Aarsleff, Hans. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language in Intellectual History. London, 1982.Google Scholar

Aarsleff, Hans. “The State of Nature and the Nature of Man in Locke.” In John Locke: Problems and Perspectives, ed. Yolton, John. Cambridge, 1969: 99–136.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Tranformations. Cambridge, MA, 1992.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We The People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA, 1993.Google Scholar

Adler, Matthew D. “Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1363–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aeschylus. The Oresteia, Fagles, Robert, trans. New York, 1977.Google Scholar

Alexander, Lawrence, ed. Constitutionalism. Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert. “The Nature of Arguments About the Nature of Law.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, Robert. The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford, 2002.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. America's Constitution: A Biography. New York, 2005.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995a: 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Presidents, Vice-Presidents, and Death: Closing the Constitution's Succession Gap.” Arkansas Law Review 48 (1995b): 215–38.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V.” Columbia Law Review 94 (1994): 457–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V.” University of Chicago Law Review 55 (1988): 1043–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ames, William. Conscience With the Power and Cases Therof. London, 1639.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H.. “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1503–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appleby, Joyce. “Locke, Liberalism and the Natural Law of Money.” Past and Present 71 (1976): 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle. The Politics and the Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Stephen, trans. Benjamin Jowett. Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar

Ashcraft, Richard, ed. John Locke: Critical Assessments, 4 vols. New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Ashcraft, Richard. “Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government: Radicalism and Lockean Political Theory.” Political Theory 8 (November 1980): 429–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. “Locke on Language,” 14 Canadian Journal of Philosophy”14 (1984): 45–73. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft, vol. 1. New York, 1991:235–59.

Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. New York, 2000.Google Scholar

Ayoub, M. “Translating the Meaning of the Quran: Traditional Opinions and Modern Debates.” Afkar Inquiry 3 (May 1986): 34–9.Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack. “Fidelity in Constitutional Theory: Does the Constitution Deserve Our Fidelity?: Agreements with Hell and Other Objects of Our Faith.” Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1703–38.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A. “Notes on Constitutional Maintenance.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotiros A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 162–66.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A.On What the Constitution Means. Baltimore, 1984.Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E. “Constitutional Legitimacy.” Columbia Law Review 103 (2003): 111–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardsworth, Richard. Derrida and the Political. London, 1996.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard. “The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Democracy.” In Constitutions in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives, eds. Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione, Dario. Oxford, 1996: 24–44.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, . Princeton, 1996: 3–18.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. Liberty. Oxford, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, Harold J. “The Origins of Historical Jurisprudence: Coke, Selden, Hale.” Yale Law Journal 103 (1994): 1651–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven, 1986.Google Scholar

Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols, facs. ed. Katz, Stanley N.. Chicago, 1979.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, Phillip. Constitutional Interpretation. Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, Phillip. Constitutional Fate. Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. The Six Books of a Commonwealth [1606], ed. McRae, Kenneth Douglas, facs. of trans. Richard Knolles. Cambridge, MA, 1962.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert. “The Judge's Role in Law and Culture.” Ave Maria Law Review 1 (2003): 19–29.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert. The Tempting of America: the Political Seduction of the Law. New York, 1990.Google Scholar

Boyd, Richard. “The Calvinist Origins of Lockean Political Economy.” History of Political Thought 23 (2002): 30–60.Google Scholar

Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. “Kelsen's Unstable Alternative to Natural Law: Recent Critiques.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 41 (1996): 133–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandon, Mark E. “Constitutionalism and Constitutional Failure.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 298–313.Google Scholar

Brandon, Mark E.Free in the World: American Slavery and Constitutional Failure. Princeton, 1998.Google Scholar

Browne, Thomas. Religio Medici. London, 1643.Google Scholar

Brewer, David J. “An Independent Judiciary as the Salvation of the Nation,” (1893). Reprinted in The Annals of America: Agrarianism and Urbanization 1884–1894, vol. 11 (Chicago, 1968: 423–30).

Byrne, James. “The Basis of Natural Law in Locke's Philosophy.” Catholic Lawyer10 (1964): 55–63. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, vol. 2, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: 52–62.

Cardozo, Benjamin. The Nature of the Judicial Process. Boston, 1921.Google Scholar

Castiglione, Dario. “The Political Theory of the Constitution.” In The Constitution in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives, eds. Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione. Oxford, 1996: 417–35Google Scholar

Carroll, Lewis. Alice in Wonderland.

Cohen, Joshua. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, . Princeton, 1996: 95–119.Google Scholar

Cohen, Barak. “Empowering Constitutionalism with Text from an Israeli Perspective.” American University International Law Review 18 (2003): 585–650.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “Structure, Choice and Legitimacy: Locke's Theory of the State.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1986): 301–24.Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules. The Practice of Principle: In Defense of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules. “Authority and Reason.” In The Autonomy of Law:Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 287–319.Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules, and Leiter, Brian. “Determinacy, Objectivity, and Authority.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1993): 549–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cover, Robert. “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95 (1986): 1601–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cover, Robert. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard. Law Review 97 (1983): 4–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cover, Robert. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven, 1975.Google Scholar

Croly, Stephen P. “The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (1995): 689–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism. Ithaca, NY, 1982.Google Scholar

Curry, Thomas J.The First Freedoms. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar

Dawson, Hannah, “Locke on Private Language,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 609–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denning, Brian. “Means to Amend: Theories of Constitutional Change.” Tennessee Law Review 65 (1997): 155–244.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “The Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority.’” Cardozo Law Review (1990): 920–1045.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference. Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Spivak. Baltimore, 1974.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “Substance, Power and Quality in Locke.” Philosophical Reviews 35 (1926): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dicey, A. B.Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 7th ed. London, 1908.Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael C. “Legal Indeterminacy and Institutional Design.” New York University Law Review 78 (2003): 875–981.Google Scholar

