References
Alexander, J. (2012). Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Almeder, R. (1992). Blind Realism: An Essay on Human Knowledge and Natural Science. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Alston, W. P. (1989). Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1973). Belief, Truth and Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1978a). Nominalism and Realism (Universals and Scientific Realism vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1978b). A Theory of Universals (Universals and Scientific Realism vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1989). Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (2004). Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge University Press.
Artemov, S. (2008). “The logic of justification.” Review of Symbolic Logic 1: 477–513.
Austin, J. L. (1970). “Other minds,” pp. 71–116 in Philosophical Papers, 2nd edn., ed. by Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. London: Oxford University Press.
Ballantyne, N. (2014). “Does luck have a place in epistemology?” Synthese 191: 1391–1407.
Baumann, P. (2014). “No luck with knowledge? On a dogma of epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89: 523–51.
Baz, A. (2012). “Must philosophers rely on intuitions?” Journal of Philosophy 109: 316–37.
Becker, K. (2012). “Methods and how to individuate them,” pp. 81–97 in The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, ed. by Becker, K. and Black, T.. Cambridge University Press.
Becker, K. and Black, T. (2012). “The resilience of sensitivity,” pp. 1–8 in The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, ed. by Becker, K. and Black, T.. Cambridge University Press.
Beebe, J. R. (2014). “Introduction,” pp. 1–8 in Advances in Experimental Epistemology, ed. by Beebe, J. R.. London: Bloomsbury.
Bernecker, S. (2011). “Keeping track of the Gettier problem.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92: 127–52.
Black, T. (2011). “Modal and anti-luck epistemology,” pp. 187–98 in The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, ed. by Bernecker, S. and Pritchard, D.. New York: Routledge.
Bogardus, T. (2014). “Knowledge under threat.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88: 289–313.
Bogardus, T. and Marxen, C. (2014). “Yes, safety is in danger.” Philosophia 42: 321–34.
Booth, A. R. (2014). “The Gettier illusion, the tripartite analysis, and the Divorce thesis.” Erkenntnis 79: 625–38.
Bradford, G. (2015a). Achievement. Oxford University Press.
Bradford, G. (2015b). “Knowledge, achievement, and manifestation.” Erkenntnis 80: 97–116.
Bradley, B. (2009). Well-Being and Death. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bradley, D. (2014). “A relevant alternatives solution to the bootstrapping and self-knowledge problems.” Journal of Philosophy 111: 379–93.
Buckwalter, W. (2012). “Non-traditional factors in judgments about knowledge.” Philosophy Compass 7: 278–89.
Buckwalter, W. and Stich, S. (2014). “Gender and philosophical intuition,” pp. 307–46 in Experimental Philosophy, vol. 2., ed. by Knobe, J. and Nichols, S.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cappelen, H. (2012). Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford University Press.
Carnap, R. (1950). Logical Foundations of Probability (1962: 2nd edn). University of Chicago Press.
Carrier, L. S. (1993). “The roots of knowledge.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 81–95.
Chalmers, D. J. (2012). Constructing the World. Oxford University Press.
Chisholm, R. M. (1966). Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chisholm, R. M. (1977). Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chisholm, R. M. (1989). Theory of Knowledge, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chudnoff, E. (2011a). “What intuitions are like.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82: 625–54.
Chudnoff, E. (2011b). “What should a theory of knowledge do?” Dialectica 65: 561–79.
Church, I. M. (2010). “Getting ‘lucky’ with Gettier.” European Journal of Philosophy 21: 37–49.
Church, I. M. (2013). “Manifest failure failure: The Gettier problem revived.” Philosophia 41: 171–7.
Cohen, L. J. (1992). An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cohen, S. (1986). “Knowledge and context.” Journal of Philosophy 83: 574–85.
Cohen, S. (1991). “Skepticism, relevance, and relativity,” pp. 17–37 in Dretske and His Critics, ed. by McLaughlin, B. P.. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Cohen, S. and Comesaña, J. (2013). “Williamson on Gettier cases and epistemic logic.” Inquiry 56: 15–29.
Colaço, D., Buckwalter, W., Stich, S., and Machery, E. (2014). “Epistemic intuitions in fake-barn thought experiments.” Episteme 11: 199–212.
Craig, E. (1990). Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
de Almeida, C., and Fett, J. R. (2016). “Defeasibility and gettierization: A reminder.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94: 152–69.
DePaul, M. R., and Ramsey, W., eds. (1998). Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
DeRose, K. (1999). “Contextualism: An explanation and defense,” pp. 187–205 in The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, ed. by Greco, J. and Sosa, E.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
DeRose, K. (2009). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Deutsch, M. (2010). “Intuitions, counter-examples, and experimental philosophy.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1: 447–60.
Deutsch, M. (2015). The Myth of the Intuitive: Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Method. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dougherty, T. (2011). “Fallibilism,” pp. 131–43 in The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, ed. by Bernecker, S. and Pritchard, D.. New York: Routledge.
Dretske, F. I. (1970). “Epistemic operators.” Journal of Philosophy 67: 1007–23.
Dretske, F. I. (1971). “Conclusive reasons.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49: 1–22.
Dretske, F. I. (1997). “So do we know or don’t we?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 407–9.
Dummett, M. (1978). “Truth,” pp. 1–24 in his Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth.
Engel, M. (1992). “Is epistemic luck compatible with knowledge?” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30: 59–75.
Fantl, J., and McGrath, M. (2009). Knowledge in an Uncertain World. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feldman, R. (1985). “Reliability and justification.” The Monist 68: 159–74.
Feldman, R. (1988). “Having evidence,” pp. 83–104 in Philosophical Analysis: A Defense by Example, ed. by Austin, D. F.. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Floridi, L. (2004). “On the logical unsolvability of the Gettier problem.” Synthese 142: 61–79.
Fogelin, R. J. (1994). Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frede, M. (1996). “Aristotle’s rationalism,” pp. 157–73 in Rationality in Greek Thought, ed. by Frede, M. and Striker, G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gallois, A. (2006). “Is knowing having the right to be sure?” pp. 169–81 in Aspects of Knowing: Epistemological Essays, ed. by Hetherington, S.. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Ganeri, J. (forthcoming 2017). “Śrīharṣa’s dissident epistemology: Knowledge as assurance,” in The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy, ed. by Ganeri, J.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gettier, E. L. (1963). “Is justified true belief knowledge?” Analysis 23: 121–3.
Giordani, A. (2013). “A logic of justification and truthmaking.” Review of Symbolic Logic 6: 323–42.
Girle, R. (2009). Modal Logics and Philosophy, 2nd edn. Durham, NC: Acumen.
Glock, H.-J. (2008). What Is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.
Goldman, A. I. (1967). “A causal theory of knowing.” Journal of Philosophy 64: 357–72.
Goldman, A. I. (1976). “Discrimination and perceptual knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 73: 771–91.
Goldman, A. I. (1979). “What is justified belief?” pp. 1–23 in Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology, ed. by Pappas., G. S. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldman, A. I. (1988). “Strong and weak justification,” pp. 51–69 in Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 2: Epistemology, ed. by Tomberlin, J. E.. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
Goldman, A. I. (2012). “Philosophical naturalism and intuitional methodology,” pp. 280–316 in his Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology: Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greco, J. (2003). “Knowledge as credit for true belief,” pp. 111–34 in Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, ed. by DePaul, M. and Zagzebski, L.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greco, J. (2010). Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge University Press.
Greco, J. (2012). “A (different) virtue epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85: 1–26.
Greco, J. (2014). “Episteme: Knowledge and understanding,” pp. 285–301 in Virtues and Their Vices, ed. by Timpe, K. and Boyd, C. A.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greenough, P., and Pritchard, D., eds., (2009). Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Gutting, G. (2009). What Philosophers Know: Case Studies in Recent Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Hales, S. D. (forthcoming). “Why every theory of luck is wrong.” Noûs.
Hales, S. D. and Johnson, J. A. (2014). “Luck attributions and cognitive bias.” Metaphilosophy 45: 509–28.
Hannon, M. (2014). “Fallibilism and the value of knowledge.” Synthese 191: 1119–46.
Hannon, M. (1973). Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Heathcote, A. (2006). “Truthmaking and the Gettier problem,” pp. 151–67 in Aspects of Knowing: Epistemological Essays, ed. by Hetherington, S.. Oxford: Elsevier.
