Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:42:32.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

16 - Collective action and the right to strike

from Part IV - Collective labour rights

Hugh Collins
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
K. D. Ewing
Affiliation:
King's College London
Aileen McColgan
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter, we consider the legal responses to workplace disputes that lead to strikes or other forms of industrial action. A strike is a withdrawal of labour by a group of workers who are in dispute with their own employer, or sometimes with another employer. The dispute may lead to forms of action other than (or as well as) a strike, such as an overtime ban, working to rule, or refusing to carry out certain tasks – all designed to put pressure on the employer. There are many reasons why workers may feel compelled to act in these ways, sometimes seeking to improve their terms and conditions of employment, with negotiations between the employer and their trade union having failed. At other times, the employer may be seeking to change existing terms and conditions of employment, with the workers fighting to hold onto what they have. In an era of economic austerity and public sector cuts, defensive action of this latter kind is much more common than in the immediate past. But whatever the reason for taking industrial action, the right to strike is often justified as being ‘an essential element in the principle of collective bargaining’, with the importance of the right to strike in the context of collective bargaining being recognised by the European Social Charter. Being the first international treaty expressly to recognise the right to strike, the Social Charter does so ‘with a view to ensuring the effective exercise of the right to bargain collectively’. If workers were unable to strike, they would have no means of pressing their demands or of resisting the pressure of the employer.

Type
Chapter
Information
Labour Law , pp. 656 - 705
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1942
Laski, H. J. 1937
1958
1977
Ewing, K. D.Hendy, J.Days of Action – The Legality of Protest Strikes against Government CutsInstitute of Employment Rights 2011Google Scholar
2003
Ewing, K. D.Hendy, J.Days of Action – The Legality of Protest Strikes against Government CutsInstitute of Employment Rights 2011Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D. 2004
Gernigon, B.Odero, A.Guido, H.ILO Principles Concerning the Right to Strike 1998 137 International Labour Review441Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D.Hendy, J.Days of Action – The Legality of Protest Strikes against Government CutsInstitute of Employment Rights 2011Google Scholar
Gernigon, B.Odero, A.Guido, H.ILO Principles Concerning the Right to Strike 1998 137 International Labour Review441Google Scholar
2008
Gernigon, B.Odero, A.Guido, H.ILO Principles Concerning the Right to Strike 1998 137 International Labour Review458Google Scholar
Gernigon, B.Odero, A.Guido, H.ILO Principles Concerning the Right to Strike 1998 137 International Labour Review460Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D. 2011
2002
2011
2009
Dukes, R.The Right to Strike under UK Law: Not Much More Than a Slogan? 2010 39 Industrial Law Journal82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011
Elias, P. 1994
1853
Deakin, S.Randall, J.Rethinking the Economic Torts 2009 72 Modern Law Review519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedderburn, Lord 1986
Wedderburn, LordIndustrial Relations and the Courts 1980 9 Industrial Law Journal65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, G.Taff Vale and the Trade Disputes Act 1906The Right to Strike: From the Trade Disputes Act 1906 to a Trade Union Freedom Bill 2006Institute of Employment Rights 2007Google Scholar
McIlroy, J.The Belfast Butchers: v. After a Hundred YearsThe Right to Strike: From the Trade Disputes Act 1906 to a Trade Union Freedom Bill 2006Institute of Employment Rights 2007Google Scholar
Carty, H. 2010
Saville, J.The Trade Disputes Act of 1906The Right to Strike: From the Trade Disputes Act 1906 to a Trade Union Freedom Bill 2006Institute of Employment Rights 2007Google Scholar
Simpson, B.The 1906 Act: The Second Fifty YearsThe Right to Strike: From the Trade Disputes Act 1906 to a Trade Union Freedom Bill 2006Institute of Employment Rights 2007Google Scholar
1942
Brodie, D.The Scottish Case – v. The Right to Strike: From the Trade Disputes Act 1906 to a Trade Union Freedom Bill 2006Institute of Employment Rights 2007Google Scholar
Wedderburn, K. W. 1964
Wedderburn, K. W. 1965
Wedderburn, K. W. 1966
Wedderburn, K. W. 1976
Elias, P.Ewing, K. D.Economic Torts – Old Principles and New Liabilities 1982 41 Cambridge Law Journal321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, K. D.Hendy, J.The Dramatic Implications of 2010 39 Industrial Law Journal2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, K. D.Hendy, J.The Right to Strike: From the Trade Disputes Act 1906 to a Trade Union Freedom Bill 2006Institute of Employment Rights 2007Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D. 2012
Simpson, R. C.Trade Dispute and Industrial Dispute in British Labour Law 1977 40 Modern Law Review16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999
1984
Ponsford, D. 2010
2010
2009
2010
Ewing, K. D. 2011
1996
2011
1996
2011
1999
1993
1995
1996
Kahn, P.Lewis, N.Livock, R.Wiles, P. 1983
Wallington, P.Policing the Miners’ Strike 1985 14 Industrial Law Journal145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyddon, D.Smith, P.The 1906 Act: The First Fifty Years – Industrial Relations, Picketing and the Employers’ ChallengeThe Right to Strike: From the Trade Disputes Act 1906 to a Trade Union Freedom Bill 2006Institute of Employment Rights 2007Google Scholar
1906
1967
1983
1989
1982
1985
1961
1965
2010
1979
1979
Ewing, K. D.The Golden Formula – Some Recent Developments 1979 8 Industrial Law Journal133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981
1989
2011
2011
2010
2009
2009
2009
2010
2009
Dukes, R.The Right to Strike under UK Law: Something More than a Slogan? 2011 40 Industrial Law Journal302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, K. D.Hendy, J.Days of Action – The Legality of Protest Strikes against Government CutsInstitute of Employment Rights 2011Google Scholar
2010
2008
2009
2009
Ewing, K. D. 2004

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×