Dow, David R. “The Plain Meaning of Article V.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 117–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dow, David R. “When Words Mean What We Believe They Say: The Case of Article V.” Iowa Law Review 76 (1990): 1–66.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. “Consent in the Political Theory of John Locke,” Historical Journal 10 (1967): 153–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA, 1977.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, MA, 2001.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher. “Judicial Supremacy and Constitutional Distortion.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 70–90.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher L., and Sager, Lawrence G.. “Why the Religious Freedom Restoration Act Is Unconstitutional.” New York University Law Review 69 (1994): 437–76.Google Scholar

Eleftheriadis, Pavlos. “The European Constitution and Cosmopolitan Ideals.” 7 Columbia Journal of European Law (2001): 21–39.Google Scholar

Elster, John. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitments, and Constraints. Cambridge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, John. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar

Erikson, Erik Oddvar, and Fossum, Jon. “Europe in Search of Legitimacy: Strategies of Legitimation Assessed.” International Political Science Review 25 (2004): 435–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farber, Daniel A., and Sherry, Suzanna. Desparately Seeking Certainty: the Misguided Quest for Constitutional Foundations. Chicago, 2004.Google Scholar

Farr, James. “The Americanization of Hermeneutics: Francis Lieber's Legal and Political Hermeneutics.” In Legal Hermeneutics:History, Theory, and Practice, ed. Leyh, Gregory. Berkeley, 1992: 83–102.Google Scholar

Ferrajoli, Luigi. “Beyond Sovereignty and Citizenship: A Global Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism, Democracy and Sovereignty: American and European Perspectives, ed. Bellamy, Richard. Aldershot, 1997: 151–59.Google Scholar

Fineman, Martha Albertson. “Cracking the Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, and Self-Sufficiency.” American University Journal of Gender, Society, Politics and Law 8 (2000): 13–29.Google Scholar

Finn, John E. “The Civic Constitution: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 41–69.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. “Law and What I Truly Should Decide.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, John. “The Truth of Legal Positivism.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 195–214.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech, and it's a Good Thing, Too. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis. Religious Liberty in America: Political Safeguards. Lawrence, KA, 2002.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian H. “Introduction.” Jean Bodin, On Sovereignty. Cambridge, 2003: ix–xxvi.Google Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited: Public Reason and Political Justifications.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 2021–72.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law. Cambridge, MA: 1969.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Cambridge, MA, 1975.Google Scholar

Gauthier, David. “Hobbes' Social Contract.” Noûs 22 (1988): 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gauthier, David. “Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979): 547–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Robert P. “Justice, Legitimacy, and Allegiance: ‘The End of Democracy?’ Symposium Revisited.” In Constitutional Politics:Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 314–28.Google Scholar

Goldie, Mark, “Introduction.” In John Locke, Political Essays, ed. Goldie, . Cambridge, 1997: xi–xxvii.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Leslie. “Popular Sovereignty, The Origins of Judicial Review, and the Revival of Unwritten Law.” Journal of Politics 48 (1986): 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graber, Mark. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (unpublished ms., Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

Grant, Ruth. John Locke's Liberalism. Chicago, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Leslie. “Law, Legitimacy and Consent,” Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 795–825.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. “Too Thin and Too Rich, Distinguishing Features of Legal Positivism.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 1–30.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. “The Religious Voice in the Public Square: Religious Expression in the Public Square – The Building Blocks for an Intermediate Position.” Loyola Law Review 29 (1996): 1411–20.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. “Religious Convictions and Lawmaking.” Michigan Law Review 84 (1985): 352–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M. “Constitutionalism in the United States: From Theory to Politics.” In Responding to Imperfection: the Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M. “The Nominee is … Article V.” Constitutional Commentary 12 (1995): 171–73.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, eds. Cronin, Ciaran and Greiff, Pablo. Cambridge, MA, 2000.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms, trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, 1972.Google Scholar

Harris, William F., II. The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore, 1993.Google Scholar

Harris, William F., II. “Bonding Word and Polity: The Logic of American Constitutionalism.” American Political Science Review 76 (1982): 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar

Hayek, Frierich A.The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar

Hayes, Peter. “Hobbes's Silent Fool: A Response to Hoekstra.” Political Theory 27 (1999): 225–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. “‘Negative’ Rights Versus ‘Positive’ Entitlements: A Comparative Study of Judicial Interpretations of Rights in an Emerging Neo-Liberal Economic Order.” Human Rights Quarterly 22 (2000): 1060–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschmann, Albert. The Passions and the Interests : Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph. Princeton, 1977.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen [1642], eds. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan [1651], ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Kinch. “Nothing to Declare?: Hobbes and the Advocate of Injustice.” Political Theory 27 (1999): 230–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekstra, Kinch. “Hobbes and the Fool.” Political Theory 25 (1997): 620–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago, 1995.Google Scholar

Jyranki, Antero. “Transferring Powers of a Nation State to International Organisations: The Doctrine of Sovereignty Revisited.” In National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, . The Hague, 1999: 61–81.Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul. Legitimacy and History : Self-Government in American Constitutional Theory. New Haven, 1995.Google Scholar

Katz, Elai. “On Amending Constitutions: The Legality and Legitimacy of Constitutional Entrenchment.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 29 (1996): 251–92.Google Scholar

Kavka, Gregory. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton, 1986.Google Scholar

Kay, Richard S. “American Constitutionalism.” Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 16–63.Google Scholar

Keller, Evelyn Fox and Longino, Helen E., eds. Feminism and Science. Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. “The Function of a Constitution,” trans. Iain Stewart. Essays on Kelsen, eds. Tur, Richard and Twining, William. Oxford, 1986: 109–19.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law, trans. Max Knight. Berkeley, 1967.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Anders Wedberg. Cambridge, MA, 1945.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. ‘A Semiotics of Critique.” 22 Cardozo Law Review (2001): 1147–86.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. A Critique of Adjudication (Fin de Siècle). Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google Scholar

