kant on Feelings and Sensations and the Gap between Rationality and Morality.” Kantian Review 25, 125–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, Alexander/Şahan, Evren (2005): “The Role of Symbolic Presentation in Kant’s Theory of Taste.” British Journal of Aesthetics 45, 228–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlösser, Ulrich (2013): “Concept Formation, Synthesis, and Judgment.” In: Self, World, and Art. Emundts, D. (ed.). Berlin: de Gruyter, 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Jochen (1985): Die Geschichte des Genie-Gedankens in der deutschen Literatur, Philosophie und Politik 1750–1945. Vol.1. Darmstadt: WBG.Google Scholar
Schulze, Gottlieb Ernst (1793): [Review of KU] Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek 115, 398–426.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens (1995): Das Problem des Glücks im Denken Christian Wolffs. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld (2003): “Kant’s ‘True Economy of Human Nature.’” In: Essays on Kant’s Anthroplogy. Jacobs, B. et al. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 194–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teufel, Thomas (2011): “Kant’s Non-teleological Conception of Purposiveness.” Kant-Studien 102, 232–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio (1966): “Kant’s Early Theory of Genius.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 4, 109–31, 209–24.Google Scholar
Tuna, Emine Hande (2016): “A Kantian Hybrid Theory of Art Criticism: A Particularist Appeal to the Generalists.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74, 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogelmann, Rafael G. (2018): “Can We Make Sense of Free Harmony?” Studia Kantiana 16, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, Wolfgang (2001): Urteil und Gefühl. Kants Theorie der Urteilskraft. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2010): “The Primacy of Practical Reason and the Idea of a Practical Postulate.” In: Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide. Reath, A./Timmermann, J. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–96.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2018): Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jessica (2022): “Attention and the Free Play of the Faculties.” Kantian Review 27, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1880): Die Blüthezeit der deutschen Philosophie. (Geschichte der neueren Philosophie, vol. 2.) Leipzig: Breitkopf&Härtel.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael (1995): Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Frankfurt: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfsdorf, David (2013): Pleasure in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999): Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuerth, Julian (2014): Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, John H. (1992): The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zelle, Carsten (1987): “Angenehmes Grauen.” Literaturhistorische Beiträge zur Ästhetik des Schreckens im 18. Jahrhundert. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa (2014): “Kant and the Pleasure of ‘Mere Reflection.’” Inquiry 55, 433–53.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2007): Kant on Beauty and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2007a): “Kant’s Rationalist Aesthetics.” Kant Studien 98, 443–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar