Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T15:13:34.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Maps and Mapping in (Perceptual) Dialect Geography

from Part II - Describing Places

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2017

Chris Montgomery
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Emma Moore
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Language and a Sense of Place
Studies in Language and Region
, pp. 147 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auer, Peter, Hilpert, Martin, Stukenbrock, Anja and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt 2013. ‘Integrating the perspectives on language and space’, in Auer, Peter, Hilpert, Martin, Stukenbrock, Anja and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (eds.) Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives. Berlin: de Gruyter. pp. 118.Google Scholar
Aurrekoetxea, Gotzon, Fernandez-Aguirre, Karmele, Rubio, Jesus, Ruiz, Borja and Sanchez, Jon 2013. ‘“DiaTech”: A new tool for dialectology’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 28: 2330.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 1999. “Geordie nation”: Language and regional identity in the northeast of England. Lore and Language 17(1). 3348.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2009. ‘Enregisterment, commodification, and historical context: “Geordie” versus “Sheffieldish”’. American Speech 84(2). 138–56. doi:10.1215/00031283-2009-012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David 2009. ‘Language and space: The variationist approach’, in Auer, Peter and Schmidt, Jürgen E. (eds.) Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 142–62.Google Scholar
Britain, David 2010. ‘Conceptualisations of geographic space in linguistics’, in Lameli, Alfred, Kehrein, Roland, and Rabanus, Stefan (eds.) Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 2: Language Mapping. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 6997.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, Bermudez, Nancy, Fung, Victor, Edwards, Lisa and Vargas, Rosalva 2007. ‘Hella nor Cal or Totally so Cal? The perceptual dialectology of California’. Journal of English Linguistics 35: 325–52.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, Bermudez, Nancy, Fung, Victor, Vargas, Rosalva and Edwards, Lisa 2008. ‘The normative north and the stigmatized south: Ideology and methodology in the perceptual dialectology of California’. Journal of English Linguistics 36: 6287.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle and Alvanides, Seraphim 2010. ‘Applying Geographical Sampling Methods to Regional Dialectology in North East England’. Paper presented at the 4th Northern Englishes workshop, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, Peter 1998. Dialectology, Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia, Jeon, Lisa, Rector, Patricia C., Tiwari, Chetan and Shelton, Zak 2012. “Texas–It’s Like a Whole Nuther Country”: Mapping Texans’ Perceptions of Dialect Variation in the Lone Star State. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Symposium about Language and Society, Austin.Google Scholar
da Silveira, Luís Espinha 2014. ‘Geographic Information Systems and historical research: An appraisal’. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 8: 2845.Google Scholar
de Vriend, Folkert, Boves, Lou, van Hout, Roeland, and Swanenberg, Jos 2011. ‘Visualization as a research tool for dialect geography using a geo-browser’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26: 1734.Google Scholar
Dieth, Eugen and Orton, Harold. 1952. A questionnaire for a linguistic atlas of England. Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, Literary and Historical Section, Volume VI, Part IX, 605–700. Leeds.Google Scholar
Ellis, Alexander J. 1889. On Early English Pronunciation, Part V: Existing Dialectal as Compared with West Saxon Pronunciation. London: Trübner and Co.Google Scholar
Evans, Betsy E. 2011. ‘“Seattletonian” to “Faux Hick”: Perceptions of English in Washington State’. American Speech 86: 383414.Google Scholar
Evans, Betsy E. 2013. ‘Seattle to Spokane: Mapping perceptions of English in Washington State’. Journal of English Linguistics 41: 268–91.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans 1993. ‘Probleme und Methoden der Dialektometrie: Geolinguistik in globaler Perspektive’, in Viereck, Wolfgang (ed.) Proceedings of the International Congress of Dialectologists 1. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. pp. 3781.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans 2011. ‘Dialectometry and quantitative mapping’, in Lameli, Alfred, Kehrein, Roland, and Rabanus, Stefan (eds.) Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 2: Language Mapping. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 433–57.Google Scholar
Gregory, Ian N and Hardie, Andrew 2011. ‘Visual GISting: Bringing together corpus linguistics and Geographical Information Systems’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26: 297314.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack 2014. ‘A comparison of statistical methods for the aggregation of regional linguistic variation’, in Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Wälchli, Bernhard (eds.) Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis: Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 5388.Google Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Guo, Diansheng, Kasakoff, Alice, and Nini, Andrea 2014. ‘Big-data Dialectology: Analyzing Lexical Spread in a Multi-billion Word Corpus of American English’. Paper presented at the AACL 2014, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert and Nerbonne, John 2013. ‘Dialectometry’, in Hiskens, Frans and Taelderman, Johan (eds.) Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Volume III: Dutch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 624–46.Google Scholar
Heywood, Ian, Cornelius, Sarah, and Carver, Steve 2006. An Introduction to Geographical Information Systems, 3rd edn. Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jessop, Martyn 2007. ‘The inhibition of geographical information in digital humanities scholarship’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 23: 3950.Google Scholar
Kirk, John M. and Kretzschmar, William A. 1992. ‘Interactive linguistic mapping of dialect features’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 7: 168 –75.Google Scholar
Kolb, Eduard 1966. Phonological Atlas of the Northern Region: The Six Northern Counties, North Lincolnshire and the Isle of Man. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, and Boberg, Charles 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change: A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Deanna and Kretzschmar, William A. 1996. ‘Mapping with numbers’. Journal of English Linguistics 24: 343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Daniel 1999. ‘Geographical perception of Japanese dialect regions’, in Preston, Dennis R. (ed.) Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 177–98.Google Scholar