Kenyon, J. P., Stuart England. London, 1985.Google Scholar

Kerber, Linda. No Constitutional Right to be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Kerber, Linda K.No Constitutional Right to be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York, 1998.Google Scholar

King, Brett. “Wild Political Dreaming: Historical Context, Popular Sovereignty, and Supermajority Rules.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 2 (2000): 609–61.Google Scholar

Klarman, Michael. “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem.” Georgetown Law Journal 85 (1997): 491–553.Google Scholar

Kokott, Juliane. “Federal States in Federal Europe: The German Lander and Problems of European Integration.” National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, Antero. The Hague, 1999: 175–200.Google Scholar

Kramer, Larry. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. Oxford, 2004a.Google Scholar

Kramer, Larry. “Popular Constitutionalism, circa 2004.” California Law Review 92 (2004b): 959–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Matthew. John Locke and the Origins of Private Property:Philosophical Explorations of Individualism, Community, and Equality. Cambridge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramnick, Isaac. Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole. Cambridge, MA, 1968.Google Scholar

Lamprecht, Sterling, “Locke's attack upon innate ideas,” 36 Philosophical Review (1927): 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laslett, Peter. “Introduction.” In Locke: Two Treatises on Government, ed. Laslett, . Cambridge, 1988: 3–126.Google Scholar

Laslett, Peter. “The English Revolution and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge Historical Journal 12 (1956): 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiter, Brian. “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence. “The Regulation of Social Meaning.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (1995): 943–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, Sanford. “The Political Implications of Amending Clauses.” Constitutional Commentary 13 (1996): 107–23.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford. “How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) <26; (B) 26; C) 27; (D) > 27: Accounting for Constitutional Change.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, . Princeton, 1995: 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leyden, William. “John Locke and Natural Law.” Philosophy 21 (1956): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leyh, Gregory. “Legal Education and the Public Life.” In Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory and Practice, ed. Leyh, Berkeley, 1992: 269–94.Google Scholar

Li, Andrew I-kang. 2002. “A prototype simulated interactive shape grammar.” In Design e-ducation: connecting the real and the virtual. Proceedings of the 20th conference on education in computer aided architectural design in Europe, eds. Koszewski, Krzysztof and Wrona, Stefan. Warsaw, 2002: 314–17.Google Scholar

Li, A3drew I-kang. “Why do Chinese buildings have curved roofs? A first look at intellectual bias in the study of Chinese architecture. (Revised version.)” In Conference proceedings: Architecture, (Post)modernity, and Difference. Singapore, 1993: 48–51.Google Scholar

Lieber, Francis. Legal and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Principles of Interpretation and Construction in Law and Politics. New York, 1837.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government [1689], ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1689], ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar

Locke, John. “Essays on the Law of Nature [circa 1664].” In Locke, Political Essays, ed. Goldie, Mark. Cambridge, 1997: 79–133.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Gerald. “Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of a Legal System.” Cardozo Law Review 13 (1992): 1419–41.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil. Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth. Oxford, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil. “The Concept of Law and The Concept of Law.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 163–94.Google Scholar

Madigan, James. “The Idea of Public Reason Resuscitated.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 10 (2002): 719–78.Google Scholar

Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers, ed. Kramnick, Isaac. New York, 1788/1987.Google Scholar

Magarian, Gregory P. “How to Apply the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to Federal Law Without Violating the Constitution.” Michigan Law Review 99 (2001): 1903–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mancini, Judge G. F.Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union: Collected Essays. Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar

Mara, Gerald M. “Hobbes's Counsel to Sovereigns.” Journal of Politics 50 (1988): 390–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloskey, Robert G., The American Supreme Court (Chicago, 1967).Google Scholar

McCrae, Kenneth. “Introduction.” In Jean Bodin, The Six Bookes of a Commonweale [1606], ed. McRae, , trans. Richard Knolles. Cambridge, MA, 1962: i–xii, A1–A103.Google Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard. Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern. Ithaca, NY: 1940.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “The Constitutional Essentials of Political Liberalism: Justice as Fairness, Legitimacy, and the Question of Judicial Review.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 1407–20.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “Ida's Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2003): 345–65.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “Constitutional Authorship.” In Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 64–98.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “Courts and Constitutions: Thirteeen Easy Pieces.” Michigan Law Review 93 (1995): 1297–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Joshua. “Hobbes and the Equality of All Under the One.” Political Theory 21 (1993): 78–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mulligan, Lotte, Judith Richards, and John K. Graham. “A Concern for Understanding: A Case of Locke's Precepts and Practice.” Historical Journal25 (1982): 841–57. Reprinted in John Locke:Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft: vol. 4. New York, 1991: 670–89.

Murphy, Walter F. “Merlin's Memory: The Past and Future Imperfect of the Once and Future Polity.” In Responding to Imperfection:The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 163–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. “An Ordering of Constitutional Values.” Southern California Law Review 53 (1980): 703–60.Google Scholar

Noonan, John T.. Narrowing the Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States. Berkeley, 2002.Google Scholar

Norton, Ann. “Transubstantiation: The Dialectic of Constitutional Authority.” University of Chicago Law Review 55 (1988): 458–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novak, William J.The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC, 1996.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics. 1991, Liberty Press, Indianapolis, 1991.Google Scholar

Oakley, Francis, and Urdang, Elliott W.. “Locke, Natural Law, and God.” Natural Law Forum 11 (1966): 92–109.Google Scholar

Odegard, Douglas. “Locke as an Empiricist,” Philosophy40 (1965):185–96. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: vol. 4, 1–12.

Olivecrona, Karl. “Locke's Theory of Appropriation.” Philosophical Quarterly24 (1974): 220–34. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: vol. 1, 327–42.