Heller, M. (1999). “The proper role for contextualism in an anti-luck epistemology.” Philosophical Perspectives 13: 115–29.
Hetherington, S. (1992). Epistemology’s Paradox: Is a Theory of Knowledge Possible? Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hetherington, S. (1996a). Knowledge Puzzles: An Introduction to Epistemology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Hetherington, S. (1996b). “Gettieristic scepticism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 83–97.
Hetherington, S. (1998). “Actually knowing.” Philosophical Quarterly 48: 453–69.
Hetherington, S. (1999). “Knowing failably.” Journal of Philosophy 96: 565–87.
Hetherington, S. (2001a). Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hetherington, S. (2001b). “A fallibilist and wholly internalist solution to the Gettier problem.” Journal of Philosophical Research 26: 307–24.
Hetherington, S. (2002). “Fallibilism and knowing that one is not dreaming.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32: 83–102.
Hetherington, S. (2007). “Review of Justification without Awareness by M. Bergmann.” Mind 116: 1088–92.
Hetherington, S. (2008). “Not actually Hume’s problem: On induction and knowing-how.” Philosophy 83: 459–81.
Hetherington, S. (2009). “Sceptical possibilities? No worries.” Synthese 168: 97–118.
Hetherington, S. (2010). “Elusive epistemological justification.” Synthese 174: 315–30.
Hetherington, S. (2011a). How to Know: A Practicalist Conception of Knowledge. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hetherington, S. (2011b). “Abnormality and Gettier situations: An explanatory proposal.” Ratio 24: 176–91.
Hetherington, S. (2011c). “The Gettier problem,” pp. 119–30 in The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, ed. by Bernecker, S. and Pritchard, D.. New York: Routledge.
Hetherington, S. (2012). “The Gettier illusion: Gettier-partialism and infallibilism.” Synthese 188: 217–30.
Hetherington, S. (2013). “Concessive knowledge-attributions: Fallibilism and gradualism.” Synthese 190: 2835–51.
Hetherington, S. (2014). “Knowledge can be lucky,” pp. 164–76 in Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 2nd edn., ed. by Steup, M., Turri, J., and Sosa, E.. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hetherington, S. (2016). “Understanding fallible warrant and fallible knowledge: Three proposals.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97: 270–82.
Hetherington, S. (forthcoming). “Skepticism and fallibilism,” in Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present, ed. by Machuca, D. and Reed, B.. London: Bloomsbury.
Howard-Snyder, D., Howard-Snyder, F., and Feit, N. (2003). “Infallibilism and Gettier’s legacy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 304–27.
Ichikawa, J. J., and Jarvis, B. W. (2009). “Thought-experiment intuitions and truth in fiction.” Philosophical Studies 142: 221–46.
Ichikawa, J. J., and Jarvis, B. W. (2013). The Rules of Thought. Oxford University Press.
Jackson, F. (2011). “On Gettier holdouts.” Mind & Language 26: 468–81.
Kaplan, M. (1985). “It’s not what you know that counts.” Journal of Philosophy 82: 350–63.
Kaplan, M. (2006). “If you know, you can”t be wrong,” pp. 180–98 in Epistemology Futures, ed. by Hetherington, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press,.
Kirkham, R. L. (1984). “Does the Gettier problem rest on a mistake?” Mind 93: 501–13.
Kornblith, H. (2002). Knowledge and Its Place in Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kornblith, H. (2006). “Appeals to intuition and the ambition of epistemology,” pp. 10–25 in Epistemology Futures, ed. by Hetherington, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kripke, S. A. (2011). “Nozick on knowledge,” pp. 162–224 in his Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press,.
Kuntz, J.R. and Kuntz, J.R.C. (2011). “Surveying philosophers about philosophical intuition.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2: 643–65.
Kvanvig, J. L. (2012). “Truth-tracking and the value of knowledge,” pp. 101–21 in The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, ed. by Becker, K. and Black, T.. Cambridge University Press.
Kyle, B. G. (2013). “Knowledge as a thick concept: Explaining why the Gettier problem arises.” Philosophical Studies 165: 1–27.
Lackey, J. (2008). “What luck is not.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86: 255–67.
Lehrer, K. (1965). “Knowledge, truth, and evidence.” Analysis 25: 168–75.
