Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T06:29:23.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Criminalising Healthcare Choices

from Section V - Regulating Sexuality and Bodily autonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Celia Wells  and
Oliver Quick
Celia Wells
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Oliver Quick
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

Criminal laws have long had something significant to say about regulating the maternal-fetal conflict. Principally, this has been expressed through provisions in the Offences Against the Person Act 1858 and the Abortion Act 1967. However, scientific and technological advances in the field of reproductive medicine, coupled with shifting expectations and moral attitudes, have prompted the creation of various criminal offences designed to prevent science taking us out of our ethical comfort zone. This takes place at a time when the criminal justice system and healthcare are no longer such strange bedfellows (see Erin and Ost 2007). In this chapter we start by considering the state of the abortion debate today, before moving on to consider criminal law's rather ambivalent attitude to surrogacy and its more clear moral misgivings about cloning. We end by considering the compromises criminal law makes in relation to individual requests for assistance in ending their lives.

Reproductive crimes?

Contraception and abortion

Female sexuality is constructed and regulated through a wide variety of social practices. Significant among these are medical practice and laws on various aspects of reproduction: contraception, abortion, sterilisation and surrogacy arrangements. The use of criminal law as opposed to other forms of regulation appears to be unpredictable, if not arbitrary. Abortion is the clearest and historically best established example of control through criminal powers. Historical evidence shows that abortion has existed in practically all societies (Petchesky 1986).

Type
Chapter
Information
Lacey, Wells and Quick Reconstructing Criminal Law
Text and Materials
 , pp. 596 - 640
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackford, Russell ‘Slippery Slopes to Slippery Slopes: Therapeutic Cloning and the Criminal Law’ (2007) 7:2 The American Journal of Bioethics63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier, MargaretSurrogacy: Review for Health Ministers of Current Arrangements for Payments and Regulation (Cm 4068 1998).
Coggon, John ‘Ignoring the Moral and Intellectual Shape of the Law after Bland: the Unintended Side-effect of a Sorry Compromise’ (2007) 27 Legal Studies110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxtable, RichardEuthanasia, Ethics and the Law: From Conflict to Compromise (Routledge-Cavendish 2007).Google Scholar
Keown, JohnEuthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalisation (Cambridge University Press 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, PenneyAssisted Dying and Legal Change (Oxford University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, RogerAngels of Death: Exploring the Euthanasia Underground (Melbourne University Press 2002).Google Scholar
Seymour, JohnChildbirth and the Law (Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, John and Bois-Pedain, Antje du (eds.) Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice (Hart, 2006).Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis ‘A Defense of Abortion’ (1971) Philosophy and Public Affairs 47.Google Scholar
Tur, Richard ‘Legislative Technique and Human Rights: The Sad Case of Assisted Suicide’ [2003] Criminal Law Review 3.Google Scholar
Warnock, Mary and Macdonald, ElisabethEaseful Death: Is There a Case for Assisted Dying? (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Williams, GlanvilleThe Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law (Stevens 1958).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×