Olivecrona, Karl. “Appropriation in the State of Nature: Locke on the Origin of Property.” Journal of the History of Ideas 35 (1974): 211–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orren, Karen. “Officer's Rights: Toward a Unified Field Theory of Constitutional Development.” Law & Society Review 34 (2000): 837–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrish, Richard. Aporias of Justice. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2004.Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, 1988.Google Scholar

Penner, J. E. “Legal Reasoning and the Authority of Law.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pildes, Richard H. “Why Rights Are Not Trumps: Social Meanings, Expressive Harms, and Constitutionalism.” Journal of Legal Studies 27 (1998): 725–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, Hannah, The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, 1972.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. A. G., The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton, 1975).Google Scholar

Post, Robert. Who's Afraid of Jurispathic Courts?: Violence and Public Reason in Nomos and Narrative.” Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 17 (2005): 9–16.Google Scholar

Postema, Gerald. “Law's Autonomy and Public Practical Reason.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 79–118.Google Scholar

Powell, H. Jefferson. “Symposium on Philip Bobbitt's Constitutional Interpretation: Constitutional Investigations.” Texas Law Review 72 (1994): 1731–51.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich, “The Political Meaning of Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism, Democracy and Sovereignty: American and European Perspectives, ed. Bellamy, Richarl. Aldershot, 1997: 11–150.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: 2001.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York, 1996.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “Comments and Responses.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 152–93.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar

Riley, Patrick. “On Finding and Equilibrium between Consent and Natural Law in Locke's Political Philosophy.” Political Studies 22 (1974): 432–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitunal Self-Government. New Haven, 2001a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubenfeld, Jed. “Legitimacy and Interpretation.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001b: 194–243.Google Scholar

Rubin, Edward L.Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State. Princeton, 2005.Google Scholar

Sager, Lawrence. “The Constitutional Essentials of Political Liberalism: The Why of Constitutional Essentials.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 1421–33.Google Scholar

Sager, Lawrence, “The Domain of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar

Sager, Lawrence. “You Can Raise the First, Hide Behind the Fourth, and Plead the Fifth. But What On Earth Can You Do With The Ninth Amendment?” Chicago-Kent Law Review 64 (1988): 239–64.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand. Course in General Linguistics. New York, 1966.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Judicial Supremacy and the Modest Constitution.” California Law Review 92 (2004): 1045–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Precedent and the Necessary Externality of Constitutional Norms.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 17 (1994): 45–56.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Constitutional Positivism.” Connecticut Law Review 25 (1993): 797–828.Google Scholar

Schweber, Howard. The Creation of American Common Law, 1850–1880: Technology, Politics, and the Construction of Citizenship in Illinois and Virginia. Cambridge 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweber, Howard Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1995).

Shapin, Steven, and Schaeffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, 1989.Google Scholar

Shivakumar, Dhananjai. “The Pure Theory as Ideal Type: Defending Kelsen on the Basis of Weberian Methodology.” Yale Law Journal 105 (1996): 1383–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols. Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven D. “Expressivist Jurisprudence and the Depletion of Meaning.” Maryland Law Review 60 (2001): 506–77.Google Scholar

Soles, David E. “Intellectualism and Natural Law in Locke's Second Treatise.” History of Political Thought 8 (1977): 63–81.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Drury. “To Whom Is the Law Addressed?” Yale Law and Policy Review 21 (2003): 105–67.Google Scholar

Stewart, Iain. “Kelsen Tomorrow.” Current Legal Problems 51 (1998): 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Iain. ‘The Critical Legal Science of Hans Kelsen.” Journal of Law and Society 17 (1990): 273–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoner, James R.. Common-Law Liberty: Rethinking American Constitutionalism. Lawrence, 2003.Google Scholar

Strauss, David A. “Common Law Constitutional Interpretation.” University of Chicago Law Review 63 (1996): 877–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. “On the Expressive Function of Law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (1996): 2021–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA, 1993.Google Scholar

Tomlins, Christopher. Law, Labor and Ideology in the Early American Republic. Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar

Trenchard, John, and Thomas Gordon. Cato's Letters: or, Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and other Important Subjects, ed. Hamowy, Ronald, 2 vols. Indianapolis, 1995.Google Scholar

Tribe, Lawrence. Constitutional Choices. Cambridge, MA, 1985.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. “Introduction.” In Thomas Hobbes, On The Citizen, eds. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge, 2002: viii–xxxiii.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard, “Introduction.” Thomas Hobbes Leviathan, ed. Tuck, . Cambridge, 1996: ix–xlv.Google Scholar

Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tur, Richard, and Twining, William, eds. Essays on Kelsen. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. The American Law of Slavery, 1810–1860: Considerations of Humanity and Interest. Princeton, 1981.Google Scholar

Venter, Francois. “Constitution Making and the Legitimacy of the Constitution.” In National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, Antero. The Hague, 1999: 9–29.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, Amaryllis. The European Union in Search of a Democratic and Constitutional Theory. The Hague, 2003.

Waldron, Jeremy. “Authority for Officials.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge, 2002a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Christopher L. Eisgruber's Constitutional Self-Government: Eisgruber's House of Lords.” University of San Francisco Law Review 37 (2002b): 89–114.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Precommitment and Disagreement.” In Contitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 271–99.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Pildes on Dworkin's Theory of Rights.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 301–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “What is a Human Right? Universals and the Challenge of Cultural Relativism.” Pace International Law Review 11 (1999): 129–38.Google Scholar

Walsh, Katherine Cramer. Talking About Politics. Chicago, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H.The Constitution of Europe: Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor? and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar

White, James Boyd. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago, 1990.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence, KA, 1999a.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA, 1999b.Google Scholar

Wilson, James. The Works of James Wilson, ed. Green McCloskey, Robert, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA, 1967.Google Scholar

Wood, Gordon. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill, 1969.Google Scholar

Yolton, John. “Locke on the Law of Nature.” Philosophical Review 67 (1958): 477–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, 1996: 120–35.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Michael. Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence, KA: 2002.Google Scholar

Aarsleff, Hans. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language in Intellectual History. London, 1982.Google Scholar