Lehrer, K. and Paxson, T. D. (1969). “Knowledge: Undefeated justified true belief.” Journal of Philosophy 66: 225–37.
Lewis, D. (1983). “Introduction,” pp. ix–xi in his Philosophical Papers, Vol. I. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1996). “Elusive knowledge.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 549–67.
Lowy, C. (1978). “Gettier’s notion of justification.” Mind 87: 105–8.
Lycan, W. G. (2006). “On the Gettier problem problem,” pp. 148–68 in Epistemology Futures, ed. by Hetherington., S. Oxford: Clarendon Press,.
MacBride, F. (2014). “Analytic philosophy and its synoptic commission: Towards the epistemic end of days,” pp. 221–36 in Philosophical Traditions (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 74), ed. by O’Hear, A.. Cambridge University Press.
Machery, E., Stich, S., Rose, D., et al. (forthcoming). “Gettier across cultures.” Noûs.
Madison, B. J. C. (2011). “Combating anti anti-luck epistemology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89: 47–58.
Maher, P. (2007). “Explication defended.” Studia Logica 86: 331–41.
Merricks, T. (1995). “Warrant entails truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55: 841–55.
Merricks, T. (1997). “More on warrant’s entailing truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 627–31.
Moon, A. (2012). “Warrant does entail truth.” Synthese 184: 287–97.
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2005). Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nagel, J. (2007). “Epistemic intuitions.” Philosophy Compass 2: 792–819.
Nagel, J. (2012a). “Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case method in epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85: 495–527.
Nagel, J. (2012b). “Mindreading in Gettier cases and skeptical pressure cases,” pp. 171–91 in Knowledge Ascriptions, ed. by Brown, J. and Gerken, M.. Oxford University Press.
Nagel, J., San Juan, V., and Mar, R. A. (2013a). “Lay denial of knowledge for justified true beliefs.” Cognition 129: 652–61.
Nagel, J., San Juan, V., and Mar, R. A. (2013b). “Authentic Gettier cases: A reply to Starmans and Friedman.” Cognition 129: 666–9.
Neta, R. (forthcoming). “Basing = treating.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Napier, S. (2008). Virtue Epistemology: Motivation and Knowledge. London: Continuum.
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Olsson, E. J. (2015). “Gettier and the method of explication: A 60 year old solution to a 50 year old problem.” Philosophical Studies 172: 57–72.
Plantinga, A. (1993a). Warrant: The Current Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A. (1993b). Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A. (1996). “Respondeo,” pp. 307–78 in Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga’s Theory of Knowledge, ed. by Kvanvig, J. L.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Pollock, J. L. (1986). Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Pritchard, D. (2005). Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pritchard, D. (2007). “Anti-luck epistemology.” Synthese 158: 277–97.
Pritchard, D. (2009). Knowledge. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pritchard, D. (2014a). “Epistemic luck, safety, and assertion,” pp. 155–72 in Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion, ed. by Littlejohn, C. and Turri, J.. Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. (2014b). “Knowledge cannot be lucky,” pp. 152–64 in Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 2nd edn., ed. by Steup, M., Turri, J., and Sosa, E.. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Pritchard, D. (2015). “Anti-luck epistemology and the Gettier problem.” Philosophical Studies 172: 93–111.
Reed, B. (2000). “Accidental truth and accidental justification.” Philosophical Quarterly 50: 57–67.
Reed, B. (2002). “How to think about fallibilism.” Philosophical Studies 107: 143–57.
Reed, B. (2009). “A new argument for skepticism.” Philosophical Studies 142: 91–104.
Reed, B. (2012). “Fallibilism.” Philosophy Compass 7(9): 585–96.
Rescher, N. (1995). Luck: The Brilliant Randomness of Everyday Life. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Riggs, W. D. (2009). “Luck, knowledge, and control,” pp. 204–21 in Epistemic Value, ed. by Haddock, A., Millar, A., and Pritchard, D.. Oxford University Press.
Riggs, W. D. (2014). “Luck, knowledge, and ‘mere coincidence’.” Metaphilosophy 45: 627–39.
Roush, S. (2005). Tracking Truth: Knowledge, Evidence, and Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Roush, S. (2012). “Sensitivity and closure,” pp. 242–68 in The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, ed. by Becker, K. and Black, T.. Cambridge University Press.
