Book contents
- Frontmatter
- PREFACE
- Contents
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- INDEX TO ABBREVIATIONS
- CHAPTER I INTRODUCTORY
- CHAPTER II DESCENT
- CHAPTER III DEFINITIONS AND HISTORY
- CHAPTER IV TABLES OF CLASSES, PHRATRIES, ETC.
- CHAPTER V PHRATRY NAMES
- CHAPTER VI ORIGIN OF PHRATRIES
- CHAPTER VII CLASS NAMES
- CHAPTER VIII THEORIES OF THE ORIGIN OF CLASSES
- CHAPTER IX KINSHIP TERMS
- CHAPTER X TYPES OF SEXUAL UNIONS
- CHAPTER XI GROUP MARRIAGE AND MORGAN'S THEORIES
- CHAPTER XII GROUP MARRIAGE AND THE TERMS OF RELATIONSHIP
- CHAPTER XIII PIRRAURU
- CHAPTER XIV TEMPORARY UNIONS
- APPENDIX: ANOMALOUS MARRIAGES
- INDEX OF PHRATRY, BLOOD, AND CLASS NAMES
- INDEX OF SUBJECTS
- Plate section
CHAPTER II - DESCENT
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2012
- Frontmatter
- PREFACE
- Contents
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
- INDEX TO ABBREVIATIONS
- CHAPTER I INTRODUCTORY
- CHAPTER II DESCENT
- CHAPTER III DEFINITIONS AND HISTORY
- CHAPTER IV TABLES OF CLASSES, PHRATRIES, ETC.
- CHAPTER V PHRATRY NAMES
- CHAPTER VI ORIGIN OF PHRATRIES
- CHAPTER VII CLASS NAMES
- CHAPTER VIII THEORIES OF THE ORIGIN OF CLASSES
- CHAPTER IX KINSHIP TERMS
- CHAPTER X TYPES OF SEXUAL UNIONS
- CHAPTER XI GROUP MARRIAGE AND MORGAN'S THEORIES
- CHAPTER XII GROUP MARRIAGE AND THE TERMS OF RELATIONSHIP
- CHAPTER XIII PIRRAURU
- CHAPTER XIV TEMPORARY UNIONS
- APPENDIX: ANOMALOUS MARRIAGES
- INDEX OF PHRATRY, BLOOD, AND CLASS NAMES
- INDEX OF SUBJECTS
- Plate section
Summary
In discussions of the origin and evolution of kinship organisations, we are necessarily concerned not only with their forms but also with the rules of descent which regulate membership of them. Until recently the main questions at issue were twofold: (1) the priority or otherwise of female descent; (2) the causes of the transition from one form of descent to another. Of late the question has been raised whether in the beginning hereditary kinship groups existed at all, or whether membership was not rather determined by considerations of an entirely different order. Dr Frazer, who has enunciated this view, maintains that totemism rests on a primitive theory of conception, due to savage ignorance of the facts of procreation. But his theory is based exclusively on the foundation of the beliefs of the Central Australians and seems to neglect more than one important point which goes to show that the Arunta have evolved their totemic system from the more ordinary hereditary form. Whether this be so or not, it is difficult to see how any idea of kinship could arise from such a condition of nescience. If we take the analogous case of the nagual or “individual totem” there seems to be no trace of any belief in the kinship of those who have the same animal as their nagual, but are otherwise bound by no tie of relationship. Yet if Dr Frazer's theory were correct, this is precisely what we ought to find.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kinship Organisations and Group Marriage in Australia , pp. 12 - 28Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010First published in: 1906