Aarsleff, Hans. “The State of Nature and the Nature of Man in Locke.” In John Locke: Problems and Perspectives, ed. Yolton, John. Cambridge, 1969: 99–136.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Tranformations. Cambridge, MA, 1992.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We The People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA, 1993.Google Scholar

Adler, Matthew D. “Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1363–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aeschylus. The Oresteia, Fagles, Robert, trans. New York, 1977.Google Scholar

Alexander, Lawrence, ed. Constitutionalism. Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert. “The Nature of Arguments About the Nature of Law.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, Robert. The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford, 2002.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. America's Constitution: A Biography. New York, 2005.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995a: 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Presidents, Vice-Presidents, and Death: Closing the Constitution's Succession Gap.” Arkansas Law Review 48 (1995b): 215–38.Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V.” Columbia Law Review 94 (1994): 457–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V.” University of Chicago Law Review 55 (1988): 1043–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ames, William. Conscience With the Power and Cases Therof. London, 1639.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H.. “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1503–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appleby, Joyce. “Locke, Liberalism and the Natural Law of Money.” Past and Present 71 (1976): 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle. The Politics and the Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Stephen, trans. Benjamin Jowett. Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar

Ashcraft, Richard, ed. John Locke: Critical Assessments, 4 vols. New York, 1991.Google Scholar

Ashcraft, Richard. “Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government: Radicalism and Lockean Political Theory.” Political Theory 8 (November 1980): 429–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. “Locke on Language,” 14 Canadian Journal of Philosophy”14 (1984): 45–73. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft, vol. 1. New York, 1991:235–59.

Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. New York, 2000.Google Scholar

Ayoub, M. “Translating the Meaning of the Quran: Traditional Opinions and Modern Debates.” Afkar Inquiry 3 (May 1986): 34–9.Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack. “Fidelity in Constitutional Theory: Does the Constitution Deserve Our Fidelity?: Agreements with Hell and Other Objects of Our Faith.” Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1703–38.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A. “Notes on Constitutional Maintenance.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotiros A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 162–66.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A.On What the Constitution Means. Baltimore, 1984.Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E. “Constitutional Legitimacy.” Columbia Law Review 103 (2003): 111–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardsworth, Richard. Derrida and the Political. London, 1996.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard. “The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Democracy.” In Constitutions in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives, eds. Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione, Dario. Oxford, 1996: 24–44.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, . Princeton, 1996: 3–18.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. Liberty. Oxford, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, Harold J. “The Origins of Historical Jurisprudence: Coke, Selden, Hale.” Yale Law Journal 103 (1994): 1651–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven, 1986.Google Scholar

Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols, facs. ed. Katz, Stanley N.. Chicago, 1979.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, Phillip. Constitutional Interpretation. Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, Phillip. Constitutional Fate. Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. The Six Books of a Commonwealth [1606], ed. McRae, Kenneth Douglas, facs. of trans. Richard Knolles. Cambridge, MA, 1962.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert. “The Judge's Role in Law and Culture.” Ave Maria Law Review 1 (2003): 19–29.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert. The Tempting of America: the Political Seduction of the Law. New York, 1990.Google Scholar

Boyd, Richard. “The Calvinist Origins of Lockean Political Economy.” History of Political Thought 23 (2002): 30–60.Google Scholar

Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. “Kelsen's Unstable Alternative to Natural Law: Recent Critiques.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 41 (1996): 133–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandon, Mark E. “Constitutionalism and Constitutional Failure.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 298–313.Google Scholar

Brandon, Mark E.Free in the World: American Slavery and Constitutional Failure. Princeton, 1998.Google Scholar

Browne, Thomas. Religio Medici. London, 1643.Google Scholar

Brewer, David J. “An Independent Judiciary as the Salvation of the Nation,” (1893). Reprinted in The Annals of America: Agrarianism and Urbanization 1884–1894, vol. 11 (Chicago, 1968: 423–30).

Byrne, James. “The Basis of Natural Law in Locke's Philosophy.” Catholic Lawyer10 (1964): 55–63. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, vol. 2, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: 52–62.

Cardozo, Benjamin. The Nature of the Judicial Process. Boston, 1921.Google Scholar

Castiglione, Dario. “The Political Theory of the Constitution.” In The Constitution in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives, eds. Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione. Oxford, 1996: 417–35Google Scholar

Carroll, Lewis. Alice in Wonderland.

Cohen, Joshua. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, . Princeton, 1996: 95–119.Google Scholar

Cohen, Barak. “Empowering Constitutionalism with Text from an Israeli Perspective.” American University International Law Review 18 (2003): 585–650.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “Structure, Choice and Legitimacy: Locke's Theory of the State.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1986): 301–24.Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules. The Practice of Principle: In Defense of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules. “Authority and Reason.” In The Autonomy of Law:Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 287–319.Google Scholar

Coleman, Jules, and Leiter, Brian. “Determinacy, Objectivity, and Authority.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1993): 549–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cover, Robert. “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95 (1986): 1601–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cover, Robert. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard. Law Review 97 (1983): 4–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cover, Robert. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven, 1975.Google Scholar

Croly, Stephen P. “The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (1995): 689–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism. Ithaca, NY, 1982.Google Scholar

Curry, Thomas J.The First Freedoms. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar

Dawson, Hannah, “Locke on Private Language,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 609–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denning, Brian. “Means to Amend: Theories of Constitutional Change.” Tennessee Law Review 65 (1997): 155–244.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. “The Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority.’” Cardozo Law Review (1990): 920–1045.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference. Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Spivak. Baltimore, 1974.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “Substance, Power and Quality in Locke.” Philosophical Reviews 35 (1926): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dicey, A. B.Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 7th ed. London, 1908.Google Scholar

Dorf, Michael C. “Legal Indeterminacy and Institutional Design.” New York University Law Review 78 (2003): 875–981.Google Scholar

