Secondary Sources
Allison, H. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Allison, H. (1996). On the Presumed Gap in the Derivation of the Imperative, Categorical. In Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Allison, H. (2011). Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aune, B. (1980). Kant’s Theory of Morals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Baron, M. (1984). The Alleged Moral Repugnance of Acting from Duty. Journal of Philosophy 81(4): 197–220.
Baron, M. (1995). Kantian Ethics (Almost) without Apology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Baron, M. (2008). Virtue Ethics, Kantian Ethics, and the “One Thought Too Many” Objection. In Betzler, M. (ed.), Kant’s Ethics of Virtues. Berlin: DeGruyter.
Baxley, A. (2010). Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dean, R. (2006). The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Engstrom, S. (1992). The Concept of the Highest Good in Kant’s Moral Theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 747–780.
Formosa, P. and Sticker, M. (2019). Kant and the Demandingness of the Duty of Beneficence. European Journal of Philosophy 27: 625–642.
Gaut, B. and Kerstein, S. (1999). The Derivation without the Gap: Rethinking Groundwork I. Kantian Review 3: 18–40.
Glasgow, J. (2003). Expanding the Limits of Universalization. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33: 23–47.
Guyer, P. (1993). Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, P. (1998). The Value of Reason and the Value of Freedom. Ethics 109: 22–35.
Guyer, P. (2002). Ends of Reason and Ends of Nature: The Place of Teleology in Kant’s Ethics. Journal of Value Inquiry 36: 161–186.
Guyer, P. (2007). Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Continuum Press.
Guyer, P. (2019). Kant on the Rationality of Morality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1803/1975). On the Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law. Trans. T. M. Knox. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1821/1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H. B. Nisbet, Ed. Wood, A.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Herman, B. (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hill, T. (1973). The Hypothetical Imperative. Philosophical Review 82: 429–450.
Hill, T. (1992). Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kain, P. (2010) Duties Regarding Animals. In Denis, L. (ed.) Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kleingeld, P. (1995). What Do the Virtuous Hope For? Re-Reading Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good. In Robinson, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Kleingeld, P. (2010). Moral Consciousness and the “Fact of Reason.” In Reath, A. and Timmermann, J. (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kleingeld, P. and Willaschek, M. (2019). Autonomy without Paradox: Kant, Self-Legislation, and the Moral Law. Philosopher’s Imprint 19(6): 1–18.
Kohl, M. (2018). Kant’s Critique of Instrumental Reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99: 489–516.
Korsgaard, K. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, K. (2018). Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Langton, R. (1992). Duty and Desolation. Philosophy 67: 481–505.
Mahon, J. (2003). Kant on Lies, Candour, and Reticence. Kantian Review 7: 102–133.
Mahon, J. (2009). The Truth About Kant on Lies. In Martin, C. (ed.), The Philosophy of Deception. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, A. (2006). How to Argue for the Value of Humanity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87: 96–125.
Mill, J. S. (1867). Utilitarianism. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
O’Neill, O. (1975). Acting on Principle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Papish, L. (2018). Kant’s Revised Account of the Non-Moral Imperatives of Practical Reason. Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5: 289–317.
Paton, H. J. (1971). The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Pistorius, H. A. (1786). Rezension der Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In Bittner, R. and Cramer, K. (eds.), Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Prichard, H. (1912). Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake? Mind 21: 21–37.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. Journal of Philosophy 77(9): 515–572.
Reath, A. (1988). Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 26: 593–619.
Reinholt, K. L. (1792/2005). Letters on the Kantian Philosophy. Trans. J. Hebbeler, Ed. Ameriks, K.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schroeder, M. (2005). The Hypothetical Imperative? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 357–372.
Sidgwick, H. (1874). The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Sticker, M. (2019). A Funeral March for Those Drowning in Shallow Ponds? Imperfect Duties and Emergencies. Kant-Studien 110: 236–255.
Stocker, M. (1976). The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories. The Journal of Philosophy 73(14): 453–466.
Stohr, K. (2011). Kantian Beneficence and the Problem of Obligatory Aid. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8: 45–67.
Timmermann, J. (2005). When the Tail Wags the Dog: Animal Welfare and Indirect Duty in Kantian Ethics. Kantian Review 10: 128–149.
Timmermann, J. (2006). Value without Regress: Kant’s “Formula of Humanity” Revisited. European Journal of Philosophy 14: 69–93.
Timmermann, J. (2007). Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Timmermann, J. (2010). Reversal or Retreat? Kant’s Deductions of Freedom and Morality. In Reath, A. and Timmermann, J. (eds.), Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Timmermann, J. (2018a). Autonomy, Progress, and Virtue: Why Kant Has Nothing to Fear from the Demandingness Objection. Kantian Review 23: 379–397.
Timmermann, J. (2018b). Emerging Autonomy: Dealing with the Inadequacies of the Canon of the Critique of Pure Reason. In Bacin, S. and Sensen, O. (eds.), The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tittel, G. A. (1786). Über Herrn Kants Moralreform. Frankfurt/Leipzig: Pfähler.
Uleman, J. (2010). An Introduction to Kant’s Moral Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Uleman, J. (2016). No King and No Torture: Kant on Suicide and Law. Kantian Review 21: 77–100.
Varden, H. (2020). Kant and Moral Responsibility for Animals. In Allais, L. and Callanan, J. (eds.), Kant on Animals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Velleman, J. D. (1999). Love as a Moral Emotion. Ethics 109: 338–374.
Ware, O. (2017). Kant’s Deductions of Morality and Freedom. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47: 116–147.
Williams, B. (1973). A Critique of Utilitarianism. In Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. (eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. (1981). Persons, Character, and Morality. In Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, A. (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, A. (2013). Kant on Practical Reason. In Timmons, M. and Baiasu, S. (eds.), Kant on Practical Justification: Interpretative Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.