Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:01:29.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Theories as a tool for understanding the complex network of molecular interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

H. Meinhardt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute für Entwicklungsbiologie, Spemannstr. 35, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
Manuel Marí-Beffa
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain
Jennifer Knight
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Development is controlled by a highly complex network of interactions in which nonlinear feedback loops play an important role. Our intuition is not reliable to predict the properties of such complex networks. In many branches of natural science theoretical approaches are an integral part to understand the behaviour of complex systems. In this chapter, using the formation of an organizing region as an example, a theoretical approach will be used to determine what type of interactions allow pattern formation, and how one can formulate a hypothetical interaction into a set of differential equations convenient for computer simulations. Finally, the postulated interaction is compared with known experimental observations.

HOW TO GENERATE AN ORGANIZING REGION

In Chapters 1 and 5 the freshwater polyp hydra was discussed as model organism. The hydra hypostome had long been known to be an organizing region (Browne, 1909, Lehnhoff, 1991). Even after dissociation into individual cells, upon re-aggregation complete animals are formed (Gierer et al., 1972), showing that pattern formation is possible even if the initial situation is more or less uniform. We proposed that pattern formation is accomplished by local self-enhancement and long-ranging antagonistic effects (Gierer and Meinhardt, 1972, Meinhardt, 1982). A simple and molecularly feasible realization would consist of two interacting substances. One substance, called the activator, has an autocatalytic feedback on its own synthesis. It controls the production of the second substance, the inhibitor. The inhibitor spreads more rapidly and suppresses the self-enhancement of the activator.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browne, E. N. (1909). The production of new hydrants in Hydra by insertion of small grafts. J. Exp. Zool., 7, 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buikema, W. J., and Haselkorn, R. (2001). Expression of the Anabaena hetR gene from a copper-regulated promoter leads to heterocyst differentiation under repressing conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 2729–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y., and Schier, A. F. (2002). Lefty proteins are long-range inhibitors of squint-mediated nodal signaling. Curr. Biol., 12, 2124–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cubas, P., and Modolell, J. (1992). The extramacrochaetae gene provides information for sensory organ patterning. EMBO J., 9, 3385–93Google Scholar
Culí, J., and Modolell, J. (1998). Proneural gene self-stimulation in neural precursors – An essential mechanism for sense organ development that is regulated by Notch signaling. Genes Dev., 12, 2036–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gierer, A., Berking, S., Bode, H., David, C. N., Flick, K., Hansmann, G., Schaller, H., and Trenkner, E. (1972). Regeneration of hydra from reaggregated cells. Nature New Biology, 239, 98–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gierer, A., and Meinhardt, H. (1972). A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik, 12, 30–9 (available at http://www.eb.tuebingen.mpg.de/depth/meinhardt/home.html)CrossRef
Hobmayer, B., Rentzsch, F., Kuhn, K., Happel, C. M., Cramer von Laue, C., Snyder, P., Rothbacher, U., and Holstein, T. W. (2000). WNT signalling molecules act in axis formation in the diploblastic metazoan Hydra. Nature, 407, 186–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenhoff, H. M. (1991). Ethel Browne, Hans Spemann and the discovery of the organizer phenomenon. Biol. Bull., 181, 72–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marí-Beffa, M., Celis, J. F., and García-Bellido, A. (1991). Genetic and development analyses of chaetae pattern formation in Drosophila tergites. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol., 200, 132–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinhardt, H. (1976). Morphogenesis of lines and nets. Differentiation, 6, 117–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meinhardt, H. (1982). Models of Biological Pattern Formation. London: Academic Press (available at http://www.eb.tuebingen.mpg.de/depth/meinhardt/home.html)
Meinhardt, H. (1983a). A boundary model for pattern formation in vertebrate limbs. J. Embryol. exp. Morphol., 76, 115–37Google Scholar
Meinhardt, H. (1983b). Cell determination boundaries as organizing regions for secondary embryonic fields. Dev. Biol., 96, 375–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinhardt, H. (1999). Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: Models and mechanisms. J. Cell Sci., 112, 2867–74Google ScholarPubMed
Meinhardt, H. (2001). Organizer and axes formation as a self-organizing process. Int. J. Dev. Biol., 45, 177–88Google ScholarPubMed
Meinhardt, H. (2002). The radial-symmetric hydra and the evolution of the bilateral body plan: An old body became a young brain. BioEssays, 24, 185–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meinhardt, H. (2003). The Algorithmic Beauty of Sea Shells, 3rd ed. Heidelberg, New York: Springer
Meinhardt, H., and Gierer, A. (2000). Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. BioEssays, 22, 753–603.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Technau, U., Lane, C. C., Rentzsch, F., Luft, S., Hobmayer, B., Bode, H. R., and Holstein, T. W. (2000). Parameters of self-organization in Hydra aggregates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 12127–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wasserman, J. D., and Freeman, M. (1998). An autoregulatory cascade of EGF receptor signaling patterns the Drosophila egg. Cell, 95, 355–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1940). Local and general factors in the development of “pattern” in Rhodnius Prolixus. J. exp. Biol. 17, 180–200Google Scholar
Yoon, H. S., and Golden, J. W. (1998). Heterocyst pattern-formation controlled by a diffusible peptide. Science, 282, 935–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×