Dow, David R. “The Plain Meaning of Article V.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 117–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dow, David R. “When Words Mean What We Believe They Say: The Case of Article V.” Iowa Law Review 76 (1990): 1–66.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. “Consent in the Political Theory of John Locke,” Historical Journal 10 (1967): 153–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA, 1977.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, MA, 2001.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher. “Judicial Supremacy and Constitutional Distortion.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 70–90.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher L., and Sager, Lawrence G.. “Why the Religious Freedom Restoration Act Is Unconstitutional.” New York University Law Review 69 (1994): 437–76.Google Scholar

Eleftheriadis, Pavlos. “The European Constitution and Cosmopolitan Ideals.” 7 Columbia Journal of European Law (2001): 21–39.Google Scholar

Elster, John. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitments, and Constraints. Cambridge, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, John. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar

Erikson, Erik Oddvar, and Fossum, Jon. “Europe in Search of Legitimacy: Strategies of Legitimation Assessed.” International Political Science Review 25 (2004): 435–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farber, Daniel A., and Sherry, Suzanna. Desparately Seeking Certainty: the Misguided Quest for Constitutional Foundations. Chicago, 2004.Google Scholar

Farr, James. “The Americanization of Hermeneutics: Francis Lieber's Legal and Political Hermeneutics.” In Legal Hermeneutics:History, Theory, and Practice, ed. Leyh, Gregory. Berkeley, 1992: 83–102.Google Scholar

Ferrajoli, Luigi. “Beyond Sovereignty and Citizenship: A Global Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism, Democracy and Sovereignty: American and European Perspectives, ed. Bellamy, Richard. Aldershot, 1997: 151–59.Google Scholar

Fineman, Martha Albertson. “Cracking the Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, and Self-Sufficiency.” American University Journal of Gender, Society, Politics and Law 8 (2000): 13–29.Google Scholar

Finn, John E. “The Civic Constitution: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 41–69.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. “Law and What I Truly Should Decide.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, John. “The Truth of Legal Positivism.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 195–214.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech, and it's a Good Thing, Too. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis. Religious Liberty in America: Political Safeguards. Lawrence, KA, 2002.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian H. “Introduction.” Jean Bodin, On Sovereignty. Cambridge, 2003: ix–xxvi.Google Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited: Public Reason and Political Justifications.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 2021–72.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law. Cambridge, MA: 1969.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Cambridge, MA, 1975.Google Scholar

Gauthier, David. “Hobbes' Social Contract.” Noûs 22 (1988): 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gauthier, David. “Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979): 547–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Robert P. “Justice, Legitimacy, and Allegiance: ‘The End of Democracy?’ Symposium Revisited.” In Constitutional Politics:Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 314–28.Google Scholar

Goldie, Mark, “Introduction.” In John Locke, Political Essays, ed. Goldie, . Cambridge, 1997: xi–xxvii.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Leslie. “Popular Sovereignty, The Origins of Judicial Review, and the Revival of Unwritten Law.” Journal of Politics 48 (1986): 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graber, Mark. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (unpublished ms., Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

Grant, Ruth. John Locke's Liberalism. Chicago, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Leslie. “Law, Legitimacy and Consent,” Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 795–825.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. “Too Thin and Too Rich, Distinguishing Features of Legal Positivism.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 1–30.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. “The Religious Voice in the Public Square: Religious Expression in the Public Square – The Building Blocks for an Intermediate Position.” Loyola Law Review 29 (1996): 1411–20.Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent. “Religious Convictions and Lawmaking.” Michigan Law Review 84 (1985): 352–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M. “Constitutionalism in the United States: From Theory to Politics.” In Responding to Imperfection: the Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M. “The Nominee is … Article V.” Constitutional Commentary 12 (1995): 171–73.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, eds. Cronin, Ciaran and Greiff, Pablo. Cambridge, MA, 2000.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms, trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, MA, 1999.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, 1972.Google Scholar

Harris, William F., II. The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore, 1993.Google Scholar

Harris, William F., II. “Bonding Word and Polity: The Logic of American Constitutionalism.” American Political Science Review 76 (1982): 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar

Hayek, Frierich A.The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, 1978.Google Scholar

Hayes, Peter. “Hobbes's Silent Fool: A Response to Hoekstra.” Political Theory 27 (1999): 225–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. “‘Negative’ Rights Versus ‘Positive’ Entitlements: A Comparative Study of Judicial Interpretations of Rights in an Emerging Neo-Liberal Economic Order.” Human Rights Quarterly 22 (2000): 1060–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschmann, Albert. The Passions and the Interests : Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph. Princeton, 1977.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen [1642], eds. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan [1651], ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar

Hoekstra, Kinch. “Nothing to Declare?: Hobbes and the Advocate of Injustice.” Political Theory 27 (1999): 230–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekstra, Kinch. “Hobbes and the Fool.” Political Theory 25 (1997): 620–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago, 1995.Google Scholar

Jyranki, Antero. “Transferring Powers of a Nation State to International Organisations: The Doctrine of Sovereignty Revisited.” In National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, . The Hague, 1999: 61–81.Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul. Legitimacy and History : Self-Government in American Constitutional Theory. New Haven, 1995.Google Scholar

Katz, Elai. “On Amending Constitutions: The Legality and Legitimacy of Constitutional Entrenchment.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 29 (1996): 251–92.Google Scholar

Kavka, Gregory. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton, 1986.Google Scholar

Kay, Richard S. “American Constitutionalism.” Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 16–63.Google Scholar

Keller, Evelyn Fox and Longino, Helen E., eds. Feminism and Science. Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. “The Function of a Constitution,” trans. Iain Stewart. Essays on Kelsen, eds. Tur, Richard and Twining, William. Oxford, 1986: 109–19.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law, trans. Max Knight. Berkeley, 1967.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Anders Wedberg. Cambridge, MA, 1945.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. ‘A Semiotics of Critique.” 22 Cardozo Law Review (2001): 1147–86.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. A Critique of Adjudication (Fin de Siècle). Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google Scholar