Russell, B. (1948). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: Allen & Unwin.
Sainsbury, M. (1997). “Easy possibilities.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 907–19.
Schafer, K. (2014). “Knowledge and two forms of non-accidental truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89: 373–93.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin.
Shope, R. K. (1983). The Analysis of Knowing: A Decade of Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sinhababu, N., and Williams, J. (2015). “The backward clock, truth-tracking, and safety.” Journal of Philosophy 112: 46–55.
Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Sosa, E. (1999). “How must knowledge be modally related to what is known?” Philosophical Topics 26: 373–84.
Sosa, E. (2007a). A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sosa, E. (2007b). “Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition.” Philosophical Studies 132: 99–107.
Sosa, E. (2011). Knowing Full Well. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Spicer, F. (2006). “Epistemic intuitions and epistemic contextualism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72: 366–85.
Spicer, F. (2008). “Knowledge and the heuristics of folk epistemology,” pp. 354–83 in New Waves in Epistemology, ed. by Hendricks, V. and Pritchard, D.. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stalnaker, R. (2006). “On logics of knowledge and belief.” Philosophical Studies 128: 169–99.
Stalnaker, R. (2012). Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Starmans, C., and Friedman, O. (2012). “The folk conception of knowledge.” Cognition 124: 272–83.
Starmans, C., and Friedman, O. and Friedman, O. (2013). “Taking ‘know’ for an answer: A reply to Nagel, San Juan, and Mar.” Cognition 129: 662–5.
Stich, S., and Buckwalter, W. (2011). “Gender and the philosophy club.” The Philosopher’s Magazine 52: 60–5.
Stone, J. (2013). “‘Unlucky’ Gettier cases.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94: 421–30.
Stoltz, J. (2007). “Gettier and factivity in Indo-Tibetan epistemology.” Philosophical Quarterly 57: 394–415.
Sturgeon, S. (1993). “The Gettier problem.” Analysis 53: 156–64.
Swain, S., Alexander, J., and Weinberg, J. M. (2008). “The instability of philosophical intuitions: Running hot and cold on Truetemp.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76: 138–55.
Turri, J. (2011). “Manifest failure: The Gettier problem solved.” Philosophers’ Imprint 11(8): 1–11.
Turri, J. (2012a). “In Gettier’s wake,” pp. 214–29 in Epistemology: The Key Thinkers, ed. by Hetherington, S.. London: Continuum.
Turri, J. (2012b). “Is knowledge justified true belief?” Synthese 184: 247–59.
Turri, J. (2013). “A conspicuous art: putting Gettier to the test.” Philosophers’ Imprint 13(10): 1–16.
Turri, J. (forthcoming). “Knowledge judgments in ‘Gettier’ cases,” in A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, ed. by Sytsma, J. and Buckwalter, W.. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Turri, J., Buckwalter, W., and Blouw, P. (2015). “Knowledge and luck.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22: 378–90.
Unger, P. (1968). “An analysis of factual knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 65: 157–70.
Vaesen, K., Peterson, M., and van Bezooijen, B. (2013). “The reliability of armchair intuitions.” Metaphilosophy 44: 559–78.
Vance, C. (2014). “Truthmaker theory does not solve the Gettier problem.” Ratio 27: 291–305.
Weatherson, B. (2003). “What good are counterexamples?” Philosophical Studies 115: 1–31.
Weinberg, J. M. (2006). “What’s epistemology for? The case for neopragmatism in normative metaepistemology,” pp. 26–47 in Epistemology Futures, ed. by Hetherington, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Weinberg, J. M., Nichols, S., and Stich, S. (2001). “Normativity and epistemic intuitions.” Philosophical Topics 29: 429–60.
Williams, M. (1991). Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Williamson, T. (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Williamson, T. (2009). “Probability and danger.” Amherst Lecture in Philosophy 4: 1–35.
Williamson, T. (2013). “Gettier cases in epistemic logic.” Inquiry 56: 1–14.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zagzebski, L. (1994). “The inescapability of Gettier problems.” Philosophical Quarterly 44: 65–73.
Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry Into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Zagzebski, L. (1999). “What is knowledge?” pp. 92–116 in The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, ed. by Greco, J. and Sosa, E.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