Long, Daniel and Yim, Young-Cheol 2002. ‘Regional differences in the perception of Korean dialects’, in Preston, Dennis R. (ed.) Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 249–75.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald 1985. ‘Linguistic maps: Visual aid or abstract art?’, in Kirk, John M., Sanderson, Stewart, and Widdowson, John D. A. (eds.) Studies in Linguistic Geography. London: Croom Helm. pp. 172–86.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I. 1983. ‘Retrospect’. Journal of English Linguistics 16: 4754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monmonier, Mark 1991. How to Lie with Maps. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris 2007. ‘Northern English dialects: A Perceptual Approach’. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris 2012. ‘The effect of proximity in perceptual dialectology’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16: 638–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Chris 2014. ‘Perceptual ideology across the Scottish-English border’, in Watt, Dominic and Carmen, Llamas (eds.) Language, Borders and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 118–36.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris and Beal, Joan C. 2011. ‘Perceptual dialectology’, in Maguire, Warren and McMahon, April (eds.) Analysing Variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 121–48.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris and Stoeckle, Philipp 2013. ‘Geographic information systems and perceptual dialectology: A method for processing draw-a-map data’. Journal of Linguistic Geography 1: 5285.Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John 2010. ‘Mapping aggregate variation’, in Lameli, Alfred, Kehrein, Roland, and Rabanus, Stefan (eds.) Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 2: Language Mapping. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 476–95.Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John and Kretzschmar, William 2003. ‘Introducing computation techniques in dialectometry’. Computers and the Humanities 37: 245–55.Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John and Kretzschmar, William 2006. ‘Progress in dialectometry: Toward explanation’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21: 387–97.Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John and Kretzschmar, William 2013. ‘Dialectometry++’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 28: 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, John, Colen, Rinke, Gooskens, Charlotte, Kleiweg, Peter and Leinone, Therese 2011. ‘GabMap: A web application for dialectometry’. Dialectología Special Issue 2: 6589.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna 2013. ‘The vertical archipelago: Adding the third dimension to linguistic geography’, in Auer, Peter and Schmidt, Jürgen E. (eds.). Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 3860.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. 2011. Special Workplace Statistics - LAD Level. ESRC/JISC Census Programme, Census Interaction Data Service, University of Leeds and University of St. Andrews. https://wicid.ukdataservice.ac.uk/ (1 July, 2015).Google Scholar
Onishi, Isao and Long, Daniel 1997. Perceptual Dialectology Quantifier (PDQ) for Windows. http://nihongo.hum.tmu.ac.jp/~long/maps/perceptmaps.htm. (15 February, 2017).Google Scholar
Orton, Harold 1962. Survey of English Dialects: Introduction. Leeds: Edward Arnold and Sons Limited.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold and Barry, Michael V. 1969. Survey of English Dialects: Volume II, The West Midland Counties, Part 1. Leeds: Edward Arnold and Sons Limited.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold and Wright, Nathalia 1974. A Word Geography of England. London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold, Sanderson, Stewart and Widdowson, John D. A. (eds.) 1978. The Linguistic Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1982. ‘Perceptual dialectology: Mental maps of United States dialects from a Hawaiian perspective’. Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 549.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual Dialectology: Non-Linguists’ View of Aerial Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1999. ‘Introduction’. Preston, Dennis R. (ed.) Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. xxiiixxxix.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2002. ‘Language with an attitude’, in Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 4066.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. and Howe, George M.. 1987. ‘Computerized studies of mental dialect maps’, in Denning, Keith M., Inkelas, Sharon, McNair-Knox, Faye, and Rickford, John (eds.) 1987. Variation in Language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Stanford: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University. pp. 361–78.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Séguy, Jean 1973. ‘La Dialectométrie dans l’Atlas linguistique de la Gascogne’. Société de linguistique romane 73: 124.Google Scholar
Stoeckle, Philipp 2012. ‘The folk linguistic construction of local dialect areas: Linguistic and extra-linguistic factors’, in Hansen, Sandra, Schwarz, Christian, Stoeckle, Philipp, and Streck, Tobias, (eds.) Dialectological and Folk Dialectological Concepts of Space: Current Methods and Perspectives in Sociolinguistic Research on Dialect Change. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2012. ‘Methods and objectives in contemporary dialectology’, in Seržant, Ilja A. and Wiemar, Björn (eds.) Contemporary Approaches to Dialectology: The Area of North, Northwest Russian and Belarusian Vernaculars. Bergen: Slavica Bergensia 13. pp. 8192.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2013. ‘Lost in space? The many geographies and methodologies in research on variation within languages’, in Auer, Peter, Hilpert, Martin, Stukenbrock, Anja and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (eds.) Space in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives. Berlin: de Gruyter. pp. 238–41.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 1999. The Dialects of England, Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1990. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press USA.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive 2006. ‘Modern regional English in the British Isles’, in Mugglestone, Lynda (ed.) 2006. The Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 379414.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive 2010. ‘Designing maps for non-linguists’, in Lameli, Alfred, Kehrein, Roland, and Rabanus, Stefan (eds.) Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 2: Language Mapping. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 142–57.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive, Parry, David, and Widdowson, John D. A. 1994. Survey of English Dialects: The Dictionary and Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive and Widdowson, John D. A. 1996. An Atlas of English Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wieling, Martijn, Shackleton, Robert G., and Nerbonne, John 2013. ‘Analyzing phonetic variation in the traditional English dialects: Simultaneously clustering dialects and phonetic features’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 28; 3141.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×