Kenyon, J. P., Stuart England. London, 1985.Google Scholar

Kerber, Linda. No Constitutional Right to be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York, 1999.Google Scholar

Kerber, Linda K.No Constitutional Right to be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York, 1998.Google Scholar

King, Brett. “Wild Political Dreaming: Historical Context, Popular Sovereignty, and Supermajority Rules.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 2 (2000): 609–61.Google Scholar

Klarman, Michael. “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem.” Georgetown Law Journal 85 (1997): 491–553.Google Scholar

Kokott, Juliane. “Federal States in Federal Europe: The German Lander and Problems of European Integration.” National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, Antero. The Hague, 1999: 175–200.Google Scholar

Kramer, Larry. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. Oxford, 2004a.Google Scholar

Kramer, Larry. “Popular Constitutionalism, circa 2004.” California Law Review 92 (2004b): 959–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Matthew. John Locke and the Origins of Private Property:Philosophical Explorations of Individualism, Community, and Equality. Cambridge, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramnick, Isaac. Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole. Cambridge, MA, 1968.Google Scholar

Lamprecht, Sterling, “Locke's attack upon innate ideas,” 36 Philosophical Review (1927): 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laslett, Peter. “Introduction.” In Locke: Two Treatises on Government, ed. Laslett, . Cambridge, 1988: 3–126.Google Scholar

Laslett, Peter. “The English Revolution and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge Historical Journal 12 (1956): 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiter, Brian. “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence. “The Regulation of Social Meaning.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (1995): 943–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, Sanford. “The Political Implications of Amending Clauses.” Constitutional Commentary 13 (1996): 107–23.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford. “How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) <26; (B) 26; C) 27; (D) > 27: Accounting for Constitutional Change.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, . Princeton, 1995: 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leyden, William. “John Locke and Natural Law.” Philosophy 21 (1956): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leyh, Gregory. “Legal Education and the Public Life.” In Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory and Practice, ed. Leyh, Berkeley, 1992: 269–94.Google Scholar

Li, Andrew I-kang. 2002. “A prototype simulated interactive shape grammar.” In Design e-ducation: connecting the real and the virtual. Proceedings of the 20th conference on education in computer aided architectural design in Europe, eds. Koszewski, Krzysztof and Wrona, Stefan. Warsaw, 2002: 314–17.Google Scholar

Li, A3drew I-kang. “Why do Chinese buildings have curved roofs? A first look at intellectual bias in the study of Chinese architecture. (Revised version.)” In Conference proceedings: Architecture, (Post)modernity, and Difference. Singapore, 1993: 48–51.Google Scholar

Lieber, Francis. Legal and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Principles of Interpretation and Construction in Law and Politics. New York, 1837.Google Scholar

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government [1689], ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1689], ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar

Locke, John. “Essays on the Law of Nature [circa 1664].” In Locke, Political Essays, ed. Goldie, Mark. Cambridge, 1997: 79–133.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Gerald. “Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of a Legal System.” Cardozo Law Review 13 (1992): 1419–41.Google Scholar

MacCormick, Neil. Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth. Oxford, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil. “The Concept of Law and The Concept of Law.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 163–94.Google Scholar

Madigan, James. “The Idea of Public Reason Resuscitated.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 10 (2002): 719–78.Google Scholar

Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers, ed. Kramnick, Isaac. New York, 1788/1987.Google Scholar

Magarian, Gregory P. “How to Apply the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to Federal Law Without Violating the Constitution.” Michigan Law Review 99 (2001): 1903–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mancini, Judge G. F.Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union: Collected Essays. Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar

Mara, Gerald M. “Hobbes's Counsel to Sovereigns.” Journal of Politics 50 (1988): 390–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloskey, Robert G., The American Supreme Court (Chicago, 1967).Google Scholar

McCrae, Kenneth. “Introduction.” In Jean Bodin, The Six Bookes of a Commonweale [1606], ed. McRae, , trans. Richard Knolles. Cambridge, MA, 1962: i–xii, A1–A103.Google Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard. Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern. Ithaca, NY: 1940.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “The Constitutional Essentials of Political Liberalism: Justice as Fairness, Legitimacy, and the Question of Judicial Review.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 1407–20.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “Ida's Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2003): 345–65.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “Constitutional Authorship.” In Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 64–98.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “Courts and Constitutions: Thirteeen Easy Pieces.” Michigan Law Review 93 (1995): 1297–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Joshua. “Hobbes and the Equality of All Under the One.” Political Theory 21 (1993): 78–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mulligan, Lotte, Judith Richards, and John K. Graham. “A Concern for Understanding: A Case of Locke's Precepts and Practice.” Historical Journal25 (1982): 841–57. Reprinted in John Locke:Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft: vol. 4. New York, 1991: 670–89.

Murphy, Walter F. “Merlin's Memory: The Past and Future Imperfect of the Once and Future Polity.” In Responding to Imperfection:The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 163–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. “An Ordering of Constitutional Values.” Southern California Law Review 53 (1980): 703–60.Google Scholar

Noonan, John T.. Narrowing the Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States. Berkeley, 2002.Google Scholar

Norton, Ann. “Transubstantiation: The Dialectic of Constitutional Authority.” University of Chicago Law Review 55 (1988): 458–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novak, William J.The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC, 1996.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics. 1991, Liberty Press, Indianapolis, 1991.Google Scholar

Oakley, Francis, and Urdang, Elliott W.. “Locke, Natural Law, and God.” Natural Law Forum 11 (1966): 92–109.Google Scholar

Odegard, Douglas. “Locke as an Empiricist,” Philosophy40 (1965):185–96. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: vol. 4, 1–12.

Olivecrona, Karl. “Locke's Theory of Appropriation.” Philosophical Quarterly24 (1974): 220–34. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: vol. 1, 327–42.

Olivecrona, Karl. “Appropriation in the State of Nature: Locke on the Origin of Property.” Journal of the History of Ideas 35 (1974): 211–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orren, Karen. “Officer's Rights: Toward a Unified Field Theory of Constitutional Development.” Law & Society Review 34 (2000): 837–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parrish, Richard. Aporias of Justice. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2004.Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, 1988.Google Scholar

Penner, J. E. “Legal Reasoning and the Authority of Law.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pildes, Richard H. “Why Rights Are Not Trumps: Social Meanings, Expressive Harms, and Constitutionalism.” Journal of Legal Studies 27 (1998): 725–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, Hannah, The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, 1972.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. A. G., The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton, 1975).Google Scholar

Post, Robert. Who's Afraid of Jurispathic Courts?: Violence and Public Reason in Nomos and Narrative.” Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 17 (2005): 9–16.Google Scholar

Postema, Gerald. “Law's Autonomy and Public Practical Reason.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 79–118.Google Scholar

Powell, H. Jefferson. “Symposium on Philip Bobbitt's Constitutional Interpretation: Constitutional Investigations.” Texas Law Review 72 (1994): 1731–51.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich, “The Political Meaning of Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism, Democracy and Sovereignty: American and European Perspectives, ed. Bellamy, Richarl. Aldershot, 1997: 11–150.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: 2001.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York, 1996.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “Comments and Responses.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 152–93.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar

Riley, Patrick. “On Finding and Equilibrium between Consent and Natural Law in Locke's Political Philosophy.” Political Studies 22 (1974): 432–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitunal Self-Government. New Haven, 2001a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubenfeld, Jed. “Legitimacy and Interpretation.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001b: 194–243.Google Scholar

Rubin, Edward L.Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State. Princeton, 2005.Google Scholar

Sager, Lawrence. “The Constitutional Essentials of Political Liberalism: The Why of Constitutional Essentials.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 1421–33.Google Scholar

Sager, Lawrence, “The Domain of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 1998.Google Scholar

Sager, Lawrence. “You Can Raise the First, Hide Behind the Fourth, and Plead the Fifth. But What On Earth Can You Do With The Ninth Amendment?” Chicago-Kent Law Review 64 (1988): 239–64.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand. Course in General Linguistics. New York, 1966.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Judicial Supremacy and the Modest Constitution.” California Law Review 92 (2004): 1045–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Precedent and the Necessary Externality of Constitutional Norms.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 17 (1994): 45–56.Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick. “Constitutional Positivism.” Connecticut Law Review 25 (1993): 797–828.Google Scholar

Schweber, Howard. The Creation of American Common Law, 1850–1880: Technology, Politics, and the Construction of Citizenship in Illinois and Virginia. Cambridge 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweber, Howard Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1995).

Shapin, Steven, and Schaeffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, 1989.Google Scholar

Shivakumar, Dhananjai. “The Pure Theory as Ideal Type: Defending Kelsen on the Basis of Weberian Methodology.” Yale Law Journal 105 (1996): 1383–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols. Cambridge, 1978.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven D. “Expressivist Jurisprudence and the Depletion of Meaning.” Maryland Law Review 60 (2001): 506–77.Google Scholar

Soles, David E. “Intellectualism and Natural Law in Locke's Second Treatise.” History of Political Thought 8 (1977): 63–81.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Drury. “To Whom Is the Law Addressed?” Yale Law and Policy Review 21 (2003): 105–67.Google Scholar

Stewart, Iain. “Kelsen Tomorrow.” Current Legal Problems 51 (1998): 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Iain. ‘The Critical Legal Science of Hans Kelsen.” Journal of Law and Society 17 (1990): 273–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoner, James R.. Common-Law Liberty: Rethinking American Constitutionalism. Lawrence, 2003.Google Scholar

Strauss, David A. “Common Law Constitutional Interpretation.” University of Chicago Law Review 63 (1996): 877–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. “On the Expressive Function of Law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (1996): 2021–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA, 1993.Google Scholar

Tomlins, Christopher. Law, Labor and Ideology in the Early American Republic. Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar

Trenchard, John, and Thomas Gordon. Cato's Letters: or, Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and other Important Subjects, ed. Hamowy, Ronald, 2 vols. Indianapolis, 1995.Google Scholar

Tribe, Lawrence. Constitutional Choices. Cambridge, MA, 1985.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. “Introduction.” In Thomas Hobbes, On The Citizen, eds. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge, 2002: viii–xxxiii.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard, “Introduction.” Thomas Hobbes Leviathan, ed. Tuck, . Cambridge, 1996: ix–xlv.Google Scholar

Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tur, Richard, and Twining, William, eds. Essays on Kelsen. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. The American Law of Slavery, 1810–1860: Considerations of Humanity and Interest. Princeton, 1981.Google Scholar

Venter, Francois. “Constitution Making and the Legitimacy of the Constitution.” In National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, Antero. The Hague, 1999: 9–29.Google Scholar

Verhoeven, Amaryllis. The European Union in Search of a Democratic and Constitutional Theory. The Hague, 2003.

Waldron, Jeremy. “Authority for Officials.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge, 2002a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Christopher L. Eisgruber's Constitutional Self-Government: Eisgruber's House of Lords.” University of San Francisco Law Review 37 (2002b): 89–114.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Precommitment and Disagreement.” In Contitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 271–99.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Pildes on Dworkin's Theory of Rights.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 301–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “What is a Human Right? Universals and the Challenge of Cultural Relativism.” Pace International Law Review 11 (1999): 129–38.Google Scholar

Walsh, Katherine Cramer. Talking About Politics. Chicago, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H.The Constitution of Europe: Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor? and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar

White, James Boyd. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago, 1990.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence, KA, 1999a.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA, 1999b.Google Scholar

Wilson, James. The Works of James Wilson, ed. Green McCloskey, Robert, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA, 1967.Google Scholar

Wood, Gordon. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill, 1969.Google Scholar

Yolton, John. “Locke on the Law of Nature.” Philosophical Review 67 (1958): 477–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, 1996: 120–35.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Michael. Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence, KA: 2002.Google Scholar